Impact of Shoulder Sonography on Clinical Decision Making

Current and future utility of ultrasound imaging in upper extremity musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A scoping review

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a scoping review.

BACKGROUND

Continued advances in musculoskeletal sonography technology and access have increased the feasibility of point-of-care use to support day-to-day clinical care and decision-making. Sonography can help improve therapeutic outcomes in upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation by enabling clinicians to visualize underlying structures during treatment.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to (1) evaluate the growth, range, extent, and composition of sonography literature supporting UE rehabilitation; (2) identify trends, gaps, and opportunities with regard to anatomic areas and diagnoses examined and ultrasound techniques used; and (3) evaluate potential research and practice utility.

METHODS

Searches were completed in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, and BIOSIS. We included data-driven articles using ultrasound imaging for upper extremity structures in rehabilitation-related conditions. Articles directly applicable to UE rehabilitation were labeled direct articles, while those requiring translation were labeled indirect articles. Articles were further categorized by ultrasound imaging purpose. Article content between the two groups was descriptively compared, and direct articles underwent an evaluation of evidence levels and narrative synthesis to explore potential clinical utility.

RESULTS

Average publication rates for the final included articles (n = 337) steadily increased. Indirect articles (n = 288) used sonography to explore condition etiology, assess measurement properties, inform medical procedure choice, and grade condition severity. Direct articles (n = 49) used sonography to assess outcomes, inform clinical reasoning, and aid intervention delivery. Acute UE conditions and emerging sonography technology were rarely examined, while tendon, muscle, and soft tissue conditions and grayscale imaging were common. Rheumatic and peripheral nerve conditions and Doppler imaging were more prevalent in indirect than direct articles. Among reported sonography service providers, there was a high proportion of nonradiologist clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Sonography literature for UE rehabilitation demonstrates potential utility in evaluating outcomes, informing clinical reasoning, and assisting intervention delivery. A large peripheral knowledge base provides opportunities for clinical applications; however, further research is needed to determine clinical efficacy and impact for specific applications.

Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging as First-Line Imaging Strategies for Rotator Cuff Pathologies: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Practices, Economic Efficiency, and Future Perspectives

Rotator cuff injuries are a prevalent cause of atraumatic chronic shoulder pain, imposing a significant healthcare burden. This article reviews the clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging modalities, practice variations, and economic efficiency considerations in the evaluation of rotator cuff pathologies. Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the primary imaging methods for diagnosing rotator cuff injuries. US provides real-time visualization but has limited tissue penetration, while MRI offers detailed anatomical information but is not a dynamic process. Studies show that MRI is superior to US with higher sensitivity and specificity. MRI is the gold standard, particularly for surgical planning, but US remains relevant when MRI is not feasible. Both require standardized protocols for evaluating tear dimensions and muscle atrophy. With the operator-dependent nature of US, MRI offers a more comprehensive assessment of rotator cuff tears and predictive insights for clinical outcomes. Practice variations exist in the management of rotator cuff pathologies, with some countries favoring US as the primary imaging modality and others relying more on MRI. These variations are influenced by factors like resource availability and healthcare system nuances. In Australia, current guidelines lean toward conservative management, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and increased costs. The United States often favors MRI, while Canada advocates for US as the initial choice. Economic considerations play a significant role in selecting imaging modalities. While US is cost-effective, it may necessitate subsequent MRI examinations, contributing to inefficiencies in the diagnostic process. Studies suggest that a combined approach of US and MRI is less efficient and cost-effective than MRI alone. However, the use of both modalities rather than MRI alone is common in clinical practice, adding to healthcare expenses. In conclusion, the choice of imaging modality for rotator cuff pathologies should consider factors such as diagnostic efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and resource availability. Radiologists play a pivotal role in guiding this selection and ensuring comprehensive evaluations. Future considerations should include the revision of management guidelines and the potential inclusion of shoulder pathologies in healthcare coverage to optimize patient care and healthcare expenditure.

The Evolving Roles of MRI and Ultrasound in First-Line Imaging of Rotator Cuff Injuries

Rotator cuff tears are the most likely source of shoulder pain in adults and may cause protracted disability. Management of rotator cuff tears is associated with considerable costs. Accurate diagnosis can guide surgical planning and help achieve a favorable clinical outcome. While radiographs remain the initial imaging test for shoulder injury, the roles of MRI and ultrasound (US) as first-line imaging after radiography are evolving. This review leverages current literature and the practical experience of subspecialty musculoskeletal radiologists from different institutions in describing a practical approach to imaging rotator cuff pathology. Both MRI and US are accurate for identifying rotator cuff tears, but each has advantages and shortcomings. As both modalities currently represent reasonable first-line approaches, considerable practice variation has evolved. Given the low cost of US, imagers should strive to optimize the quality of shoulder US examinations and to build referrer confidence in this modality. The roles of direct CT and MR angiography, as well as imaging evaluation of the postoperative rotator cuff, are also considered. Through careful selection among the available imaging modalities, as well as optimal performance and interpretation of such examinations, radiologists can positively contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff injuries.

Influence of Acromial Morphologic Characteristics and Acromioclavicular Arthrosis on the Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Partial Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to determine the medium-term effect of ultrasound-guided infiltration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on partial tears of the supraspinatus tendon (SST) and to identify prognostic indicators of an unfavorable outcome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Over a period of 4 years, patients with a partial SST tear smaller than 1.5 cm referred for ultrasound-guided PRP infiltration (1 mL) for shoulder pain lasting more than 3 months were recruited consecutively. MRI was used to analyze the type of acromion and presence of acromioclavicular (AC) arthrosis. Primary (size of the tear and associated bursitis) and secondary (mobility and pain) results were collected at 3 months. RESULTS. The study included 128 patients (66 men, 62 women; mean age, 48.3 years; range, 20-59 years). At 3 months, favorable evolution of the tear repair was recorded in 71.1% (91/128) of patients and resolution of bursitis in 66.7% (42/63). Changes in tear size had large effect sizes (Cohen d ≥ 1.16), as did pain and shoulder mobility (Cohen d ≥ 0.95). The strongest predictors of unfavorable evolution of tear and bursitis were type 3 acromion and types 1 and 2 acromion with AC arthrosis (p < 0.001; β = 20.412). CONCLUSION. Ultrasound-guided PRP infiltration of partial tears of the SST relieves pain and improves shoulder mobility, but its effect on the size of the tear is influenced by the morphologic characteristics of the acromion and the presence of AC arthrosis. The effect of PRP is insufficient in patients with a type 3 acromion or severe AC arthrosis.

Clinical Contribution of Wrist and Hand Sonography: Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical contribution of wrist and hand sonography.

METHODS

This study was performed in a tertiary academic medical center. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Data collection was done retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016 and prospectively from January 2017 to July 2017. The study included 112 consecutive patients (52 men and 60 women; mean age, 47 ± 16 years; range, 15-87 years). A total of 126 examinations were performed. All ultrasound examinations were done with high-resolution probes with up-to-date protocols. The clinical contribution of wrist and hand sonography was assessed (ultrasound examinations contributive/noncontributive). Descriptive statistic and nonparametric tests were used.

RESULTS

In 96 of 126 (76%) examinations, sonography proved to be contributive, and in 30 of 126 (24%) examinations, sonography proved to be noncontributive. The contributive/noncontributive ratio was 3.2 (96/30). A total of 51 of 126 (40%) examinations were performed in patients with a history of previous trauma. Sonography proved to be significantly more contributive in a posttraumatic setting (chi-square, 9.2; P = .0023).

CONCLUSION

Wrist and hand sonography significantly influences the diagnostic and therapeutic path, especially in a posttraumatic setting.