Assessment of the Latent Adverse Events of Antipsychotic Treatment Using a Subjective Questionnaire in Japanese Patients with Schizophrenia

Utilizing questionnaires for medication counselling of patients taking antipsychotics during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single site, community pharmacy-based survey study

BACKGROUND

During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, general strategies for preventing infectious diseases, such as social distancing and the use of protective equipment have resulted in communication barriers between pharmacists and patients in community pharmacies.

METHODS

To resolve these communication challenges to medication counselling during the COVID-19 pandemic, during their waiting time at our community pharmacy, we administered two questionnaires to patients receiving at least one antipsychotic drug. The first questionnaire, Questionnaire (A), included questions about any problems with wearing a mask and face shield, forgetting to take medication and adverse effects of their medication. The second questionnaire, Questionnaire (B), included questions regarding the evaluation of medication counselling and the ease of using the first questionnaire.

RESULTS

Questionnaire (A) showed that 26.8% of participants had communication problems due to the mask and face shield and 33.8% sometimes forgot to take their medication. The most common adverse effects of the medications were weight gain (43.7%), dry mouth (39.4%) and sexual dysfunction (31%). In the case of Questionnaire (B), more than 80% responded that it was either very easy or easy to fill out Questionnaire (A). Additionally, 93% participants responded that they felt either very good or good about the pharmacist's medication counselling using Questionnaire (A).

CONCLUSIONS

These results strongly suggest that the utilization of questionnaires in medication counselling may be a useful strategy for preventing communication problems between pharmacists and patients receiving antipsychotics in community pharmacies during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Satisfaction Survey on Antipsychotic Formulations by Schizophrenia Patients in Japan

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

A community pharmacist's intervention in antipsychotic drug-induced sexual dysfunction in a patient with schizophrenia

The community pharmacist interviewed a patient with sexual dysfunction (SD) and suggested a change in prescription. Early intervention by the community pharmacist ameliorated antipsychotic drug-induced SD timeously.

Trend survey on adverse event profiles of antipsychotic long-acting injections and oral agents using the Japanese adverse drug event report database

This study aims to assess the differences in adverse event profiles of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) and oral antipsychotics (OAPs) using real-world data in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Reporting odds ratios were determined using disproportionality analysis to estimate the risk of adverse events for LAIs and OAPs. Differences in adverse event profiles between formulations were determined after propensity score matching. Time-to-onset of adverse events was compared between LAIs and OAPs using the Weibull shape parameter. Signals were detected for approximately 50% of the adverse events (12 of 22) with LAIs and for the majority of adverse events (19 of 22) with OAPs. LAIs was associated with significantly lower reporting rate than OAPs for extrapyramidal symptom, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and dystonia. For QT prolongation, convulsions, and hyperglycemia associated with LAIs, the 95% Confidence Interval of β included 1 in time-to-onset analysis. Real-world data suggest that LAIs tend to reduce the occurrence of extrapyramidal symptom and neuroleptic malignant syndrome, but a number of other adverse events have potential risks as well as OAPs. In addition, onset of adverse events with LAIs have been shown to be slightly delayed, requiring more careful long-term monitoring.

Rehospitalization Risk of Receptor-Affinity Profile in Antipsychotic Drug Treatment: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Japanese Employment-Based Health Insurance Database

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a difference in the risk of rehospitalization when antipsychotics are classified into two groups treated using drugs with a higher or lower affinity to H1 or α1 receptors than to D2 receptors (histamine H1 receptors, adrenaline α1 receptors [HA] high- and HA low-affinity drug group, respectively) based on affinity to receptors related to sedation using a nationwide insurance claims database in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified eligible patients by the following two criteria: (i) hospitalization due to schizophrenia (International Classification of Disease [ICD]-10 code: F20 or F25) in psychiatric wards between January 1st, 2005 and August 31st, 2017, and (ii) administration of HA high- or HA low-affinity drugs in the next month after discharge from the earliest hospitalization due to schizophrenia (index month). The primary endpoint was rehospitalization due to schizophrenia. The secondary endpoints were (i) involuntary rehospitalization, (ii) concomitant use of anxiolytics/hypnotics, mood stabilizers, and antiparkinsonian drugs, (iii) all-cause death, and (iv) medication discontinuation. Propensity score (PS) matching analysis was applied, and the hazard ratio (HR) of the event rate in the HA high-affinity drug group relative to the HA low-affinity drug group was calculated using Cox's proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred and forty patients were identified as eligible patients. Among PS-matched patients (819 in each group), the HR in the HA high-affinity drug group compared with the HA low-affinity drug group was 1.018 (0.822-1.260, P = 0.870). Other outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was observed in the rehospitalization risk due to schizophrenia associated with HA high-affinity antipsychotic drugs. Although this study was a retrospective PS-matched cohort study, the possibility of masking of the rehospitalization risk cannot be excluded because more than 80% of the patients were administered an anxiolytic/hypnotic at the time of admission.

Randomised controlled trial of gradual antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation in people with schizophrenia and related disorders: the RADAR trial (Research into Antipsychotic Discontinuation and Reduction)

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotic medication is effective in reducing acute symptoms of psychosis, but it has a range of potentially serious and debilitating adverse effects and is often disliked by patients. It is therefore essential it is only used when benefits outweigh harms. Although multiple trials conducted with people with schizophrenia indicate an increased risk of relapse in the short-term following abrupt antipsychotic discontinuation, there is little evidence about the long-term outcome of a gradual process of reduction and discontinuation on social functioning, relapse and other outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre, randomised controlled trial involving people with schizophrenia and related disorders who have had more than one episode. Participants are randomised to have a clinically-supervised, gradual reduction of antipsychotic medication, leading to discontinuation when possible, or to continue with maintenance treatment. Blinded follow-up assessments are conducted at 6, 12 and 24 months and the primary outcome is social functioning, measured by the Social Functioning Scale at 24 months. A minimum of 134 evaluable participants provides 90% power to detect a five-point difference, and 206 to detect a four-point difference. Secondary outcomes include severe relapse (admission to hospital) and the study is also intended to detect a minimum 10% difference in severe relapse, which requires 402 participants, assuming a 15% loss to follow-up. Other secondary outcomes include all relapses, as identified by an independent and blinded endpoint committee, symptoms measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, quality of life, adverse effects, self-rated recovery and neuropsychological measures. Enrolment started in 2016. The trial is scheduled to finish in June 2022.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was initially obtained on 27 October 2016 (UK Research Ethics Committee reference 16/LO/1507). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to the public.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN90298520. EudraCT: 2016-000709-36. Pre-results.

Switching Antipsychotics to Blonanserin in Patients with Schizophrenia: An Open-label, Prospective, Multicenter Study

Objective

This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin in schizophrenic patients who were previously treated with other antipsychotics but, due to insufficient response, were switched to blonanserin.

Methods

A total of 52 patients with schizophrenia who were unresponsive to treatment with antipsychotic monotherapy or combination therapy were recruited into this 12-week, open-label, prospective, multicenter study. Patients were switched to blonanserin from their existing antipsychotics over a maximum 2-week tapering-off period. Efficacy was primarily evaluated using the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Assessments were performed at baseline, and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12.

Results

Switching to blonanserin resulted in a significant decrease in the mean total score on the BPRS from baseline (56.8 ± 9.4) to week 12 (42.1 ± 13.8, p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were extrapyramidal symptoms (n = 12, 23.1%), insomnia (n = 10, 19.2%), and emotional arousal (n = 6, 11.5%). Overweight or obese patients (body mass index ≥ 23 kg/m², n = 33) who switched to blonanserin exhibited significant weight loss from 75.2 ± 9.3 kg at baseline to 73.5 ± 9.2 kg at week 12 (p = 0.006). The total cholesterol (baseline, 236.1 ± 47.6 mg/dl; endpoint [week 12], 209.9 ± 28.0 mg/dl; p = 0.005) and prolactin levels (baseline, 80.0 ± 85.2 ng/ml; endpoint [week 12], 63.2 ± 88.9 ng/ml; p = 0.003) were also significantly improved in patients with hypercholesterolemia or hyperprolactinemia.

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that switching to blonanserin may be an effective strategy for schizophrenic patients unresponsive to other antipsychotic treatments.

Longitudinally Measured Changes in Somnolence Severity With a Visual Analog Scale in a Randomized Lithium Versus Quetiapine-IR Study in Bipolar Disorder

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to use a visual analog scale (VAS) longitudinally measuring somnolence severity in patients with bipolar disorder.

METHODS

A data set of patients with bipolar spectrum disorders who were randomized to lithium or quetiapine-IR for 16 weeks was used. The somnolence severity was measured with a VAS from 0 to 100 (VAS based), and somnolence frequency was recorded according to incident report (incidence based) at each visit. The rates of VAS-based and incidence-based somnolence and changes in somnolence severity from baseline to the end of study were compared between the lithium and quetiapine groups. Longitudinal changes in somnolence severity were analyzed with linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 42 patients randomized, only 3 scored 0 on the VAS at baseline. The rates of incidence-based and VAS-based somnolence were similar in the lithium and quetiapine-IR groups. The VAS change scores from baseline to each visit varied in both groups with significant decreases at weeks 6 and 12 in the quetiapine-IR group only. The decrease at week 6 in the quetiapine-IR group was significantly different from that in the lithium group. Patterns of changes in somnolence severity were inconsistent in both groups. A significant interaction between time course and the decrease in VAS scores was observed in the quetiapine-IR group, but not in the lithium group.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline somnolence was highly prevalent in patients with bipolar disorder. The change in somnolence severity was different between lithium-treated and quetiapine-treated patients. Quantifying somnolence longitudinally is important in clinical trials and practice.

Recurrent Psychosis after Phentermine Administration in a Young Female: A Case Report

Phentermine is a sympathomimetic amine, like amphetamine, which is one of the most often prescribed drugs for weight loss. Although exact mechanism of phentermine causing psychosis is still not clear, numerous reports already showed that phentermine can induce psychosis. Psychotic symptoms are generally resolved once the medications are stopped. In contrast, we present a case of a 25-years-old Asian female patient who developed psychotic symptoms repeatedly after phentermine administrations. This case suggests that phentermine can cause psychotic episodes repeatedly, resulting in chronic occupational and social impairment. Therefore, a precautious measure such as government regulations for physicians prescribing and an education for patients taking phentermine are urgently needed.

Inhibited autonomy for promoting physical health: qualitative analysis of narratives from persons living with severe mental illness

BACKGROUND

Autonomy is a key factor in the reduction of inequitable physical healthcare among people with severe mental illness compared with the general population.AimsTo clarify the critical mechanism underlying autonomy in physical health promotion based on the perspectives of people with severe mental illness.

METHOD

We employed a conventional content analysis of narrative data from the Healthy Active Lives in Japan (HeAL Japan) workshop meetings.

RESULTS

'Inhibited autonomy' was extracted as a central component and shaped by the users' experiences, both in a healthcare setting and in real life. This component emerged based on the lack of an empowerment mechanism in psychiatric services.

CONCLUSIONS

A barrier to the encouragement of autonomy in physical health promotion was found in current psychiatric services. An effective strategy should be explored to foster an empowerment mechanism in psychiatric and mental health services.Declaration of interestNone.

Effect of prescription medications on erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects about 50% of men in the USA and is primarily attributed to physiological (organic) and psychological causes. However, a substantial portion of men suffer from ED due to iatrogenic causes. Common medications such as antihypertensives, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antacids may cause ED. Physicians should be aware of the various prescription medications that may cause ED to properly screen and counsel patients on an issue that many may feel too uncomfortable to discuss. In this review, we discuss the physiology, data and alternative therapies for the ED caused by medications.