Reducing avoidable emergency department attendances through bespoke education

Teaching and learning modalities for continuing professional development in the long-term care: A rapid synthesis review

AIM

To describe the various teaching and learning modalities for the delivery of Continuing Professional Development activities for health care professionals in the long-term care sector.

BACKGROUND

Continuing Professional Development is a key activity that organisations undertake to achieve effective workforce planning, recruitment, retention and upskilling strategies in long-term care settings. During the Covid-19 pandemic there was a rapid move to online modalities of Continuous Professional Development, but there is a paucity of evidence in relation to their effectiveness compared with face-to-face, or in-class learning.

DESIGN

A rapid synthesis review.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CINAHL and HEALTH BUSINESS ELITE databases were used to identify relevant articles that were published between 2016 and 2022. Original studies of any design investigating Continuing Professional Development activities, with or without a comparison between interventions or activities were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was followed. The Kirkpatrick model was adopted as a globally recognised method for evaluating training programmes.

RESULTS

After a full text analysis, 34 papers were included in the review. Face to face was the most common method of delivery followed by online, while blended (a mix of face-to-face and online delivery) was the least common method used. The teaching modalities were not associated with specific learning contents, but were used for a range of content. Most studies obtained positive outcomes following implementation of the educational interventions. Kirkpatrick Level 4 (results) was the most commonly measured outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

While blended learning was the least common method of delivery, it was found to be more beneficial for learners than face-to-face or online exclusively. There are now new spaces to learn and new technologies that allow us to 'reimagine' where, when and how we teach. This requires Continuing Professional Development providers to design and tailor their courses according to health professionals' learning needs and the clinical contexts where they work. We recommend that Continuing Professional Development providers involve employers when designing teaching and learning activities for Long Term Care workers, to decide which modalities enable effective knowledge translation.

Hospital transfer rates and advance care planning following a nursing home-targeted video-conference education series (Project ECHO): a prospective cohort study

Purpose

Nursing home staff manage increasingly complex patients yet struggle to access education. This study measured the impact of a novel education programme on emergency transfers from nursing homes.

Methods

In this prospective experimental cohort study, ten interactive sessions were provided to 20 nursing homes, using teleconferencing technology through the “Project ECHO” (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) model. Details of all emergency hospital transfers were submitted by participating nursing homes 6 months before and 6 months from commencement of ECHO.

Results

Of 20 nursing homes, 13 submitted sufficient data for inclusion. In these 13, there were 260 emergency transfers over a year. There was no significant difference in the number of transfers before and after ECHO (137/260 pre-ECHO vs 123/260 post-ECHO, p = 0.62). Post-ECHO, it was 50% more likely that transfer wishes were discussed in advance of transfer (62 of 137 (45%) transferred pre-ECHO vs 82 of 123 (67%) post-ECHO, p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in compliance with resident wishes post-ECHO in that transferred residents were less likely to have a documented “Not for Transfer” wish (29/137 pre-ECHO (21%) vs 10/123 post-ECHO (8%), p < 0.001). Point prevalence surveys of residents demonstrated significant increases in “Do Not Resuscitate” orders; 286/589 (49%) residents pre-ECHO vs 386/594 (65%) post-ECHO, p < 0.001. Post-ECHO, pain was less frequently the primary cause for transfer (11/137 (8%) pre-ECHO vs 1/123 (0.8%) post-ECHO, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

ECHO did not affect rates of emergency hospital transfers but did increase advance care planning discussions ahead of hospital transfer by 50% and compliance with the results of those discussions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-022-00624-6.

Aim

What effect does a novel education programme have on emergency hospital transfers of, and advance care planning decisions among, nursing home residents?

Findings

This education programme did not affect overall rates of emergency hospital transfer. It did increase advance care planning discussions, increase compliance with the results of these discussions and increase “DNR” orders among nursing home residents.

Message

Novel tele-education programmes have the potential to improve advance care planning discussions in nursing homes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-022-00624-6.