Effect of Postoperative Anesthesiologists' Single Visit on Patient Satisfaction: A Hospital-Based Non-Randomized Study

Comparison of Hemodynamic and Recovery Profile Between Segmental Thoracic Spinal and General Anesthesia in Upper Abdominal and Breast Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) has been described primarily as case reports for performing upper abdominal and thoracic surgeries in significant respiratory comorbid patients. A few comparative studies have recently evaluated the technique as an advantageous alternative to general anesthesia (GA). However, there is no systematic evaluation and comparison of the techniques. The present systematic review evaluated the hemodynamic, comfort, and satisfaction of patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic surgeries under STSA and GA. PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar Advanced, and citation tracking were performed to find suitable articles that compared STSA and GA. The primary objective-related data were hypotension and bradycardia. The secondary objective-related data in the context of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV), pain, rescue analgesics, sedation requirement, satisfaction, and comfort were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed for dichotomous data on hypotension, bradycardia, and PONV; odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Data of 394 patients from six studies were evaluated. Patients undergoing upper abdominal and breast surgeries under STSA had significantly higher odds of hypotension (Fixed-Effect Model OR 12.23, 95% CI 2.81-53.28; I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 12.01, 95% CI 2.75-52.52; I2 =0%) and bradycardia (Fixed-Effect Model OR 10.95, 95% CI 2.94-40.74, I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 9.97, 95% CI 2.61-38.08; I2 =0%) but lower odds of PONV (Fixed-Effect Model OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.43; I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.45; I2 =0%). Most of the patients undergoing STSA were given intravenous sedation to overcome anxiety and discomfort. Overall, patient satisfaction was on par with GA. However, few surgeons were unenthusiastic about the technique while performing axillary clearances due to bothering twitches from cautery. STSA led to early post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge and provided better pain control, lowering the need for rescue analgesics and opioid consumption in the first 24-hour postoperative period. STSA is associated with very high odds of hypotension and bradycardia as compared to GA. On the other hand, STSA demonstrated superior pain control, reduced opioid requirements, shorter PACU stays, and significantly reduced risk of PONV. Nevertheless, STSA patients mostly require sedation to make the patient comfortable.

Comparative outcomes of awake spine surgery under spinal versus general anesthesia: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Awake surgery, under spinal anesthesia (SA), is an alternative to surgery under general anesthesia (GA), in neurological and spine surgery. In the literature, there seem to be some evidence supporting benefits associated with the use of this anesthetic modality, as compared to GA. Currently, there is a notable lack of updated and comprehensive review addressing the complications associated with both awake SA and GA in spine surgery. We hence aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the topic.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that assessed SA in spine surgery from database inception to April 14, 2023, in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Outcomes of interest included estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, operative time, and overall complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models.

RESULTS

In total, 38 studies that assessed 7820 patients were included. The majority of the operations that were treated with SA were single-level lumbar cases. Awake patients had significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay (Mean difference (MD): - 0.40 days; 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.17) and operative time (MD: - 19.17 min; 95% CI - 29.68 to - 8.65) compared to patients under GA. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in patients under GA than SA (RR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.47-0.74]). Patients under GA had significantly higher rates of postoperative nausea/vomiting RR, 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.90]) and urinary retention (RR, 0.61 [95% CI 0.37-0.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing awake spine surgery under SA had significantly shorter operations and hospital stays, and fewer rates of postoperative nausea and urinary retention as compared to GA. In summary, awake spine surgery offers a valid alternative to GA and added benefits in terms of postsurgical complications, while being associated with relatively low morbidity.

Perioperative Management Conundrum for a Case With Multiple Commonly Used Drug Hypersensitivity

Perioperative hypersensitivity reactions vary from mild to potentially fatal anaphylaxis, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Most of the perioperative hypersensitivity and allergic reactions are attributed to antibiotics, antiseptic solutions, latex, and opioids. In the current thrust for opioid-free anesthesia, owing to its multiple advantages, paracetamol and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents play a significant role in multi-modal pain and inflammatory response management. Nearly nine out of ten individuals experience postoperative pain, one-third experience postoperative nausea and vomiting, and one-fourth experience fever, irrespective of surgery and type of anesthesia, often as an inflammatory response. While perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are common, a patient allergic to multiple commonly used drugs for the treatment of pain, fever, acid-peptic disorder, and nausea and vomiting is scarce. Such cases pose a great challenge in perioperative management. A 14-year-old male child with a traumatic foot drop planned for tibialis posterior tendon transfer developed an allergic reaction with mild fever following an injection of Ranitidine and Ondansetron in the preoperative area. Surgery was deferred and was investigated for allergy profile testing for commonly used drugs, which showed high IgE levels and moderate to severe hypersensitivity for diclofenac and paracetamol. The patient was operated on after one month under spinal anesthesia, avoiding ranitidine, ondansetron, diclofenac, and paracetamol. The following morning, he developed a high-grade fever (102.3° F), which did not resolve with conservative measures. Hypersensitivity and allergic reactions to NSAIDs are reported in the literature. While there are multiple drugs available as NSAIDs, cross-sensitivity or allergy to other drugs within the same group, and even chemically related groups, is also another possibility that needs to be considered while managing such patients. Mefenamic acid controlled the fever, and the child was discharged home after 48 hours of observation. However, the case posed a great perioperative management dilemma; the present report intends to highlight and discuss it.

Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Observational Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

The expanding horizons of the application of Segmental Thoracic Spinal anesthesia in day-to-day anesthesia practice prompted us to perform this study in a large subset of healthy patients with the aim of determining the feasibility, safety, advantages, and complications of this mode of anesthesia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The prospective observational study was conducted from April 2020 to March 2022, 2.146 patients with symptoms of cholelithiasis and planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study, and 44 patients from this study were excluded due to pre-defined exclusion criteria. The patients belonging to ASA lIl, lV, severe cardiovascular or renal disability, on beta blockers, coagulation anomaly, spinal deformities, or previous spine surgeries were not included in the study. The patients exhibiting allergy to local anesthetics, requiring more than two attempts for the procedure, patchy or inadequate effects after spinal anesthesia, or change in the plan of surgery intraoperatively were also excluded from the study. All other patients were given subarachnoid block at T10-T11 intervertebral space with 26G Quincke needle and Inj. Bupivacaine Heavy (0.5%) 2.4 mL with 5µg of Dexmedetomidine. Intraoperative parameters, number of attempts, the incidence of paresthesia during the procedure intraoperative and postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated and recorded.

RESULTS

Spinal anesthesia was successful in 2,074 patients and was achieved in a single attempt of procedure in 92% of patients. The incidence of paresthesia during needle insertion was 5.8%. Hypotension was observed in 18% of patients, bradycardia (13%), and nausea (10%) in a few patients, with shoulder tip pain in only 6% of patients. The majority of patients (94%) were "very satisfied" with the procedure. There were no episodes of any adverse event during the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

 Thoracic spinal anesthesia is a regional anesthesia technique practically feasible for healthy patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a manageable incidence of intraoperative complications and no evidence of any neurological complications. It has the advantage of providing manageable hemodynamics, minimal postoperative complication, and an acceptable degree of patient satisfaction.