Comparison of frozen-thawed embryo transfer strategies for the treatment of infertility in young women: a retrospective study

Effect of GnRH agonist down-regulation combined with hormone replacement treatment on reproductive outcomes of frozen blastocyst transfer cycles in women of different ages

Objective

To investigate the effect of GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) down-regulation prior to hormone replacement treatment (HRT) to prepare the endometrium in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in women of different ages.

Methods

This was a retrospective study, and after excluding patients with adenomyosis, endometriosis, severe endometrial adhesions, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and repeated embryo implantation failures, a total of 4,091 HRT cycles were collected. Patients were divided into group A (<35 years old) and group B (≥35 years old), and each group was further divided into HRT and GnRHa-HRT groups. The clinical outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the HRT and GnRHa-HRT groups among women aged <35 years. In women of advanced age, higher rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth were seen in the GnRHa-HRT group. Logistic regression analysis showed that female age and number of embryos transferred influenced the live birth rate in FET cycles, and in women aged ≥ 35 years, the use of GnRH-a down-regulation prior to HRT improved pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusions

In elderly woman without adenomyosis, endometriosis, PCOS, severe uterine adhesions, and RIF, hormone replacement treatment with GnRH agonist for pituitary suppression can improve the live birth rate of FET cycles.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes among patients of different ages who underwent frozen-thawed high-quality single blastocyst transfer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of performing frozen-thawed high-quality single blastocyst transfer in women of different ages.

METHODS

A total of 1,279 women were divided into four groups: a 38-40-year-old group (n = 147), 35-37-year-old group (n = 164), 30-34-year-old group (n = 483), and < 30-year-old group (n = 485). Intergroup comparisons of baseline characteristics and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were made.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rate (47.6%), and live birth rate (34.0%) in the 38-40-year-old group were significantly lower than those in the 30-34-year-old group (64.4%, 50.9%, respectively; all P < 0.001) and < 30-year-old group (62.9%, 50.7%, respectively; all P < 0.001). However, the 35-37-year-old group did not differ from the other three groups in these two dimensions (all P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no differences in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, or obstetric or neonatal complications among the four groups (all P > 0.05). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the 35-37-year-old group was not associated with non-live birth outcomes, adverse pregnancy outcomes, or obstetric or neonatal complications. However, being 38-40 years of age was a risk factor for non-live birth (OR = 2.121, 95% CI: 1.233-3.647) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR = 1.630, 95% CI: 1.010-2.633). Post hoc power analysis showed that the study was sufficiently powered to detect meaningful differences.

CONCLUSION

Frozen-thawed high-quality single blastocyst transfer produces the same satisfactory pregnancy outcomes for women aged 35-37 years as younger patients. Future prospective randomized controlled studies with larger populations are needed to verify the feasibility and safety of this method.

Comparison of frozen-thaw blastocyst transfer strategies in women aged 35-40 years: a retrospective study

Objective

To compare the effects of five different frozen-thaw embryo transfer (FET) strategies in women aged 35-40 years.

Methods

Data from 1,060 patients were divided into five groups according to the number and quality of transferred blastocysts: a high-quality single blastocyst group (group A, n= 303), a high-quality double blastocysts group (group B, n= 176), a high-quality plus poor-quality double blastocysts group (group C, n= 273), a poor-quality double blastocysts group (group D, n= 189), and a poor-quality single blastocyst group (group E, n= 119). Comparative analyses were then performed between groups with regard to primary conditions, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes.

Results

Group A had the lowest twin pregnancy rate (1.97%) and incidence of low-birth-weight infants (3.45%), which were significantly different from groups B, C, and D. In addition, the preterm birth rate (7.89%), neonatal birth weight (3300 g [3000, 3637.5]), and neonatal birth age (39.14 weeks [38.43, 39.61]) in group A were different from those in groups B and C. Double blastocyst transfer (DBT) was associated with a 20.558-fold (Risk Ratio [RR]=20.558, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.628-63.763) and 3.091-fold (RR=3.091, 95% CI, 1.69-5.653) increased risk of twin pregnancy and preterm delivery in unadjusted analysis, respectively, when compared with single blastocyst transfer (SBT). In the adjusted analysis, we observed similar risk estimates (adjusted RR=26.501, 95% CI, 8.503-82.592; adjusted RR=3.586, 95% CI, 1.899-6.769).

Conclusion

Although, high-quality SBT resulted in a lower live birth rate than high-quality DBT, it also significantly reduced the risk of adverse pregnancies, thus resulting in more benefits for both the mother and baby. Collectively, our data indicate that high-quality SBT remains the optimal FET strategy for women aged 35-40 years and warrants further clinical application.