Postoperative management of Zenker's diverticulum: Results of the American Bronchoesophagological Association survey

INTRODUCTION

Although treatment of Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is commonly performed by otolaryngologists using a variety of surgical techniques, there is little published data on the postoperative management of patients. We sought to determine practice patterns among members of the American Bronchoesophagological Association (ABEA) after surgery for ZD.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was designed via JotForm™ and subsequently sent to active members of the ABEA. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Twenty-three members (6.6 %) completed the survey. Most (73.9 %) were fellowship trained in laryngology and reported performing >5 procedures per year. Most laryngologists reported employing multiple techniques including transcervical (TC) (73.9 %), endoscopic stapling (ES) (65.2 %), endoscopic CO₂ laser (EL) (56.5 %), and endoscopic harmonic scalpel (EH) (4.3 %). Postoperatively, 52.3 % of respondents placed patients in 23-hour observation after TC, 66.7 % after ES, 69.2 % after EL, and 100 % after EH. 47.1 % of respondents used standard overnight admission after TC, as compared to 13.3 % after ES, 23.1 % after EL and 0 % after EH. Postoperative esophagography was utilized by 70.6 % of respondents after TC, 20 % after ES, 38.5 % after EL, and 100 % after EH. A peroral diet was started postoperatively on the day of surgery by 26.7 % respondents after ES but not after any of the other techniques.

CONCLUSION

Most laryngology trained respondents employ multiple techniques for the treatment of ZD including at least 1 endoscopic technique. Respondents were more likely to hospitalize patients after a transcervical than endoscopic approach. Postoperative esophagography was utilized in most patients after TC, but not after ES or EL. Most respondents admit patients for 23-hour observation and start a peroral diet on postoperative day 1 regardless of technique.

Effect of cricopharyngeus muscle surgery on the pharynx

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction (CPD) ranges from asymptomatic cricopharyngeal bar (CPB) to Zenker's diverticulum. Previous work suggests that CPD can result in dilation and weakening of the pharynx above the obstruction. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the ability of surgery on the cricopharyngeus muscle to improve pharyngeal area and strength.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case study.

METHODS

Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies of all persons with CPD who underwent cricopharyngeus (CP) intervention followed by routine postoperative fluoroscopic study, between October 1, 1999 and January 1, 2010 were reviewed. Objective measures of pharyngeal area and constriction were obtained from pretreatment and post-treatment studies. Paired t tests and repeated measures analysis of variance were employed to compare results.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included. Pharyngeal constriction and pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) opening improved significantly after intervention (P < .05).Pharyngeal dilation was unchanged (P > .05). PES opening improved more with CP myotomy than with dilation and botulinum toxin.

CONCLUSIONS

Relief of CP obstruction by surgery or dilation improves pharyngeal constriction and PES opening. Dilation of the pharynx possibly related to prolonged outlet obstruction does not improve. CP myotomy appears more effective than dilation or botulinum toxin in relieving obstruction.

The risk and complications of aspiration following cricopharyngeal myotomy

This article reviews a series of patients undergoing cricopharyngeal myotomy and determines whether clinically dangerous aspiration is seen postoperatively. A total of 23 patients underwent myotomy. Indications included Zenker's diverticulum (14), anticipated or real dysphagia from skull base lesions (5), dysphagia from stroke (2), and dysphagia from glossectomy and radiation therapy (2). Surgical procedures, complications, and effectiveness were reviewed. Of patients with Zenker's diverticula, 13 of 14 had clinically useful improvement in dysphagia. Of patients with skull base lesions, all 5 had improvement (4 of these also had thyroplasites and cervical plexus-to-superior laryngeal nerve anastomoses). Of the patients with strokes, neither had significant improvement. Of the patients with glossectomy and radiation, 1 had useful improvement. Complications were seen in 5 patients: 2 had self-limiting pharyngeal leaks, and 3 had pneumonia 1-4 months postoperatively. One patient also had a postoperative ipsilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. There were no postoperative deaths. In conclusion, cricopharyngeal myotomy has definite utility in the management of cervical dysphagia, even though the etiology of the dysphagia can be multifactorial. Risks directly attributable to the procedure are usually self-limiting; serious complications are usually associated with the underlying disease. The addition of adjunctive procedures, such as thyroplasty and superior laryngeal nerve reinnervation, may be of additional benefit to patients with high extracranial vagal injuries.

Outcome analysis of Zenker's diverticulectomy and cricopharyngeal myotomy

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of Zenker's diverticula is controversial in part because of the method of categorizing treatment success or failure. Subjective and objective radiologic tests have been used to evaluate the various treatment modalities. There seems to be poor correlation between subjective and objective findings, and we tested this hypothesis in a group of patients undergoing one form of therapy (diverticulectomy and cricopharyngeal myotomy [CPM]).

METHODS

Eighteen consecutive patients underwent Zenker's diverticulectomy and CPM. Postoperative symptoms and abnormalities detected by barium esophagrams were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 30.3 months (range, 7-74 months).

RESULTS

Three of 18 patients (17%) complained of dysphagia (2 occasional and not bothersome; 1 bothersome and affecting dietary intake). Postoperative static contrast esophagrams were interpreted without knowledge of the subjective symptoms. Small diverticula were identified in 8 patients (44%). There was poor correlation between symptoms and objective radiographic abnormalities with agreement of 56% and a kappa statistic of 0.23.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective radiographic abnormalities are far more common than subjective complaints following diverticulectomy and CPM. Postoperative static contrast radiography is not routinely required and may be misleading because of the poor correlation between symptoms and radiographic findings. The value of dynamic videofluoroscopy needs to be evaluated.