1
|
Jenkins PM, Bender KJ. Axon initial segment structure and function in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2025; 105:765-801. [PMID: 39480263 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00030.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2024] [Revised: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/06/2024] Open
Abstract
At the simplest level, neurons are structured to integrate synaptic input and perform computational transforms on that input, converting it into an action potential (AP) code. This process, converting synaptic input into AP output, typically occurs in a specialized region of the axon termed the axon initial segment (AIS). The AIS, as its name implies, is often contained to the first section of axon abutted to the soma and is home to a dizzying array of ion channels, attendant scaffolding proteins, intracellular organelles, extracellular proteins, and, in some cases, synapses. The AIS serves multiple roles as the final arbiter for determining if inputs are sufficient to evoke APs, as a gatekeeper that physically separates the somatodendritic domain from the axon proper, and as a regulator of overall neuronal excitability, dynamically tuning its size to best suit the needs of parent neurons. These complex roles have received considerable attention from experimentalists and theoreticians alike. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of the AIS and its role in neuronal integration and polarity in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M Jenkins
- Departments of Pharmacology and Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Kevin J Bender
- Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arkhipov A, da Costa N, de Vries S, Bakken T, Bennett C, Bernard A, Berg J, Buice M, Collman F, Daigle T, Garrett M, Gouwens N, Groblewski PA, Harris J, Hawrylycz M, Hodge R, Jarsky T, Kalmbach B, Lecoq J, Lee B, Lein E, Levi B, Mihalas S, Ng L, Olsen S, Reid C, Siegle JH, Sorensen S, Tasic B, Thompson C, Ting JT, van Velthoven C, Yao S, Yao Z, Koch C, Zeng H. Integrating multimodal data to understand cortical circuit architecture and function. Nat Neurosci 2025; 28:717-730. [PMID: 40128391 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-025-01904-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025]
Abstract
In recent years there has been a tremendous growth in new technologies that allow large-scale investigation of different characteristics of the nervous system at an unprecedented level of detail. There is a growing trend to use combinations of these new techniques to determine direct links between different modalities. In this Perspective, we focus on the mouse visual cortex, as this is one of the model systems in which much progress has been made in the integration of multimodal data to advance understanding. We review several approaches that allow integration of data regarding various properties of cortical cell types, connectivity at the level of brain areas, cell types and individual cells, and functional neural activity in vivo. The increasingly crucial contributions of computation and theory in analyzing and systematically modeling data are also highlighted. Together with open sharing of data, tools and models, integrative approaches are essential tools in modern neuroscience for improving our understanding of the brain architecture, mechanisms and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jim Berg
- Allen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Julie Harris
- Allen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cure Alzheimer's Fund, Wellesley Hills, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ed Lein
- Allen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Lydia Ng
- Allen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brette R. Theory of axo-axonic inhibition. PLoS Comput Biol 2025; 21:e1013047. [PMID: 40258075 PMCID: PMC12052214 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2025] [Revised: 05/05/2025] [Accepted: 04/11/2025] [Indexed: 04/23/2025] Open
Abstract
The axon initial segment of principal cells of the cortex and hippocampus is contacted by GABAergic interneurons called chandelier cells. The anatomy, as well as alterations in neurological diseases such as epilepsy, suggest that chandelier cells exert an important inhibitory control on action potential initiation. However, their functional role remains unclear, including whether their effect is indeed inhibitory or excitatory. One reason is that there is a relative gap in electrophysiological theory about the electrical effect of axo-axonic synapses. This contribution uses resistive coupling theory, a simplification of cable theory based on the observation that the small initial segment is resistively coupled to the large cell body acting as a current sink, to fill this gap. The main theoretical finding is that a synaptic input at the proximal axon shifts the action potential threshold by an amount equal to the product of synaptic conductance, driving force at threshold, and axial axonal resistance between the soma and either the synapse or of the middle of the initial segment, whichever is closer. The theory produces quantitative estimates useful to interpret experimental observations, and supports the idea that axo-axonic cells can potentially exert powerful inhibitory control on action potential initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Brette
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics (ISIR), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao R, Ren B, Xiao Y, Tian J, Zou Y, Wei J, Qi Y, Hu A, Xie X, Huang ZJ, Shu Y, He M, Lu J, Tai Y. Axo-axonic synaptic input drives homeostatic plasticity by tuning the axon initial segment structurally and functionally. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadk4331. [PMID: 39093969 PMCID: PMC11296346 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adk4331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Homeostatic plasticity maintains the stability of functional brain networks. The axon initial segment (AIS), where action potentials start, undergoes dynamic adjustment to exert powerful control over neuronal firing properties in response to network activity changes. However, it is poorly understood whether this plasticity involves direct synaptic input to the AIS. Here, we show that changes of GABAergic synaptic input from chandelier cells (ChCs) drive homeostatic tuning of the AIS of principal neurons (PNs) in the prelimbic (PL) region, while those from parvalbumin-positive basket cells do not. This tuning is evident in AIS morphology, voltage-gated sodium channel expression, and PN excitability. Moreover, the impact of this homeostatic plasticity can be reflected in animal behavior. Social behavior, inversely linked to PL PN activity, shows time-dependent alterations tightly coupled to changes in AIS plasticity and PN excitability. Thus, AIS-originated homeostatic plasticity in PNs may counteract deficits elicited by imbalanced ChC presynaptic input at cellular and behavioral levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Zhao
- Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Baihui Ren
- Center for Brain Science of Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Yujie Xiao
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Institute for Translational Brain Research, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, MOE Innovative Center for New Drug Development of Immune Inflammatory Diseases, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jifeng Tian
- Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yi Zou
- Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jiafan Wei
- Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yanqing Qi
- Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ankang Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiaoying Xie
- Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Z. Josh Huang
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Yousheng Shu
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Institute for Translational Brain Research, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, MOE Innovative Center for New Drug Development of Immune Inflammatory Diseases, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Miao He
- Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jiangteng Lu
- Center for Brain Science of Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
- Songjiang Research Institute, Shanghai Songjiang District Central Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Yilin Tai
- Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhao R, Ren B, Xiao Y, Tian J, Zou Y, Wei J, Qi Y, Hu A, Xie X, Huang ZJ, Shu Y, He M, Lu J, Tai Y. Axo-axonic synaptic input drives homeostatic plasticity by tuning the axon initial segment structurally and functionally. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.11.589005. [PMID: 38659885 PMCID: PMC11042219 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.11.589005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
The stability of functional brain network is maintained by homeostatic plasticity, which restores equilibrium following perturbation. As the initiation site of action potentials, the axon initial segment (AIS) of glutamatergic projection neurons (PyNs) undergoes dynamic adjustment that exerts powerful control over neuronal firing properties in response to changes in network states. Although AIS plasticity has been reported to be coupled with the changes of network activity, it is poorly understood whether it involves direct synaptic input to the AIS. Here we show that changes of GABAergic synaptic input to the AIS of cortical PyNs, specifically from chandelier cells (ChCs), are sufficient to drive homeostatic tuning of the AIS within 1-2 weeks, while those from parvalbumin-positive basket cells do not. This tuning is reflected in the morphology of the AIS, the expression level of voltage-gated sodium channels, and the intrinsic neuronal excitability of PyNs. Interestingly, the timing of AIS tuning in PyNs of the prefrontal cortex corresponds to the recovery of changes in social behavior caused by alterations of ChC synaptic transmission. Thus, homeostatic plasticity of the AIS at postsynaptic PyNs may counteract deficits elicited by imbalanced ChC presynaptic input. Teaser Axon initial segment dynamically responds to changes in local input from chandelier cells to prevent abnormal neuronal functions.
Collapse
|