A Retrospective Observational Real-Word Analysis of the Adherence, Healthcare Resource Consumption and Costs in Patients Treated with Bisoprolol/Perindopril as Single-Pill or Free Combination

INTRODUCTION

The present real-world analysis aims to compare the drug utilization, hospitalizations and direct healthcare costs related to the use of single-pill combination (SPC) or free-equivalent combination (FEC) of perindopril and bisoprolol (PER/BIS) in a large Italian population.

METHODS

This observational retrospective analysis was based on administrative databases covering approximately 7 million subjects across Italy. All adult subjects receiving PER/BIS as SPC or FEC between January 2017-June 2020 were included. Subjects were followed for 1 year after the first prescription of PER/BIS as FEC (± 1 month) or SPC. Before comparing the SPC and FEC cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics. Drug utilization was investigated as adherence (defined by the proportion of days covered, PDC) and persistence (evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves). Hospitalizations and mean annual direct healthcare costs (due to drug prescriptions, hospitalizations and use of outpatient services) were analyzed during follow-up.

RESULTS

The original cohort included 11,440 and 6521 patients taking the SPC and FEC PER/BIS combination, respectively. After PSM, two balanced SPC and FEC cohorts of 4688 patients were obtained (mean age 70 years, approximately 50% male, 24% in secondary prevention). The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥ 80%) was higher for those on SPC (45.5%) than those on FEC (38.6%), p < 0.001. The PER/BIS combination was discontinued by 35.8% of patients in the SPC cohort and 41.7% in the FEC cohort (p < 0.001). The SPC cohort had fewer cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (5.3%) than the free-combination cohort (7.4%), p < 0.001. Mean annual total healthcare costs were lower in the SPC (1999€) than in the FEC (2359€) cohort (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, patients treated with PER/BIS SPC showed higher adherence, lower risk of drug discontinuation, reduced risk of CV hospitalization, and lower healthcare costs than those on FEC of the same drugs.

Risk of thyroid cancer associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study

AIMS

To determine the potential association between the use of either glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and the risk of thyroid cancer in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This population-based cohort study used claims data from the Korean National Health Insurance Database, 2014-2020. Two distinct cohorts were established to compare each incretin-based drug with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, chosen as active comparators because of their previous non-association with thyroid cancer, and their common usage as add-on therapy to metformin along with GLP-1RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors. The first cohort included 21 722 new users of GLP-1RAs and 326 993 new users of SGLT2 inhibitors, whereas the second cohort included 904 300 DPP-4 inhibitor new users and 112 017 SGLT2 inhibitor new users. The outcome was the time to incident thyroid cancer. Weighted Cox proportional models were used to estimate hazard ratios of thyroid cancer incidence associated with incretin-based drugs of interest.

RESULTS

The use of GLP-1RAs was not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer (weighted hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.53) compared with that of SGLT2 inhibitors. Using DPP-4 inhibitors was also not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer (0.95, 0.79-1.14) compared with that of SGLT2 inhibitors. No significant effect modifications were observed across subgroup analyses. Sensitivity analyses, including alternative outcome definition analysis of medullary thyroid cancer, were consistent with the primary analysis results.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

A real-world analysis of outcomes and healthcare costs of patients on perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill vs. multiple-pill combination in Italy

OBJECTIVES

This analysis compared adherence, cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause mortality incidence, and healthcare costs among hypertensive patients treated with perindopril (PER)/indapamide (IND)/amlodipine (AML) in single-pill combination (SPC) vs. multiple-pill combination, in a real-world setting in Italy.

METHODS

In this observational retrospective analysis of Italian administrative databases, adult patients treated with PER/IND/AML between 2010 and 2020 were divided into two cohorts: single-pill vs. multiple-pill. Patient data were available for at least one year before and after index date. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias. Adherence was defined as proportion of days covered: non-adherence, <40%; partial adherence, 40-79%, and adherence ≥80%. Mortality incidence and CV events as single, or composite, endpoints were evaluated after first year of follow-up. Healthcare cost analyses were performed from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.

RESULTS

Following PSM, the single-pill cohort included 12 150 patients, and the multiple-pill cohort, 6105. The SPC cohort had a significantly higher percentage of adherent patients vs. the multiple-pill cohort (59.9% vs. 26.9%, P  < 0.001). Following the first year of follow-up, incidence of all-cause mortality, and combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and CV events were lower in the SPC cohort compared with multiple-pill cohort. Average annual direct healthcare costs were lower in the single-pill cohort (€2970) vs. multiple-pill cohort (€3642); cost of all drugs and all-cause hospitalizations were major contributors.

CONCLUSION

The SPC of PER/IND/AML, compared with multiple-pill combination, is associated with higher adherence to medication, lower incidence of CV events and mortality, and reduced healthcare costs.

Impact of adherence to disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis: A study on Italian real-world data

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system requiring complex diagnostic and therapeutic management. Treatment with Disease Modifying Drugs (DMDs) is aimed at reducing relapse rate and disease disability. Few real-world, population-based data are available on the impact of adherence on relapse rate. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of adherence to DMDs on relapses in a real-world Italian setting.

METHODS

Population-based cohort study. People with MS (PwMS) older than 18 years and residing in the Emilia-Romagna region, Northern Italy, were identified through administrative databases using a validated algorithm. A Cox regression model with a time-varying exposure was performed to assess the association between level of adherence to DMDs and relapses over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

A total of 2,528 PwMS receiving a first prescription of DMDs between 2015 and 2019 were included (average age of 42, two-thirds female). Highly adherent PwMS had a 25 % lower hazard of experiencing moderate or severe relapses than non-adherent PwMS (Hazard Ratio 0.75, 95 % CI 0.58 to 0.98), after adjusting for age and sex. Several sensitivity analyses supported the main result.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study support the hypothesis that a high level of DMD adherence in MS is associated with a lower risk of moderate or severe relapse. Therefore, choosing the DMD with which to start drug treatment and recommending adherence to treatment appear to be crucial aspects involving both physicians and patients.

Adherence to Triple Single-Pill Combination of Perindopril/Indapamide/Amlodipine: Findings from Real-World Analysis in Italy

INTRODUCTION

Single-pill combination therapy for hypertension is recognized to improve adherence to treatment. However, less is known about the benefits of triple single-pill combinations. This retrospective observational analysis aimed to assess changes in adherence when treatment was switched from perindopril (PER)/indapamide (IND) + amlodipine (AML) to PER/IND/AML single-pill combination, in Italian clinical practice.

METHODS

This analysis used data extracted from administrative databases of Italian healthcare entities. Adult patients receiving PER/IND/AML were selected, and the prescription date was considered as the index date. Among them, those who had a prescription for PER/IND + AML during the 12 months before the index date and a prescription of PER/IND/AML during 6 months of follow-up were included. Adherence was calculated as the proportion of days covered (PDC: PDC < 40%, non-adherent; PDC = 40-79%, partially adherent; PDC ≥ 80%, adherent).

RESULTS

Among the identified patients, 158 were exposed users and were included in the analysis. When patients were compared before and after switch to triple single-pill combination, the proportion of adherent patients was significantly higher with PER/IND/AML single-pill combination (75.3%) than with PER/IND + AML combination (44.3%) (P < 0.05). Conversely, the proportion of non-adherent patients was lower with the PER/IND/AML single-pill combination (14.6%) vs PER/IND + AML (17.7%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This real-world analysis showed that switching to a triple single-pill combination could offer an opportunity to improve adherence to antihypertensive treatment in real-life clinical practice.

The impact of renal denervation procedure on use of antihypertensive drugs in the real-life setting

Purpose. Randomised controlled trials have shown that renal denervation lowers office and ambulatory blood pressure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether patients undergoing renal denervation procedure in a real-life setting have a reduction in antihypertensive drug prescription over the subsequent years.Material and methods. Using the healthcare utilisation database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), the 136 patients who, during the period 2011-2016, were prescribed four or more antihypertensive drugs and underwent renal denervation were included in the study cohort. The number and type of antihypertensive drugs were assessed over the year before and during the three-year period after renal denervation.Results. The median age of the patients was 67 years and 68% of them were men. Based on a multisource comorbidity score, about 40% of patients showed a poor or very poor clinical status. Before renal denervation, the majority of the patients were prescribed four or five antihypertensive drugs. The number of drugs decreased after the denervation and reached 55% after three years. Over the same period, patients prescribed six drugs decreased from 18% to 2%. All antihypertensive drugs were less prescribed throughout the post denervation period. Compared to the year before the denervation, after three years prescription of diuretics was reduced by 15%, calcium channel blockers by 21%, ACE-inhibitors by 32%, angiotensin receptor blockers by 22%, beta-blockers by 20%, and alfa-blockers by 30%. Use of antihypertensive drugs exhibited a reduction also in an age, sex, and clinically matched control group with no renal denervation to an extent, however, much lower than in denervated patients (p-value = 0.013).Conclusion. In the real-life setting, patients who underwent renal denervation had a clearcut reduction in antihypertensive drug prescription over the following years.Plain Language SummaryPatients exhibited a reduction in the prescription of antihypertensive drugs during the three years that followed the denervation procedureThe decrease in the number of antihypertensive drugs was marked, started after a relatively short time (six months), and involved all drugs prescribed before the denervationThe number of hospitalisations for a cardiovascular event was similar before and after renal denervationAlbeit blood pressure values were not recorded in our database, all these findings taken together suggest the renal denervation procedure has a favourable influence on blood pressure control and is not associated with an increase in the risk of major cardiovascular complications.