The Comparative Evaluation of Patient's Satisfaction and Comfort Level by Diode Laser and Scalpel in the Management of Mucogingival Anomalies

A review on modern prosthodontic practice using laser

Lasers are a very appealing technology in many areas of dentistry because of their minimally invasive nature, quick tissue interaction & response, and ability to heal. Numerous investigations on the possible uses of lasers in dentistry have been carried out since Maiman developed the ruby laser in 1960. Numerous applications such as quick prototyping and computer-aided design, and the study of occlusion in complete denture using three-dimensional laser scanning has been used to develop dentures. Its uses are numerous from fixed prosthodontics to dentinal hypersensitivity treatment to surface treatment of base metal alloys. These days, it even encompasses maxillofacial prosthodontics and dental implantology. Hence, it is of interest to review the use of lasers in clinical prosthodontics.

Power Output of Two Semiconductor Lasers: An Observational Study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the power output of two dental devices. The study examined two semiconductor lasers, namely, SIROLaser Blue (445 nm, 970 nm) and Picasso (810 nm). The power output performance was studied at the maximum output power of the devices. The study compared the preset power output measured by a power meter in a continuous-wave mode and in pulsed mode at 50% duty cycles. Ten 60 s measurements were performed for each setting. The largest difference between the stipulated and the actual output power at continuous-wave (D-cw) and pulsed (D-p) modes was calculated. Moreover, the percentage variations in the mean output power at continuous-wave (%D-cw) and pulsed (%D-p) modes were calculated. The D-cw values for 445 nm, 970 nm, and 810 nm lasers were 0.7 W, 0.5 W, and −0.3 W, respectively, and %D-cw values were 21%, 23%, and −8%, respectively. The D-p values for 445 nm, 970 nm, and 810 nm lasers were 1.1 W, 0.5 W, and −0.1 W, respectively, whereas the %D-p values were 37%, 26%, and −3%, respectively. This study found that the actual power is not necessarily lower but can be higher than the displayed power output. Clinicians are recommended to calibrate the laser output by using a power meter before use.

Most effective method for the management of physiologic gingival hyperpigmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aim:

Gingival hyperpigmentation is an esthetic problem. The aim of the present study was to identify most effective treatment modality for managing generalized physiological gingival pigmentation.

Materials and Methods:

A systematic review and meta-analysis were done (1919 to October 2018) using PubMed, CINHAL, Dental and Oral Science, and manual searches. Twenty-five articles were finally reviewed. Only human clinical trials were considered with physiological gingival pigmentation treated with different depigmentation methods and compared with surgical stripping. The outcome was the achievement of gingival depigmentation and its recurrence. RevMan software was used for data analysis.

Results:

Of 26,132 articles, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen were randomized control trials and 8 were nonrandomized control trials. Most of the studies were on laser. The control group was scalpel surgery. Majority of studies showed no difference in compared treatment modality. A meta-analysis compared laser ablation with surgical stripping revealed a nonsignificance difference regarding recurrence (P = 0.75) and depigmentation (P = 0.23) and a statistically significant difference regarding postoperative pain favoring laser ablation (P ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions:

Surgical stripping has been the conventional treatment of choice, but our review showed that new techniques are equally effective or even better. Laser especially diode laser was the most frequently used technique and showed better esthetic outcomes, less pain, faster healing, and patients' preference and satisfaction after treatment. However, laser showed more regimentation at 6-month evaluation. More good quality randomized controlled trials with different depigmentation methods are needed to draw strong conclusions.

Laser Surgery of Soft Tissue in Orthodontics: Review of the Clinical Trials

Introduction: Recently, a wide variety of procedures have been done by laser application in orthodontics. Apart from the mentioned range of various treatments, laser has become a tool for many soft tissue surgeries as an alternative to conventional scalpel-based technique during orthodontic treatments in the management of soft tissue. Due to scarce information in the latter subject, this study was designed in order to include clinical trials that included soft tissue ablation by laser in orthodontics. Methods: Literature was searched based on PubMed and Google Scholar databases in 5 years (2010-2015) with English language restriction and clinical trial design. Studies that performed soft tissue application of laser during orthodontic treatment were extracted by the authors. Results: Only eight studies met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found between laser ablation and conventional scalpel technique in the matter of treatment outcome. However, few issues remained to clarify the differences in the mentioned procedures. Conclusion: Laser performance can be recommended in case of preceding less bleeding and discomfort during surgical procedure. There are still quandaries among clinical application of scalpel-based surgery in aesthetic region with bracket-bonded teeth. Precaution and knowledge regarding the characteristics of laser beam such as wavelength, frequency, power and timing is extremely needed.