Cognition in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) and Its Neuroimaging Correlation: A Prospective Case-Control Study

Brain Proteome Profiling Reveals Common and Divergent Signatures in Parkinson's Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

The molecular pathogenesis of degenerative parkinsonisms, including Parkinson's disease (PD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and Multiple system atrophy (MSA), remains largely unknown. To gain novel insight into molecular processes associated with these diseases, we conducted a proteome-wide expression study in prefrontal cortex tissue from a cohort of 181 individuals, comprising PD (N = 73), PSP (N = 18), MSA (N = 17) and healthy control (N = 73). Using marker gene profiles, we first assess the cellular composition of the samples and, subsequently, identify distinct protein signatures for each disease, while correcting for cell composition. Our findings indicate that all three diseases are characterized by a structural and/or functional loss of deep cortical neurons, while PD exhibits an additional decrease in somatostatin-expressing interneurons, as well as in endothelial cells. Differential protein expression analysis identified multiple proteins and pathways with disease-specific expression, some of which have previously been associated with parkinsonism or neurodegeneration in general. Notably, we observed a strong mitochondrial signature which was present in both PD and PSP, albeit of a different composition and most pronounced in PSP, but not in MSA where immunological/inflammation-related pathways dominated. Additionally, we identified protein signatures associated with the severity of α-synuclein pathology in PD and showed that these are highly enriched in an upregulation of mitochondrial processes, specifically related to oxidative phosphorylation and in particular respiratory complexes I and IV. We identify multiple novel signatures of protein expression, associated with PD, PSP, and MSA, as well as with the severity of α-synuclein pathology in the PD brain.

Cognitive and Autonomic Dysfunction in Multiple System Atrophy Type P and C: A Comparative Study

Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) is a rare neurodegenerative disease, clinically defined by a combination of autonomic dysfunction and motor involvement, that may be predominantly extrapyramidal (MSA-P) or cerebellar (MSA-C). Although dementia is generally considered a red flag against the clinical diagnosis of MSA, in the last decade the evidence of cognitive impairment in MSA patients has been growing. Cognitive dysfunction appears to involve mainly, but not exclusively, executive functions, and may have different characteristics and progression in the two subtypes of the disease (i.e., MSA-P and MSA-C). Despite continued efforts, combining in-vivo imaging studies as well as pathological studies, the physiopathological bases of cognitive involvement in MSA are still unclear. In this view, the possible link between cardiovascular autonomic impairment and decreased cognitive performance, extensively investigated in PD, needs to be clarified as well. In the present study, we evaluated a cohort of 20 MSA patients (9 MSA-P, 11 MSA-C) by means of a neuropsychological battery, hemodynamic assessment (heart rate and arterial blood pressure) during rest and active standing and bedside autonomic function tests assessed by heart rate variability (HRV) parameters and sympathetic skin response (SSR) in the same experimental session. Overall, global cognitive functioning, as indicated by the MoCA score, was preserved in most patients. However, short- and long-term memory and attentional and frontal-executive functions were moderately impaired. When comparing MSA-P and MSA-C, the latter obtained lower scores in tests of executive functions and verbal memory. Conversely, no statistically significant difference in cardiovascular autonomic parameters was identified between MSA-P and MSA-C patients. In conclusion, moderate cognitive deficits, involving executive functions and memory, are present in MSA, particularly in MSA-C patients. In addition, our findings do not support the role of dysautonomia as a major driver of cognitive differences between MSA-P and MSA-C.