The Use of High Volume Plasmapheresis in Acute Liver Failure

Sequential Use of High-Volume Plasma Exchange and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Hepatitis B Virus-Related Acute Liver Failure: A Case Report

Background

Acute liver failure (ALF) may represent an indication for liver transplantation (LT). However, in patients who do not meet the criteria or who have contraindications for LT, support measures remain indicated since they may improve survival. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be considered in the presence of hyperammonemia, 3 times above the upper normal limit, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE), even in the absence of the classic indications. High-volume plasma exchange (HVPE) is an artificial liver support system with proven benefits in ALF, allowing ammonia and inflammatory mediator clearance. Both techniques, HVPE and CRRT, are associated with an increase in transplant-free survival.

Case Summary

We share a case of a 51-year-old male, without relevant personal history, diagnosed with severe acute hepatitis B which progressed to ALF, with grade IV HE (West-Haven criteria) and hyperammonemia (423 μg/dL). Due to the simultaneously diagnosed malignant neoplasm, he was not a candidate for LT. After refractory to medical therapy, HVPE was started, followed by CRRT. There was a significant improvement in liver tests, allowing surgical treatment of malignancy. After recovery, the patient returned to his everyday life.

Conclusion

The authors present a successful case in which an early and invasive approach to ALF was revealed to be a game changer. The lack of response to the measures instituted, as well as the contraindication for LT, motivated the institution of HVPE and CRRT. Both techniques proved to be an asset, allowing complete clinical recovery, reaffirming their role in ALF.

Transplant Hepatectomy With Portacaval Shunt and MARS Therapy for Perioperative Catastrophe: A Series of Four Liver Transplant Cases

Increased worldwide focus on maximal donor utilization and transplantation of patients once considered too ill to survive liver transplantation may increase the otherwise rare frequency of catastrophic graft failure. Although the deleterious effects of an acutely failing allograft have been established for decades, the optimal strategy in this patient population in the perioperative period remains ill-defined.