1
|
Baranidharan G, Bretherton B, Feltbower RG, Timothy J, Khan AL, Subramanian A, Ahmed M, Crowther TA, Radford H, Gupta H, Chandramohan M, Beall DP, Deer TR, Hedman T. 24-Month Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using a Minimally Invasive Interspinous Fixation Device versus Standard Open Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison. J Pain Res 2024; 17:2079-2097. [PMID: 38894862 PMCID: PMC11182879 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s453343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose An early-stage, multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial with five-year follow-up was approved by Health Research Authority to compare the efficacy of a minimally invasive, laterally implanted interspinous fixation device (IFD) to open direct surgical decompression in treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Two-year results are presented. Patients and Methods Forty-eight participants were randomly assigned to IFD or decompression. Primary study endpoints included changes from baseline at 8-weeks, 6, 12 and 24-months follow-ups for leg pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), back pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), LSS physical function (Zurich Claudication Questionnaire), distance walked in five minutes and number of repetitions of sitting-to-standing in one minute. Secondary study endpoints included patient and clinician global impression of change, adverse events, reoperations, operating parameters, and fusion rate. Results Both treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in mean leg pain, back pain, ODI disability, LSS physical function, walking distance and sitting-to-standing repetitions compared to baseline over 24 months. Mean reduction of ODI from baseline levels was between 35% and 56% for IFD (p<0.002), and 49% to 55% for decompression (p<0.001) for all follow-up time points. Mean reduction of IFD group leg pain was between 57% and 78% for all time points (p<0.001), with 72% to 94% of participants having at least 30% reduction of leg pain from 8-weeks through 24-months. Walking distance for the IFD group increased from 66% to 94% and sitting-to-standing repetitions increased from 44% to 64% for all follow-up time points. Blood loss was 88% less in the IFD group (p=0.024) and operating time parameters strongly favoured IFD compared to decompression (p<0.001). An 89% fusion rate was assessed in a subset of IFD participants. There were no intraoperative device issues or re-operations in the IFD group, and only one healed and non-symptomatic spinous process fracture observed within 24 months. Conclusion Despite a low number of participants in the IFD group, the study demonstrated successful two-year safety and clinical outcomes for the IFD with significant operation-related advantages compared to surgical decompression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesan Baranidharan
- Pain Management Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Beatrice Bretherton
- Pain Management Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard G Feltbower
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jake Timothy
- Department of Neuroscience, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Almas Latif Khan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ashok Subramanian
- Somerset Spinal Surgery Service, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
| | - Mushtaq Ahmed
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Tracey A Crowther
- Pain Management Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Research & Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Helen Radford
- Research & Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Harun Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Thomas Hedman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah A, Hagedorn JM, Latif U, Bailey-Classen A, Azeem N, Beall DP, Mehta P, Stephens C, Khoo L, Deer TR. Posterior Lateral Arthrodesis as a Treatment Option for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Safety and Early Clinical Outcomes. J Pain Res 2024; 17:107-116. [PMID: 38196972 PMCID: PMC10775691 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s422736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition caused by degenerative changes in the lumbar spine with age. LSS is caused by a variety of factors, including degenerative spondylosis and spondylolisthesis. People suffering with LSS experience neurogenic claudication, which causes severe physical limitations, discomfort, and a decrease in quality of life. Less invasive procedures are now being researched to improve the prognosis, success rate, and safety of LSS treatments. Posterior lateral spinal arthrodesis (PLSA) is a new surgical treatment for LSS. This study looks at the procedural and patient safety of PLSA. Materials and methods This study is a multicenter retrospective analysis of the safety of PLSA who met the clinical indications for PLSA and underwent the procedure at eight interventional spine practices. Data was collected on demographical information, pre-procedural numeric rating scale score (NRS), post-procedural NRS, and complication reporting. Patients who were included had LSS with or without spondylolisthesis and had failed conservative treatments. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed to report the outcomes. Results were reported as mean and standard deviations for continuous outcomes, and frequency (%) for categorical outcomes. Results This retrospective analysis involved 191 patients and 202 PLSA implants. The majority of patients were male Caucasians with a mean age of 69.2 years and a BMI of 31.1. A large majority of implants were placed at the L4-5 level, and the average pre-procedural NRS was 6.3 while the average post-procedural NRS was 3.1, indicating a 50.8% reduction in pain (p < 0.0001). Two patients reported complications, but they were unrelated to the device or surgical procedure; no infections, device malfunctions, or migrations were reported in the patient cohort. Conclusion Preliminary results with PLSA implants indicate that it is a safe treatment option for patients with moderate LSS who do not respond to conservative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj Shah
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Usman Latif
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Nomen Azeem
- Florida Spine & Pain Specialists, Riverview, FL, USA
| | | | - Pankaj Mehta
- Pain Specialists of Austin and Central Texas Pain Center, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Chad Stephens
- Noble Pain Management and Sports Medicine, Southlake, TX, USA
| | - Larry Khoo
- The Spine Clinic of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Ray Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Falowski SM, Raso LJ, Mangal V, Nairizi A, Patterson DG, Danko MD, Justiz R, Vogel RS, Koga S, Josephson Y, Pope JE, Raji OR. Early Functional Outcomes in Low Back Pain Subjects with a Novel Interspinous Fusion Device: REFINE Study 6-Month Results. J Pain Res 2023; 16:4113-4126. [PMID: 38058981 PMCID: PMC10697144 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s427407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Lumbar interlaminar decompression with interspinous fixation is an established safe and effective treatment for spinal stenosis. Early maintenance of improvements in pain intensity and function are critical for durability of symptom relief. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of minimally invasive treatments for low back pain during the early period after treatment and their utility in setting the course for longer term success. Patients and Methods This study utilized patient evaluations at 3- and 6-months following treatment and is part of an actively enrolling, institutional review board (IRB) approved, single-arm, multicenter, prospective, open-label 12-month study. Clinical efficacy was assessed primarily using the change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the back and leg pain during walking and standing, and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and secondarily using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1. The safety endpoints were the adverse events and reoperations or revisions at the index level(s). Results At 6-month post-op, 76%, 62%-64%, and 64% of patients demonstrated clinical meaningful, and statistically significant improvement in their pain as defined by ZCQ, VAS (back and leg), and ODI, respectively. In addition, 78% of patients noted improvement in PGIC. Two procedure-related adverse events were noted which fully resolved without surgical intervention. Conclusion This 6-month interim analysis at 42% enrollment of patients was conducted to determine prolonged safety and efficacy of the interspinous fusion device. Our analysis showed a sustained improvement in clinical efficacy, and safety endpoints, when compared to the 3-months evaluations, across both interventional pain and neurosurgery specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Falowski
- Argires-Marotti Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | | | - Vipul Mangal
- National Spine and Pain Centers, Oxon Hill, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rainer S Vogel
- Comprehensive and Interventional Pain Management, Henderson, NV, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Skoblar M, Hedman T, Rogers AJ, Jasper GP, Beall DP. Instrumented Posterior Arthrodesis of the Lumbar Spine: Prospective Study Evaluating Fusion Outcomes in Patients Receiving an Interspinous Fixation Device for the Treatment of Degenerative Spine Diseases. J Pain Res 2023; 16:2909-2918. [PMID: 37649625 PMCID: PMC10463371 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s417319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Prospective evaluation of radiographic fusion outcomes in patients receiving instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine using a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device. Patients and Methods All patients (n = 110) from a single US physician's practice who received instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine with a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device in the calendar year 2020 were invited to return for a follow-up CT scan to radiographically assess fusion. Forty-three patients, representing 69 total treated levels, consented to participate and received a lumbar CT scan at a mean of 459 days post-surgery (177 to 652). The interspinous/interlaminar fusion was assessed by 3 independent radiologists using a novel grading scale. Spinous process fractures were also assessed. Results 92.8% of the assessed levels were considered fused. There were no intraoperative spinous process fractures. There were 4 spinous process fractures (5.8%) identified on CT imaging, all of which were asymptomatic and healed without subsequent intervention. There were no instances of device mechanical failure or device-related reoperation. Conclusion Instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine using a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device provides clinically meaningful fusion rates with no reoperations and a low risk of spinous process fracture or other device-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Hedman
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Spinal Simplicity LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|