The McKenzie Method Is an Effective Rehabilitation Paradigm for Treating Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Effects of myofascial release technique in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy: A single blind-randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the myofascial release technique in individuals diagnosed with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four cervical radiculopathy patients were randomly assigned to either the myofascial release group or the exercise group. Both groups received conventional treatment. Additionally, the exercise group performed stretching and strengthening exercises while the myofascial release group received the myofascial release technique. The pain pressure threshold, muscle strength, cervical range of motion, pain, and disability variables were assessed for all patients.

RESULTS

The myofascial release group demonstrated significantly larger improvements in flexion (p = 0.001), extension (p = 0.037), left rotation (p = 0.012), and left lateral flexion (p = 0.001) range of motions compared to the exercise group. Muscle strength in the wrist flexors (p < 0.001), wrist extensors (p < 0.010), biceps (p < 0.001) and triceps (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the myofascial release group compared to the exercise group. And, again, the myofascial release group demonstrated significantly larger improvements in wrist flexors (p < 0.001), wrist extensors (p < 0.001), biceps (p < 0.001), triceps (p < 0.001), pectorals (p < 0.001), subscapularis (p < 0.001), upper trapezius (p = 0.002), and the pain pressure threshold. Finally, the myofascial release group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain (p < 0.001) and disability (p < 0.001) scales compared to the exercise group.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of the arm muscle strength and pain pressure threshold variables in patients with cervical radiculopathy may benefit clinicians in the preparation of treatments. Cervical radiculopathy symptoms may improve after the application of myofascial release techniques. A customized cervical exercise program and conventional treatment could be added to the non-surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

Research Priorities in the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Among Diploma Therapists: An International Delphi Study

Introduction Mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) is the most researched approach in musculoskeletal physical therapy and involves classifying patients into sub-groups based on their response to loading strategies. MDT diploma therapists (Dip-MDTs) fully recognize the value of MDT in musculoskeletal physical therapy. MDT is updating its system based on the latest research, but the system has not yet been fully established. Therefore, more research is required to increase the comprehensibility of the system. Thus, we aimed to identify future research priorities of MDT. Methods We conducted a modified Delphi study with three rounds. The Research Advisory Committee (RAC) members (n=7) of the McKenzie Institute International were invited to participate in the initial idea generation round. In the subsequent two consensus rounds, Dip-MDTs (n=299) were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the results of the idea generation round using a five-point Likert scale. The criteria for consensus were mean score ≥4.0, coefficient of variation ≤30%, percent agreement ≥75%, and quartile deviation ≤1. A post-hoc analysis of the consensus was conducted when the number of participants from a certain country exceeded one-third of the total number of participants. Results The participation rates for each round were 57.1%, 52.2%, and 49.8%. The USA accounted for 43.6% and 44.3% of all participants at the two consensus rounds, respectively. Finally, nine items reached consensus in the second consensus round. After the post-hoc analysis, eight items reached consensus: (1) cost-effectiveness, (2) cervical and thoracic spine, (3) extremity classifications, (4) filtered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (5) spinal source classification, (6) centralization and directional preferences, (7) predictive factors for recurrence, and (8) patient education. Conclusion In this study, we identified the research priorities of MDT that would enhance the completion of the MDT system.

The Impact of the Addition of a Physical Therapy Assistant to the Treatment Team for Management of Neck Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Outpatient Physical Therapy Clinics

Introduction The impact of physical therapy assistants (PTAs) on patient outcomes, mostly in the acute and subacute setting, is well known in the literature. However, no study to date has examined the impact of using PTAs as part of a treatment team in the outpatient setting for common musculoskeletal conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine if physical therapy team composition, either physical therapists (PTs) only or a team consisting of PTs and PTAs, has a significant impact on patient outcomes in adult patients with musculoskeletal neck pain to help investigate an ideal practice pattern for outpatient physical therapy. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing the impact of physical therapy treatment team composition (PTs only, or team consisting of PTs and PTAs) on pain, active range-of-motion (AROM), and disability outcomes via the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in the conservative treatment of neck pain. All patients were treated with usual physical therapy care. Inclusion criteria involved patients with a diagnosis of neck pain (M48.2), older than 18 years old, a physical therapy evaluation procedure code (97161, 97162, 97163), and at least two visits per bout of physical therapy. Primary outcome measures were pain, bilateral rotation AROM, disability, and number of visits.  Results Included patients (n=195) had an average age of 60.8 years ± 16.1 years with an average number of total physical therapy visits of 7.4 visits ± 4.3 visits (range, 2 visits - 22 visits) with 120 patients (61.5%) treated by a PT only (PT-only group) and 75 patients (38.5%) treated by a team consisting of a PT and a PTA (PTA group). The PT-only group had significantly fewer visits than the PTA group (p<0.001). The PT-only group had a pain improvement of 2.1 points ± 2.3 points whereas the PTA group had a pain improvement of 2.2 points ± 2.4 points with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.573). The PT-only group (n=46 patients) had an average rotation AROM improvement of 20.0 ± 17.4 degrees whereas the PTA group (n=40 patients) had an average rotation AROM improvement of 16.8 degrees ± 23.0 degrees with no significant difference between the level of rotation AROM improvement between the two groups (p=0.408). Furthermore, there was also no significant difference in the amount of NDI improvement seen in both groups (p=0.594). Conclusion There was no significant difference in patient outcomes for pain, AROM, and disability when PTAs were added to the physical therapy treatment team in the conservative management of neck pain in the outpatient setting. However, patients treated with a treatment team consisting of PTAs had significantly more visits, despite no significant change in outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed as the reasons for these findings can be many and require further research.