Dental unit waterline testing practices: an 11-Year retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study examined the dental unit waterline (DUWL) testing practices of Saskatchewan dental clinics over a period of 11 years, with an emphasis on their responses after identification of high microbial levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dental clinics (n = 137) aseptically collected samples of output water from their air/water syringes, handpieces, and ultrasonic scaler lines using Sigma-Aldrich® waterline test kits and delivered them to a quality assurance laboratory. Tests were incubated for seven days at room temperature, and those with heterotrophic plate counts > 500 CFU/mL were reported as failures. Statistical analyses were performed on a database containing 4,093 test results.

RESULTS

Participating clinics submitted an average of 11 DUWL tests per year. Overall, 21% of tests failed, and a moderate positive association (rs=.52, p < 0.001) was found between clinics' DUWL testing frequency and failure rate. Only 7% of failed DUWL tests were followed up by collection of a subsequent test within two weeks, of which 47% still exceeded the 500 CFU/mL threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate an association between DUWL testing frequency and detection of unacceptable microbial levels, along with infrequent retesting and often-inadequate intervention after a failed test. This suggests the need for further efforts at the regulatory and educational levels to maintain adequate water quality during dental treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Procedural water can become contaminated in DUWLs and endanger patients. Regular DUWL monitoring and evidence-based interventions to treat contaminated systems are necessary to safeguard patient health.

The long-term effect of sub-boiling water on dental unit waterlines and its ability to control cross-contamination in dentistry

This study investigated the effect of water at high temperature on the physical and mechanical properties of polyurethane and on biofilm removal, aiming for its applicability in dental unit waterlines. The evaluations were carried out after simulating a 1-year period of daily immersion and measured changes in color, microhardness, surface roughness, and tensile strength before and after reproducing a disinfection protocol. For antibiofilm activity measurement, fragments of waterline were contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and submitted to the disinfection protocols. Relative to effects on the physical and mechanical properties, immersion in water at 60°C did not promote changes in color and tensile strength. However, lower values were observed for microhardness and increased values for surface roughness. Regarding antibiofilm action, water at 60°C significantly reduced the microbial load and promoted substantial changes in cells morphology. In conclusion, disinfection with water at 60°C demonstrated possible application in controlling cross-contamination in dentistry.

Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Numerous studies have shown that dental unit water lines (DUWLs) are often contaminated by a wide range of micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa) and various prevalence have been reported for it in previous studies. Therefore, this review study aims to describe the prevalence of bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis in which the related keywords in different international databases, including Medline (via PubMed) and Scopus were searched. The retrieved studies were screened and the required data were extracted from the included studies. Three standard methods including American Dental Association (ADA), The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and contaminated > 100 CFU/ml(C-100) standards were used to assess the bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs. All studies that calculated the prevalence of bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs, and English full-text studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies that did not have relevant data or used unusual laboratory methods were excluded. Methodological risk of bias was assessed by a related checklist and finally, the data were pooled by fixed or random-effect models.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-six studies were identified and screened and 26 related studies were included in the meta-analysis. The oldest included study was published in 1976 and the most recent study was published in 2020. According to the ADA, CDC and C-100 standards, the prevalence of bacterial contamination was estimated to be 85.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.0-94.0%), 77.0% (95%CI: 66.0-85.0%) and 69.0% (95%CI: 67.0-71.0%), respectively. The prevalence of Legionella Pneumophila and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in DUWLs was estimated to be 12.0% (95%CI: 10.0-14.0%) and 8.0% (95%CI: 2.0-24.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review study suggested a high prevalence of bacterial biofilm in DUWLs; therefore, the use of appropriate disinfecting protocol is recommended to reduce the prevalence of contamination and reduce the probable cross-infection.

Dental Unit Water Lines and their Disinfection and Management: A Review

The perceived threat to public health from dental unit water line (DUWL) contamination comes from opportunistic and respiratory pathogens such as Legionella spp, Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) and pseudomonads. These organisms can grow and multiply in the DUWL biofilm to reach infective concentrations, with the potential for inhalation leading to respiratory infections or direct contamination of surgical wounds. In this paper we discuss current legislation and practical methods for delivering water within the DUWL that meets the standards for safety. Clinical relevance: Understanding the clinical relevance and methods for decontaminating DUWL is essential to create a safe working environment in dentistry.

Risk of Fungal Infection to Dental Patients

Fungi can cause various diseases, and some pathogenic fungi have been detected in the water of dental equipment. This environment offers suitable conditions for fungal biofilms to emerge, which can facilitate mycological contamination. This study verified whether the water employed in the dental units of two dental clinics at the University of Franca was contaminated with fungi. This study also evaluated the ability of the detected fungi to form biofilms. The high-revving engine contained the largest average amount of fungi, 14.93 ± 18.18 CFU/mL. The main fungal species verified in this equipment belonged to the genera Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., Candida spp., and Rhodotorula spp. Among the isolated filamentous fungi, only one fungus of the genus Fusarium spp. did not form biofilms. As for yeasts, all the Candida spp. isolates grew as biofilm, but none of the Rhodotorula spp. isolates demonstrated this ability. Given that professionals and patients are often exposed to water and aerosols generated by the dental procedure, the several fungal species detected herein represent a potential risk especially to immunocompromised patients undergoing dental treatment. Therefore, frequent microbiological monitoring of the water employed in dental equipment is crucial to reduce the presence of contaminants.

Detection of oral streptococci in dental unit water lines after therapy with air turbine handpiece: biological fluid retraction more frequent than expected

AIM

Oral streptococci detected in water from dental unit water lines (DUWLs) are a surrogate marker of patients' biological fluid retraction during therapy. We investigated oral streptococci detection rate in DUWLs in a representative sample of private offices in real-life conditions.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Samples of nondisinfected water (100 ml) were collected from the DUWL designated for the air turbine handpiece in 81 dental units, immediately after dental treatment of patients with extensive air turbine handpiece use. Water was filtered and plated on a selective medium for oral streptococci and, morphologically, typical colonies of oral streptococci were counted. The lowest detection limit was 0.01 CFU/ml.

RESULTS

The oral streptococci detection rate was 72% (95% CI: 62-81%), with a mean level of 0.7 CFU/ml. Oral streptococci detection was not affected by handpiece age or dental treatment type, but was associated with dental unit age.

CONCLUSION

Biological fluid retraction into DUWLs during patient treatment and, possibly, the risk for patient-to-patient blood- or air-borne pathogen transmission are more frequent than expected.

An audit improves the quality of water within the dental unit water lines of general dental practices across the East of England

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and improve upon the quality of water emanating from the dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) which supply irrigation for dental handpieces and triple spray syringes in general practice.

DESIGN

A prospective clinical audit.

SETTING

Seventy-two general dental practices in the East of England.

METHODS

In 2006, 124 dentists initially registered to participate in the audit. By 2007, 72 had begun and by 2008, 68 had completed the project. This involved collecting samples of water discharged from the DUWLs in the dental practices both before the start and mid-way through a morning session. These were tested microbiologically at a United Kingdom Accreditation Service testing laboratory.

INTERVENTIONS

Before the audit, 56% of the DUWLs were reportedly flushed through for 2 minutes at the start of the day, 29% were purged for 20 seconds in between each patient, 50% were treated with a wide range of different disinfectant solutions, 44% were drained down dry at the end of the day and 9% had no cross-infection control measures applied to them at all. In the audit, 100% used a disinfectant solution alone, predominantly either Alpron or Sterilox.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The minimum audit standard set was for the water samples to meet the United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline on the quality of DUWL water, namely that the United States' Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory standards for drinking water be adopted, in that no more than 5% of water samples should be contaminated with total coliforms and that they should not have more than 500 colony forming units per ml (cfu/ml) of heterotrophic water bacteria. However, the participating dentists were encouraged to try and achieve the more stringent European Union (EU) standards for potable (drinking) water, namely for the water samples to have neither Escherichia coli nor any other faecal coliforms present and for the aerobic colony count to be less than 100 cfu/ml at 22°C after 72 hours of culturing.

RESULTS

In the pre-audit survey, none of the 72 DUWL water samples were contaminated with E. coli but in five of them (7%) coliforms were recovered. Only 25% reached the EU potable water standard, of which 11% had zero planktonic bacterial contamination. Three percent were above the EU standard but below the CDC guideline/EPA regulatory drinking water standard, while alarmingly, 72% of them failed to reach this minimum audit standard altogether. However, after the application of a suitable disinfectant for at least a month, the audit revealed that E. coli still remained absent in the water samples taken from the 68 DUWLs that completed the project and in only one (1.5%) were coliforms recovered. Remarkably, nearly 81% reached the EU potable water standard, of which 54% had zero planktonic bacterial contamination, with nearly an additional 6% reaching the American CDC/EPA standard and with only 13% failing outright.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical audit using appropriate DUWL disinfectants can result in the improvement of the quality of water that is discharged through DUWLs, thereby minimising both the risk of cross-infection to vulnerable patients as well as to dental staff chronically exposed to contaminated aerosols.

Waterborne pathogens and dental waterlines

Humans, like every other living thing on Earth, have evolved in a world dominated by many billions of microscopic life forms. Most of the time, we live in a state of harmony (or even mutualism) with our invisible coinhabitants. When this balance becomes disturbed however, the consequences can be devastating. Infectious diseases including malaria, tuberculosis, and AIDS remain the world's greatest mass murderers. Dental workers strive to reduce infection risks for their patients through infection control measures that reduce or eliminate potentially pathogenic agents in the clinical environment. As increasing numbers of patients with varying degrees of immune suppression present for dental treatment, the need to ensure an aseptic treatment environment will become a higher priority for the dental profession. The possibility that exposure to aerosols contaminated with endotoxin might exacerbate asthma or cause chronic respiratory problems in dental health care workers should be investigated. Although direct evidence of widespread complications among patients or occupationally acquired illness among dental workers is presently lacking, reducing the numbers of microorganisms present in dental treatment water is consistent with other empiric measures that form the basis of infection-control practice.

Efficacy of anti-retraction devices in preventing bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines

OBJECTIVE

In this study we examine the efficacy of anti-retraction devices in preventing microbial contamination of dental unit water lines (DUWLs).

METHODS

The study was performed on 54 randomly selected DUs in use at private and public institutions for over six months. The selected DUs were all currently commercially available. To evaluate the efficiency of anti-retraction devices, two different methods were employed, mechanical and microbiological. The ADA/ANSI specification #47 (corresponding to a water retraction of less than 40.3 microl) was used for the evaluation of the retraction determined using the mechanical method; the presence/absence of test microorganisms in DUWLs upstream the turbine after the test was used for evaluating the microbiological assay.

RESULTS

Both evaluation methods indicated correct amounts of retraction and prevention of DUWL contamination occurred in only two cases (3.7%). Correct retraction was noted in six other dental units (DUs), but their DUWLs became contaminated during testing. Six other produced the opposite results-improper retraction, yet no contamination. The remaining 40 DUs (74.0%) failed both evaluations.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the overwhelming majority of the anti-retraction devices did not prevent retraction when the turbine stopped running, leading to a contamination of the water lines, and to a consequent possible cross-contamination of the patients.