Sensitivity of deep learning applied to spatial image steganalysis

A comparative study of CNN-capsule-net, CNN-transformer encoder, and Traditional machine learning algorithms to classify epileptic seizure

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a disease characterized by an excessive discharge in neurons generally provoked without any external stimulus, known as convulsions. About 2 million people are diagnosed each year in the world. This process is carried out by a neurological doctor using an electroencephalogram (EEG), which is lengthy.

METHOD

To optimize these processes and make them more efficient, we have resorted to innovative artificial intelligence methods essential in classifying EEG signals. For this, comparing traditional models, such as machine learning or deep learning, with cutting-edge models, in this case, using Capsule-Net architectures and Transformer Encoder, has a crucial role in finding the most accurate model and helping the doctor to have a faster diagnosis.

RESULT

In this paper, a comparison was made between different models for binary and multiclass classification of the epileptic seizure detection database, achieving a binary accuracy of 99.92% with the Capsule-Net model and a multiclass accuracy with the Transformer Encoder model of 87.30%.

CONCLUSION

Artificial intelligence is essential in diagnosing pathology. The comparison between models is helpful as it helps to discard those that are not efficient. State-of-the-art models overshadow conventional models, but data processing also plays an essential role in evaluating the higher accuracy of the models.

Machine learning applications on intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma using single-cell RNA sequencing data

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing all fields that affect people's lives and health. One of the most critical applications is in the study of tumors. It is the case of glioblastoma (GBM) that has behaviors that need to be understood to develop effective therapies. Due to advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), it is possible to understand the cellular and molecular heterogeneity in the GBM. Given that there are different cell groups in these tumors, there is a need to apply Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. It will allow extracting information to understand how cancer changes and broaden the search for effective treatments. We proposed multiple comparisons of ML algorithms to classify cell groups based on the GBM scRNA-seq data. This broad comparison spectrum can show the scientific-medical community which models can achieve the best performance in this task. In this work are classified the following cell groups: Tumor Core (TC), Tumor Periphery (TP) and Normal Periphery (NP), in binary and multi-class scenarios. This work presents the biomarker candidates found for the models with the best results. The analyses presented here allow us to verify the biomarker candidates to understand the genetic characteristics of GBM, which may be affected by a suitable identification of GBM heterogeneity. This work obtained for the four scenarios covered cross-validation results of $93.03\% \pm 5.37\%$, $97.42\% \pm 3.94\%$, $98.27\% \pm 1.81\%$ and $93.04\% \pm 6.88\%$ for the classification of TP versus TC, TP versus NP, NP versus TP and TC (TPC) and NP versus TP versus TC, respectively.

Machine learning applications to predict two-phase flow patterns

Recent advances in artificial intelligence with traditional machine learning algorithms and deep learning architectures solve complex classification problems. This work presents the performance of different artificial intelligence models to classify two-phase flow patterns, showing the best alternatives for this specific classification problem using two-phase flow regimes (liquid and gas) in pipes. Flow patterns are affected by physical variables such as superficial velocity, viscosity, density, and superficial tension. They also depend on the construction characteristics of the pipe, such as the angle of inclination and the diameter. We selected 12 databases (9,029 samples) to train and test machine learning models, considering these variables that influence the flow patterns. The primary dataset is Shoham (1982), containing 5,675 samples with six different flow patterns. An extensive set of metrics validated the results obtained. The most relevant characteristics for training the models using Shoham (1982) dataset are gas and liquid superficial velocities, angle of inclination, and diameter. Regarding the algorithms, the Extra Trees model classifies the flow patterns with the highest degree of fidelity, achieving an accuracy of 98.8%.