Immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis

Several studies have evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic uveal melanoma; however, the efficacy of ICIs in the previous studies varied greatly. In this systematic review, we searched for prospective or retrospective studies on single or dual-ICIs for metastatic uveal melanoma treatment. A random-effect model meta-analysis with generic inverse-variance was conducted, and 36 articles representing 41 cohorts of 1414 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were included. The pooled outcomes were as follows: objective response rate (ORR) was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 3.7-7.5%; I2, 36%), disease control rate (DCR) was 32.5% (95% CI 27.2-37.7%; I2, 73%), median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.7-2.9 months; I2, 26%), and median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months (95% CI 9.6-13.2 months; I2, 74%). Compared to single-agent ICI, dual ICI led to better ORR (single-agent: 3.4% [95% CI 1.8-5.1]; dual-agent: 12.4% [95% CI 8.0-16.9]; P < 0.001), DCR (single-agent: 29.3%, [95% CI 23.4-35.2]; dual-agent: 44.3% [95% CI 31.7-56.8]; P = 0.03), and OS (single-agent: 9.8 months [95% CI 8.0-12.2]; dual-agent: 16.3 months [95% CI 13.5-19.7]; P < 0.001). Our analysis provided treatment outcomes as described above. Dual-ICIs appear better than single-agent ICIs for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy for advanced acral and mucosal melanoma

Acral melanoma (AM) and mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare clinical subtypes of melanoma. AM and MM are etiologically, biologically, and molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanoma (CM). Despite the recent development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of advanced CMs, the true therapeutic efficacy of ICIs for these rare subtypes remains unclear. Since these subtypes are rare, especially in the Caucasian population, their biological features and corresponding novel therapies are underexplored than those of CM. Even in the larger phase III clinical trials for ICIs, the sample size of patients with AM and MM is limited. Consequently, establishment of standard of care for advanced AM and MM has been challenging. This review covers current update and overview on clinical efficacy of ICIs and ICI-based therapy for advanced AM and MM, based mainly on the reported clinical trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies, to provide a better understanding of the current landscape of this field. In addition, we discuss the future direction of treatment for those rare clinical subtypes, focusing on issues relevant to dermatology and medical oncology.

BAG2 Is a Novel Prognostic Biomarker and Promising Immunotherapy Target in Uveal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

The importance of BAG2 in malignancy is gradually being recognized, however, information on its role in uveal melanoma (UVM) is limited. We aimed to elucidate its function and potential mechanism of action in UVM.

METHODS

Using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GEO-related datasets, we analyzed the differential expression of BAG2 in tumors, combined with clinical information and methylation data to analyze the prognostic value of BAG2, differential methylation and its association with UVM metastasis. In addition, correlation analysis explored the immunological characteristics of BAG2 in UVM and the response to immunotherapy. Finally, a prognostic model of ferroptosis- related genes was constructed and validated.

RESULTS

BAG2 is significantly downregulated in multiple cancers including UVM. Prognostic analysis showed that BAG2 was an independent prognostic factor for UVM. Abnormal methylation of BAG2 may affect the metastasis of UVM and be significantly associated with poor prognosis. Immune analysis clarified that BAG2 was significantly associated with UVM immune cell infiltration and multiple immune checkpoints, and low expression of BAG2 was more beneficial in immunotherapy. In addition, the prognostic model of ferroptosis we constructed has good performance in predicting overall survival and metastasis-free survival of UVM.

CONCLUSIONS

BAG2 is an independent prognostic factor for UVM and may be a potential immune checkpoint for UVM.

Recent Advances and Challenges in Uveal Melanoma Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Although it can be controlled locally, half of the patients still develop metastases. To date, there have been no standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention or treatment of metastases. Existing therapies, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, induce only minimal responses. This review focuses on newly published research on immunotherapy. We highlight expanding treatments and their clinical outcomes, as well as propose promising new treatments and feasible checkpoints. Based on these findings, we provide innovative insights into feasible strategies for the treatment of patients with uveal melanoma.

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), which mainly harbors BRAF or NRAS mutations, UM predominantly harbors GNAQ or GNA11 mutations. Although primary UM can be controlled locally, approximately 50% of patients still develop metastases. To date, there have been no standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention or treatment of metastases. Unfortunately, chemotherapy and targeted therapies only induce minimal responses in patients with metastatic UM, with a median survival time of only 4–5 months after metastasis detection. Immunotherapy agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have achieved pioneering outcomes in CM but have shown limited effects in UM. Researchers have explored several feasible checkpoints to identify options for future therapies. Cancer vaccines have shown little in the way of therapeutic benefit in patients with UM, and there are few ongoing trials providing favorable evidence, but adoptive cell transfer-related therapies seem promising and deserve further investigation. More recently, the immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptor against the cancer molecule tebentafusp showed impressive antitumor effects. Meanwhile, oncolytic viruses and small molecule inhibitors have also gained ground. This review highlights recent progress in burgeoning treatments and provides innovative insights on feasible strategies for the treatment of UM.

Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on the Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The gut microbiome plays a critical role in modulating the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used in cancer patients and may affect the gut microbiome by altering gut pH.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if concurrent use of PPI is associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of advanced cancer adult patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab between September 1, 2014, and August 31, 2019. Concomitant PPI exposure was defined as PPI use 0 to 30 days before or after initiation of ICIs. Treatment outcome was OS and PFS.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients were included in our study. Concomitant PPI use was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22; 95% CI = 0.80-1.86) or PFS (HR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.76-1.45) in patients with ICI use. The effect estimates were robust after adjusting for covariates in multivariate analysis and in patients with NSCLC.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Concomitant PPI use was not associated with the effectiveness of nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Certain predictors of survival outcomes related to PPI use in patients receiving immunotherapy, such as the time window and indication of PPI exposure and autoimmune disorders, should be explored in the future to better carve out the impact of PPI on the effectiveness of ICI use.

Development of new therapeutic options for the treatment of uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Important cytogenetic and genetic risk factors for the development of UM include chromosome 3 monosomy, mutations in the guanine nucleotide-binding proteins GNAQ/GNA11, and loss of the BRACA1-associated protein 1 (BAP 1). Most primary UMs are treated conservatively with radiotherapy, but enucleation is necessary for large tumours. Despite the effectiveness of local control, up to 50% of UM patients develop metastasis for which there are no effective therapies. Attempts to utilise the targeted therapies that have been developed for the treatment of other cancers, including a range of signal transduction pathway inhibitors, have rarely produced significant outcomes in UM. Similarly, the application of immunotherapies that are effective in cutaneous melanoma to treat UM have also been disappointing. Other approaches that have been initiated involve proteasomal inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors which are approved for the treatment of other cancers. Nevertheless, there have been occasional positive outcomes from these treatments in UM. Moreover, combination approaches in UM have also yielded some positive developments. It would be valuable to identify how to apply such therapies efficiently in UM, potentially via individualised tumour profiling. It would also be important to characterise UM tumours to differentiate the potential drivers of progression from those in other types of cancers. The recent identification of novel kinases and metastatic genes in UM tumours makes the development of new UM-specific treatments feasible.

Immunotherapy in uveal melanoma: novel strategies and opportunities for personalized treatment

INTRODUCTION

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular cancer and represents a discrete subtype of melanoma. Metastatic disease, which occurs in half of patients, has a dismal prognosis. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has produced promising results in cutaneous melanoma but has failed to show analogous efficacy in metastatic UM. This is attributable to UM's distinct genetics and its complex interaction with the immune system. Hence, more efficacious immunotherapeutic approaches are under investigation.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss those novel immunotherapeutic strategies in clinical and preclinical studies for advanced disease and which are thought to overcome the hurdles set by UM in terms of immune recognition. We also highlight the need to determine predictive markers in relation to these strategies to improve clinical outcomes. We used a simple narrative analysis to summarize the data. The search methodology is located in the Introduction.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel immunotherapeutic strategies focus on transforming immune excluded tumor microenvironment in metastatic UM to T cell inflamed. Preliminary results of approaches such as vaccines, adoptive cell transfer and other novel molecules are encouraging. Factors such as HLA compatibility and expression level of targeted antigens should be considered to optimize personalized management.

Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

More than 50% of patients with uveal melanoma end up developing metastases. Currently, there is no standard first-line treatment that facilitates proper management of the metastatic disease.

METHODS

A systematic review of the last 40 years in PubMed with an exhaustive and strict selection of studies was conducted, in which the unit of measurement was overall survival (OS) expressed in Kaplan-Meier curves or numerically.

RESULTS

After the selection process, 110 articles were included. Regional therapies, such as intra-arterial liver chemotherapy (OS: 2, 9-22 months), isolated liver perfusion (OS: 9, 6-27, 4 months), or selective internal radiation therapy (OS: 18 months in monotherapy and 26 months in combination with other therapies) showed some superiority when compared to systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy (OS: 4, 6-17 months), immunotherapy (OS: 5-19, 1 month), immunosuppression (OS: 11 months), or targeted therapy (OS: 6-12 months), without being significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review suggest that there are no important differences in OS when comparing the different current treatment modalities. Most of the differences found seem to be explained by the heterogenicity of the different studies and the presence of biases in their design, rather than actual extensions of patient survival.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or metastatic mucosal melanoma: a systematic review

Background

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy offers minor benefit to patients with mucosal melanoma (MM). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the preferred approach in patients with advanced or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, the evidence of their clinical use for MM is still limited. This systematic review aims to summarize the efficacy and safety of ICIs in advanced or metastatic MM.

Methods

We searched electronic databases, conference abstracts, clinical trial registers and reference lists for relevant studies. The primary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), one-year PFS rate, and one-year OS rate.

Results

This review identified 13 studies assessing anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, 22 studies assessing anti-PD-1 monotherapy, two studies assessing anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 combination therapy, one study assessing anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with axitinib, and three studies assessing anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with radiotherapy. For most patients who received ipilimumab monotherapy, the ORR ranged from 0% to 17%, the median PFS was less than 5 months, and the median OS was less than 10 months. For patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy, most studies showed an ORR of more than 15% and a median OS of more than 11 months. The combined administration of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 agents showed benefits over single-agent therapy with an ORR of more than 33.3%. In a phase Ib trial of toripalimab in combination with axitinib, approximately half of patients had complete or partial responses. Three retrospective studies that investigated anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with radiotherapy showed an ORR of more than 50%, which was higher than each single modality treatment.

Conclusions

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies alone and in combination with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies or other modalities, are promising treatment options for advanced or metastatic MM. However, high-level evidence is still needed to support the clinical application.