Targeting Tyrosine Kinases in Ovarian Cancer: Small Molecule Inhibitor and Monoclonal Antibody, Where Are We Now?

Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynaecological malignancies worldwide. Despite high success rates following first time treatment, this heterogenous disease is prone to recurrence. Oncogenic activity of receptor tyrosine kinases is believed to drive the progression of ovarian cancer. Here we provide an update on the progress of the therapeutic targeting of receptor tyrosine kinases in ovarian cancer. Broadly, drug classes that inhibit tyrosine kinase/pathways can be classified as small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or immunotherapeutic vaccines. Small molecule inhibitors tested in clinical trials thus far include sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, tivantinib, and erlotinib. Monoclonal antibodies include bevacizumab, cetuximab, pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and seribantumab. While numerous trials have been carried out, the results of monotherapeutic agents have not been satisfactory. For combination with chemotherapy, the monoclonal antibodies appear more effective, though the efficacy is limited by low frequency of target alteration and a lack of useful predictive markers for treatment stratification. There remain critical gaps for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancers; however, platinum-sensitive tumours may benefit from the combination of tyrosine kinase targeting drugs and PARP inhibitors. Immunotherapeutics such as a peptide B-cell epitope vaccine and plasmid-based DNA vaccine have shown some efficacy both as monotherapeutic agents and in combination therapy, but require further development to validate current findings. In conclusion, the tyrosine kinases remain attractive targets for treating ovarian cancers. Future development will need to consider effective drug combination, frequency of target, and developing predictive biomarker.

Management of small cell lung cancer: recent developments for optimal care

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents approximately 13% of all lung cancer diagnoses and the incidence has reduced over the last 20 years. Treatment of SCLC remains challenging because of its rapid growth, early dissemination and development of drug resistance during the course of the disease. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for limited (LD) and extensive disease (ED), with concurrent chemotherapy and radical thoracic radiotherapy representing the best treatment option for fit patients with LD. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in fit patients with good organ function, and the radiosensitizing effect of cisplatin is critically important for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in LD. Anthracycline-containing regimens represent a viable alternative for patients where platinum-based chemotherapy is contraindicated. Patients who relapse or progress after first-line chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis. Second-line therapy may produce a modest clinical benefit. Maintenance chemotherapy has not been shown to convincingly improve outcomes for SCLC. A number of targeted agents have been investigated in LD and ED, mostly in unselected populations, with disappointing results. Prophylactic cranial irradiation has been shown to reduce the incidence of brain metastases and prolong survival for both LD and ED without negative impact on quality of life (QOL) and cognitive function. Ongoing trials will shed some light on the impact of thoracic radiotherapy on QOL, symptom control and survival in ED SCLC patients who benefitted from first-line chemotherapy.

Update on new drugs in small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) will account for 25,000 to 32,000 new lung cancer cases in the USA in 2010. Current treatmenta pproaches include platinum-based chemotherapy and etoposide with or without radiation therapy depending on stage and performance status. Five-year survival is approximately 25% for patients with limited stage disease and 1 -- 2% for patients with extensive stage disease and has noti mproved in almost two decades.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the results of recent clinical trials that have evaluated targeted agents and novel cytotoxic agents alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with SCLC.

EXPERT OPINION

The lack of a targeted approach to the treatment of patients with SCLC has led investigators to evaluate a multitude of agents with overwhelmingly negative results. A more systematic approach to clinical trials in patients is needed to improve outcomes for patients with this disease.

Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial

PURPOSE

Because of promising efficacy signals in single-arm studies, a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to first-line standard chemotherapy for treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with SCLC were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab or placebo, with cisplatin or carboplatin plus etoposide, for four cycles followed by single-agent bevacizumab or placebo until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to the bevacizumab group and 50 to the placebo group; 69% versus 66%, respectively, completed four cycles of therapy. Median PFS was higher in the bevacizumab group (5.5 months) than in the placebo group (4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.86). Median overall survival (OS) was similar for both groups (9.4 v 10.9 months for bevacizumab and placebo groups, respectively), with an HR of 1.16 (95% CI, 0.66 to 2.04). Overall response rates were 58% (95% CI, 43% to 71%) for the bevacizumab group and 48% (95% CI, 34% to 62%) for the placebo group. Median duration of response was 4.7 months for the bevacizumab group and 3.2 months for the placebo group. In the bevacizumab and placebo groups, 75% versus 60% of patients, respectively, experienced one or more grade 3 or higher adverse events. No new or unexpected safety signals for bevacizumab were observed.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to cisplatin or carboplatin plus etoposide for treatment of extensive-stage SCLC improved PFS, with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, no improvement in OS was observed.

Phase 2 study of irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or refractory small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who develop disease progression with standard cisplatin-based therapy are reported to have a poor overall prognosis. Irinotecan and paclitaxel are active as single agents and exhibit preclinical synergy in SCLC cell lines. A phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate this combination in patients with recurrent or refractory SCLC.

METHODS

Patients with SCLC who progressed with 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and had measurable disease present; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function were included in the study. Paclitaxel (at a dose of 75 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (at a dose of 50 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Therapy was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The target response rate of interest was > or =30%.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were enrolled, 51 of whom received at least 1 dose of therapy. The majority of the patients had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (96%). A median of 3 cycles of treatment was administered, and 15 patients received > or =6 cycles. Seventeen patients experienced toxicity of grade 3 or higher (neutropenia in 8 patients and fatigue in 5 patients). The overall response rate was 21%. The median survival was 25.4 weeks, and the 1-year survival rate was 22%.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen of irinotecan and paclitaxel was found to be tolerated well in patients with recurrent or refractory SCLC. Although modest anticancer activity was noted, the efficacy failed to meet the primary endpoint of interest.

Treatment options for small cell lung cancer - do we have more choice?

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a significant health problem worldwide because of its high propensity for relapse. This review discusses existing and future therapies for the treatment of SCLC.

Targeted therapies in small cell lung cancer: a review

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer that is characterized by a rapid doubling time, early onset of dissemination and high sensitivity to chemotherapy. Despite the potential for cure in patients with limited disease with concurrent chemoradiation and an initial good response to chemotherapy in extensive disease, there is a high chance of disease relapse with an overall poor median survival for both stages. With increasing translational research and a better understanding of the molecular basis of cancer, a number of molecular targets have been identified in various preclinical studies. This review summarizes potentially viable targets and new agents that have been developed and employed in recent, ongoing and future clinical trials to attempt to improve clinical outcomes in this disease.

Cediranib, an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor kinases, is an active drug in recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer

PURPOSE

Angiogenesis is important for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) growth, and blocking angiogenesis can lead to EOC regression. Cediranib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, and c-kit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a phase II study of cediranib for recurrent EOC or peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer; cediranib was administered as a daily oral dose, and the original dose was 45 mg daily. Because of toxicities observed in the first 11 patients, the dose was lowered to 30 mg. Eligibility included

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were enrolled; 46 were treated. Clinical benefit rate (defined as complete response [CR] or partial response [PR], stable disease [SD] > 16 weeks, or CA-125 nonprogression > 16 weeks), which was the primary end point, was 30%; eight patients (17%; 95% CI, 7.6% to 30.8%) had a PR, six patients (13%; 95% CI, 4.8% to 25.7%) had SD, and there were no CRs. Eleven patients (23%) were removed from study because of toxicities before two cycles. Grade 3 toxicities (> 20% of patients) included hypertension (46%), fatigue (24%), and diarrhea (13%). Grade 2 hypothyroidism occurred in 43% of patients. Grade 4 toxicities included CNS hemorrhage (n = 1), hypertriglyceridemia/hypercholesterolemia/elevated lipase (n = 1), and dehydration/elevated creatinine (n = 1). No bowel perforations or fistulas occurred. Median PFS was 5.2 months, and median OS has not been reached; median follow-up time is 10.7 months.

CONCLUSION

Cediranib has activity in recurrent EOC, tubal cancer, and peritoneal cancer with predictable toxicities observed with other TKIs.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Administration, Oral
• Adult
• Aged
• Disease-Free Survival
• Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
• Drug Administration Schedule
• Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/mortality
• Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/pathology
• Female
• Humans
• Maximum Tolerated Dose
• Middle Aged
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
• Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy
• Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/mortality
• Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology
• Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality
• Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
• Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Peritoneal Neoplasms/mortality
• Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology
• Prognosis
• Quinazolines/administration & dosage
• Quinazolines/adverse effects
• Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors
• Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/therapeutic use
• Risk Assessment
• Survival Analysis
• Treatment Outcome

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ursula A Matulonis Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, MA 02115, USA.
Suzanne Berlin
Percy Ivy
Karin Tyburski
Carolyn Krasner
Corrine Zarwan
Anna Berkenblit
Susana Campos
Neil Horowitz
Stephen A Cannistra
Hang Lee
Julie Lee
Maria Roche
Margaret Hill
Christin Whalen
Laura Sullivan
Chau Tran
Benjamin D Humphreys
Richard T Penson

Collapse

Phase I study of cediranib in combination with oxaliplatin and infusional 5-Fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Cediranib is a potent oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity associated with all subtypes of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Purposes of this study were to determine the recommended phase II dose of cediranib in combination with standard doses of modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6), and the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of this combination in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Cediranib was administered daily orally at a starting dose of 30 mg and escalated to 45 mg daily, and mFOLFOX-6 was repeated every 14 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were done for oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cediranib. Response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors every four cycles.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients received 150 cycles of treatment (median, 6; range, 1-20 cycles). Of 9 patients enrolled at the 30-mg dose level, 1 patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea during cycle 1. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 7 patients at the 45-mg dose level. Common grade 3 toxicities related to cediranib included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, and anorexia. Of 14 patients evaluable for response, there were 6 partial responses (42.9%; 95% confidence interval, 17.7-71.1%) and 6 stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months. There were no pharmacokinetic interactions between cediranib and 5-fluorouracil or free plasma intact oxaliplatin.

CONCLUSIONS

Toxicities of this combination were manageable and consistent with previous studies. The recommended phase II dose is cediranib at 30 mg daily continuously in combination with standard doses of mFOLFOX-6. Cediranib and mFOLFOX-6 has promising antitumor activity and this combination warrants further investigation.