Direct Cortical Motor Evoked Potentials Versus Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials for the Detection of Cortical Ischemia During Supratentorial Craniotomy: Case Report

Neuromonitoring Guided Vessel Identification in Iatrogenic Arterial Injury During Meningioma Resection

Neuromonitoring is commonly used in neurosurgery and allows intraoperative assessment of functional pathways in the brain during surgery. Monitoring alerts can guide surgical decision making in real-time allowing surgeons to mitigate or avoid potential iatrogenic injury and subsequent postoperative neurologic sequelae that may result from cerebral ischemia or malperfusion. Here we present a case of a patient undergoing a right pterional craniotomy for the resection of a tumor which crosses midline with multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring including somatosensory evoked potentials, transcranial motor evoked potentials, and visual evoked potentials. During the final portion of tumor resection, arterial bleeding was noted of unknown origin shortly followed by loss of right lower extremity motor evoked potential recordings. Motor evoked potential recordings in the right upper, and left upper and lower extremities were stable, as well as all somatosensory evoked potentials and visual evoked potentials. This distinct pattern of right lower extremity motor-evoked potential loss suggested compromise of the contralateral anterior cerebral artery and guided the surgeons to a rapid intervention. The patient awoke from surgery with moderate postoperative weakness in the affected limb that resolved to preoperative status by postoperative day 2, and back to normal strength prior to three-month follow-up. In this case the neuromonitoring data suggested compromise to the contralateral anterior cerebral artery which guided the surgeons to investigate and identify the site of vascular injury. The present case reinforces the utility of neuromonitoring in emergent surgical situations to guide surgical decision making.

Short and long-term prognostic value of intraoperative motor evoked potentials in brain tumor patients: a case series of 121 brain tumor patients

PURPOSE

Iatrogenic neurologic deficits adversely affect patient outcomes following brain tumor resection. Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring allows surgeons to assess the integrity of motor-eloquent areas in real-time during tumor resection to lessen the risk of iatrogenic insult. We retrospectively associate intraoperative transcranial and direct cortical MEPs (TC-MEPs, DC-MEPs) to early and late post-operative motor function to prognosticate short- and long-term motor recovery in brain tumor patients undergoing surgical resection in peri-eloquent regions.

METHODS

We reviewed 121 brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomies with DC-MEP and/or TC-MEP monitoring. Motor function scores were recorded at multiple time-points up to 1 year postoperatively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated at each time point.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of TC-MEP in the immediate postoperative period was 17.5%, 100%, 100%, and 69.4%, respectively. For DC-MEP monitoring, the respective values were 25.0%, 100%, 100%, and 68.8%. By discharge, sensitivity had increased for both TC-MEP and DC MEPs to 43.8%, and 50.0% respectively. Subset analysis on patients without tumor recurrence/progression at long term follow-up (n = 62 pts, 51.2%) found that all patients with stable monitoring maintained or improved from preoperative status. One patient with transient intraoperative TC-MEP loss and permanent DC-MEP loss suffered a permanent deficit.

CONCLUSION

Brain tumor patients who undergo surgery with intact MEP monitoring and experience new postoperative deficits likely suffer transient deficits that will improve over the postoperative course in the absence of disease progression.

Deliberate Parent Artery Sacrifice Guided by Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Complex Surgical Clipping of a Ruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm

Aneurysms arising from the anterior communicating artery (ACOA) are the most common intracranial aneurysms encountered. Most aneurysms can be treated with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling; however, there are times when parent vessel sacrifice (PVS) is necessary such as aneurysms with fragile necks or large/giant aneurysms. Application of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) can assist in guiding permissive temporary vessel occlusion during complex aneurysm clippings. However, to-date there is no literature that describes how IONM can be used as a predictor of post-operative neurological status when PVS is employed or as a guide to determine whether PVS is safe. We present a case where IONM guided the sacrifice of the A1 and anterior communicating arteries after 2 hours and 25 min of temporary vessel occlusion. No attenuation was noted in the IONM at any point during the procedure, and the IONM predicted the patient would awake neurologically intact.

Temporary vessel occlusion in cerebral aneurysm surgery guided by direct cortical motor evoked potentials

BACKGROUND

Temporary clipping is an important tool in the vascular neurosurgeon's armamentarium. We routinely utilize intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for complex brain aneurysm surgery cases, relying on direct cortical motor evoked potential (DCMEP) alerts to guide the duration of temporary clipping. Previous studies have argued for relatively short and intermittent temporary clipping strategies. In this study, we sought to assess the maximal permissive temporary clipping time during complex aneurysm surgery. To do this, we assessed patient outcome in relation to temporary clip duration guided by DCMEP.

METHODS

We queried our prospectively collected neuromonitoring database for anterior circulation aneurysm cases where temporary clipping was utilized by a single cerebrovascular surgeon between 2018 and 2021. Operative and IONM reports were reviewed. Patients in whom the duration of temporary clipping could not be determined were excluded. The operative strategy permissively allowed continuous temporary clipping as long as no neuromonitoring alerts were encountered. Maximal permissive parent artery occlusion time (Clip_max) was recorded as the longest duration of tolerated temporary vessel clipping without decrement in DCMEP.

RESULTS

A total of 41 complex anterior circulation aneurysm clipping cases met criteria for this study. The mean Clip_max for all cases was just over 19 min and did not differ between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Initial alert times were not found to be predictive of final permissive temporary clip duration after re-perfusion. In 100% (41/41) of cases, the aneurysm was completely clip occluded without residual on catheter angiogram. Stable or improved modified Rankin Score was achieved in 98% (40/41) of cases at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that using DCMEP can facilitate relatively long but safe temporary clipping durations in complex anterior circulation aneurysm surgery. In the endovascular era with only a limited subset of technically challenging aneurysms needing open surgical treatment, extended permissive temporary clipping guided by DCMEPs can significantly enhance a surgeon's ability to achieve excellent technical and clinical outcomes.

Postoperative Focal Lower Extremity Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome refers to varying degrees of transient hemiparesis and mutism following insult to the medial posterior frontal lobe. We describe a rare case of an isolated lower limb SMA deficit with associated pre- and post-operative multimodality neurophysiological monitoring data. We review the literature on SMA somatotopy and the prognostic abilities of intraoperative motor evoked potentials in suspected SMA dysfunction. A 45-year-old male underwent staged resection of a complex parasagittal WHO grade II meningioma involving the posterior superior frontal gyrus bilaterally. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with transcranial motor evoked potentials (TCMEP) and direct cortical motor evoked potentials (DCMEP) were used during both stages of resection. The patient developed an isolated left foot drop despite unchanged DCMEP and TCMEP data obtained during the first stage of the procedure. During the second stage of resection 3 days later, repeat neurophysiological monitoring confirmed intact corticospinal tracts. Deep peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) revealed good morphology, appropriate latency and amplitudes during the second stage of resection. These results suggested a diagnosis of focal SMA dysfunction. Left foot drop persisted 7 days post-operatively. At one month follow up, the patient was neurologically intact with full strength noted in all muscle groups of the left lower extremity. An improved understanding of the somatotopic organization of the SMA with additional neuromonitoring data can allow neurosurgeons to better predict and understand perioperative SMA dysfunctions.

Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review

During intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP), heterogeneity across studies in terms of study populations, intraoperative settings, applied warning criteria, and outcome reporting exists. A scoping review of MEP warning criteria in supratentorial surgery was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Sixty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The most commonly used alarm criteria were MEP signal loss, which was always a major warning sign, followed by amplitude reduction and threshold elevation. Irreversible MEP alterations were associated with a higher number of transient and persisting motor deficits compared with the reversible changes. In almost all studies, specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were high, while in most of them, sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) were rather low or modest. Thus, the absence of an irreversible alteration may reassure the neurosurgeon that the patient will not suffer a motor deficit in the short-term and long-term follow-up. Further, MEPs perform well as surrogate markers, and reversible MEP deteriorations after successful intervention indicate motor function preservation postoperatively. However, in future studies, a consensus regarding the definitions of MEP alteration, critical duration of alterations, and outcome reporting should be determined.