Effect of domain knowledge encoding in CNN model architecture-a prostate cancer study using mpMRI images

Advancing Prostate Cancer Diagnostics: A ConvNeXt Approach to Multi-Class Classification in Underrepresented Populations

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with diagnostic challenges magnified in underrepresented regions like sub-Saharan Africa. This study introduces a novel application of ConvNeXt, an advanced convolutional neural network architecture, for multi-class classification of prostate histopathological images into normal, benign, and malignant categories. The dataset, sourced from a tertiary healthcare institution in Nigeria, represents a typically underserved African population, addressing critical disparities in global diagnostic research. We also used the ProstateX dataset (2017) from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) to validate our result. A comprehensive pipeline was developed, leveraging advanced data augmentation, Grad-CAM for interpretability, and an ablation study to enhance model optimization and robustness. The ConvNeXt model achieved an accuracy of 98%, surpassing the performance of traditional CNNs (ResNet50, 93%; EfficientNet, 94%; DenseNet, 92%) and transformer-based models (ViT, 88%; CaiT, 86%; Swin Transformer, 95%; RegNet, 94%). Also, using the ProstateX dataset, the ConvNeXt model recorded 87.2%, 85.7%, 86.4%, and 0.92 as accuracy, recall, F1 score, and AUC, respectively, as validation results. Its hybrid architecture combines the strengths of CNNs and transformers, enabling superior feature extraction. Grad-CAM visualizations further enhance explainability, bridging the gap between computational predictions and clinical trust. Ablation studies demonstrated the contributions of data augmentation, optimizer selection, and learning rate tuning to model performance, highlighting its robustness and adaptability for deployment in low-resource settings. This study advances equitable health care by addressing the lack of regional representation in diagnostic datasets and employing a clinically aligned three-class classification approach. Combining high performance, interpretability, and scalability, this work establishes a foundation for future research on diverse and underrepresented populations, fostering global inclusivity in cancer diagnostics.

A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models for the Automatic Detection, Localization, and Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a critical role in prostate cancer diagnosis, but is limited by variability in interpretation and diagnostic accuracy. This systematic review evaluates the current state of deep learning (DL) models in enhancing the automatic detection, localization, and characterization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on MRI.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across Medline/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect for studies published between January 2020 and September 2023. Studies were included if these presented and validated fully automated DL models for csPCa detection on MRI, with pathology confirmation. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool and the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, showing promising results in detecting and characterizing csPCa. However, significant heterogeneity in study designs, validation strategies, and datasets complicates direct comparisons. Only one-third of studies performed external validation, highlighting a critical gap in generalizability. The reliance on internal validation limits a broader application of these findings, and the lack of standardized methodologies hinders the integration of DL models into clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

DL models demonstrate significant potential in improving prostate cancer diagnostics on MRI. However, challenges in validation, generalizability, and clinical implementation must be addressed. Future research should focus on standardizing methodologies, ensuring external validation and conducting prospective clinical trials to facilitate the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in routine clinical settings. These findings support the cautious integration of AI into clinical practice, with further studies needed to confirm their efficacy in diverse clinical environments.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we reviewed how artificial intelligence (AI) models can help doctors better detect and understand aggressive prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging scans. We found that while these AI tools show promise, these tools need more testing and validation in different hospitals before these can be used widely in patient care.

Catalyzing Precision Medicine: Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management

BACKGROUND

The aim was to analyze the current state of deep learning (DL)-based prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis with a focus on magnetic resonance (MR) prostate reconstruction; PCa detection/stratification/reconstruction; positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT); androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); prostate biopsy; associated challenges and their clinical implications.

METHODS

A search of the PubMed database was conducted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the use of DL methods within the abovementioned areas.

RESULTS

A total of 784 articles were found, of which, 64 were included. Reconstruction of the prostate, the detection and stratification of prostate cancer, the reconstruction of prostate cancer, and diagnosis on PET/CT, ADT, and biopsy were analyzed in 21, 22, 6, 7, 2, and 6 studies, respectively. Among studies describing DL use for MR-based purposes, datasets with magnetic field power of 3 T, 1.5 T, and 3/1.5 T were used in 18/19/5, 0/1/0, and 3/2/1 studies, respectively, of 6/7 studies analyzing DL for PET/CT diagnosis which used data from a single institution. Among the radiotracers, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [18F]DCFPyl, and [18F]PSMA-1007 were used in 5, 1, and 1 study, respectively. Only two studies that analyzed DL in the context of DT met the inclusion criteria. Both were performed with a single-institution dataset with only manual labeling of training data. Three studies, each analyzing DL for prostate biopsy, were performed with single- and multi-institutional datasets. TeUS, TRUS, and MRI were used as input modalities in two, three, and one study, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DL models in prostate cancer diagnosis show promise but are not yet ready for clinical use due to variability in methods, labels, and evaluation criteria. Conducting additional research while acknowledging all the limitations outlined is crucial for reinforcing the utility and effectiveness of DL-based models in clinical settings.

Medical informed machine learning: A scoping review and future research directions

Combining domain knowledge (DK) and machine learning is a recent research stream to overcome multiple issues like limited explainability, lack of data, and insufficient robustness. Most approaches applying informed machine learning (IML), however, are customized to solve one specific problem. This study analyzes the status of IML in medicine by conducting a scoping literature review based on an existing taxonomy. We identified 177 papers and analyzed them regarding the used DK, the implemented machine learning model, and the motives for performing IML. We find an immense role of expert knowledge and image data in medical IML. We then provide an overview and analysis of recent approaches and supply five directions for future research. This review can help develop future medical IML approaches by easily referencing existing solutions and shaping future research directions.

Automatic Diagnosis of Glaucoma from Retinal Images Using Deep Learning Approach

Glaucoma is characterized by increased intraocular pressure and damage to the optic nerve, which may result in irreversible blindness. The drastic effects of this disease can be avoided if it is detected at an early stage. However, the condition is frequently detected at an advanced stage in the elderly population. Therefore, early-stage detection may save patients from irreversible vision loss. The manual assessment of glaucoma by ophthalmologists includes various skill-oriented, costly, and time-consuming methods. Several techniques are in experimental stages to detect early-stage glaucoma, but a definite diagnostic technique remains elusive. We present an automatic method based on deep learning that can detect early-stage glaucoma with very high accuracy. The detection technique involves the identification of patterns from the retinal images that are often overlooked by clinicians. The proposed approach uses the gray channels of fundus images and applies the data augmentation technique to create a large dataset of versatile fundus images to train the convolutional neural network model. Using the ResNet-50 architecture, the proposed approach achieved excellent results for detecting glaucoma on the G1020, RIM-ONE, ORIGA, and DRISHTI-GS datasets. We obtained a detection accuracy of 98.48%, a sensitivity of 99.30%, a specificity of 96.52%, an AUC of 97%, and an F1-score of 98% by using the proposed model on the G1020 dataset. The proposed model may help clinicians to diagnose early-stage glaucoma with very high accuracy for timely interventions.

The Low Rate of Adherence to Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging Criteria Among Published Prostate MRI Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rigor, generalizability, and reproducibility of published classification and detection artificial intelligence (AI) models for prostate cancer (PCa) on MRI using the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) guidelines, a 42-item checklist that is considered a measure of best practice for presenting and reviewing medical imaging AI research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review searched English literature for studies proposing PCa AI detection and classification models on MRI. Each study was evaluated with the CLAIM checklist. The additional outcomes for which data were sought included measures of AI model performance (eg, area under the curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, free-response operating characteristic curves), training and validation and testing group sample size, AI approach, detection versus classification AI, public data set utilization, MRI sequences used, and definition of gold standard for ground truth. The percentage of CLAIM checklist fulfillment was used to stratify studies into quartiles. Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was used for pair-wise comparisons.

RESULTS

In all, 75 studies were identified, and 53 studies qualified for analysis. The original CLAIM items that most studies did not fulfill includes item 12 (77% no): de-identification methods; item 13 (68% no): handling missing data; item 15 (47% no): rationale for choosing ground truth reference standard; item 18 (55% no): measurements of inter- and intrareader variability; item 31 (60% no): inclusion of validated interpretability maps; item 37 (92% no): inclusion of failure analysis to elucidate AI model weaknesses. An AUC score versus percentage CLAIM fulfillment quartile revealed a significant difference of the mean AUC scores between quartile 1 versus quartile 2 (0.78 versus 0.86, P = .034) and quartile 1 versus quartile 4 (0.78 versus 0.89, P = .003) scores. Based on additional information and outcome metrics gathered in this study, additional measures of best practice are defined. These new items include disclosure of public dataset usage, ground truth definition in comparison to other referenced works in the defined task, and sample size power calculation.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of AI studies do not fulfill key items in CLAIM guidelines within their methods and results sections. The percentage of CLAIM checklist fulfillment is weakly associated with improved AI model performance. Additions or supplementations to CLAIM are recommended to improve publishing standards and aid reviewers in determining study rigor.