Somatostatin Receptor Avidity in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Theranostic Implications of Gallium-68 Scan and Eligibility for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Advances in Drug Therapy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is a common gastrointestinal sarcoma located in the stromal cells of the digestive tract, and molecular studies have revealed the pathogenesis of mutations in KIT and PDGFRA genes. Since imatinib opened the era of targeted therapy for GIST, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that can treat GIST have been developed successively. However, the lack of new drugs with satisfactory therapeutic standards has made addressing resistance a significant challenge for TKIs in the face of the resistance to first-line and second-line drugs. Therefore, we need to find as many drugs and new treatments that block mutated genes as possible.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive collection of literature using databases, integrated and analysed the selected literature based on keywords and the comprehensive nature of the articles, and finally wrote articles based on the content of the studies.

RESULTS

In this article, we first briefly explained the relationship between GIST and KIT/ PDGFRα and then introduced the related drug treatment. The research progress of TKIs was analyzed according to the resistance of the drugs.

CONCLUSION

This article describes the research progress of some TKIs and briefly introduces the currently approved TKIs and some drugs under investigation that may have better therapeutic effects, hoping to provide clues to the research of new drugs.

Radiotherapy in the Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered insensitive to radiotherapy. However, a growing number of case reports and case series have shown that some lesions treated by radiotherapy achieved an objective response. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of all reported cases, case series, and clinical studies of GISTs treated with radiotherapy to reevaluate the role of radiotherapy in GISTs. A systematic search of the English-written literature was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Overall, 41 articles describing 112 patients were retrieved. The included articles were of low to moderate quality. Bone was the most common site treated by radiotherapy, followed by the abdomen. In order to exclude the influence of effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), a subgroup analysis was conducted on whether and which TKIs were concurrently applied with radiotherapy. Results showed that radiotherapy alone or combined with resistant TKIs could help achieve objective response in selected patients with advanced or metastatic GISTs; however, survival benefits were not observed in the included studies. Pain was the most common symptom in symptomatic GISTs, followed by neurological dysfunction and bleeding. The symptom palliation rate was 78.6% after excluding the influence of effective TKIs. The adverse reactions were mainly graded 1-2. Radiotherapy was generally well-tolerated. Overall, radiotherapy may relieve symptoms for GIST patients with advanced or metastatic lesions and even help achieve objective response in selected patients without significantly reducing the quality of life. In addition to bone metastases, fixed abdominal lesions may be treated by radiotherapy. Publication bias and insufficient quality of included studies were the main limitations in this review. Further clinical studies are needed and justified.

New treatment strategies for advanced-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumours

When gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), the most common form of sarcoma, was first recognized as a distinct pathological entity in the 1990s, patients with advanced-stage disease had a very poor prognosis owing to a lack of effective medical therapies. The discovery of KIT mutations as the first and most prevalent drivers of GIST and the subsequent development of the first KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib, revolutionized the treatment of patients with this disease. We can now identify the driver mutation in 99% of patients with GIST via molecular diagnostic testing, and therapies have been developed to treat many, but not all, molecular subtypes of the disease. At present, seven drugs are approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced-stage GIST (imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib, avapritinib, larotrectinib and entrectinib), all of which are TKIs. Although these agents can be very effective for treating certain GIST subtypes, challenges remain and new therapeutic approaches are needed. In this Review, we discuss the molecular subtypes of GIST and the evolution of current treatments, as well as their therapeutic limitations. We also highlight emerging therapeutic approaches that might overcome clinical challenges through novel strategies predicated on the biological features of the distinct GIST molecular subtypes.

Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumor: from diagnostic dilemma to novel personalised therapy in 2 case reports

Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a unique and distinctive subtype of gastric GIST. The literature on this subtype from developing countries is exceedingly sparse. Patients with SDH-deficient GIST often experience a lack or delay in genomic profiling, despite stereotypical clinicopathologic features, potentially resulting in sub-optimal management. SDH-deficient GISTs are highly syndromic, typically have more indolent behavior, a prognosis not predicted by size and mitotic rate, a tendency to lymph node metastases, and are insensitive to standard tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We report two women with SDH-deficient GIST. In the first case, SDH deficiency was identified late due to lack of awareness and poor access to diagnostic facilities. The patient progressed through TKI therapy, but responded to temozolomide, which is under investigation in clinical trials. In the second case, SDH deficiency was identified at diagnosis, and the patient responded well to ¹⁷⁷Lutetium peptide radionuclide receptor therapy (PRRT) after progressing through two lines of TKIs. We aim to highlight the need for more awareness and access to genomic diagnostic facilities for GIST patients, temozolomide as a novel therapy for SDH-deficient GIST, and the potential value of DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET) and PRRT as a novel imaging modality and therapy for TKI insensitive GIST patients.

The role of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in wild-type KIT/PDGFRA gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST)

BACKGROUND

[68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is now recognised as the most sensitive functional imaging modality for the diagnosis of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and can inform treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. However, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression is not unique to NET, and therefore, [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT may have oncological application in other tumours. Molecular profiling of gastrointestinal stromal tumours that lack activating somatic mutations in KIT or PDGFRA or so-called 'wild-type' GIST (wtGIST) has demonstrated that wtGIST and NET have overlapping molecular features and has encouraged exploration of shared therapeutic targets, due to a lack of effective therapies currently available for metastatic wtGIST.

AIMS

To investigate (i) the diagnostic role of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT; and, (ii) to investigate the potential of this imaging modality to guide treatment with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in patients with wtGIST.

METHODS

[68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was performed on 11 patients with confirmed or metastatic wtGIST and one patient with a history of wtGIST and a mediastinal mass suspicious for metastatic wtGIST, who was subsequently diagnosed with a metachronous mediastinal paraganglioma. Tumour expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) using immunohistochemistry was performed on 54 tumour samples including samples from 8/12 (66.6%) patients who took part in the imaging study and 46 tumour samples from individuals not included in the imaging study.

RESULTS

[68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging was negative, demonstrating that liver metastases had lower uptake than background liver for nine cases (9/12 cases, 75%) and heterogeneous uptake of somatostatin tracer was noted for two cases (16.6%) of wtGIST. However, [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated intense tracer uptake in a synchronous paraganglioma in one case and a metachronous paraganglioma in another case with wtGIST.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that SSTR2 is not a diagnostic or therapeutic target in wtGIST. [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT may have specific diagnostic utility in differentiating wtGIST from other primary tumours such as paraganglioma in patients with sporadic and hereditary forms of wtGIST.

Tumor detection rates in screening of individuals with SDHx-related hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndrome

Purpose:

Minimal data exist regarding the efficacy of screening protocols for individuals with SDHx germline pathogenic variants with Hereditary Paraganglioma-Pheochromocytoma Syndrome. This study aimed to evaluate the SDHx-related tumor detection rate in individuals undergoing clinical screening protocols.

Methods:

A multi-center retrospective longitudinal observational study was conducted. Individuals with germline SDHx pathogenic variants underwent clinical whole-body imaging and biochemical testing.

Results:

263 individuals with SDHx germline pathogenic variants completed 491 imaging screens. Individuals with SDHB germline pathogenic variants were most common (n=188/263, 72%), followed by SDHD (n=35/263, 13%) and SDHC (n=28/263, 11%). SDHx-related tumors were found in 17% (n=45/263) of the cohort. Most SDHx-related tumors were identified on baseline imaging screen (n=39/46, 85%). Individuals with SDHD pathogenic variants had the highest tumor detection rate (n=14/35, 40%). Of imaging screens identifying SDHx-related paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma, 29% (n=12/41) had negative biochemical testing. Secondary actionable findings were identified in 15% (n=75/491) of imaging screens.

Conclusion:

Current SDHx screening protocols are effective at identifying SDHx-related tumors. Tumor detection rates vary by SDHx gene and screening has the potential to uncover actionable secondary findings. Imaging is an essential part of the screening process as biochemical testing alone does not detect all disease.