Ultrasonography for depiction of brachial plexus injury

Ultrasound accuracy for brachial plexus pathology

AIM

To determine (a) the accuracy of ultrasound in detecting brachial plexus pathology and (b) outline the advantages and limitations of ultrasound compared to MRI for imaging the brachial plexus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

cases with clinically suspected brachial plexus pathology were evaluated first by ultrasound, followed by MRI. Patients with prior brachial plexus imaging were excluded. The final diagnosis was based on a combination of ultrasound, MRI, clinical follow-up, and surgical findings. The accuracy of the ultrasound was assessed by comparing the ultrasound and the final diagnoses. The mean clinical follow-up time following ultrasound was 1.8 ± 1.4 years.

RESULTS

Ninety-two (64%) of the 143 cases had normal brachial plexus ultrasound and MRI examinations. Fifty-one (36%) of 143 cases had brachial plexus pathology on MRI, comprising post-radiation fibrosis (n=25, 49%), nerve sheath tumor (n=11, 21%), traumatic injury (n=7, 14%), inflammatory polyneuropathy (n=4, 8%), malignant infiltration (n=2, 4%), desmoid fibromatosis (n=1,2%), and neuralgic amyotrophy (n=1, 2%). Overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for brachial plexus pathology was 98% (140/143), with three discordant cases (neuralgic amyotrophy n=1, inflammatory neuropathy n=1, postradiation fibrosis n=1) regarded as normal on ultrasound assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of ultrasound for identifying brachial plexus pathology were 94%, 100%, 100%, and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound identifies brachial plexus pathology with high accuracy and specificity, showing comparable diagnostic efficacy to MRI. Ultrasound can serve as an effective first-line imaging investigation for suspected brachial plexus pathology.

Diagnostic performance of preoperative ultrasound for traumatic brachial plexus root injury: A comparison study with an electrophysiology study

Purpose

Accurate preoperative assessment for traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) is critical for clinicians to establish a treatment plan. The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of preoperative ultrasound (US) through comparison with an electrophysiology study (EPS) in the assessment of traumatic brachial plexus (BP) root injury.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective study in patients with traumatic BPI who had preoperative US and EPS, excluding obstetric palsy and other nontraumatic neuropathies. US examination was performed on an EPIQ 5 color Doppler equipment. EPS was performed on a Keypoint 9033A07 Electromyograph/Evoked Potentials Equipment, testing electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction studies (NCS), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP). Each BP root of all patients was assessed by US and EPS as completely injured or incompletely injured, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated based on the correlation with intraoperative findings. The accuracy of US and EPS were compared using the McNemar test. The added benefit of US was evaluated by comparing the sensitivity and specificity between the combined tests with EPS using the McNemar test.

Results

This study included 49 patients with traumatic BPI who underwent BP surgeries from October 2018 to September 2022. Surgical exploration confirmed 89 completely injured BP roots in 28 patients. US correctly detected 80 completely injured BP roots (sensitivity, 0.899; specificity, 0.981; PPV, 0.964; NPV, 0.944; accuracy, 0.951). EPS correctly detected 75 completely injured BP roots (sensitivity, 0.843; specificity, 0.929; PPV, 0.872; NPV, 0.912; accuracy, 0.898). US showed significantly higher accuracy than EPS (p = 0.03). When combining US and EPS for completely injured BP root detection, the sensitivity of the inclusive combination (0.966) was significantly higher than EPS alone (p = 0.000977), and the specificity of the exclusive combination (1.000) was significantly higher than EPS alone (p = 0.000977).

Conclusion

Preoperative US is an effective diagnostic tool in the assessment of traumatic BP root injury. US had higher accuracy than EPS in this study. Sensitivity and specificity were significantly higher than EPS when US was combined with EPS.

Brachial plexus injury after shoulder dislocation: a literature review

Brachial plexus injuries are among the rarest but at the same time the most severe complications of shoulder dislocation. The symptoms range from transient weakening or tingling sensation of the upper limb to total permanent paralysis of the limb associated with chronic pain and disability. Conflicting opinions exist as to whether these injuries should be treated operatively and if so when surgery should be performed. In this review, available literature dedicated to neurological complications of shoulder dislocation has been analysed and management algorithm has been proposed. Neurological complications were found in 5.4-55% of all dislocations, with the two most commonly affected patient groups being elderly women sustaining dislocation as a result of a simple fall and young men after high-energy injuries, often multitrauma victims. Infraclavicular part of the brachial plexus was most often affected. Neurapraxia or axonotmesis predominated, and complete nerve disruption was observed in less than 3% of the patients. Shoulder dislocation caused injury to multiple nerves more often than mononeuropathies. The axillary nerve was most commonly affected, both as a single nerve and in combination with other nerves. Older patient age, higher energy of the initial trauma and longer period from dislocation to its reduction have been postulated as risk factors. Brachial plexus injury resolved spontaneously in the majority of the patients. Operative treatment was required in 13-18% of the patients in different studies. Patients with suspected neurological complications require systematic control. Surgery should be performed within 3-6 months from the injury when no signs of recovery are present.

Do not follow the bone, follow the nerve ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block: a reconfirmation

Indirect and direct methods have been used to localize the stellate ganglion. Identifying the C6 and C7 transverse process can be a technical challenge for practitioners when performing an ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block. Following the nerve roots from the interscalene plexus into the corresponding foramen can serve as a reconfirmation for identifying the C6 and C7 transverse process.

A prospective study of high resolution ultrasound in brachial plexopathies - Correlation with electrophysiological measurements

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic role of ultrasound in brachial plexopathies.

METHODS

We included 59 healthy subjects (HS) and 42 patients consecutively referred with clinical suspicion of brachial plexopathy from October 2015 to May 2016. Patients underwent routine electrodiagnostic testing (EDx) as reference standard and a blinded standardised ultrasound examination of the brachial plexus as index test with cross-sectional area (CSA) as the ultrasound parameter of choice.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were diagnosed by EDx with brachial plexopathy, ten with mononeuropathies, and ten had normal EDx. Five had a cervical radiculopathy. In 11 (64%) out of the 17 patients with EDx diagnosed plexopathy, we found at least one abnormal level on ultrasound. Six (60%) out of ten normal EDx patients had a normal ultrasound examination at all levels. Ultrasound identified the same abnormal level(s) as EDx in eight (73%) of the 11 patients who had both abnormal EDx and ultrasound results. Mean CSA was higher in the plexopathy group compared to HS at the level of the C6 root (p = .022), the middle trunk (p = .027), and the medial cord (p = .003).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound examination showed abnormalities in patients with brachial plexopathies in good agreement with EDx.

SIGNIFICANCE

Ultrasound may be an important supplement to electrodiagnostics in evaluating brachial plexopathies.

Ultrasound imaging of brachial plexus trauma in gunshot injury

INTRODUCTION

Brachial plexus trauma related to gunshot (GS) injury requires early examination and characterization to ensure appropriate treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be contraindicated when there are metal fragments in a patient's body. Ultrasound (US) may present an alternative to imaging GS-related brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

Three patients with GS-related brachial plexus injury who underwent US imaging evaluation at our institution were identified. A retrospective review of the patients' medical records was performed.

RESULTS

US characterization of nerve abnormalities after GS injury to the brachial plexus was in agreement with electrodiagnostic and intraoperative findings.

DISCUSSION

Information from the US reports was useful in preparation for brachial plexus reconstruction surgery. As such, US has unique utility when MRI cannot be performed. US imaging can provide useful characterization of the brachial plexus after GS injury when performed by an experienced operator. Muscle Nerve 59:707-711, 2019.

Diagnosis of closed injury and neoplasm of the brachial plexus by ultrasonography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of high-frequency sonography (US) in diagnosing traumatic brachial plexus (BP) lesions and neoplasms in the adult.

METHODS

Eleven patients with suspected BP closed trauma, 6 patients with BP neoplasm, and 12 healthy volunteers were scanned. The US findings were compared with surgical findings.

RESULTS

The interscalene space and intervertebral foramina were useful anatomic markers in identifying the BP. In the 24 sites examined in the normal group (12 subjects examined on both sides), the fifth to seventh cervical nerve roots (C5-7, including upper and middle trunk) were seen, whereas the eighth cervical and first thoracic nerve roots (C8, T1, including the lower trunk) were seen in 91.7% (22/24) of the subjects. The BP appeared as three or four discrete rounded hypoechoic nodules between the anterior scalene and middle scalene muscle in transverse views at the C5-7 level, representing the trunks in the sagittal oblique section. In the BP trauma group (n = 11), the normal nerve trunk was interrupted, and lesions were shown as thickening and swelling with indistinct inner structures. In the neoplasm group (n = 6), masses were shown as hypoechoic masses.

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency US is valuable in diagnosing BP closed injuries and neoplasms.

High-resolution ultrasonography for the diagnosis of brachial plexus root lesions

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using high-resolution ultrasonography in the diagnosis of brachial plexus (BP) root lesions. A prospective study of ultrasonographic evaluation of BP nerve roots was performed in 37 patients with BP root lesions (29 with root injuries, 8 with tumors). The pre-operative ultrasonographic findings were compared with the surgical and pathohistological findings. All C5-7 roots were detected by ultrasonography in all patients, whereas 92% (68/74) of C8 and 51% (38/74) of T1 nerve roots were visualized. Among 29 patients with BP root avulsion, partial injuries or totally interrupted BP roots were detected in all patients. Cystic masses and neuromas were detected in 16 and 23 patients, respectively. In 8 patients with BP root tumors, 8 hypo-echoic masses were detected inside or partly outside of intervertebral foramina connecting to nerve roots. Surgical exploration revealed that there were 57 BP root avulsions in 29 patients. However, 2 T1 nerve root avulsions had been missed by pre-operative ultrasonography. Pathohistology revealed that all 8 BP root tumors pre-operatively diagnosed by ultrasonography were schwannomas. High-resolution ultrasonography can provide a convenient and accurate imaging modality for quick diagnosis and location of BP root lesions.

Brachial plexus injury as a complication after nerve block or vessel puncture

Brachial plexus injury is a potential complication of a brachial plexus block or vessel puncture. It results from direct needle trauma, neurotoxicity of injection agents and hematoma formation. The neurological presentation may range from minor transient pain to severe sensory disturbance or motor loss with poor recovery. The management includes conservative treatment and surgical exploration. Especially if a hematoma forms, it should be removed promptly. Comprehensive knowledge of anatomy and adept skills are crucial to avoid nerve injuries. Whenever possible, the patient should not be heavily sedated and should be encouraged to immediately inform the doctor of any experience of numbness/paresthesia during the nerve block or vessel puncture.

Dynamic neuromusculoskeletal ultrasound documentation of brachial plexus/thoracic outlet compression during elevated arm stress testing

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and validation of thoracic outlet syndrome/brachial plexopathy (TOS) remains a difficult challenge for surgeons, neurologists, and radiologists. This is due to the fact that the responses of standard elevated arm stress tests can be considered somewhat subjective and can vary. Therefore, non-vascular TOS cases are presently diagnosed clinically, and any objective diagnosis has been controversial.

METHODS

This is a technique paper describing the use of dynamic neuromusculoskeletal ultrasound to assist in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet/brachial plexus pathology. We propose a new way to observe the brachial plexus dynamically, so that physical verification of nerve compression between the anterior and middle scalene muscles can be clearly made at the onset of clinical symptoms. This gives a way to objectively identify clinically significant brachial plexus compression.

RESULTS

Dynamic testing can add objective analysis to tests such as the elevated arm stress tests and can correlate the onset of symptoms with plexus compression between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. With this, the area of pathologic compression can be identified and viewed while performing the dynamic testing. If compression is seen and the onset of symptoms ensues, this is a positive confirmatory test for the presence of TOS and a clinically significant disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper offers a simple, objective, and visual diagnostic test that can validate the presence or absence of brachial plexus compression during arm elevation in patients with brachial plexus injury and thoracic outlet syndrome.

Use of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster to treat localized neuropathic pain secondary to traumatic injury of peripheral nerves

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster (LMP) has previously been demonstrated in post-traumatic localized neuropathic pain. This study evaluated the use of LMP in localized neuropathic pain secondary to traumatic peripheral nerve injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled patients with traumatic injuries to peripheral nerves that were accompanied by localized neuropathic pain of more than 3 months duration. Demographic variables, pain intensity (measured using the numeric rating scale; NRS), answers to the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire, and the size of the painful area were recorded.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included, aged (mean ± standard deviation) 41.4 ± 15.7 years. Nerve injuries affected the upper (eight patients) or lower (11 patients) limbs. The mean duration of pain before starting treatment with LMP was 22.6 ± 43.5 months (median 8 months). Mean baseline values included: NRS 6.7 ± 1.6, painful area 17.8 ± 10.4 cm(2) (median 18 cm(2)), and DN4 score 6.7 ± 1.4. The mean duration of treatment with LMP was 19.5 ± 10.0 weeks (median 17.4 weeks). Mean values after treatment were: NRS 2.8 ± 1.5 (≥3 point reduction in 79% of patients, ≥50% reduction in 57.9% of patients) and painful area 2.1 ± 2.3 cm(2) (median 1 cm(2), ≥50% reduction in 94.7% of patients). Functional improvement after treatment was observed in 14/19 patients (73.7%).

CONCLUSION

LMP effectively treated traumatic injuries of peripheral nerves which presented with chronic localized neuropathic pain, reducing both pain intensity and the size of the painful area.

Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of peripheral nerve disease

INTRODUCTION

High-resolution ultrasound (US) of the peripheral nerves is now a standard means of assessing neuromuscular disorders in many centers. Currently used in conjunction with electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies, nerve US is especially effective in the diagnosis of entrapment neuropathies.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the basic physics of peripheral nerve US, guidelines for its current use and future directions. Advantages of using nerve US alongside EDX studies are outlined along with current limitations of testing. The role of US in the diagnosis of entrapment neuropathy is emphasized, particularly in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). US assisted diagnosis of peripheral nerve tumors, hereditary neuropathy and dysimmune neuropathy and traumatic injuries is also described.

EXPERT OPINION

US is a powerful tool in the assessment of peripheral nerve disease. Nerve US is an evolving, young discipline. There is still much to learn, but current evidence supports US imaging of all patients presenting for evaluation of possible mononeuropathy. With improvements in resolution, the introduction of US contrast agents and objective measures of nerve echogenicity, there is promise for further expanding its role in the diagnosis of all peripheral neuropathies.

Differential diagnosis between pre- and postganglionic adult traumatic brachial plexus lesions by ultrasonography

The goal of this study was to prospectively investigate the feasibility of preoperative ultrasonography evaluation in the differentiation between pre- and postganglionic traumatic brachial plexus lesions. Two expert radiologists employed ultrasonography to observe the morphology of the brachial plexus in 23 patients with suspected traumatic brachial plexus lesions and 40 healthy volunteers. The detection rate was 100% (126/126) for the C5 through C7 nerve roots and upper and middle trunks and three fascicles, 84% (106/126) for the C8 roots and the lower trunks and 64% (81/126) for T1 roots in all subjects. Surgical inspections found 58 lesions in 23 patients (40 preganglionic lesions and 18 postganglionic lesions). Ultrasonography detected most of the brachial plexus lesions (56/58) but misjudged two preganglionic and two postganglionic lesions. The rate of differentiation was 93% (52/56). This study demonstrated that ultrasonography is a useful but experience-dependent supplemental imaging technique for preoperative diagnosis of brachial plexus lesions and differentiation between pre- and postganglionic brachial plexus lesions.

High-resolution ultrasound of peripheral neurogenic tumors

Peripheral nerve tumors are not frequent, but due to their association with a nerve they are somewhat special. They may be encountered incidentally during evaluation of a soft-tissue mass or when a nerve lesion is clinically suspected and the recognition of such a lesion and its differential diagnosis is key for successful therapy and patient prognosis. As sonography is often the first line modality in the work-up of a soft-tissue mass, the sonographer should be aware of the typical features of such lesions in order to arrive at the correct diagnosis, and this article tries to give an overview of the histological subtypes of peripheral nerve tumors and their sonographic characteristics.

High-resolution ultrasound of the supraclavicular brachial plexus—can it improve therapeutic decisions in patients with plexus trauma?

Patients with major traumatic brachial plexus lesions benefit from early surgery, but they are seldom isolated by today's diagnostic workup. Subjects with ambiguous findings after such workups usually undergo a trial of conservative treatment and those without improvement delayed surgery. Our study focuses on this problem. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of high-resolution ultrasound (HR-US) on patient recruitment for non-delayed surgery. Twelve patients after blunt shoulder trauma and standardized HR-US assessment who underwent plexus surgery were included in this prospective observational study. Thereby, a total of 168 plexus elements were evaluated. All findings were compared to electrophysiological data if available and tested statistically against the gold-standard, i.e., surgical validation. Major plexus lesions were correctly detected by HR-US in nine patients (20 plexus elements). In two patients (five plexus elements), the lesion was underestimated by HR-US in relation to the gold standard (surgical inspection). Our analysis showed a high positive (1.0) and an acceptable negative predictive value (0.92) for the grading of traumatic plexus lesions with HR-US. Based on HR-US findings alone, 9 of 11 patients with objective major lesions would have undergone early surgery. In conclusion, HR-US proved a valuable tool for the triage of patients with traumatic lesions into surgical and non-surgical candidates.

Sonography of Brachial Plexus Traction Injuries

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility of sonography in identifying nerve abnormalities in patients with traction injury of the brachial plexus.

CONCLUSION

Sonography of the brachial plexus was technically feasible, although the entire brachial plexus could not be evaluated. Sonography appears to be a useful bedside imaging technique for assessing brachial plexus injury. The potential of sonography as a complementary diagnostic tool in the evaluation of these patients warrants further investigation.