The effects of cancer treatment on reproductive functions

Restoring Ovarian Fertility and Hormone Function: Recent Advancements, Ongoing Efforts and Future Applications

The last 20 years have seen substantial improvements in fertility and hormone preservation and restoration technologies for a growing number of cancer survivors. However, further advancements are required to fill the gaps for those who cannot use current technologies or to improve the efficacy and longevity of current fertility and hormone restoration technologies. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) followed by ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) offers those unable to undergo ovarian stimulation for egg retrieval and cryopreservation an option that restores both fertility and hormone function. However, those with metastatic disease in their ovaries are unable to transplant this tissue. Therefore, new technologies to produce good-quality eggs and restore long-term cyclic ovarian function are being investigated and developed to expand options for a variety of patients. This mini-review describes current and near future technologies including in vitro maturation, in vitro follicle growth and maturation, bioprosthetic ovaries, and stem cell applications in fertility restoration research by their proximity to clinical application.

Clinical practice guidelines for fertility preservation in young women undergoing gonadotoxic treatment: an overview and critical appraisal of methodological quality and content

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the methodological quality and content of internationally available clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on fertility preservation (FP) care in adult women?

DESIGN

Internationally available CPGs on FP care in adult women were identified after conducting an extensive literature search and consulting (inter)national key experts. The methodological quality of the CPGs was appraised by an (inter)national panel of experts using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. The content of the best CPGs, scoring ≥60% for the domain 'Rigour of development' of the AGREE II instrument, was extracted and categorized according to their topic.

RESULTS

Thirty of the 1808 documents found were included. After consulting (inter)national key experts, 30 CPGs were included, six of which scored ≥60% for their 'Rigour of development'. The number of FP-related topics discussed by these six CPGs ranged from 4 to 12. The number of recommendations provided by the CPGs on these topics varied. The number of topics to which ≥5 recommendations were dedicated ranged from 0 to 4 between CPGs.

CONCLUSION

CPGs on the subject of FP care are available, but there is room for improvement in quality and content. Although written for use in daily practice, the CPGs can also be used to develop quality indicators to monitor the quality of current FP care or to evaluate future improvement initiatives.

Nonclinical reproductive and developmental safety evaluation of the MAGE-A3 Cancer Immunotherapeutic, a therapeutic vaccine for cancer treatment

We assessed potential toxic effects of the MAGE-A3 Cancer Immunotherapeutic on female fertility and embryo-fetal, pre- and post-natal development in rats and on male fertility in rats and monkeys. Three groups of 48 female (Study 1) or 22 male (Study 2) CD rats received 5 or 3 injections of 100μL of saline, AS15 immunostimulant, or MAGE-A3 Cancer Immunotherapeutic (MAGE-A3 recombinant protein combined with AS15) at various timepoints pre- or post-mating. Male Cynomolgus monkeys (Study 3) received 8 injections of 500μL of saline (n=2) or the MAGE-A3 Cancer Immunotherapeutic (n=6) every 2 weeks. Rats were sacrificed on gestation day 20 or lactation day 25 (Study 1) or 9 weeks after first injection (Study 2) and monkeys, 3 days or 8 weeks after last injection. Injections were well tolerated. Female rat mating performance or fertility, pre- and post-natal survival, offspring development up to 25 days of age, and male mating performance (rats) or fertility parameters (rats and monkeys) were unaffected.

Emerging gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists

INTRODUCTION

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist analogs (GnRHa) are peptides that mimic the action of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and are used to suppress subsequent sex steroid production. Although the analogs are a rather defined group of drugs, there have been developments in the past decades and there is still ample room for improvement. New therapeutic strategies in the use of GnRHs are discussed.

AREAS COVERED

Major points of discussion include: i) the use of concomitant treatment of early breast cancer in premenopausal estrogen-positive and -negative patients, ii) the use of GnRHa for fertility preservation in young female patients with malignant diseases and iii) the use of GnRH analogs in assisted reproduction. The manuscript provides a better understanding of GnRH agonists as well as an explanation of their major indications, biochemical pathways and concluding therapeutic strategies. Recent results from international meetings and debates are described to explain current controversies.

EXPERT OPINION

This paper highlights the need for more complex GnRH analogs. In the next few years, there will be longer acting GnRHas that may improve adherence. New therapeutic targets in oncological concepts may go beyond fertility preservation and focus on the antiproliferative effects of GnRH analogs.

Survivorship, late effects and cancer of the cervix

As the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer improves, there is increasing focus on the months and years after cancer treatment. Of those women living after a diagnosis of cancer, 10% will have a gynaecological malignancy and although the incidence of cervix cancer has dropped over the last 20 years, so has the age at diagnosis, with more than 60% surviving at least 5 years. In a recent report, 63% of 231 064 US survivors of cervix cancer were more than 10 years from diagnosis. More survivors are living long enough to develop chronic treatment-related conditions. The 2007 English Cancer Reform Strategy highlighted the importance of cancer survivorship and uses the US National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship definition-'living through and beyond cancer'. The emerging picture is of populations living after a diagnosis of cancer without active disease, still having similar health and disability profiles to populations with a diagnosis of a chronic illness. This offers new challenges in identifying and meeting their needs.