Identification of preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes in relation to delays in surgery for hip fractures

How do early geriatric intervention and time to surgery influence each other in the management of proximal hip fractures?

INTRODUCTION

Time to surgery (TTS) increases mortality risk in old patients with proximal femur fractures (PFFs). Orthogeriatric care pathways reduce mortality and length of stay, but the interaction between TTS and geriatric intervention remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify organisational variables-including geriatric intervention-that are predictive of 90-day mortality and explore their interactions with TTS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 7756 PFFs aged over 60 who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2017. Organisational factors influencing 90-day mortality (main outcome) were identified in an administrative database using log-rank tests. Variables such as a mobile geriatric team (MGT) intervening in the emergency department were screened. Selected variables were included in a Cox model alongside TTS and the AtoG score, a validated multidimensional prognostic tool (from 0 no comorbidity to ≥5). Statistical interactions between TTS and organisational variables were calculated.

RESULTS

MGT was one of the rare organisational variables with a protective effect: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, CI 95% [0.68-0.98], P = 0.03. MGT's strongest effect was for TTS up to 1 day (HR = 0.70, CI95% [0.53-0.92], P = 0.01) and then decreased beyond 2 days (HR = 0.97, CI95% [0.73-1.3], P = 0.08). In patients with an AtoG score ≤ 2, MGT was the strongest parameter: HR = 0.76, CI95% [0.60-0.93], P = 0.03, while the HR for TTS was 1.01 CI 95% [0.99; 1.02], P = 0.15. In patients with an AtoG>2, there was a synergic interaction between MGT and reduced TTS (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Geriatric intervention modulated the effect of TTS on 90-day mortality up to a TTS of 2 days. MGT had a positive impact on both vulnerable and earthier patients.

Rate of Complications after Hip Fractures Caused by Prolonged Time-to-Surgery Depends on the Patient's Individual Type of Fracture and Its Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are common injuries in the elderly and are usually treated with timely surgery. While severe postoperative complications are reported for up to 10% of patients, many studies identified predictive factors for the occurrence of complications postoperatively. A controversially discussed factor is "time-to-surgery". The aim of the study was to examine if time-to-surgery was associated with the occurrence of complications and if the complication rate differed between the patient individual fracture types of intracapsular on the one hand and extracapsular hip fractures on the other hand. We hypothesized that time-to-surgery had less impact on complications in intracapsular hip fractures compared to extracapsular ones, and therefore, guidelines should pay attention to the patient individual case scenario.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who were admitted to the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery of an academic teaching hospital for hip fracture surgery (n = 650) over a five-year period were included in the study. After the application of the exclusion criteria, such as periprosthetic or pathologic fractures, cases needed immediate surgical treatment, and after outlier adjustment, 629 cases remained in the study. Hip fractures were classified into intracapsular fractures (treated by hip arthroplasty) and extracapsular fractures (treated by intramedullary nailing osteosynthesis). The occurrence of severe complications in patients treated within 24 h was compared with patients treated later than 24 h after injury. For statistical evaluation, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of time-to-surgery interval on the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

Patients with an extracapsular fracture, which was treated with intramedullary nailing (44.5%), rarely suffered a serious complication when surgery was performed within 24 h after injury. However, when the interval of the time-to-surgery was longer than 24 h, the complication rate increased significantly (8.63% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.002). In contrast to this finding in patients with intracapsular fractures (55.5%), which were treated with cemented arthroplasty, complication rates did not depend on the 24 h interval (26.17% vs. 20.83%, p = 0.567).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of complications after surgical treatment of hip fractures is associated with the time interval between injury and surgery. A 24 h time interval between injury and surgical procedure seems to play a major role only in extracapsular fractures treated with osteosynthesis but not in intracapsular fractures treated with arthroplasty. Therefore, guidelines should take notice of the patient individual case scenario and, in particular, the individual hip fracture type.

Sex differences in clinical outcomes amongst 1105 patients admitted with hip fractures

Amongst hip fracture admissions, mortality is higher in men than in women. However, sex differences in other care-quality measures have not been well-documented. We aimed to examine sex differences in mortality as well as a wide range of underlying health indicators and clinical outcomes in adults ≥ 60 year of age admitted with hip fractures from their own homes to a single NHS hospital between April-2009 and June-2019. Sex differences in delirium, length of stay (LOS) and mortality in hospital, readmission, and discharge destination, were examined by logistic regression. There were 787 women and 318 men of similar mean age (± SD): 83.1 year (± 8.6) and 82.5 year (± 9.0), respectively (P = 0.269). There were no sex differences in history of dementia or diabetes, anticholinergic burden, pre-fracture physical function, American Society of Anesthesiologists grades, or surgical and medical management. Stroke and ischaemic heart disease, polypharmacy, and alcohol consumption were more common in men. After adjustment for these differences and age, men had greater risk of delirium (with or without cognitive impairment) within one day of surgery: OR = 1.75 (95%CI 1.14-2.68), LOS ≥ 3 weeks in hospital: OR = 1.52 (1.07-2.16), mortality in hospital: OR = 2.04 (1.14-3.64), and readmission once or more after 30 days of a discharge: OR = 1.53 (1.03-2.31). Men had a lower risk of a new discharge to residential/nursing care: OR = 0.46 (0.23-0.93). The present study revealed that, in addition to a greater risk of mortality than women, men also had many other adverse health outcomes. These findings, which have not been well-documented, serve to stimulate future targeted preventive strategies and research.

Contributing Factors to Operating Room Delays Identified from an Electronic Health Record: A Retrospective Study

The operating room (OR) is considered a major cost center and revenue generator for hospitals. Multiple factors contribute to OR delays and impact patient safety, patient satisfaction scores, and hospital financial performance. Reducing OR delays allows better utilization of OR resources and staffing and improves patient satisfaction while decreasing operating costs. Accurate scheduling can be the basis to achieve these goals. The objective of this initial study was to identify factors not normally documented in the electronic health record (EHR) that may contribute to or be indicators of OR delays. Materials and Methods. A retrospective data analysis was performed analyzing 67,812 OR cases from 12 surgical specialties at a small university medical center from 2010 through the first quarter of 2017. Data from the hospital's EHR were exported and subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results. Statistical analysis of the extracted EHR data revealed factors that were associated with OR delays including, surgical specialty, preoperative assessment testing, patient body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, daily procedure count, and calendar year. Conclusions. Delays hurt OR efficiency on many levels. Identifying those factors may reduce delays and better accommodate the needs of surgeons, staff, and patients thereby leading to improved patient's outcomes and patient satisfaction. Reducing delays can decrease operating costs and improve the financial position of the operating theater as well as that of the hospital. Anesthesiology teams can play a key role in identifying factors that cause delays and implementing mitigating efficiencies.