Metformin-associated Severe Lactic Acidosis in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury

Unusual Extreme Leukocytosis in Metformin Overdose

We present the challenging differential diagnosis of an extreme leukocytosis noted at hospital admission of a patient with severe lactic acidosis and acute kidney injury secondary to metformin overdose. Laboratory and imaging work-up ruled out an infectious or malignant cause for severely increased leukocytes count; thus, it was established that the process of leukocyte demargination was the main cause of increased count of leukocytes. Discussion of available literature data is also presented. Our case report highlights the importance for clinicians to be aware of this possible spurious increase of leukocytes in acute non-infectious stressful conditions in order to avoid unnecessary antibiotics.

Emergence and Evidence: A Close Look at Bunge’s Philosophy of Medicine

In his book “Medical Philosophy: Conceptual issues in Medicine”, Mario Bunge provides a unique account of medical philosophy that is deeply rooted in a realist ontology he calls “systemism”. According to systemism, the world consists of systems and their parts, and systems possess emergent properties that their parts lack. Events within systems may form causes and effects that are constantly conjoined via particular mechanisms. Bunge supports the views of the evidence-based medicine movement that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the best evidence to establish the truth of causal hypothesis; in fact, he argues that only RCTs have this ability. Here, we argue that Bunge neglects the important feature of patients being open systems which are in steady interaction with their environment. We show that accepting this feature leads to counter-intuitive consequences for his account of medical hypothesis testing. In particular, we point out that (i) the confirmation of hypotheses is inherently stochastic and affords a probabilistic account of both confirmation and evidence which we provide here; (ii) RCTs are neither necessary nor sufficient to establish the truth of a causal claim; (iii) testing of causal hypotheses requires taking into account background knowledge and the context within which an intervention is applied. We conclude that there is no “best” research methodology in medicine, but that different methodologies should coexist in a complementary fashion.