1
|
Knop MR, Nagashima-Hayashi M, Lin R, Saing CH, Ung M, Oy S, Yam ELY, Zahari M, Yi S. Impact of mHealth interventions on maternal, newborn, and child health from conception to 24 months postpartum in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Med 2024; 22:196. [PMID: 38750486 PMCID: PMC11095039 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03417-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have been harnessed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to address the intricate challenges confronting maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH). This review aspires to scrutinize the effectiveness of mHealth interventions on MNCH outcomes during the pivotal first 1000 days of life, encompassing the period from conception through pregnancy, childbirth, and post-delivery, up to the age of 2 years. METHODS A comprehensive search was systematically conducted in May 2022 across databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL), Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Trip Pro, to unearth peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2022. The inclusion criteria consisted of (i) mHealth interventions directed at MNCH; (ii) study designs, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RCT variations, quasi-experimental designs, controlled before-and-after studies, or interrupted time series studies); (iii) reports of outcomes pertinent to the first 1000 days concept; and (iv) inclusion of participants from LMICs. Each study was screened for quality in alignment with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Joanne Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. The included articles were then analyzed and categorized into 12 mHealth functions and outcome domain categories (antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care), followed by forest plot comparisons of effect measures. RESULTS From the initial pool of 7119 articles, we included 131 in this review, comprising 56 RCTs, 38 cluster-RCTs, and 37 quasi-experimental studies. Notably, 62% of these articles exhibited a moderate or high risk of bias. Promisingly, mHealth strategies, such as dispatching text message reminders to women and equipping healthcare providers with digital planning and scheduling tools, exhibited the capacity to augment antenatal clinic attendance and enhance the punctuality of child immunization. However, findings regarding facility-based delivery, child immunization attendance, and infant feeding practices were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that mHealth interventions can improve antenatal care attendance and child immunization timeliness in LMICs. However, their impact on facility-based delivery and infant feeding practices varies. Nevertheless, the potential of mHealth to enhance MNCH services in resource-limited settings is promising. More context-specific implementation studies with rigorous evaluations are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Ravn Knop
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michiko Nagashima-Hayashi
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ruixi Lin
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chan Hang Saing
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mengieng Ung
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sreymom Oy
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Esabelle Lo Yan Yam
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marina Zahari
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siyan Yi
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
- KHANA Center for Population Health Research, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
- Public Health Program, College of Education and Health Sciences, Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Papaioannou D, Hamer-Kiwacz S, Mooney C, Cooper C, O'Cathain A, Sprange K, Moody G. Recording harms in randomized controlled trials of behavior change interventions: a scoping review and map of the evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 169:111275. [PMID: 38336177 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Randomized controlled trials evaluate diverse interventions. This can include medical interventions such as drugs or surgical procedures, or behavior change interventions (BCIs) that aim to change a habit, belief, or attitude to improve health, for example, healthy eating, psychological wellbeing. Harms are often recorded poorly or inconsistently within randomized controlled trials of BCIs. This scoping review aimed to collate and describe literature on categories, definitions, and mechanisms of harms from BCIs; methods of identifying plausible harms; and recommendations for recording harms. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A scoping review was conducted. Three databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were searched. Reference list checking and citation searching were performed. Articles were included if they discussed (1) interventions that aimed to modify behavior, (2) categories or mechanisms of harms, and (3) methods or recommendations for recording harms. All research designs were included. One reviewer reviewed titles, abstracts, and full texts; queries were checked with another reviewer. Data were extracted and synthesized descriptively by one reviewer and checked by another reviewer. A thematic map was constructed to summarize the review findings. Harms described from specific BCIs were identified, and examples were selected and summarized. RESULTS The review included 37 articles. Nineteen of 37 articles contributed to a thematic review. Three articles described categories of harms; categories of harm included physical, psychological, group and social interactions, cultural, equity, opportunity cost, environmental, and economic. Seven articles included mechanisms or underlying factors for harms including feelings of failure leading to shame or stigma, and group interventions enabling knowledge exchange on unhealthy behaviors. Twelve articles provided recommendations for recording harms, including taking a proportionate approach by focusing on the most plausible and important harms, collecting different perspectives on whether harms had occurred (eg, caregivers and family members), and using qualitative research methods to identify harms. One article described a three-step method to identify plausible harms from an intervention, and six articles supported aspects of the method. Eighteen of 37 articles contributed to a review which collated harms arising from specific interventions, for example, a peer support intervention in inflammatory bowel disease caused distressing conversations which might lead to anxiety and confrontation with a possible negative future. CONCLUSION BCIs can cause harm. This review identified categories and proposed mechanisms of harms, as well as methods and recommendations for identifying and recording harms in BCIs for inclusion in forthcoming recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Papaioannou
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Sienna Hamer-Kiwacz
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Cara Mooney
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Cindy Cooper
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Alicia O'Cathain
- Health and Care Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Kirsty Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Gwenllian Moody
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sorhaindo AM, Castle S, Flomen L, Lathrop E, Mohagheghpour S, Dabash R, Toedtli FK, Wilkins R, Läser L, Titulaer P, Nyamato E, Dakouo ML, Awadallah A, Shrestha R, Morales M, Rehnström Loi U. Adaptations to comprehensive abortion care during the COVID-19 pandemic: case studies of provision in Bolivia, Mali, Nepal, and the occupied Palestinian territory. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2023; 31:2249694. [PMID: 37747711 PMCID: PMC11003643 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2249694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted comprehensive abortion care provision. To maintain access to services while keeping individuals safe from infection, many organisations adapted their programmes. We conducted a programme evaluation to examine service adaptations implemented in Bolivia, Mali, Nepal, and the occupied Palestinian territory. Our programme evaluation used a case study approach to explore four programme adaptations through 14 group and individual interviews among 16 service providers, facility managers and representatives from supporting organisations. Data collection took place between October 2021 and January 2022. We identified adaptations to comprehensive abortion care services in relation to provision, health information systems and counselling, and referrals. Four overarching strategies emerged: (1) the use of digital technologies, (2) home and community outreach, (3) health worker optimisation, and (4) further consideration of groups in vulnerable situations. In Bolivia, the use of a messaging application increased access to confidential gender-based violence support and comprehensive abortion care. In Mali, the adoption of digital approaches created timely and complete data reporting and trained members of the community served as "interlocutors" between the communities and providers. In Nepal, an interim law expanded medical abortion provision to pharmacies, and home visits complemented facility-based services. In the occupied Palestinian territory, the use of a hotline and social media expanded access to quick and reliable information, counselling, referrals, and post-abortion care. Adaptations to comprehensive abortion care service delivery to mitigate disruptions to services during the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to benefit service quality of care, access to care, routine monitoring, as well as inclusivity and communication in the longer term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annik Mahalia Sorhaindo
- Technical Consultant, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Castle
- Technical Consultant, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lola Flomen
- Mixed Health Systems Consultant, Population Services International, WashingtonDC, USA
| | - Eva Lathrop
- Global Medical Director, Population Services International, WashingtonDC, USA
| | - Shirine Mohagheghpour
- Senior Technical Advisor for Service Delivery, Population Services International, WashingtonDC, USA
| | - Rasha Dabash
- Senior Technical Consultant, Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Rebecca Wilkins
- Technical Lead, Abortion, International Planned Parenthood Federation, London, UK
| | - Laurence Läser
- Technical Officer UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patricia Titulaer
- Technical Consultant, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ernest Nyamato
- Global Associate Director, Quality of Care, Ipas, Nairobi County, Kenya
| | - Mary Lea Dakouo
- Senior Technical Advisor, Population Services International, Bamako, Mali
| | - Ammal Awadallah
- Executive Director, Palestine Family Planning and Protection Association (PFPPA), Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Raman Shrestha
- Global Evidence and Impact Advisor, Marie Stopes Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Malena Morales
- Country Director Bolivia, Ipas LAC Region, La Paz, Bolivia
| | - Ulrika Rehnström Loi
- Technical Officer, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Free C, Palmer MJ, Potter K, McCarthy OL, Jerome L, Berendes S, Gubijev A, Knight M, Jamal Z, Dhaliwal F, Carpenter JR, Morris TP, Edwards P, French R, Macgregor L, Turner KME, Baraitser P, Hickson FCI, Wellings K, Roberts I, Bailey JV, Hart G, Michie S, Clayton T, Devries K. Behavioural intervention to reduce sexually transmitted infections in people aged 16–24 years in the UK: the safetxt RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2023. [DOI: 10.3310/dane8826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
The prevalence of genital chlamydia and gonorrhoea is higher in the 16–24 years age group than those in other age group. With users, we developed the theory-based safetxt intervention to reduce sexually transmitted infections.
Objectives
To establish the effect of the safetxt intervention on the incidence of chlamydia/gonorrhoea infection at 1 year.
Design
A parallel-group, individual-level, randomised superiority trial in which care providers and outcome assessors were blinded to allocation.
Setting
Recruitment was from 92 UK sexual health clinics.
Participants
Inclusion criteria were a positive chlamydia or gonorrhoea test result, diagnosis of non-specific urethritis or treatment started for chlamydia/gonorrhoea/non-specific urethritis in the last 2 weeks; owning a personal mobile phone; and being aged 16–24 years.
Allocation
Remote computer-based randomisation with an automated link to the messaging system delivering intervention or control group messages.
Intervention
The safetxt intervention was designed to reduce sexually transmitted infection by increasing partner notification, condom use and sexually transmitted infection testing before sex with new partners. It employed educational, enabling and incentivising content delivered by 42–79 text messages over 1 year, tailored according to type of infection, gender and sexuality.
Comparator
A monthly message regarding trial participation.
Main outcomes
The primary outcome was the incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection at 12 months, assessed using nucleic acid amplification tests. Secondary outcomes at 1 and 12 months included self-reported partner notification, condom use and sexually transmitted infection testing prior to sex with new partner(s).
Results
Between 1 April 2016 and 23 November 2018, we assessed 20,476 people for eligibility and consented and randomised 6248 participants, allocating 3123 to the safetxt intervention and 3125 to the control. Primary outcome data were available for 4675 (74.8%) participants. The incidence of chlamydia/gonorrhoea infection was 22.2% (693/3123) in the intervention group and 20.3% (633/3125) in the control group (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.31). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in any of the prespecified subgroups. Partner notification was 85.6% in the intervention group and 84.0% in the control group (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.33). At 12 months, condom use at last sex was 33.8% in the intervention group and 31.2% in the control group (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.28) and condom use at first sex with most recent new partner was 54.4% in the intervention group and 48.7% in the control group (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.45). Testing before sex with a new partner was 39.5% in the intervention group and 40.9% in the control group (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.10). Having two or more partners since joining the trial was 56.9% in the intervention group and 54.8% in the control group (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.24) and having sex with someone new since joining the trial was 69.7% in the intervention group and 67.4% in the control group (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.28). There were no differences in safety outcomes. Additional sensitivity and per-protocol analyses showed similar results.
Limitations
Our understanding of the mechanism of action for the unanticipated effects is limited.
Conclusions
The safetxt intervention did not reduce chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections, with slightly more infections in the intervention group. The intervention increased condom use but also increased the number of partners and new partners. Randomised controlled trials are essential for evaluating health communication interventions, which can have unanticipated effects.
Future work
Randomised controlled trials evaluating novel interventions in this complex area are needed.
Trial registration
This trial is registered as ISRCTN64390461.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 11, No. 1. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Free
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Melissa J Palmer
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kimberley Potter
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ona L McCarthy
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Lauren Jerome
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sima Berendes
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anasztazia Gubijev
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Megan Knight
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Zahra Jamal
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Farandeep Dhaliwal
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - James R Carpenter
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Tim P Morris
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK
| | - Phil Edwards
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rebecca French
- Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Louis Macgregor
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Katy ME Turner
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Ford CI Hickson
- Sigma Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kaye Wellings
- Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ian Roberts
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Julia V Bailey
- eHealth Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Graham Hart
- Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tim Clayton
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Karen Devries
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baynes C, Steyn P, Soi C, Dinis A, Tembe S, Mehrtash H, Narasimhan M, Kiarie J, Sherr K. Use of implementation science to advance family planning programs in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Front Glob Womens Health 2022; 3:1038297. [PMID: 36561275 PMCID: PMC9763469 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.1038297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective As environmental and economic pressures converge with demands to achieve sustainability development goals, low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) increasingly require strategies to strengthen and scale-up evidence-based practices (EBP) related to family planning (FP). Implementation science (IS) can help these efforts. The purpose of this article is to elucidate patterns in the use of IS in FP research and identify ways to maximize the potential of IS to advance FP in LMIC. Design and methods We conducted a systematic review that describes how IS concepts and principles have been operationalized in LMIC FP research published from 2007-2021. We searched six databases for implementation studies of LMIC FP interventions. Our review synthesizes the characteristics of implementation strategies and research efforts used to enhance the performance of FP-related EBP in these settings, identifying gaps, strengths and lessons learned. Results Four-hundred and seventy-two studies were eligible for full-text review. Ninety-two percent of studies were carried out in one region only, whereas 8 percent were multi-country studies that took place across multiple regions. 37 percent of studies were conducted in East Africa, 21 percent in West and Central Africa, 19 percent in Southern Africa and South Asia, respectively, and fewer than 5 percent in other Asian countries, Latin America and Middle East and North Africa, respectively. Fifty-four percent were on strategies that promoted individuals' uptake of FP. Far fewer were on strategies to enhance the coverage, implementation, spread or sustainability of FP programs. Most studies used quantitative methods only and evaluated user-level outcomes over implementation outcomes. Thirty percent measured processes and outcomes of strategies, 15 percent measured changes in implementation outcomes, and 31 percent report on the effect of contextual factors. Eighteen percent reported that they were situated within decision-making processes to address locally identified implementation issues. Fourteen percent of studies described measures to involve stakeholders in the research process. Only 7 percent of studies reported that implementation was led by LMIC delivery systems or implementation partners. Conclusions IS has potential to further advance LMIC FP programs, although its impact will be limited unless its concepts and principles are incorporated more systematically. To support this, stakeholders must focus on strategies that address a wider range of implementation outcomes; adapt research designs and blend methods to evaluate outcomes and processes; and establish collaborative research efforts across implementation, policy, and research domains. Doing so will expand opportunities for learning and applying new knowledge in pragmatic research paradigms where research is embedded in usual implementation conditions and addresses critical issues such as scale up and sustainability of evidence-informed FP interventions.Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42020199353.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Baynes
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States,Correspondence: Colin Baynes
| | - Petrus Steyn
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Soi
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Aneth Dinis
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States,The National Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health of Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Stelio Tembe
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Hedieh Mehrtash
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Manjulaa Narasimhan
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - James Kiarie
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kenneth Sherr
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States,Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burke HM, Ridgeway K, Murray K, Mickler A, Thomas R, Williams K. Reproductive empowerment and contraceptive self-care: a systematic review. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2022; 29:2090057. [PMID: 35892261 PMCID: PMC9336472 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2090057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Holly M. Burke
- Scientist, FHI 360, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health division, Durham, NC, USA. Correspondence:
| | - Kathleen Ridgeway
- Research Associate, FHI 360, Health Services Research division, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kate Murray
- Research Associate, FHI 360, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health division, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alexandria Mickler
- Program Analyst, USAID/Public Health Institute, Office of Population and Reproductive Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Reana Thomas
- Technical Officer, FHI 360, Research Utilization division, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Katie Williams
- MPH Candidate, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Fellow, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith C, Sokhey L, Tijamo CFE, McLaren M, Free C, Watkins J, Amra O, Masuda C, Oreglia E. Development of an intervention to support reproductive health of garment factory workers in Cambodia: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e049254. [PMID: 34815276 PMCID: PMC8611443 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to describe the development of an intervention to support the reproductive health of garment factory workers in Cambodia. DESIGN A qualitative study informed by intervention mapping which included semistructured interviews and participant observation, followed by intervention development activities including specifying possible behaviour change, designing the intervention, and producing and refining intervention content. SETTING The research was conducted by a multidisciplinary team with backgrounds in public health, linguistics, digital cultures and service delivery in a suburb of Phnom Penh where many garment factories cluster. PARTICIPANTS Garment factory workers in Cambodia; typically young women aged under 30 years who have migrated from rural areas to Phnom Penh city. OUTCOMES Analysis of reproductive health issues facing garment factory workers and metrics of videos developed. RESULTS Our research identified some challenges that Cambodian garment factory workers experience regarding contraception and abortion. Concerns or experience of side-effects were identified as an important determinant leading to non-use of effective contraception and subsequent unintended pregnancy. Financial constraints and a desire to space pregnancies were the main reported reasons to seek an abortion. Information about medical abortion given to women by private providers was often verbal, with packaging and the drug information leaflet withheld. In order to address limitations in the provision of accessible reproductive health information for factory workers, and given their observed widespread use of social media, we decided to make three 'edutainment' videos about family planning. Key social media metrics of the videos were evaluated after 1 month. CONCLUSIONS We describe the development of an intervention to support reproductive health among garment factory workers in Cambodia. These videos could be further improved and additional videos could be developed. More work is required to develop appropriate and effective interventions to support reproductive health of garment factory workers in Cambodia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Smith
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ly Sokhey
- Marie Stopes International Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | | | | | - Caroline Free
- Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Justin Watkins
- School of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, London, UK
| | - Ou Amra
- Marie Stopes International Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Chisato Masuda
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chukwu E, Gilroy S, Addaquay K, Jones NN, Karimu VG, Garg L, Dickson KE. Formative Study of Mobile Phone Use for Family Planning Among Young People in Sierra Leone: Global Systematic Survey. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e23874. [PMID: 34766908 PMCID: PMC8663572 DOI: 10.2196/23874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teenage pregnancy remains high with low contraceptive prevalence among adolescents (aged 15-19 years) in Sierra Leone. Stakeholders leverage multiple strategies to address the challenge. Mobile technology is pervasive and presents an opportunity to reach young people with critical sexual reproductive health and family planning messages. OBJECTIVE The objectives of this research study are to understand how mobile health (mHealth) is used for family planning, understand phone use habits among young people in Sierra Leone, and recommend strategies for mobile-enabled dissemination of family planning information at scale. METHODS This formative research study was conducted using a systematic literature review and focus group discussions (FGDs). The literature survey assessed similar but existing interventions through a systematic search of 6 scholarly databases. Cross-sections of young people of both sexes and their support groups were engaged in 9 FGDs in an urban and a rural district in Sierra Leone. The FGD data were qualitatively analyzed using MAXQDA software (VERBI Software GmbH) to determine appropriate technology channels, content, and format for different user segments. RESULTS Our systematic search results were categorized using Grading of Recommended Assessment and Evaluation (GRADE) into communication channels, audiovisual messaging format, purpose of the intervention, and message direction. The majority of reviewed articles report on SMS-based interventions. At the same time, most intervention purposes are for awareness and as helpful resources. Our survey did not find documented use of custom mHealth apps for family planning information dissemination. From the FGDs, more young people in Sierra Leone own basic mobile phones than those that have feature capablilities or are smartphone. Young people with smartphones use them mostly for WhatsApp and Facebook. Young people widely subscribe to the social media-only internet bundle, with the cost ranging from 1000 leones (US $0.11) to 1500 leones (US $0.16) daily. Pupils in both districts top-up their voice call and SMS credit every day between 1000 leones (US $0.11) and 5000 leones (US $0.52). CONCLUSIONS mHealth has facilitated family planning information dissemination for demand creation around the world. Despite the widespread use of social and new media, SMS is the scalable channel to reach literate and semiliterate young people. We have cataloged mHealth for contraceptive research to show SMS followed by call center as widely used channels. Jingles are popular for audiovisual message formats, mostly delivered as either push or pull only message directions (not both). Interactive voice response and automated calls are best suited to reach nonliterate young people at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emeka Chukwu
- Department of Computer Information System, Faculty of Information and Communications Technology (ICT), Msida, Malta.,United Nations Population Fund Country Office, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Sonia Gilroy
- United Nations Population Fund Country Office, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Kojo Addaquay
- United Nations Population Fund Country Office, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Nki Nafisa Jones
- United Nations Population Fund Country Office, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Victor Gbadia Karimu
- National Secretariat for the Reduction of Teenage Pregnancy, New England, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Lalit Garg
- Department of Computer Information System, Faculty of Information and Communications Technology (ICT), Msida, Malta
| | - Kim Eva Dickson
- United Nations Population Fund Country Office, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kirkwood EK, Clymer C, Imbulana K, Mozumder S, Dibley MJ, Alam NA. What role do mHealth interventions play in changing gender relations? A systematic review of qualitative findings. (Preprint). JMIR Hum Factors 2021; 9:e32330. [PMID: 35862143 PMCID: PMC9353673 DOI: 10.2196/32330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The rapid and widespread growth of mobile technologies in low- and middle-income countries can offer groundbreaking ways of disseminating public health interventions. However, gender-based inequalities present a challenge for women in accessing mobile technology. Research has shown that mobile health (mHealth) interventions can affect gender relations in both positive and negative ways; however, few mHealth programs use a gender-sensitive lens when designing, implementing, or analyzing programs. Objective This systematic review aims to identify and summarize the findings of qualitative research studies that explore the impact of mHealth interventions on gender relations as a result of participating in such initiatives in low- and middle-income countries. Methods We performed a systematic literature review to examine empirical evidence of changes in gender relations attributed to participation in an mHealth intervention in low- and middle-income countries. Peer-reviewed articles were included based on whether they evaluated an mHealth intervention and were published between 2013 and 2020. Articles using mHealth that solely targeted health workers, did not assess a specific intervention, used mobile technology for data collection only, or were formative or exploratory in nature were excluded. The search terms were entered into 4 key electronic databases—MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Scopus—generating a comprehensive list of potentially relevant peer-reviewed articles. Thematic analysis was used to identify, analyze, and report the themes that emerged from our data. Results Of the 578 full-text articles retrieved, 14 (2.4%) were eligible for inclusion in the study. None of the articles appraised gender from the outset. The articles uncovered findings on gender relations through the course of the intervention or postprogram evaluation. Most studies took place in sub-Saharan Africa, with the remainder in South and Southeast Asia. The articles focused on maternal and child health, HIV diagnosis and treatment, and reproductive health. This review found that mHealth programs could enhance spousal communication, foster emotional support between couples, improve women’s self-efficacy and autonomy in seeking health information and services, and increase their involvement in health-related decision-making. Despite the positive impacts, some mHealth interventions had an adverse effect, reinforcing the digital divide, upholding men as gatekeepers of information and sole decision-makers, and exacerbating relationship problems. Conclusions These results suggest that given the rapid and persistent upscale of mHealth interventions in low- and middle-income settings, it is imperative to design interventions that consider their impact on power dynamics and gender relations. Future research is needed to fill the evidence gaps on gender and mHealth, acknowledging that women are not passive beneficiaries and that they need to actively participate and be empowered by mHealth interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Kirkwood
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Michael J Dibley
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Neeloy Ashraful Alam
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zimmerman LA, Sarnak DO, Karp C, Wood SN, Moreau C, Kibira SPS, Makumbi F. Family Planning Beliefs and Their Association with Contraceptive Use Dynamics: Results from a Longitudinal Study in Uganda. Stud Fam Plann 2021; 52:241-258. [PMID: 34015142 PMCID: PMC9290856 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Norms and beliefs toward contraception, both positive and negative, motivate contraceptive use; however, they have seldom been explored longitudinally in low‐ and middle‐income countries, limiting our understanding of their influence on contraceptive dynamics. We used PMA2020 Uganda national longitudinal data of reproductive aged women in 2018 (baseline) and 2019 (follow‐up) to explore discontinuation and switching among modern contraceptive users at baseline (n = 688) and contraceptive use at follow‐up among nonusers at baseline (n = 1,377). Multivariable simple and multinomial logistic regressions assessed the association of individual and community‐level contraceptive beliefs with contraceptive uptake, discontinuation and switching. One‐quarter of nonusers at baseline were using contraception at follow‐up, while 37 percent of users at baseline had discontinued and 28 percent had switched methods at follow‐up. The odds of contraceptive uptake were lower among women who strongly agreed that contraception impacted future fertility or caused conflict within a couple, relative to those who strongly disagreed (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.7 and aOR: 0.6, respectively), but higher among women who strongly agreed that contraception preserved beauty (aOR: 1.6). Women who strongly agreed that it was acceptable to use contraception before having children were less likely to discontinue their method than those who strongly disagreed (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR): 0.5), though living in a community where more women agreed with this statement was associated with higher discontinuation (aRRR: 6.0). Family planning programs that promote positive beliefs toward family planning could improve contraceptive uptake and continuation. More research is needed to understand how contraceptive beliefs shape contraceptive decisions across the life course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linnea A Zimmerman
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Dana O Sarnak
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Celia Karp
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Shannon N Wood
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Caroline Moreau
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.,"Soins et Sant" primaire, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, France
| | - Simon P S Kibira
- Department of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Fredrick Makumbi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Filippi V, Dennis M, Calvert C, Tunçalp Ö, Ganatra B, Kim CR, Ronsmans C. Abortion metrics: a scoping review of abortion measures and indicators. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e003813. [PMID: 33514592 PMCID: PMC7849886 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Consensus is lacking on the most appropriate indicators to document progress in safe abortion at programmatic and country level. We conducted a scoping review to provide an extensive summary of abortion indicators used over 10 years (2008-2018) to inform the debate on how progress in the provision and access to abortion care can be best captured. Documents were identified in PubMed and Popline and supplemented by materials identified on major non-governmental organisation websites. We screened 1999 abstracts and seven additional relevant documents. Ultimately, we extracted information on 792 indicators from 142 documents. Using a conceptual framework developed inductively, we grouped indicators into seven domains (social and policy context, abortion access and availability, abortion prevalence and incidence, abortion care, abortion outcomes, abortion impact and characteristics of women) and 40 subdomains. Indicators of access and availability and of the provision of abortion care were the most common. Indicators of outcomes were fewer and focused on physical health, with few measures of psychological well-being and no measures of quality of life or functioning. Similarly, there were few indicators attempting to measure the context, including beliefs and social attitudes at the population level. Most indicators used special studies either in facilities or at population level. The list of indicators (in online supplemental appendix) is an extensive resource for the design of monitoring and evaluation plans of abortion programmes. The large number indicators, many specific to one source only and with similar concepts measured in a multitude of ways, suggest the need for standardisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronique Filippi
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| | - Mardieh Dennis
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| | - Clara Calvert
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bela Ganatra
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Caron Rahn Kim
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Carine Ronsmans
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marston C, Arjyal A, Maskey S, Regmi S, Baral S. Using qualitative evaluation components to help understand context: case study of a family planning intervention with female community health volunteers (FCHVs) in Nepal. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:685. [PMID: 32703196 PMCID: PMC7379347 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05466-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluations of health interventions are increasingly concerned with measuring or accounting for 'context'. How to do this is still subject to debate and testing, and is particularly important in the case of family planning where outcomes will inevitably be influenced by contextual factors as well as any intervention effects. We conducted an evaluation of an intervention where female community health volunteers (FCHVs) in Nepal were trained to provide better interpersonal communication on family planning. We included a context-orientated qualitative component to the evaluation. Here, we discuss the evaluation findings, specifically focusing on what was added by attending to the context. We explore and illustrate important dimensions of context that may also be relevant in future evaluation work. METHODS The evaluation used a mixed methods approach, with a qualitative component which included in-depth interviews with women of reproductive age, FCHVs, and family planning service providers. We conducted iterative, thematic analysis. RESULTS The life-history fertility and contraception narratives generated from the in-depth interviews contextualised the intervention, yielding nuanced data on contraceptive choices, needs, and areas for future action. For instance, it highlighted how women generally knew about effective contraceptive methods and were willing to use them: information was not a major barrier. Barriers instead included reports of providers refusing service when women were not in the fifth day of their menstrual cycle when this was unnecessary. Privacy and secrecy were important to some women, and risked being undermined by information sharing between FCHVs and health services. The qualitative component also revealed unanticipated positive effects of our own evaluation strategies: using referral slips seemed to make it easier for women to access contraception. CONCLUSIONS Life history narratives collected via in-depth interviews helped us understand pathways from intervention to effect from the user point of view without narrowly focusing only on the intervention, highlighting possible areas for action that would otherwise have been missed. By attending to context in a nuanced way in evaluations, we can build a body of evidence that not only informs future interventions within that context, but also builds better knowledge of contextual factors likely to be important elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cicely Marston
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| | | | | | | | - Sushil Baral
- HERD International, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ampt FH, L'Engle K, Lim MSC, Plourde KF, Mangone E, Mukanya CM, Gichangi P, Manguro G, Hellard M, Stoové M, Chersich MF, Jaoko W, Agius PA, Temmerman M, Wangari W, Luchters S. A Mobile Phone-Based Sexual and Reproductive Health Intervention for Female Sex Workers in Kenya: Development and Qualitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e15096. [PMID: 32469326 PMCID: PMC7293053 DOI: 10.2196/15096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 11/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Female sex workers (FSWs) have high rates of both unintended pregnancy and HIV, but few health promotion interventions address their contraceptive needs or other sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) concerns. A broader approach integrates contraceptive promotion with HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention and management, alcohol awareness, gender-based violence and rights, and health care utilization. The Women's Health Intervention using SMS for Preventing Pregnancy (WHISPER) mobile phone intervention uses a participatory development approach and behavior change theory to address these high-priority concerns of FSWs in Mombasa, Kenya. OBJECTIVE This paper aimed to (1) describe the process of development of the WHISPER intervention, its theoretical framework, key content domains and strategies and (2) explore workshop participants' responses to the proposed intervention, particularly with regard to message content, behavior change constructs, and feasibility and acceptability. METHODS The research team worked closely with FSWs in two phases of intervention development. First, we drafted content for three different types of messages based on a review of the literature and behavior change theories. Second, we piloted the intervention by conducting six workshops with 42 FSWs to test and refine message content and 12 interviews to assess the technical performance of the intervention. Workshop data were thematically analyzed using a mixed deductive and inductive approach. RESULTS The intervention framework specified six SRHR domains that were viewed as highly relevant by FSWs. Reactions to intervention content revealed that social cognitive strategies to improve knowledge, outcome expectations, skills, and self-efficacy resonated well with workshop participants. Participants found the content empowering, and most said they would share the messages with others. The refined intervention was a 12-month SMS program consisting of informational and motivational messages, role model stories portraying behavior change among FSWs, and on-demand contraceptive information. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight the need for health promotion interventions that incorporate broader components of SRHR, not only HIV prevention. Using a theory-based, participatory approach, we developed a digital health intervention that reflects the complex reality of FSWs' lives and provides a feasible, acceptable approach for addressing SRHR concerns and needs. FSWs may benefit from health promotion interventions that provide relevant, actionable, and engaging content to support behavior change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances H Ampt
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kelly L'Engle
- University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Megan S C Lim
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Emily Mangone
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | - Peter Gichangi
- Technical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,International Centre for Reproductive Health, Mombasa, Kenya
| | | | - Margaret Hellard
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Stoové
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew F Chersich
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Paul A Agius
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marleen Temmerman
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,International Centre for Reproductive Health, Mombasa, Kenya.,Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Winnie Wangari
- International Centre for Reproductive Health, Mombasa, Kenya
| | - Stanley Luchters
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bacchus LJ, Reiss K, Church K, Colombini M, Pearson E, Naved R, Smith C, Andersen K, Free C. Using Digital Technology for Sexual and Reproductive Health: Are Programs Adequately Considering Risk? GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2019; 7:507-514. [PMID: 31874936 PMCID: PMC6927830 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-19-00239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Digital technologies provide opportunities for advancing sexual and reproductive health and services but also present potential risks. We propose 4 steps to reducing potential harms: (1) consider potential harms during intervention design, (2) mitigate or minimize potential harms during the design phase, (3) measure adverse outcomes during implementation, and (4) plan how to support those reporting adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kate Reiss
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England
| | | | | | | | | | - Chris Smith
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | - Caroline Free
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England
| |
Collapse
|