Foot length in fetuses with abnormal growth

Sonographic Assessment of Fetal Growth Abnormalities

Fetal growth abnormalities have significant consequences for pregnancy management and maternal and fetal well-being. The accurate diagnosis of fetal growth abnormalities contributes to optimal antenatal management, which may minimize the sequelae of inadequate or excessive fetal growth. An accurate diagnosis of abnormal fetal growth depends on accurate pregnancy dating and serial growth measurements. The fetal size at any given stage of pregnancy is either appropriate or inappropriate for the given gestational age (GA). Pregnancy dating is most accurate in the first trimester, as biologic variability does not come into play until the second and third trimesters. The authors describe the determination of GA with use of standard US measurements and how additional parameters can be used to confirm dating. Once dates are established, serial measurements are used to identity abnormal growth patterns. The sometimes confusing definitions of abnormal growth are clarified, the differentiation of a constitutionally small but healthy fetus from a growth-restricted at-risk fetus is described, and the roles of Doppler US and other adjunctive examinations in the management of growth restriction are discussed. In addition, the definition of selective growth restriction in twin pregnancy is briefly discussed, as is the role of Doppler US in the classification of subtypes of selective growth restriction in monochorionic twinning. The criteria for diagnosing macrosomia and the management of affected pregnancies also are reviewed. The importance of correct pregnancy dating in the detection and surveillance of abnormal fetal growth and for prevention of perinatal maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality cannot be overstated. The online slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2020.

Fetal foot length at delivery as a tool for determining gestation length in non-macerated stillbirths

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether fetal foot length at autopsy could reliably indicate gestation duration at stillbirth and the effects of maceration on this method.

METHODS

The present cross-sectional secondary analysis was part of the Safe Passage Study; all Safe Passage Study participants who experienced a stillbirth at Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, between August 1, 2007, and January 31, 2015, were eligible to participate. After providing written informed consent for autopsy, the duration of gestation calculated using early ultrasonography and fetal foot length were compared.

RESULTS

There were 69 fetal autopsies included in the present study; placental histology was available for 65. Generally, the gestation length calculated from the first ultrasonography scan correlated well with that calculated from the fetal foot length (Spearman correlation=0.85). However, significant differences were found in the gestation lengths calculated when the fetus was macerated (P<0.001), or when umbilical cord pathology (P<0.001) or maternal vascular malperfusion (P<0.001) was the cause of fetal death.

CONCLUSION

Foot length at stillbirth was a good indicator of gestation length; however, it was a weaker indicator if fetal maceration had occurred.

Postnatal Foot Length to Determine Gestational Age: A Pilot Study

Gestational age is a critical factor in the management, decision-making, prognostication and follow-up of newborn infants. It is also essential for research and epidemiology. In the absence of an early assessment of fetal gestation by abdominal ultrasound, many neonatal units in developing countries determine gestational age by neonatal scores and last menstrual period-both of which are highly inaccurate. The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether postnatal foot length measurement could accurately determine gestational age in a specified South African hospitalized neonatal population. Foot length was measured with a plastic Verniere's caliper. Foot length was shown to correlate well with gestational age (r = 0.919,p < 0.001). Intra-observer and inter-observer variability of foot length measurements was low. Foot length can therefore be used with high accuracy to determine the gestational age in a population where there is poor access to or utilization of antenatal sonar.

An algorithm for the estimation of gestational age at the time of fetal death

BACKGROUND

Accurate assignment of gestational age (GA) at time of fetal death is important for research and clinical practice. An algorithm to estimate GA at fetal death was developed and evaluated.

METHODS

The algorithm developed by the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) incorporated clinical and post-mortem data. The SCRN conducted a population-based case-control study of women with stillbirths and livebirths from 2006 to 2008 in five geographical catchment areas. Rules were developed to estimate a due date, identify an interval during which death likely occurred, and estimate GA at the time of fetal death. Reliability of using fetal foot length to estimate GA at death was assessed.

RESULTS

The due date estimated for 620 singleton stillbirths studied was considered clinically reliable for 87%. Only 25.2% of stillbirths were documented alive within 2 days before diagnosis and 47.6% within 1 week of diagnosis. The algorithm-derived estimate of GA at time of fetal death was one or more weeks earlier than the GA at delivery for 43.5% of stillbirths. GA estimated from fetal foot length agreed with GA by algorithm within 2 weeks for 75% within a subset of well-dated stillbirths.

CONCLUSIONS

Precise assignment of GA at death, defined as reliable dating criteria and a short interval (≤1 week) during which fetal death was known to have occurred, was possible in 46.6% of cases. Fetal foot length is a relatively accurate measure of GA at death and should be collected in all stillbirth cases.

Nontraditional sonographic pearls in estimating gestational age

Accurate gestational dating is one of the most important assessments obstetrical providers make in pregnancy, given that all of the various management strategies are dependent on knowing where the patient is in gestation. In addition to traditional biometry, ancillary biometric and nonbiometric measurements can help narrow the biologic variability between fetuses. Moreover, one can employ these nontraditional measurements both in late gestation to assist in determining appropriate gestational age and fetal lung maturity, and in other specific clinical situations-such as oligohydramnios, in which compression of the fetal head and abdomen can lead to difficulty in obtaining an accurate biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference. This chapter focuses on nontraditional fetal ultrasound measurements, including the transverse cerebellar diameter, fetal foot length, ratios of biometric and nonbiometric measurements, epiphyseal ossification centers, amniotic fluid volume, placental grading, and other miscellaneous markers in the context of evaluating a fetus with possible intrauterine growth restriction.