Comparing the First-Pass Success Rate of the King LTS-D and the i-gel Airway Devices in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Paramedic i-gel® Placement and Perception of Use in Prehospital Airway Management

OBJECTIVES

Use of supraglottic airways by emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians has increased for patients of all ages. However, data are limited on real-world use in the prehospital setting, including success rates, complications, and paramedic experience. The objective of this study was to determine frequency of successful i-gel® insertion and associated complications, and to describe paramedic perception of i-gel® use.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of i-gel® use in adult patients at four fire-based EMS Provider Agencies in Los Angeles (LA) County from June to September 2021. All paramedics received asynchronous and hands-on training prior to implementation. The i-gel® was indicated for adult patients in respiratory and/or cardiac arrest of any etiology, as directed by LA County protocols. Patients were included if a paramedic attempted i-gel® placement at any point. After transition of care, paramedics completed a web-based questionnaire and contacted an on-call EMS physician investigator to discuss the case. Further data were abstracted from the EMS electronic patient care record. The primary outcome was successful placement of i-gel® based on adequate ventilation post insertion confirmed with capnography. Secondary outcomes were frequency of complications and paramedic perceived ease of placement and of ventilation with i-gel® measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were reported.

RESULTS

Of the 102 adult patients, 55 (54%) were female and the median age was 69 years (IQR 53-79). The majority 91 (89%) of the patients had a paramedic impression of non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Placement was successful in 90 (88%) patients overall with 85 (83%) i-gel® insertions successful on the first attempt. Complications included: 28 (28%) cases with regurgitation/emesis, bleeding (8, 8%), hypoxia (7, 7%), and dislodgement (5, 5%). Among cases of successful i-gel® placement, the majority of paramedics rated both ease of placement and ease of ventilation as "very easy" (69% and 78%, respectively) or "somewhat easy" (23% and 9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Paramedics were successful in 88% of i-gel® insertion attempts with the most common complication being regurgitation/emesis. Paramedics rated the ease of placement and ease of ventilation of the i-gel® device as "very easy" or "somewhat easy" in the vast majority of cases.

The i-gel® supraglottic airway device compared to endotracheal intubation as the initial prehospital advanced airway device: A natural experiment during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

Unlike randomized controlled trials, practical real-world studies can offer important information about implementation of prehospital interventions, particularly in community settings where there may be reluctance to adopt new practices. We present the results of a natural experiment that was driven by mandated COVID-19 pandemic-driven shift from endotracheal intubation (ETI) to the i-gel® supraglottic airway (SGA) as a primary advanced airway management device in the prehospital setting to reduce emergency medical services (EMS) personnel exposure to potentially infectious secretions. The objective was to compare first-pass success and timing to successful airway placement between ETI and the i-gel® SGA under extenuating circumstances.

Methods

This pre/post study compared airway placement metrics in prehospital patients requiring advance airway management for non-trauma-related conditions. Data from EMS records were extracted over 2 years, 12 months pre-pandemic, and 12 months post-pandemic. During the pre-COVID-19 year, the EMS protocols utilized ETI as the primary advanced airway device (ETI group). Post-pandemic paramedics were mandated to utilize i-gel® SGA as the primary advanced airway device to reduce exposure to secretions (SGA group).

Results

There were 199 adult patients, 83 (42%) in the ETI group and 116 (58%) in the SGA group. First-pass success was significantly higher with SGA 96% (92%-99%) than ETI 68% (57%-78%) with paramedics citing the inability to visualize the airway in 52% of ETI cases. Time to first-pass success was significantly shorter in the SGA group (5.9 min [5.1-6.7 min]) than in the ETI group (8.3 min [6.9-9.6 min]), as was time to overall successful placement at 6.0 min (5.1-6.8 min) versus 9.6 min (8.2-11.1 min), respectively. Multiple placement attempts were required in 26% of ETI cases and 1% of the SGA cases. There were no statistically significant differences in the number and types of complications between the cohorts. Return of spontaneous circulation (on/before emergency department [ED] arrival), mortality at 28 days, intensive care unit length of stay, or ventilator-free days between the groups were not statistically different between the groups.

Conclusion

In this natural experiment, the SGA performed significantly better than ETI in first-pass airway device placement success and was significantly faster in achieving first-pass success, and overall airway placement, thus potentially reducing exposure to respiratory pathogens. Practical real-world studies can offer important information about implementation of prehospital interventions, particularly in community settings and in systems with a low frequency of tracheal intubations.

I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel

The supraglottic airway (SGA) is widely used. I-gel Plus is a next-generation i-gel with some improvements, including facilitation of fiberoptic tracheal intubation (FOI). To compare the performance of i-gel Plus and standard i-gel as conduits for FOI, a Thiel-embalmed cadaveric study was conducted. Twenty-two anesthesiologists were enrolled as operators in Experiment 1. The i-gel Plus and standard i-gel were inserted into one cadaver, and the FOI was performed through each SGA. The primary outcome was time required for FOI. The secondary outcomes were the number of attempts and visual analog scale (VAS) score for difficulty in FOI. Moreover, fiberoptic views of the vocal cords in each SGA were assessed by an attending anesthesiologist using nine cadavers in Experiment 2. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score without fiberscope tip upward flexion and upward angle of the fiberscope tip to obtain a 100% POGO score were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The time for FOI through i-gel Plus was significantly shorter than that through standard i-gel (median (IQR), i-gel Plus: 30.3 (25.4-39.0) s, vs standard i-gel: 54.7 (29.6-135.0) s; median of differences, 24.4 s; adjusted 95% confidence interval, 3.0-105.7; adjusted P = 0.040). Although the number of attempts for successful FOI was not significantly different, the VAS score for difficulty in the i-gel Plus group was significantly lower (easier) than that in the standard i-gel group. Moreover, i-gel Plus required a significantly smaller upward angle of the fiberscope tip to obtain a 100% POGO score. FOI can be performed more easily using i-gel Plus than using standard i-gel because of the improved fiberoptic visibility of vocal cords.