Percutaneous sonographically guided radio frequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: causes of mistargeting and factors affecting the feasibility of a second ablation session

Immediate changes in MRI signals after the MRI-guided microwave ablation of malignant liver tumors

OBJECTIVE

To observe the immediate changes in MRI signals after the MRI-guided microwave ablation of malignant liver tumors and to explore the pattern of immediate signal changes post-ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 23 patients with 27 lesions who underwent MRI-guided liver microwave ablation at Baoshan people's Hospital from September 2022 to December 2023. The relationship between the changes in MRI signals and time post-ablation was studied. The first scan was performed immediately after ablation (designated as 0 min) and followed by scans at 3 min, 6 min, 10 min, 15 min, 20 min, and 30 min post-ablation. The signal characteristics that changed in each sequence after each scan were measured and recorded.

RESULTS

After ablation, the mean maximum diameter of the high-signal range in 27 T1WI ablation foci varied over a short period of time (0 min: 22.00 mm; at 3 min: 26.58 mm; at 6 min: 26.94 mm; at 10 min: 27.06 mm; at 15 min: 27.12mm; at 20 min: 27.16 mm; and at 30 min: 27.16 mm). The change from 0-10 min was statistically significant (t = -10.326, P < 0.001), whereas the change from 10-30 min was not statistically significant (t = -1.536, P = 0.068). And, the signal intensity increased over time. The signal intensity of the primary lesion remained unchanged while the range decreased. There were minimal differences in the range and intensity changes in the T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) sequence. In diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), the lesions showed high-signal intensity pre-ablation, but in post-ablation, it exhibited a high-signal surrounding the ablation zone with iso-intense or mixed signals, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value increased.

CONCLUSION

The high-signal range observed in the T1WI sequence at the 10th min scan after the ablation completely reflected the true extent of the ablated foci, whereas the low-signal range in the T2WI sequence was stable and unchanged.

A Comparative Study of SonoVue and Sonazoid for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound CT/MRI Fusion Guidance During Radiofrequency Ablation of Poorly Visualized Hepatic Malignancies: A Prospective Intra-Individual Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two contrast agents, SonoVue (SV) and Sonazoid (SZ), by comparing them intra-individually in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-CT/MRI fusion imaging (FI) to improve the visibility of inconspicuous liver malignancies on B-mode sonography for guiding percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Additionally, the radiologists' preference between SonoVue- CT/MRI FI (SV-FI) and Sonazoid-CT/MRI FI (SZ-FI) was determined.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 23 patients with inconspicuous hepatic malignancies (≤ 3 cm) on B-mode US who underwent both SV-FI and SZ-FI for RFA guidance. The patients underwent real-time CEUS FI with CT/MRI on the same day, utilizing both SV and SZ with at least 15-min intervals. Tumor visibility and radiologists' preferences were assessed and graded using a 4-point scale during the dynamic phases of both SV-FI and SZ-FI and the Kupffer phase of SZ-FI.

RESULTS

The tumor visibility scores obtained from CEUS-CT/MRI FI were significantly better than those obtained from US-FI. Indeed, SV-FI and SZ-FI demonstrated comparable visibility scores when corresponding phases were compared (p > 0.05). However, the Kupffer phase images of SZ-FI displayed superior visibility scores (3.70 ± 0.56 vs. 2.96 ± 0.88; p = 0.002) than the late vascular phase images of SV-FI. The radiologists favored SZ-FI in many cases, exhibiting moderate inter-observer agreement (Kappa value = 0.587; 95% CI, 0.403-0.772).

CONCLUSION

Although CEUS-CT/MRI FI with either SV or SZ substantially improved the visibility of inconspicuous tumors on US-CT/MRI FI, radiologists preferred SZ to SV to guide the RFA procedure.

Feasibility and safety study of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for sub-cardiac liver cancers without artificial ascites assistance

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) without artificial ascites (AA) inpatients with sub-cardiac (SC) liver cancers.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with the left lobe and caudate lobe of the liver cancer who underwent US-guided MWA in our institute from January 2020 to December 2022. According to whether the target lesion was located ≤5 mm from the pericardium, patients were divided into the SC group and the non-sub-cardiac (NSC) group. In the SC group, AA was not employed during the ablation procedure. The results of technical success, technical efficiency, local tumour progression (LTP), and major complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients with 87 lesions were enrolled. There were 38 patients with 38 lesions in the SC group and 41 patients with 49 lesions in the NSC group. The median follow-up of all patients was 15 (range, 3-44) months. There was no significant difference in technical success rates (100% vs 100%), technique efficiency rates (100% vs 95.7%), LTP rates (2.63% vs 0%,), and major complication rates (2.63% vs 7.32%) between the SC group and the NSC group (P > .05). No cardiac-related complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided MWA without AA for SC liver cancers was safe and effective.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The clinical prognosis of thermal ablation without AA in the treatment of SC liver cancers is still unclear. The finding of this study provided evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of US-guided MWA without AA for treating this tricky location.

No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2023 Korean Society of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation Guidelines

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been widely used to manage hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) equal to or smaller than 3 cm. No-touch RFA has gained attention and has recently been implemented in local ablation therapy for HCCs, despite its technical complexity, as it provides improved local tumor control compared to conventional tumor-puncturing RFA. This article presents the practice guidelines for performing no-touch RFA for HCCs, which have been endorsed by the Korean Society of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation (KSITA). The guidelines are primarily designed to assist interventional oncologists and address the limitations of conventional tumor-puncturing RFA with describing the fundamental principles, various energy delivery methods, and clinical outcomes of no-touch RFA. The clinical outcomes include technical feasibility, local tumor progression rates, survival outcomes, and potential complications.

Operator Evaluation of Ultrasound Fusion Imaging Usefulness in the Percutaneous Ablation of Hepatic Malignancies: A Prospective Study

The purpose of the work described here was to evaluate the use of ultrasound fusion imaging (US-FI) in percutaneous ablation of hepatic malignancies with respect to its global usefulness, improvement of conspicuity, confidence increment, needle route changes, and time savings. Thirty-four hepatic tumors (28 hepatocellular carcinomas, 6 metastases) were prospectively ablated in 16 consecutive patients (64 ± 11 y, 75% males), first simulating B-mode-only planning and then synchronizing computed tomography/magnetic resonance images with US and proceeding to needle insertion and tumor ablation under US-FI guidance. Surveys were administered to the operators to evaluate their perception of US-FI advantages. First treatment and local recurrence were also compared. US-FI was judged useful in 91% of cases and more useful when the tumor was not conspicuous in B-mode (p < 0.001), in particular for ablation of local recurrences (p = 0.021). Forty-one percent of tumors were undetectable at B-mode evaluation, and 93% of them were completely ablated under US-FI guidance. The confidence of the operator was highly increased by US-FI in 68% of cases. In 71% of cases, the radiologist saved time using US-FI, especially in treatment of local recurrences (p = 0.024). In conclusion, US-FI significantly increases the detection of target tumors, improves the confidence of the operator and is a time-saving method, especially in the treatment of local recurrences.

Assessing the value of volume navigation during ultrasound-guided radiofrequency- and microwave-ablations of liver lesions

Purpose

The goal of our study was to determine the influence of ultrasound (US)-coupled volume navigation on the use of computed tomography (CT) during minimally-invasive radiofrequency and microwave ablation procedures of liver lesions.

Method

Twenty-five patients with 40 liver lesions of different histological origin were retrospectively analysed. Lesions were ablated following standard protocol, using 1) conventional US-guidance, 2) manual registered volume navigation (mVNav), 3) automatic registered (aVNav) or 4) CT-guidance. In case of ultrasonographically inconspicuous lesions, conventional US-guidance was abandoned and mVNav was used. If mVNav was also unsuccessful, the procedure was either continued with aVNav or CT-guidance. The number, size and location of the lesions targeted using the different approaches were documented.

Results

Of the 40 lesions, sixteen (40.0 %) could be targeted with conventional US-guidance only, sixteen (40.0 %) with mVNav, three (7.5 %) with aVNav and five (12.5 %) only through the use of CT-guidance. Of the three alternatives (mVNav, aVNav and CT only) the mean size of the lesions targeted using mVNav (9.1 ± 4.6 mm) was significantly smaller from those targeted using US-guidance only (20.4 ± 9.4 mm; p < 0.001). The location of the lesions did not influence the selection of the modality used to guide the ablation.

Conclusions

In our cohort, mVNav allowed the ablation procedure to become less dependent on the use of CT. mVNav supported the ablation of lesions smaller than those that could be ablated with US only and doubled the application of minimally-invasive US-guided ablations.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer: assessment of tumor visibility and the feasibility of the procedure with planning ultrasonography

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and causes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) infeasibility in cases of metastatic colorectal cancer and to evaluate factors affecting the invisibility of the tumor on planning ultrasonography (US).

Methods

This study screened 386 patients who underwent planning US using fusion imaging and/or contrast-enhanced US for percutaneous RFA for suspected metastatic colorectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2020, from whom 136 patients with a single hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer measuring <3 cm were included. The factors related to the infeasibility of percutaneous RFA were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the factors associated with tumor invisibility on planning US.

Results

Among the 136 patients, percutaneous RFA was considered infeasible in 24.3% (33/136) due to a high risk of the heat-sink effect caused by the abutment of a large vessel (n=12), an inconspicuous tumor on planning US (n=11), a high risk of collateral thermal damage to an adjacent organ (n=8), and the absence of a safe electrode path (n=2). In univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor size was a statistically significant factor affecting invisibility on planning US (P=0.003 and P=0.018, respectively).

Conclusion

Percutaneous RFA was infeasible in approximately one-fourth of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The reason for the infeasibility was mainly an unfavorable tumor location and invisibility on planning US. Small tumor size was the sole significant factor affecting the invisibility of hepatic metastases on planning US.

Image Guidance in Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Fusion Imaging

The ultrasound (US) imaging technology, including contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and fusion imaging, has experienced radical improvement, and advancement in technology thus overcoming the problem of poor conspicuous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). On CEUS, the presence or absence of enhancement distinguishes the viable portion from the ablative necrotic portion. Using volume data of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fusion imaging enhances the three-dimensional relationship between the liver vasculature and HCC. Therefore, CT/MR-US fusion imaging provides synchronous images of CT/MRI with real-time US, and US-US fusion imaging provides synchronous US images before and after ablation. Moreover, US-US overlay fusion can visualize the ablative margin because it focuses the tumor image onto the ablation zone. Consequently, CEUS and fusion imaging are helpful to identify HCC with little conspicuity, and with more confidence, we can perform ablation therapy. CEUS/fusion imaging guidance has improved the clinical effectiveness of ablation therapy in patients with poor conspicuous HCCs. Therefore; this manuscript reviews the status of CEUS/fusion imaging guidance in ablation therapy of poor conspicuous HCC.

Value of MRI/CT Image Fusion for Targeting "invisible" Lesions in Stereotactic Microwave Ablation (SMWA) of Malignant Liver Lesions: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the technical feasibility of MRI/CT image fusion and completeness of ablation treatment for primary or metastatic liver lesions invisible on contrast-enhanced CT planning scans and outcome in patients treated with stereotactic microwave ablation (SMWA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Patients who underwent SMWA between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All liver lesions for which MRI/CT fusion was performed due to invisibility on pre-interventional CT planning scans were included and reassessed. The outcome measurement was successful ablation of the lesion at first follow-up imaging.

RESULTS

During the study period, 236 patients underwent 312 SMWAs with ablation of 496 lesions. Twenty-four lesions in 15 patients (mean age, 62 years; range, 43-80 years) were included. Following MRI/CT image fusion, all 24 lesions could be sufficiently localized to perform SMWA. The first follow-up imaging showed complete ablation of 22 lesions. Two initially incompletely ablated lesions were hepatocellular carcinomas and were successfully re-ablated afterwards.

CONCLUSION

SMWA with MRI/CT image fusion is an accurate and safe treatment option for patients with liver lesions not detectable on contrast-enhanced CT planning scans. MRI/CT image fusion may allow more patients with malignant liver lesions to benefit from local ablation treatment even if their lesions are not visible on CT planning examinations.

Manual versus automated image fusion of real-time ultrasonography and MR/CT images for radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: results of a randomized prospective trial (NCT02705118)

PURPOSE

This study compared the technical parameters and clinical outcomes of manual and automatic image fusion techniques of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic tumors.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive patients (male:female=47:23, 67.1±10.9 years old) who underwent RFA for hepatic tumors were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to the manual or automatic registration group. Two operators performed RFA with one of two imaging fusion techniques. Technical parameters (the registration error, time required for image registration, number of point registrations) and clinical outcomes (technical success, technical effectiveness, local tumor progression [LTP]-free survival, and progression-free survival [PFS]) were compared.

RESULTS

The automatic group contained 35 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, while the manual group included 34 hepatocellular carcinoma patients and a patient with colon cancer liver metastasis. The registration error, time required for registration, and number of point registrations were 5.7±4.3 mm, 147.8±78.2 seconds, and 3.26±1.20 in the automatic group, and 6.3±5.0 mm, 150.3±89.7 seconds, and 3.20±1.13 in the manual group, respectively. The technical success and effectiveness rates were both 97.1% in the automatic group and both 100.0% in the manual group. The above differences were not significant. The LTP-free survival and PFS (28.3 and 21.2 months in the automatic group, and 29.0 and 24.9 months in the manual group, respectively) showed no significant between-group differences during a median 20.1-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The technical parameters and clinical outcomes of automatic image fusion were not significantly different from those of manual image fusion for RFA of hepatic tumors.

Ultrasound fusion imaging technologies for guidance in ablation therapy for liver cancer

With advances in imaging technology, images from ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be displayed simultaneously and in real time, according to the angle of the transducer. CT/MR-US fusion imaging improves the visualization of inconspicuous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and helps us to understand the three-dimensional relationship between the liver vasculature and HCC. US fusion imaging guidance facilitates improvement in the treatment response for HCC with poor conspicuity, and the rates of technical success of ablation and local tumor progression for inconspicuous HCC range from 94.4 to 100% and 0 to 8.3%, respectively. Moreover, the development of image fusion has made it possible to compare and overlay pre- and post-ablation US images. This US-US fusion imaging allows side-by-side comparison of the ablative margin, while US-US overlay fusion can visualize the ablative margin because the tumor image is projected onto the ablative hyperechoic zone. Thus, US-US overlay fusion guidance is highly effective for safety margin achievement in local ablation therapy for HCC, providing a lower risk of local tumor progression. This manuscript reviews the current status of ultrasound fusion imaging for percutaneous ablation therapy of HCC.

Abdominal applications of ultrasound fusion imaging technique: liver, kidney, and pancreas

Fusion imaging allows exploitation of the strengths of all imaging modalities simultaneously, eliminating or minimizing the weaknesses of every single modality. Ultrasound (US) fusion imaging provides benefits in real time from both the dynamic information and spatial resolution of the normal US and the high-contrast resolution and wider field of view of the other imaging methods. US fusion imaging can also be associated with the use of different ultrasound techniques such as color Doppler US, elastography, and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), for better localization and characterization of lesions. The present paper is focused on US fusion imaging technologies and clinical applications describing the possible use of this promising imaging technique in the liver, kidney, and pancreatic pathologies.

Recent Advances in the Image-Guided Tumor Ablation of Liver Malignancies: Radiofrequency Ablation with Multiple Electrodes, Real-Time Multimodality Fusion Imaging, and New Energy Sources

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as an effective loco-regional treatment modality for malignant hepatic tumors. Indeed, studies have demonstrated that RFA of early stage hepatocellular carcinomas can provide comparable overall survival to surgical resection. However, the incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) after RFA is significantly higher than that of surgical resection. Thus, to overcome this limitation, multiple electrode radiofrequency (RF) systems that use a multi-channel RF generator have been developed, and they demonstrate better efficiency in creating larger ablation zones than that using the conventional RFA with a single electrode. Furthermore, RFA with multiple electrodes can allow the “no-touch” ablation technique which may also help to reduce LTP. Another technique that would be helpful in this regard is multi-modality-ultrasound fusion imaging, which helps to not only more accurately determine the target lesion by enabling the RFA of small, poorly visible or invisible tumors, but also improve the monitoring of procedures and determine the appropriateness of the ablation margin. In addition, new energy sources, including microwave and cryoablation, have been introduced in imaging-guided tumor ablation. In this review, these recently introduced ablation techniques and the results of the most current animal and clinical studies are discussed.

Clinical utility of real-time ultrasound-multimodality fusion guidance for percutaneous biopsy of focal liver lesions

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively evaluate the clinical value of real-time ultrasonography (US)-computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion imaging for percutaneous needle biopsy of focal liver lesions (FLLs), and to compare its biopsy success rate with that of conventional US-guided biopsy in a propensity-score matched group.

METHODS

This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board and informed consent was obtained from all patients enrolled in the prospective study group. Ninety patients referred to the Department of Radiology for percutaneous biopsy of FLLs were enrolled in this study. Tumor visibility, attainment of a safe access route, and technical feasibility were assessed on conventional US first and later on real-time fusion imaging by one of four abdominal radiologists. Thereafter, differences in scores between real-time fusion imaging and conventional US were determined. In addition, overall diagnostic success rates of a real-time fusion imaging-guided biopsy group and a propensity-score matched, conventional US-guided biopsy group, consisting of 100 patients used as historical control, were compared.

RESULTS

With real-time fusion imaging, tumor visibility, attainment of a safe access route, and operator's technical feasibility were significantly improved compared with conventional US (P < .001). In addition, all invisible (n = 13) and not feasible (n = 10) FLLs on conventional US became visible and feasible for percutaneous US-guided biopsy after applying the fusion system. The diagnostic success rate of real-time fusion-guided biopsy was 94.4% (85/90), which was significantly better than that obtained with the conventional US-guided biopsy (94.4% vs. 83%, P < .03), with reduced biopsy procedure times (7.1 ± 3.5 vs. 9.7 ± 2.8, P < .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time US-CT/MR fusion imaging guidance was able to provide clinical value for percutaneous needle biopsy of FLLs by improving the diagnostic success rate of biopsy and by reducing procedure time.

Automatic image fusion of real-time ultrasound with computed tomography images: a prospective comparison between two auto-registration methods

Background A major drawback of conventional manual image fusion is that the process may be complex, especially for less-experienced operators. Recently, two automatic image fusion techniques called Positioning and Sweeping auto-registration have been developed. Purpose To compare the accuracy and required time for image fusion of real-time ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) images between Positioning and Sweeping auto-registration. Material and Methods Eighteen consecutive patients referred for planning US for radiofrequency ablation or biopsy for focal hepatic lesions were enrolled. Image fusion using both auto-registration methods was performed for each patient. Registration error, time required for image fusion, and number of point locks used were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results Image fusion was successful in all patients. Positioning auto-registration was significantly faster than Sweeping auto-registration for both initial (median, 11 s [range, 3-16 s] vs. 32 s [range, 21-38 s]; P < 0.001] and complete (median, 34.0 s [range, 26-66 s] vs. 47.5 s [range, 32-90]; P = 0.001] image fusion. Registration error of Positioning auto-registration was significantly higher for initial image fusion (median, 38.8 mm [range, 16.0-84.6 mm] vs. 18.2 mm [6.7-73.4 mm]; P = 0.029), but not for complete image fusion (median, 4.75 mm [range, 1.7-9.9 mm] vs. 5.8 mm [range, 2.0-13.0 mm]; P = 0.338]. Number of point locks required to refine the initially fused images was significantly higher with Positioning auto-registration (median, 2 [range, 2-3] vs. 1 [range, 1-2]; P = 0.012]. Conclusion Positioning auto-registration offers faster image fusion between real-time US and pre-procedural CT images than Sweeping auto-registration. The final registration error is similar between the two methods.

A prospective comparison between auto-registration and manual registration of real-time ultrasound with MR images for percutaneous ablation or biopsy of hepatic lesions

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy and required time for image fusion of real-time ultrasound (US) with pre-procedural magnetic resonance (MR) images between positioning auto-registration and manual registration for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation or biopsy of hepatic lesions.

METHODS

This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and all patients gave written informed consent. Twenty-two patients (male/female, n = 18/n = 4; age, 61.0 ± 7.7 years) who were referred for planning US to assess the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation (n = 21) or biopsy (n = 1) for focal hepatic lesions were included. One experienced radiologist performed the two types of image fusion methods in each patient. The performance of auto-registration and manual registration was evaluated. The accuracy of the two methods, based on measuring registration error, and the time required for image fusion for both methods were recorded using in-house software and respectively compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Image fusion was successful in all patients. The registration error was not significantly different between the two methods (auto-registration: median, 3.75 mm; range, 1.0-15.8 mm vs. manual registration: median, 2.95 mm; range, 1.2-12.5 mm, p = 0.242). The time required for image fusion was significantly shorter with auto-registration than with manual registration (median, 28.5 s; range, 18-47 s, vs. median, 36.5 s; range, 14-105 s, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Positioning auto-registration showed promising results compared with manual registration, with similar accuracy and even shorter registration time.

Comparable Outcomes of Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography in the Guidance of Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) in the guidance of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive treatment-naïve patients who received curative RFA for HCC from January 2008 to July 2013. Patients were divided into the US group or the CT group according to their RFA guidance instruments. Patients who were only suitable for US- or CT-guided RFA were excluded. Cumulative incidences of and hazard ratios for HCC recurrence were analyzed after adjusting for competing mortality risk.

Results

We recruited a total of 101 patients in the US group and 51 patients in the CT group. The baseline demographic characteristics were not significantly different in both groups. Initial response rates were similar between the two groups (US vs. CT: 89.1% vs. 92.2%, p = 0.54), and complete tumor ablation was finally achieved for all patients. However, more ablations per session were performed in US group (median 2.0 [1.0–3.0] vs. 1.0 [1.0–2.0]; p<0.01). The 1-, 2- and 3-year local tumor recurrence rates (US vs. CT: 13.0%, 20.9%, and 29.2% vs. 11.2%, 29.8% and 29.8%, respectively) and overall mortality rates (US vs. CT: 5.2%, 9.6% and 16.5% vs. 0%, 3.1% and 23.8%, respectively) were not significantly different. In multivariate analysis, tumor characteristics and underlying liver function, but not US or CT guidance, were independent prognostic factors. The complication rates were similar between the two groups (US vs. CT: 10.9% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.71), and there was no procedure-related mortality.

Conclusions

With comparable major outcomes, either US or CT can be used in the guidance of RFA in experience hands.

Automatic Registration between Real-Time Ultrasonography and Pre-Procedural Magnetic Resonance Images: A Prospective Comparison between Two Registration Methods by Liver Surface and Vessel and by Liver Surface Only

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of and the time required for image fusion between real-time ultrasonography (US) and pre-procedural magnetic resonance (MR) images using automatic registration by a liver surface only method and automatic registration by a liver surface and vessel method. This study consisted of 20 patients referred for planning US to assess the feasibility of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation or biopsy for focal hepatic lesions. The first 10 consecutive patients were evaluated by an experienced radiologist using the automatic registration by liver surface and vessel method, whereas the remaining 10 patients were evaluated using the automatic registration by liver surface only method. For all 20 patients, image fusion was automatically executed after following the protocols and fused real-time US and MR images moved synchronously. The accuracy of each method was evaluated by measuring the registration error, and the time required for image fusion was assessed by evaluating the recorded data using in-house software. The results obtained using the two automatic registration methods were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Image fusion was successful in all 20 patients, and the time required for image fusion was significantly shorter with the automatic registration by liver surface only method than with the automatic registration by liver surface and vessel method (median: 43.0 s, range: 29-74 s vs. median: 83.0 s, range: 46-101 s; p = 0.002). The registration error did not significantly differ between the two methods (median: 4.0 mm, range: 2.1-9.9 mm vs. median: 3.7 mm, range: 1.8-5.2 mm; p = 0.496). The automatic registration by liver surface only method offers faster image fusion between real-time US and pre-procedural MR images than does the automatic registration by liver surface and vessel method. However, the degree of accuracy was similar for the two methods.

Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography with SonoVue®

Due to the ability to detect the typical contrast-imaging pattern for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), that is hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and hypoenhancement in the late phase on a cirrhotic background, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) was included in the American diagnostic algorithm for HCC in 2005. However, its role has been questioned because of the possibility of misdiagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. The present review aims to describe the advantages and disadvantages of CEUS applications using Sonovue® for HCC. In particular there is focus on the accuracy of CEUS in detecting the typical HCC pattern, the CEUS patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the risk of misdiagnosis with HCC, the diagnostic use of CEUS in cases of locoregional and systemic treatments, and the evaluation of response to antiangiogenic treatment using dedicated software.

Real-time US-CT/MRI image fusion for guidance of thermal ablation of liver tumors undetectable with US: results in 295 cases

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess feasibility of US-CT/MRI fusion-guided ablation in liver tumors undetectable with US.

METHODS

From 2002 to 2012, 295 tumors (162 HCCs and 133 metastases; mean diameter 1.3 ± 0.6 cm, range 0.5-2.5 cm) detectable on contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, but completely undetectable with unenhanced US and either totally undetectable or incompletely conspicuous with contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), were treated in 215 sessions using either internally cooled radiofrequency or microwave with standard ablation protocols, guided by an image fusion system (Virtual Navigation System, Esaote S.p.A., Genova, Italy) that combines US with CT/ MRI images. Correct targeting and successful ablation of tumor were verified after 24 hours with CT or MRI.

RESULTS

A total of 282 of 295 (95.6 %) tumors were correctly targeted with successful ablation achieved in 266 of 295 (90.2 %). Sixteen of 295 (5.4 %) tumors were correctly targeted, but unsuccessfully ablated, and 13 of 295 (4.4 %) tumors were unsuccessfully ablated due to inaccurate targeting. There were no perioperative deaths. Major complications were observed in 2 of the 215 treatments sessions (0.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time virtual navigation system with US-CT/MRI fusion imaging is precise for targeting and achieving successful ablation of target tumors undetectable with US alone. Therefore, a larger population could benefit from ultrasound guided ablation procedures.

Real-time image fusion for successful percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an established nonsurgical curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of its efficiency and safety, sonography is the most commonly used imaging modality when performing RFA. However, the presence of HCC nodules that are inconspicuous when using conventional sonography is a major drawback of RFA and limits its feasibility as a treatment for HCC. However, a new technology has been developed that synthesizes high-resolution multiplanar reconstruction images using 3-dimensional data and is combined with a position-tracking system using magnetic navigation. With this technology, real-time sonograms can be fused with corresponding computed tomographic, magnetic resonance imaging, or even sonographic volume data; this process is known as real-time image fusion. In this article, we describe this novel imaging method as a useful tool for successful RFA treatment of HCC.

Fusion imaging of real-time ultrasonography with CT or MRI for hepatic intervention

With the technical development of ultrasonography (US), electromagnetic tracking-based fusion imaging of real-time US and computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) images has been used for percutaneous hepatic intervention such as biopsy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Because of the fusion imaging technique, the fused CT or MR images show the same plane and move synchronously while performing real-time US. With this information, fusion imaging can enhance lesion detectability and reduce the false positive detection of focal hepatic lesions with poor sonographic conspicuity. Three-dimensional US can also be fused with realtime US for the percutaneous RFA of liver tumors requiring overlapping ablation. When fusion imaging is not sufficient for identifying small focal hepatic lesions, contrast-enhanced US can be added to fusion imaging.

Planning US for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinomas (1-3 cm): value of fusion imaging with conventional US and CT/MR images

PURPOSE

To assess whether fusion of conventional ultrasonography (US) with liver computed tomography/magnetic resonance images for planning US for percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation can reduce false-positive detection and enhance lesion detectability of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on conventional US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. A total of 137 patients with single HCCs (mean ± standard deviation, 1.7 ± 0.6 cm; range, 1.1-3.0 cm) were included. Planning US was performed by two radiologists by using conventional US first and fusion imaging later in the same session. The false-positive detection rate of conventional US was assessed with the results of fusion imaging used as a reference standard. True-positive detection rates on conventional US and fusion imaging were compared by McNemar test. Initially undetectable HCCs on conventional US that became detectable after image fusion were also assessed.

RESULTS

The false-positive detection rate of conventional US was 7.7% (nine of 117). Overall true-positive detection rates on conventional US and fusion imaging were 78.8% (108 of 137) and 90.5% (124 of 137), respectively (P = .0002); the rates were significantly different between conventional US and fusion imaging for HCCs smaller than 2.0 cm, but not for HCCs 2.0 cm or larger. Of 20 initially undetectable HCCs on conventional US, nine (45.0%) became detectable after image fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Fusion imaging for planning US for percutaneous RF ablation can reduce false-positive detection and enhance lesion detectability of small HCCs on conventional US.

Fusion imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinomas not visible on conventional ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess whether fusion imaging of conventional ultrasound and liver CT or MR images can improve the conspicuity of lesions and feasibility of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) not visible on ultrasound. Whether peritumoral anatomic landmarks can be used for the placement of an electrode in HCCs not visible on ultrasound even after image fusion was also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Planning ultrasound for percutaneous RFA was performed using conventional ultrasound first and then using fusion imaging later during the same session. The visibility of HCCs and feasibility of RFA on conventional ultrasound and on fusion imaging were assessed. We evaluated how many HCCs initially not visible on conventional ultrasound could be visualized and ablated after applying the fusion imaging technique. One hundred twenty HCCs not visible on conventional ultrasound in 96 patients were included.

RESULTS

When fusion imaging was applied, 38 of the 120 (31.7%) HCCs that were initially not visible could be seen and RFA was feasible. Among the remaining 82 HCCs still not visible after image fusion, 26 (31.7%) were ablated under the guidance of fusion imaging the technique based on peritumoral anatomic landmarks. Overall, 64 of 120 (53.3%) HCCs (59.4%, 57 of 96 patients) not visible on conventional ultrasound could be ablated under the guidance of the fusion imaging technique.

CONCLUSION

Fusion imaging can improve the conspicuity of HCCs and the feasibility of percutaneous RFA of HCCs not visible on conventional ultrasound. Peritumoral anatomic landmarks can be used for electrode placement in HCCs that are still not visible even after image fusion.

Pretreatment evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas with poor conspicuity on conventional ultrasonography

Objective

To determine whether pretreatment evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is effective for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with poor conspicuity on conventional ultrasonography (US).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was waived. From June 2008 to July 2011, 82 patients having HCCs (1.2 ± 0.4 cm) with poor conspicuity on planning US for RFA were evaluated with CEUS prior to percutaneous RFA. We analyzed our database, radiologic reports, and US images in order to determine whether the location of HCC candidates on planning US coincide with that on CEUS. To avoid incomplete ablation, percutaneous RFA was performed only when HCC nodules were identified on CEUS. The rate of technical success was assessed. The cumulative rate of local tumor progression was estimated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method (mean follow-up: 24.0 ± 13.0 months).

Results

Among 82 patients, 73 (89%) HCCs were identified on CEUS, whereas 9 (11%) were not. Of 73 identifiable HCCs on CEUS, the location of HCC on planning US corresponded with that on CEUS in 64 (87.7%), whereas the location did not correspond in 9 (12.3%) HCCs. Technical success was achieved for all 73 identifiable HCCs on CEUS in a single (n = 72) or two (n = 1) RFA sessions. Cumulative rates of local tumor progression were estimated as 1.9% and 15.4% at 1 and 3 years, respectively.

Conclusion

Pretreatment evaluation with CEUS is effective for percutaneous RFA of HCCs with poor conspicuity on conventional US.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: fusion imaging guidance for management of lesions with poor conspicuity at conventional sonography

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether fusion imaging-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is effective in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has poor conspicuity at conventional sonography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Percutaneous RFA of HCC with poor conspicuity was performed under fusion imaging guidance. The time needed for image fusion between the ultrasound and CT or MR images was recorded. The quality of image fusion and the degree of operator confidence in identifying the index tumor were graded on 4-point scales. Technical success and procedure-related complications were evaluated with liver CT immediately after RFA.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with HCC (1.0 ± 0.3 cm) were enrolled. Twenty-seven of the 30 lesions detected at planning ultrasound were identified with fusion imaging. Of the 30 HCC candidate lesions detected with ultrasound, five were found to be pseudolesions close to the index tumor. The time needed for image fusion for the 27 lesions was 3.7 ± 2.1 minutes (range, 1.3-9.0 minutes). The quality of image fusion was graded 3.4 ± 0.6, and the degree of operator confidence in identifying the 30 HCCs, 3.3 ± 0.9. The technical success rate was 90% (27/30) in intention-to-treat analysis and 100% in analysis of actually treated lesions. There were no major RFA-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Fusion imaging-guided percutaneous RFA is effective in the management of HCC that has poor ultrasound conspicuity.