Predictors of Lymph Node Involvement by Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremity: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

Early distinction of lymph node metastasis in patients with soft tissue sarcoma and individualized survival prediction using the online available nomograms: A population-based analysis

Background

The presence of metastatic tumor cells in regional lymph nodes is considered as a significant indicator for inferior prognosis. This study aimed to construct some predictive models to quantify the probability of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival rate of patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with LNM.

Methods

Research data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2017, and data of patients with STS from our medical institution were collected to form an external testing set. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the independent risk factors for developing LNM. On the basis of the identified variables, we developed a diagnostic nomogram to predict the risk of LNM in patients with STS. Those patients with STS presenting with LNM were retrieved to build a cohort for identifying the independent prognostic factors through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Then, two nomograms incorporating the independent prognostic predictors were developed to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with STS with LNM. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis was conducted to study the survival difference. Moreover, validations of these nomograms were performed by the receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve, calibration curves, and the decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

A total of 16,601 patients with STS from the SEER database were enrolled in our study, of which 659 (3.97%) had LNM at the initial diagnosis. K-M survival analysis indicated that patients with LNM had poorer survival rate. Sex, histology, primary site, grade, M stage, and T stage were found to be independently related with development of LNM in patients with STS. Age, grade, histology, M stage, T stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery were identified as the independent prognostic factors for OS of patients with STS with LNM, and age, grade, M stage, T stage, radiotherapy, and surgery were determined as the independent prognostic factors for CSS. Subsequently, we constructed three nomograms, and their online versions are as follows: https://tyxupup.shinyapps.io/probabilityofLNMforSTSpatients/, https://tyxupup.shinyapps.io/OSofSTSpatientswithLNM/, and https://tyxupup.shinyapps.io/CSSofSTSpatientswithLNM/. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of diagnostic nomogram were 0.839 in the training set, 0.811 in the testing set, and 0.852 in the external testing set. For prognostic nomograms, the AUCs of 24-, 36-, and 48-month OS were 0.820, 0.794, and 0.792 in the training set and 0.759, 0.728, and 0.775 in the testing set, respectively; the AUCs of 24-, 36-, and 48-month CSS were 0.793, 0.777, and 0.775 in the training set and 0.775, 0.744, and 0.738 in the testing set, respectively. Furthermore, calibration curves suggested that the predicted values were consistent with the actual values. For the DCA, our nomograms showed a superior net benefit across a wider scale of threshold probabilities for the prediction of risk and survival rate for patients with STS with LNM.

Conclusion

These newly proposed nomograms promise to be useful tools in predicting the risk of LNM for patients with STS and individualized survival prediction for patients with STS with LNM, which may help to guide clinical practice.

Clinicopathologic features, prognostic factors, and outcomes of visceral sarcomas: A retrospective 12-year single-center study

Background

Visceral sarcomas are a rare form of soft tissue sarcoma. This study aimed to evaluate the survival and prognostic factors and effective treatments for visceral sarcomas.

Methods

All patients with visceral sarcoma referred to our center between January 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test were used for survival analysis.

Results

A total of 53 patients with visceral sarcoma were analyzed in this study with the median age at diagnosis of 57 (range, 24-77) years. Among them, 37 (69.8%) and 16 (30.2%) patients had localized and metastatic diseases at the initial presentation, respectively, and 44 patients underwent surgical resection. The median follow-up, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 63.0 (range, 2-130), 42.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.879-73.121) and 45.0 months (95% CI 9.938-80.062), respectively. The 5-year EFS and OS rates were 44% and 46%, respectively. Univariate analysis of prognostic indicators illustrated that metastasis at presentation, surgery, surgical margin and the types of surgery were significantly associated with OS and EFS. In this study, combined chemotherapy or radiotherapy had no effects on EFS and OS.

Conclusion

Primary visceral sarcoma is an uncommon and aggressive malignant tumor with a higher rate of local recurrence. In the largest cohort of visceral sarcomas in China to date, we identified metastases at presentation, surgery, surgical margin, and the types of surgery as independent predictors of survival. The combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy did not affect survival.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Formal Lymphadenectomy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single Center Experience of 86 Consecutive Cases

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastases (LNMs) are rare in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and there is limited evidence to guide clinical management. We describe our experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and lymphadenectomy in STS patients.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review was performed for patients with STS treated with SLNB and/or lymphadenectomy from 1994 to 2018. Clinicopathologic characteristics, multimodality treatment, regional/distant recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were examined.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients underwent SLNB (n = 34) and/or lymphadenectomy (n = 60) for STS. The most frequent histologic subtypes were epithelioid, clear cell, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Eight of 34 (23.5%) patients had a positive SLNB with 5-year OS of 71.4% compared with 71.9% for those with a negative SLNB. Eight of the 26 SLN-negative patients (30.8%) eventually developed nodal recurrence (n = 2) and/or (n = 6) distant metastasis with an estimated 5-year OS of 50%. Of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy, estimated 5-year OS was 44.6% and median RFS was 12 months. Eight (13.3%) had distant disease at time of lymphadenectomy, 20 (33.3%) developed distant recurrence after lymphadenectomy, and 6 (10%) developed regional-only recurrence. Patients with regional-only recurrence after lymphadenectomy had an estimated 5-year OS of 66.7% compared with 29.1% for those who recurred distantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with positive SLNB had similar survival to those with negative SLNB. Lymphadenectomy for isolated nodal disease is associated with poor RFS but reasonable 5-year OS when recurrence is regional-only. In STS, regional disease appears clinically distinct from distant metastatic disease and has better outcomes.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis of soft tissue sarcomas of the head, neck, and extremities, and the clinical significance of negative lymph node dissection

Background

This study sought to define the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the head, neck, and extremities, and the clinical significance of negative lymph node dissection (NLND).

Methods

STS patient data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1988 to 2015 were extracted and pooled. Logistics regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for LNM, Cox proportional hazards and Fine–Grey’s models were used for survival analysis, and Propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was used to assess the impact of NLND on patient prognosis.

Results

A total of 3276 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 283 (8.6%) developed LNM. Rhabdomyosarcoma had the highest rate of LNM (25.3%), followed by clear cell sarcoma (16.8%) and epithelioid sarcoma (12.4%), while leiomyosarcoma had the lowest rate of LNM (1.3%). Sex, tumor size, grade, histology, and site were significantly associated with LNM. For specific histologic subtypes of STS, NLND significantly improves overall survival (HR: 0.718, 95%CI 0.535–0.962; P = 0.026) and cancer-specific survival (HR: 0.699, 95%CI 0.506–0.967; P = 0.031) and reduces cancer-specific mortality (Gray’s test, P = 0.017). However, NLND did not improve overall survival (P = 0.46) or reduce cancer-specific mortality (Gray’s test, P = 0.772) of patients with leiomyosarcoma.

Conclusions

Histology is an independent risk factor for LNM in STS of the head, neck, and extremities. Prophylactic NLND treatment was necessary and had a clinical benefit for patients with STS who were at high risk for LNM but had no significant impact on the prognosis of patients with leiomyosarcoma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03050-3.

Epithelioid Sarcoma of the External Auditory Canal: An Uncommon Tumor at an Unusual Site and a Brief Overview of the Literature

We present a case (41 years old pregnant female) with epithelioid sarcoma arising in the left external auditory canal. On immunohistochemistry, the tumor cell diffusely expressed cytokeratins and showed patchy expression of ERG and CD34. The neoplastic cells demonstrated uniform loss of INI1-expression. Epithelioid sarcoma arising in the external auditory canal is rare. Awareness that ES may rarely arise at unusual sites is of critical importance in order to apply a broad enough panel in the immunohistochemical study, so a misdiagnosis of carcinoma can be avoided.

Lymphadenopathy in Fungating Extremity Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Metastasis or Reactive?

BACKGROUND

Patients with fungating extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) can develop lymphadenopathy, which can represent nodal metastasis or benign reactive adenopathy.

METHODS

In 1787 patients with STS, 67 (3.7%) had fungating extremity STS. In the 62 patients who met our inclusion criteria, we evaluated prevalence and histopathology of lymphadenopathy, factors associated with lymphadenopathy and nodal metastasis, and prevalence of and factors associated with lung metastasis and survival time from fungation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to analyze node pathology, lung metastasis, and survival duration with α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Lymphadenopathy occurred in 11 of 62 patients (18%), 6 with nodal metastasis and 5 with reactive adenopathy. The only factor associated with lymphadenopathy was location of primary tumor in the upper extremity (p = 0.02). No tumor characteristics were associated with nodal metastasis. In all five patients with reactive adenopathy, the condition was recognized within 3 days after tumor fungation. Lymphadenopathy recognized more than 3 days after tumor fungation was likely to be nodal metastasis. Forty-one percent of patients developed lung metastasis, which was not associated with presence of lymphadenopathy or any patient or tumor characteristic. Age, tumor size, and Black and Asian race were independently associated with greater risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Eighteen percent of patients with fungating extremity STS developed lymphadenopathy. Approximately half of cases represented nodal metastasis, and half represented reactive adenopathy. Lymphadenopathy that develops within 3 days after tumor fungation should increase suspicion for reactive adenopathy versus nodal metastasis.