Drug therapy in headache

Head-to-head relief: ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant in migraine treatment

Migraine, a significant cause of disability worldwide, heavily impacts daily functioning and quality of life. Despite various acute treatment options, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and triptans, patients experience limited relief or adverse effects. This review examines the efficacy and safety of gepants - ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant - in the acute treatment of migraine. We assessed phase II and III clinical trials, focusing on clinically relevant endpoints such as pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at two hours post-treatment. We calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve significant endpoints for each gepant. Gepants are recommended for the acute treatment of migraine in individuals who do not respond to triptan monotherapy or combination therapy, who experience only partial effectiveness, or who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to triptans. The NNT values for achieving pain freedom at two hours were 9 for rimegepant, 11 for zavegepant, and 12 for ubrogepant, which are comparable to NSAIDs such as naproxen (NNT = 11). Paracetamol, although not an NSAID, showed similar efficacy (NNT = 12). Triptans demonstrated lower NNTs, indicating higher efficacy. Gepants offer effective, well-tolerated alternatives with no significant cardiovascular risk and minimal potential for medication-overuse headache.

"The Dark Side of Musculoskeletal Care": Why Do Ineffective Techniques Seem to Work? A Comprehensive Review of Complementary and Alternative Therapies

The increasing interest in complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) for musculoskeletal care has sparked significant debate, particularly regarding their biological plausibility and clinical effectiveness. This comprehensive review critically examines the use of two of the most widely utilized CAMs-osteopathy and chiropractic care-over the past 25 years, focusing on their biological plausibility, clinical effectiveness, and potential mechanisms of action. Our analysis of current research and clinical studies reveals that osteopathy and chiropractic are based on concepts such as "somatic dysfunction" and "vertebral subluxation", which lack robust empirical validation. While these therapies are often presented as credible treatment options, studies evaluating their effectiveness frequently exhibit serious methodological flaws, providing insufficient empirical support for their recommendation as first-line treatments for musculoskeletal conditions. The effects and mechanisms underlying osteopathy and chiropractic remain poorly understood. However, placebo responses-mediated by the interaction of contextual, psychological, and non-specific factors-appear to play a significant role in observed outcomes. The integration of therapies with limited biological plausibility, whose effects may primarily rely on placebo effects, into healthcare systems raises important ethical dilemmas. This review highlights the need for rigorous adherence to scientific principles and calls for a more comprehensive investigation into biobehavioral, contextual, and psychosocial factors that interact with the specific effects of these interventions. Such efforts are essential to advancing our understanding of CAMs, enhancing clinical decision-making, promoting ethical practices, and guiding future research aimed at improving patient care in musculoskeletal disorders.

Clinical efficacy of escitalopram combined with botulinum toxin A in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and comorbid headache

BACKGROUND

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a common mental disorder that happens comorbidly with other diseases. Headache is a common anxiety comorbidity. Previous reports have shown that the selection of therapeutic drugs for GAD patients and comorbid headache is challenging. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of escitalopram combined with botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) in patients with GAD and comorbid headache and seek an alternative treatment strategy for the comorbidity of GAD and headache.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind study was performed. The eligible GAD patients with comorbid headache were randomly assigned to the BoNT/A group and the placebo group. All the patients were given oral escitalopram therapy (10-20 mg/day) for the whole duration of the study. The BoNT/A group was given local injections of BoNT/A (50 U per person), whereas the placebo group was given local saline (0.9% NaCl) injections at the beginning and 3 months after the experiments. All participants were followed up for 6 months and relevant information was collected at months 0, 1, 2, 3, and 6. Primary outcomes included the following: (1) the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7); (2) the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS); (3) the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scales (HAMA); (4) days with headache per month; (5) visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients (the sex ratio of female to male: 3.39:1) were finally included. Compared with the placebo group, the BoNT/A group showed a significant decrease in GAD-7 scores, SAS scores, HAMA scores, days with headache per month, and VAS scores at months 1, 2, 3, and 6 of follow-up (all p < 0.05). The average time to complete remission of anxiety symptoms (HAMA< 7 points) in the BoNT/A group was less than the placebo group (2 months vs. 3 months). At the same time, the results of the survival analysis showed a clear beneficial effect of BoNT/A relative to placebo on the time to remission of anxiety (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Mean daily doses of escitalopram at the sixth month in the BoNT/A group was smaller than the placebo group (12.5 mg vs. 16.04 mg, p < 0.001). The number of patients who relapsed (HAMA total score ≥ 14 points) at 6 months of follow-up in the BoNT/A group was less than the placebo group (2.2% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.05). The rates of response (HAMA subtraction rate ≥ 50%) were 93.8% for the BoNT/A group and 75.5% for the placebo group (p < 0.05), and the rates of remission (HAMA < 7 points) were 87.5% for the BoNT/A group and 64.2% for the placebo group (p < 0.01) at the sixth month.

CONCLUSION

The combination of escitalopram with BoNT/A is a significantly effective intervention in improving clinical efficacy and reducing the recurrence in patients with GAD and comorbid headache, and we believe that this approach will be an additional treatment strategy for future treatment of comorbid headache in GAD. Therefore, we recommend that escitalopram combined with BoNT/A should be given as early as possible in GAD patients and comorbid headache.

Pharmaceutical care for patients with headache

INTRODUCTION

Headache cephalalgia is the condition in which individuals feel pain in different parts of the head. It is one of the most common disorders believed to be amenable to self-treatment. The pharmacist can provide significant support to patients.

Pharmacogenetics in Primary Headache Disorders

Primary headache disorders, such as migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), and cluster headache, belong to the most common neurological disorders affecting a high percentage of people worldwide. Headache induces a high burden for the affected individuals on the personal level, with a strong impact on life quality, daily life management, and causes immense costs for the healthcare systems. Although a relatively broad spectrum of different pharmacological classes for the treatment of headache disorders are available, treatment effectiveness is often limited by high variances in therapy responses. Genetic variants can influence the individual treatment success by influencing pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the therapeutic as investigated in the research field of pharmacogenetics. This review summarizes the current knowledge on important primary headache disorders, including migraine, TTH, and cluster headache. We also summarize current acute and preventive treatment options for the three headache disorders based on drug classes and compounds taking important therapy guidelines into consideration. Importantly, the work summarizes and discusses the role of genetic polymorphisms regarding their impact on metabolism safety and the effect of therapeutics that are used to treat migraine, cluster headache, and TTH exploring drug classes such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, triptans, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, calcium channel blockers, drugs with effect on the renin-angiotensin system, and novel headache therapeutics such as ditans, anti-calcitonin-gene-related peptide antibodies, and gepants. Genetic variants in important phase I-, II-, and III-associated genes such as cytochrome P450 genes, UGT genes, and different transporter genes are scrutinized as well as variants in genes important for pharmacodynamics and several functions outside the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic spectrum. Finally, the article evaluates the potential and limitations of pharmacogenetic approaches for individual therapy adjustments in headache disorders.

An Update on Diagnosis and Pharmacologic Therapy for Headache in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practice

Headaches are synonymous with neurovascular pain (cephalalgias), which comprise a heterogeneous group of pain disorders that share a common anatomic region (head and neck). Headaches are often a "universal" disease presentation that is evaluated by the oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Pharmacologic therapy of headaches is most often based on the severity of symptoms and the degree of disability experienced by the patient. This article describes the epidemiology of neurovascular headaches, their pathophysiologic mechanisms/presentation, the workup of patients, and an up-to-date overview of pharmacologic approaches that can be applied in the oral and maxillofacial surgical practice to treat this patient population.

Amazonian medicinal smokes: Chemical analysis of Burseraceae pitch (breu) oleoresin smokes and insights into their use on headache

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

In Latin American Traditional Medicine, the use of Burseraceae oleoresins for headache relief is widespread. In the quilombola (maroon) communities of the municipality of Oriximiná, Pará State, Brazil, Burseraceae oleoresins are burned as incenses to treat headache; an effect attained by inhaling the smokes.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study was designed to investigate the scientific rationale behind the use of Burseraceae pitch oleoresin smokes on headache by identifying its chemical constituents and discussing whether they could be beneficial for headache treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two samples of pitch oleoresins were purchased from Amazonian public markets; one of them marketed as "breu preto" (black pitch), and the other as "breu branco" (white pitch). The smoke headspaces produced upon burning these oleoresins were collected and analysed by GC-MS. For comparative purposes, the triterpenoid fingerprints of the oleoresins' dichloromethane extracts and profiles of the essential oils were also obtained by GC-MS - and GC-FID, in the case of the essential oils.

RESULTS

A total of 32 compounds were detected in black and white pitch oleoresin smokes. All smoke headspaces of the pitch oleoresins shared the presence of volatile terpenoids (e.g., α-terpineol) and triterpenoids (e.g., α-amyrin, β-amyrin, α-amyrone, and β-amyrone). These compounds were also present in the crude resins and could potentially be responsible for anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive and analgesic effects on headache.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacological data on the terpenoids detected in the Burseraceae pitch smokes strongly support their traditional use for headache, but their actual effects upon inhalation have yet to be determined.

Triptanophobia in migraine: A case-control study on the causes and consequences of the nonuse of triptans in chronic migraine patients

Background: Triptanophobia is the excessive and inadequately justified concern about potential risks of triptans. We evaluated causes and consequences of nonuse of triptans in chronic migraine (CM) Methods: Case-control study. We included CM patients firstly referred to aheadache unit. Patients were cases or controls depending on whether they were triptan naïve, or not. We analyzed if nonuse of triptans was justified by formal contraindications or adverse events. We assessed if triptan naïve patients had higher frequency of vascular risk factors (VRF), contraceptive drugs or older age. Results: We included 941 patients, 247 (26.2%) triptan users. Triptans had been discontinued due to tolerability in 116 patients (12.3%), being 578 patients (61.4%) triptan naïve. Formal contraindications were found in 23 patients (2.4%). Frequency of VRF, contraceptive drugs or age did not differ between the groups (p > 0.1). Triptan users consumed symptomatic medications fewer days/month (13.9 vs 17.1, p < 0.001), were under prophylactic treatment more frequently (79.4% vs 34.8%, p < 0.001) and had medication overuse headache less frequently (55.1% vs. 63.0%, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Triptans were not used by three-quartersof CM patients. Nonuse of triptans was not justified by tolerability, frequency of contraindications, or frequency of VRF. Expert opinion: In the present study, we evaluated causes and consequences of the nonuse of triptans in CM sufferers. We analyzed frequency of triptan use in CM patients. We compared, between triptan users and triptan naïve patients, the presence of contraindications, frequency of vascular risk factors, and differences in management prior to the referral to a headache unit.

Characteristics of Patients Referred To A Specialized Headache Clinic

Headache is a common problem with great effect both on the individual and on the society. Recent studies raised the possibility of increasing rate of specialty referrals, inappropiate treatment and advanced imaging for simple headache. The aim of our study was to analyze the characteritics of patients (including duration of symptoms, headache type, brain imaging, treatment) referred to our specialized headache clinic between 01/01/2014 and 01/01/2015 by their general practitioners and primary care neurologists due to chronic/treatment-resistant headache syndromes. 202 patients (mean age 53.6 ± 17.6 years) were evaluated in our clinic (102 females, mean age 50.14 ± 16.11 years and 100 males, mean age 57 ± 18.1 years). Migraine (84/202) and tension-type (76/202) were the most common syndromes. 202 plain brain CT, 60 contrast-enhanced CT and 128 MRI were carried out by their general practitioners or other healthcare professioners including neurologists before referral to our headache centre. Despite of extensive brain imaging appropiate treatment was started less than 1/3 of all patients and significant proportion received benzodiazepines or opioid therapy. Furthermore, more than 10% of referred patients presented with secondary headache including one meningitis. The management of headache is still a challenge for primary care physicians leading to medical overuse. Vast majority of our patients should not be referred to our specialized headache clinic as they had uncomplicated headache or other underlying conditions than pain.

A comparative assessment of two kynurenic acid analogs in the formalin model of trigeminal activation: a behavioral, immunohistochemical and pharmacokinetic study

Kynurenic acid (KYNA) has well-established protective properties against glutamatergic neurotransmission, which plays an essential role in the activation and sensitization process during some primary headache disorders. The goal of this study was to compare the effects of two KYNA analogs, N-(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethyl)-4-oxo-1H-quinoline-2-carboxamide hydrochloride (KA-1) and N-(2-N-pyrrolidinylethyl)-4-oxo-1H-quinoline-2-carboxamide hydrochloride (KA-2), in the orofacial formalin test of trigeminal pain. Following pretreatment with KA-1 or KA-2, rats were injected with subcutaneous formalin solution in the right whisker pad. Thereafter, the rubbing activity and c-Fos immunoreactivity changes in the spinal trigeminal nucleus pars caudalis (TNC) were investigated. To obtain pharmacokinetic data, KA-1, KA-2 and KYNA concentrations were measured following KA-1 or KA-2 injection. Behavioral tests demonstrated that KA-2 induced larger amelioration of formalin-evoked alterations as compared with KA-1 and the assessment of c-Fos immunoreactivity in the TNC yielded similar results. Although KA-1 treatment resulted in approximately four times larger area under the curve values in the serum relative to KA-2, the latter resulted in a higher KYNA elevation than in the case of KA-1. With regard to TNC, the concentration of KA-1 was under the limit of detection, while that of KA-2 was quite small and there was no major difference in the approximately tenfold KYNA elevations. These findings indicate that the differences between the beneficial effects of KA-1 and KA-2 may be explained by the markedly higher peripheral KYNA levels following KA-2 pretreatment. Targeting the peripheral component of trigeminal pain processing would provide an option for drug design which might prove beneficial in headache conditions.