Wedge resection is equal to segmental resection for pulmonary typical carcinoid patients at localized stage: a population-based analysis

The role of wedge resection and lymph node examination in stage IA lung carcinoid tumors

Background

Current guidelines recommend anatomical resection and mediastinal lymph node resection for stage I to IIIA pulmonary carcinoids (PCs). The role of wedge resection in stage IA PCs remains controversial, previous studies focused on typical carcinoids (TCs) while differentiating histological subtypes preoperatively is not easy. We aimed to study the effect of wedge resection and lymph node examination (LNE) in patients with stage IA PCs.

Methods

Patients who underwent anatomical and wedge resection for stage T1N0M0 lung carcinoid tumors between 2004 and 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were also divided into a non-LNE group and an LNE group. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to calculate and compare overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to balance the variables between groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were developed to determine prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 2,029 patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors were included in this study, 1,450 underwent lobectomy, 147 underwent segmentectomy and 432 underwent wedge resection. Initially, 5-year survival differed marginally between wedge and anatomical resection (91% vs. 95%, P=0.051), but lost significance after adjustment. LNE improved 5-year survival (95% vs. 89%, P=0.003), and this remained significant after adjustment. In multivariate cox analysis, LNE remained a significant variable while extent of resection was not. This result also remained consistent after adjustment. OS was comparable between wedge resection and anatomical resection when at least 1 lymph node was examined.

Conclusions

For early-stage PC, wedge resection was not inferior to anatomical resection in terms of OS, while LNE significantly increased the survival in both multivariate and matched studies. The relationship between surgical extent and survival in the unadjusted study may be attributed to the lower rate of LNE in wedge resection. Our findings support wedge resection with emphasis on LNE in early-stage PCs.

Segmentectomy and wedge resection are equivalent for the treatment of early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumors: A retrospective cohort study

Currently, there is no consensus regarding the extent of surgery for stage I pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumors, which encompass typical carcinoid (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC) tumors. Sublobar resection includes segmental resection and wedge resection; the former is regarded as a type of anatomical resection that is better suited for tumor treatment. Therefore, it needs to be further verified whether differences exist in the effects of the two surgical methods on the survival time of patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used. The primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) time. Survival differences were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. There was no significant difference in survival between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups after PSM in either the TC or AC tumor groups (all p > 0.05). A total of 1680 patients underwent pulmonary wedge resection (TC: n = 1547, AC: n = 133), and 398 patients underwent segmental resection (TC: n = 365, AC: n = 33). After PSM, there were no statistically significant differences in survival, regardless of whether OS or CSS was considered the primary endpoint (OS: p = 0.337; CSS: p = 0.470). Furthermore, segmental resection did not prolong patient survival time compared with wedge resection in different subgroup analyses on the basis of histology, age, and tumor size (all p > 0.05). Finally, the same results were obtained via multivariate Cox analysis (OS: p = 0.153; HR = 1.21; CSS: p = 0.351, HR = 1.32). Sublobar resection could be considered for patients with early-stage typical or atypical pulmonary carcinoid, provided that a rigorous lymph node evaluation is conducted. If the tumor is distant from the pulmonary hilum, either segmentectomy or wedge resection may be performed depending on the specific location of the tumor and the clinical condition of the patient.

A Competing Risk Model Nomogram to Predict the Long-Term Prognosis of Lung Carcinoid

BACKGROUND

The prediction of long-term, cancer-specific survival of lung carcinoid remains controversial. We aimed to build a prognostic model by using competing-risk analysis to predict the long-term, cancer-specific survival of lung carcinoid patients.

METHODS

Patients were retrospectively enrolled from the SEER database, and clinicopathological data were collected. Univariable and multivariable competing-risk analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors. A competing-risk model and a nomogram were developed by using independent prognostic factors. The model was assessed by using concordance index and calibration curves.

RESULTS

A total of 2496 patients were enrolled, of which 267 (10.7%) died of diagnosed carcinoma; 316 (12.7%) died because of other reasons. The 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year cancer-specific survival of carcinoid patients were 91.35%, 86.60%, and 84.39%, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that increasing age, male, larger tumor size, higher N stage, M1, atypical carcinoid, and undergoing no surgery were independent risk factors. A competing-risk model based on the risk factors and a corresponding nomogram were developed. Concordance index of the developed model for 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year were 0.891, 0.856, 0.836 respectively in the training cohort and 0.876, 0.841, 0.819 respectively in the validation cohort after bootstrap adjustment. The calibration curves of 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year showed good agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing age, male, larger tumor size, higher N stage, M1, atypical carcinoid, and undergoing no surgery were independent risk factors. A competing risk model of excellent performance in predicting long-term survival was developed, and a nomogram was established.

The Surgical Management of Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

This review summarizes key recent developments relevant to the surgical management of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (L-NENs), including typical and atypical carcinoids, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and small cell lung carcinoma. This review includes recent insights into the classification, clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, treatment options, and follow-up. Highlighted topics include general principles of surgery in localized or locally advanced or metastatic L-NENs, lung-sparing surgery for small, peripheral typical carcinoids, adjuvant and systemic therapies for typical and atypical carcinoids, and surgery and adjuvant therapies for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma.

Current Management of Carcinoid Tumor

Bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors are rare, well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms. They can be categorized as typical or atypical lesions and are low-to-intermediate-grade, respectively. The cornerstone of therapy for carcinoid tumors is surgical resection and current consensus guidelines recommend anatomic resection for stage I to IIIA disease. The renewed interest in sublobar resections for the treatment of lung malignancies has sparked debate over the degree of resection necessary for these indolent lesions. Segmentectomy provides an oncologic resection while preserving as much lung parenchyma as possible, and is a reasonable approach to apply to small, undifferentiated, or typical carcinoid lesions.

Does Examined Lymph Node Count Influence Survival in Surgically Resected Early‑stage Pulmonary Typical Carcinoid Tumors?

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) in resected early‑stage pulmonary typical carcinoid tumors (TC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent sublobar resection and lobectomy for stage T1N0M0 TC between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and enrolled in the ELNs≥4 or ELNs<4 groups (optimal cutoff using X-tile). Propensity score matching balanced baseline intergroup characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare overall survival (OS) rates. Cox proportional hazard model analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among 2234 participants, 961 (43.02%) and 1273 (56.98%) had ELNs <4 and ≥4, respectively. The 5-year OS was significantly higher in the ELNs≥4, compared with ELNs<4, group, both before and after propensity score matching (95.41% vs. 89.71%, P<0.001 and 95.24% vs. 90.28%, P=0.004), respectively. Surgical subgroup analysis confirmed this survival trend in the lobectomy and sublobar resection groups. Tumor size-based subgroup analysis revealed superior OS with ELNs≥4 than ELNs<4 for tumors measuring 1.1-3.0 cm but not for tumors <1.0 cm. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that ELN≥4 contributed to improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher the ELNs, the greater the long-term survival rate in patients with early‑stage TC. Therefore, we recommend at least 4 ELNs as the cutoff value for evaluating the prognosis of early‑stage TCs, especially for patients with a tumor size of 1.1 to 3.0 cm.

Long-term survival analysis of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for older patients with early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumour: a database-based propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The optimal extent of surgery for older patients with early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumour (PC) remains controversial.

AIMS

To compare prognostic differences between sublobar resection versus lobectomy in older patients with early-stage PC.

METHODS

The SEER database was searched for stage T1N0M0 PC patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection from 2000 to 2017. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to determine intergroup covariate differences. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used for intergroup comparison of overall survival (OS). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate independent risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 1023 participants, 650 and 373 underwent lobectomy and sublobar resection, respectively. Before PSM, the 5- and 10-year OS in the sublobar resection group were lower than that of the lobectomy group (5-year OS 84.12% vs. 91.16%; 10-year OS 57.43% vs. 64.77%; p = 0.014); after PSM, no significant prognostic difference existed between lobectomy and sublobar resection (5-year OS 88.17% vs. 89.23%; 10-year OS 58.32% vs. 62.75%; p = 0.811). Subgroup analysis included tumour size, age, number of lymph nodes examined and histological type, and showed no statistically significant survival differences between the lobectomy and sublobar resection groups. Multivariable Cox analysis indicated that age ≥ 77 years, male sex, inadequate lymph node assessment (< 7), and atypical carcinoid were associated with reduced OS.

CONCLUSION

Sublobar resection showed a similar long-term survival rate for early-stage PC patients aged ≥ 65 years as with lobectomy, thereby providing a basis for the selection of surgical methods for PC.

Anatomic Pulmonary Resection is Associated With Improved Survival in Typical Carcinoid Lung Tumor Patients

BACKGROUND

The optimal extent of resection for a patient with a typical carcinoid tumor has been controversial. Studies suggest that wedge resection is an adequate oncologic operation for this tumor type.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the National Cancer Database to determine an optimal surgical resection for patients with a typical carcinoid tumor. We determined the number of patients who had typical carcinoid tumors. We then performed a survival analysis of the propensity-matched group of patients having a pathologic stage I typical carcinoid tumor who had undergone anatomic pulmonary resection (lobectomy and segmentectomy) or wedge resection.

RESULTS

A total of 10,265 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria: 8956 (87%) had a typical carcinoid tumor, while 1309 patients (13%) had an atypical carcinoid tumor. Among patients with typical carcinoid tumors, there were 7163 patients (80%) who underwent anatomic pulmonary resection (6755 patients with lobectomy, 94% and 408 patients with segmentectomy, 6%) and 1793 patients (20%) who underwent wedge resection. In this cohort, patients who had an anatomic resection had significantly improved 5-y survival compared to patients who had wedge resection (91% versus 84%, P < 0.001). In the propensity score-matched group of stage I typical carcinoid tumors (n = 1348), the patients who had an anatomic resection had significantly improved survival compared to patients who had wedge resections (89% versus 85%, P = 0.01) at 5 y.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomic resection compared to wedge resection was associated with improved survival in patients with early-stage typical carcinoid lung cancer. Surgically fit patients should be considered for anatomic resection for typical carcinoid tumors.

Differential Diagnosis of Nonabsorbable Inflammatory and Malignant Subsolid Nodules with a Solid Component ≤5 mm

Purpose

To investigate the differential clinical and computed tomography (CT) characteristics of pulmonary nonabsorbable inflammatory and malignant subsolid nodules (SSNs) with a solid component ≤5 mm.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 576 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection and had SSNs with a solid component ≤5 mm on CT images. These patients were divided into inflammatory and malignant groups according to pathology. Their clinical and imaging data were analyzed and compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors differentiating inflammatory from malignant SSNs. Furthermore, 146 consecutive patients were included as internal validation cohort to test the prediction efficiency of this model.

Results

Significant differences in 11 clinical characteristics and CT features were found between both groups (P < 0.05). Presence of respiratory symptoms, distribution of middle/lower lobe, irregular shape, part-solid nodule (PSNs), CT value of ground-glass opacity (GGO) areas <−657 Hu, presence of abnormal intra-nodular vessel sign, and interlobular septal thickening were the most effective factors for diagnosing nonabsorbable inflammatory SSNs, with an AUC (95% CI), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.843 (95% CI: 0.811–0.872), 89.76%, 72.86%, and 81.23%, respectively. The internal validation cohort obtained an AUC (95% CI), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.759–0.887), 83.56%, 73.91%, and 76.42%, respectively.

Conclusion

Nonabsorbable inflammatory and malignant SSNs with a solid component ≤5 mm exhibited different clinical and imaging characteristics.

Surgical Principles in the Management of Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors: Open Questions and Controversial Technical Issues

OPINION STATEMENT

Primary neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from the endocrine cells, involving different entities, from well differentiated to highly undifferentiated neoplasms. Because of the predominance of poorly differentiated tumors, advanced disease is observed at diagnosis in more than one third of patients making chemo- or chemoradiotherapy the only possible treatment. Complete surgical resection, as defined as anatomical resection plus systematic lymphadenectomy, becomes a reliable curative option only for that little percentage of patients presenting with stage I (N0) high-grade NETs. On the other hand, complete surgical resection is considered the mainstay treatment for localized low- and intermediate-grade NETs. Therefore, in the era of the mini-invasive surgery, their indolent behavior has suggested that parenchyma-sparing resections could be as adequate as the anatomical ones in terms of oncological outcomes, leading to discuss about the correct extent of resection and about the role of lymphadenectomy when dealing with highly differentiated NETs.

Wedge Resection Offers Similar Survival to Segmentectomy for Typical Carcinoid Tumors

Current guidelines recommend anatomic lung resection of typical bronchopulmonary carcinoids. Typical carcinoid tumors have excellent prognosis and sublobar resection has been associated with noninferior long-term survival. It's unclear whether wedge resection is acceptable for small typical carcinoid tumors. We hypothesize there is no difference in survival between wedge resection and segmentectomy for Stage I typical bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors. Using the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016, we identified clinical T1N0M0 typical bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors by wedge resection or segmentectomy. Short-term outcomes included length of stay, lymph nodes evaluated, pathologic node status, positive margin status, and 90-day mortality. Primary outcome was overall survival and estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. 821 patients were identified: 677 receiving wedge resection, 144 receiving segmentectomy. Segmentectomy was more commonly performed in an academic setting (70.0% vs 57.3%, P = 0.005). The mean tumor size for segmentectomy was 1.7 cm versus 1.4 cm for wedge resection (P < 0.001). There was no difference in LOS, positive margin status, and 90-day mortality between groups. There were significantly more lymph nodes evaluated in segmentectomy patients (median 4 vs 0, P < 0.001), but there was no difference in positive lymph node status (5.3% vs 2.6%, P = 0.165). The OS was similar between wedge and segmental resection (P = 0.613): 3-year survival (93.5% vs 92.8%) and 5-year survival (83.8% vs 84.9%). Wedge resection and segmentectomy have similar survival for Stage I typical bronchopulmonary carcinoids in a large national database. This analysis suggests nonanatomic, parenchymal-sparing resection should be considered an appropriate alternative for Stage I typical bronchopulmonary carcinoids.

Prognostic nomogram for predicting long-term cancer-specific survival in patients with lung carcinoid tumors

BACKGROUND

Lung carcinoid is a rare malignant tumor with poor survival. The current study established a nomogram model for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with lung carcinoid tumors.

METHODS

A total of 1956 patients diagnosed with primary lung carcinoid tumors were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The specific predictors of CSS for lung carcinoid tumors were identified and integrated to build a nomogram. Validation of the nomogram was conducted using parameters concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analyses (DCAs), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Age at diagnosis, grade, histological type, N stage, M stage, surgery of the primary site, radiation of the primary site, and tumor size were independent prognostic factors of CSS. High discriminative accuracy of the nomogram model was shown in the training cohort (C-index = 0.873), which was also testified in the internal validation cohort (C-index = 0.861). In both cohorts, the calibration plots showed good concordance between the predicted and observed CSS at 3, 5, and 10 years. The DCA showed great potential for clinical application. The ROC curve showed superior survival predictive ability of the nomogram model (area under the curve = 0.868).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a practical nomogram that provided independent predictions of CSS for patients with lung carcinoid tumors. This nomogram may have the potential to assist clinicians in prognostic evaluations or developing individualized therapies for patients with this neoplasm.