1
|
Fairhurst K, Roberts K, Fairbrother P, Potter S. Current use of drains and management of seroma following mastectomy and axillary surgery: results of a United Kingdom national practice survey. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:187-196. [PMID: 37878150 PMCID: PMC10787912 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07042-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Up to 40% of the 56,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer each year in the UK undergo mastectomy. Seroma formation following surgery is common, may delay wound healing, and be uncomfortable or delay the start of adjuvant treatment. Multiple strategies to reduce seroma formation include surgical drains, flap fixation and external compression exist but evidence to support best practice is lacking. We aimed to survey UK breast surgeons to determine current practice to inform the feasibility of undertaking a future trial. METHODS An online survey was developed and circulated to UK breast surgeons via professional and trainee associations and social media to explore current attitudes to drain use and management of post-operative seroma. Simple descriptive statistics were used to summarise the results. RESULTS The majority of surgeons (82/97, 85%) reported using drains either routinely (38, 39%) or in certain circumstances (44, 45%). Other methods for reducing seroma such as flap fixation were less commonly used. Wide variation was reported in the assessment and management of post-operative seromas. Over half (47/91, 52%) of respondents felt there was some uncertainty about drain use after mastectomy and axillary surgery and two-thirds (59/91, 65%) felt that a trial evaluating the use of drains vs no drains after simple breast cancer surgery was needed. CONCLUSIONS There is a need for a large-scale UK-based RCT to determine if, when and in whom drains are necessary following mastectomy and axillary surgery. This work will inform the design and conduct of a future trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Fairhurst
- Centre for Surgical Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
| | - K Roberts
- Bristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| | - P Fairbrother
- Independent Cancer Patient Voice (ICPV), London, England
| | - S Potter
- Centre for Surgical Research, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ballance L, Wilson RL, Kirwan CC, Boundouki G, Taxiarchi VP, Baker BG, Rusius V, Rowland M, Henderson JR, Marikakis N, McAleer J, Harvey JR, Northwest Breast Research Collaborative OBOT. Return to Activities of Daily Living after Breast Cancer Surgery: An Observational Prospective Questionnaire-Based Study of Patients Undergoing Mastectomy with or without Immediate Reconstruction. Breast J 2023; 2023:9345780. [PMID: 37771428 PMCID: PMC10533274 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9345780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Background Patients often ask about the time taken to return to activities of daily living (ADLs) after breast surgery, but there is a lack of data to give accurate guidance. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a study to determine the time taken to return to ADLs after mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods A prospective multicentre, self-reported questionnaire-based feasibility study of women who had undergone mastectomy ± reconstruction was performed, between Jan 2017 and Dec 2019. Women were asked to self-report when they returned to 15 ADLs with a 5-option time scale for "return to activity." Results The questionnaire was returned by 42 patients (median [range] age: 64 [31-84]). Of these, 22 had simple mastectomy, seven mastectomy and implant reconstruction, seven mastectomy and autologous reconstruction (DIEP), and six did not specify. Overall, over 90% could manage stairs and brush hair by two weeks and 84% could get in and out of the bath by four weeks. By 1-2 months, 92% could do their own shopping and 86% could drive. 68% of women employed returned to work within four months. Compared to simple mastectomy, patients undergoing reconstruction took a longer time to return to getting in/out of bath (<2 vs. 2-4 weeks), vacuuming (2-4 weeks vs. 1-2 months), and fitness (1-2 vs. 3-4 months). There was a slower return to shopping (1-2 months vs. 2-4 weeks), driving and work (both 3-4 vs. 1-2 months), and sports (3-4 vs. 1-2 months) in autologous reconstruction compared to implant reconstruction. Conclusion This study is feasible. It highlights slower return to specific activities (particularly strength-based) in reconstruction patients, slower in autologous compared with implant reconstruction. The impact on return to ADLs should be discussed as part of the preoperative counselling as it will inform patients and help guide their decision making. A larger study is required to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Ballance
- The Nightingale Breast Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - R. L. Wilson
- The Nightingale Breast Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - C. C. Kirwan
- The Nightingale Breast Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - G. Boundouki
- Sheffield Breast Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
| | - V. P. Taxiarchi
- The Nightingale Breast Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - B. G. Baker
- The Nightingale Breast Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - V. Rusius
- Burnley Breast Unit, Burnley General Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Casterton Avenue, Burnley BB10 2PQ, UK
| | - M. Rowland
- Liverpool Breast Unit, Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
| | - J. R. Henderson
- Liverpool Breast Unit, Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
| | - N. Marikakis
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3LY, UK
| | - J. McAleer
- Breast Care Centre, Ainscoe House, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, 12 E Park Dr, Blackpool FY3 8DX, UK
| | - J. R. Harvey
- The Nightingale Breast Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|