[Systemic therapy for advanced endometrial cancer]

Endometrial cancer has generally a good prognosis when diagnosed at an early stage, but remains incurable at an advanced stage (recurrent or metastatic) with only few therapeutic options. Hormonal therapy is the treatment of choice in case of slow progressive disease with a tumor expressing hormonal receptors due to its favorable safety profile. Taxanes, anthracyclines and platinum compounds are the most active chemotherapy agents with greater response rates when combined, though at the price of a significant toxicity. Targeted therapies based on a better understanding of tumor biology are being evaluated with some promising results. A good knowledge of patients' comorbidities, and exact histologic characteristics of the tumor (type, grade, hormonal receptor expression, and MSI status) for a well adapted therapeutic decision.

Molecular bases of endometrial cancer: new roles for new actors in the diagnosis and the therapy of the disease

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic malignancy in the western world. The majority of these cancers are curable, but a subset about 15-20% of endometrial tumors exhibits an aggressive phenotype. Based on clinic-pathological and molecular characteristics, EC has been classified into two groups: Type I estrogen-dependent adenocarcinomas, which have a good prognosis and an endometrioid histology, and Type II or non-estrogen-dependent EC associated with poor prognosis and non-endometrioid histology. EC develops as a result of a stepwise accumulation of alterations that seem to be specific of each histological type. However, more knowledge is needed to better understand the differences in the biology and the clinical outcome of EC. We would like to highlight the need to explore new potential biomarkers of EC as a tool for the detection and monitoring of aggressive endometrial tumors that, at the same time, will allow us to develop novel and more selective molecular targeted therapies against EC.

Combined weekly topotecan and biweekly bevacizumab in women with platinum-resistant ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer: results of a phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

A phase 2 trial was conducted to determine the toxicity and efficacy of combined weekly topotecan and biweekly bevacizumab in patients with primary or secondary platinum-resistant ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (OC).

METHODS

Patients were treated with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 and topotecan 4 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle until progressive disease (PD) or excessive toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), objective response, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 40) received a median of 8 treatment cycles. Toxicity was generally mild or moderate, with neutropenia (18%), hypertension (20%), gastrointestinal toxicity (18%), pain (13%), metabolic toxicity (15%), bowel obstruction (10%), and cardiotoxicity (8%) being the most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events. No bowel perforations, febrile neutropenia, or treatment-related deaths occurred. Median PFS and OS were 7.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-9.4) and 16.6 months (95% CI, 12.8-22.9), with 22 (55%) patients progression-free for ≥6 months. Ten (25%) patients had partial response (PR), 14 (35%) had stable disease (SD), and 16 (40%) had PD. Patients treated with 2 prior regimens received greater benefit than patients treated with 1: PR/SD, 78.9% versus 42.9% (P = .03); median PFS, 10.9 versus 2.8 months (P = .08); median OS, 22.9 versus 12.8 months (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

A weekly topotecan and biweekly bevacizumab combination demonstrates acceptable toxicity and encouraging efficacy in patients with platinum-resistant OC; further study is warranted.

A feasibility study of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in endometrial cancer: a Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study (KCOG0015 trial)

OBJECTIVES

The optimal chemotherapy regimen for women with endometrial cancer has not been established. We assessed the feasibility, toxicity and clinical efficacy of combination triweekly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in women with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically confirmed primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (Group A), or had localized high-risk features (Group B). All were treated with paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8 and 15) and carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1) each 21-day cycle. A minimum of 3 cycles was planned; if 75% or more of patients were able to receive at least 3 cycles with acceptable toxicity, the regimen was declared "feasible."

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled and administered 163 cycles of therapy; 38 (95%) were chemo-naive. No patients received radiation previously. Group A (measurable disease) contained 15 patients (5 with recurrent disease, 7 receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and 3 treated adjuvantly following suboptimal cytoreduction). Group B (non-measurable disease) contained 25 patients (primary stage I:10, II:5, III:8, IV:1 and relapse 1). Hematological toxicities(G3/G4) were neutropenia (31%/33%) and thrombocytopenia (6%/0%). Reversible G3 hypersensitivity (5%) and G2 cardiotoxicity (3%) was uncommon. Thirty-one patients (78%) completed ≥3 cycles (median 4, range: 1-9). Thirteen of 15 (87%) measurable patients responded (3CR, 10PR). Eighty-seven percent of measurable patients were not progressive at 6 months. In Group A, QOL scores were significantly improved after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (p=0.037), and at the completion of chemotherapy (p=0.045). QOL scores in Group B did not change during therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination chemotherapy is feasible and effective for endometrial cancer patients.

Emerging drugs in endometrial cancers

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Endometrial cancer remains the most common gynecologic malignancy. The treatment of endometrial cancer is rapidly evolving.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

In this article, we aim to review current and future treatment options in the medical treatment of endometrial cancers.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The cornerstone of curative therapy for patients with endometrial cancer is surgical treatment. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is the mainstay of therapy for metastatic and advanced endometrial cancer. The most active chemotherapy agents are anthracyclines, platinum compounds and taxanes. Combination chemotherapy has produced higher response rates than single agent therapy. Cisplatin and doxorubicin combination chemotherapy has served as the control arm in many trials. Three-drug combination regimen has shown the highest response rate but with increased toxicity. Despite the lack of published data supporting the superiority of the paclitaxel plus carboplatin combination over doxorubicin and cisplatin, many centers prefer this regimen as a standard of care. Hormonal therapy should be considered in patients with low grade tumors and in those with a poor performance status. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of endometrial cancer have led to development of targeted therapies. Among these the more promising ones are mTOR inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Clinical trials are planned to further explore how to best incorporate novel agents into the current treatment algorithm with the aim to improve outcome for women with endometrial adenocarcinomas.

A phase II study of sorafenib in advanced uterine carcinoma/carcinosarcoma: a trial of the Chicago, PMH, and California Phase II Consortia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of single agent sorafenib, an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced uterine carcinoma and carcinosarcoma.

METHODS

This multi-institutional non-randomized phase II trial enrolled two cohorts: patients with uterine carcinoma (cohort A) and uterine carcinosarcoma (cohort B). Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, 0-1 prior chemotherapy regimens, and ECOG performance status

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (40 with carcinoma, 16 with carcinosarcoma) were enrolled between March 2005 and August 2007. Two (5%) patients with uterine carcinoma had a partial response (PR) and 17 (42.5%) achieved stable disease (SD). Five had SD lasting at least 4 months. The 6-month progression-free survival rate for patients with carcinoma was 29%, and the median overall survival was 11.4 months. No patients with carcinosarcoma had an objective response. Four (25%) had SD, and one had SD lasting 18 months. The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 13%, and the median overall survival was 5.0 months. Grade 3/4 drug related toxicities included: hypertension (13%), hand-foot syndrome (13%), hypophosphatemia (7%), anemia (5%), rash (5%), diarrhea (5%), thrombosis (5%), fatigue (5%) and bleeding (5%).

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib had minimal activity in patients with uterine carcinoma. Predictive factors for potential benefit are needed.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects
• Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
• Benzenesulfonates/adverse effects
• Benzenesulfonates/therapeutic use
• Carcinoma/drug therapy
• Carcinosarcoma/drug therapy
• Disease-Free Survival
• Female
• Humans
• Middle Aged
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
• Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives
• Phenylurea Compounds
• Pyridines/adverse effects
• Pyridines/therapeutic use
• Sorafenib
• Survival Rate
• Uterine Neoplasms/drug therapy

Collapse

Grants

• P30 CA014599-34 NCI NIH HHS
• P30 CA014599 NCI NIH HHS
• N01CM62209 NCI NIH HHS
• N01CM62203 NCI NIH HHS
• N01 CM062201 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Halla S. Nimeiri University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Amit M. Oza Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Robert J. Morgan City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
Dezheng Huo University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Laurie Elit Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
James A. Knost Oncology/Hematology Associates, Peoria, IL
James L. Wade Decatur Memorial Hospital, Decatur, IL
Edem Agamah Central Illinois Hematology/Oncology Center, Springfield, IL
Everett E. Vokes University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Gini F. Fleming University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Collapse

Role of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies

This article reviews the history and current status of vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy for the most common gynecologic malignancies - epithelial ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers. The biologic rationale for targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for these disease sites is well-founded, and pre-clinical studies have supported the development of anti-VEGF agents. Their classification, known mechanisms of action, unique toxicities and clinical development are herein explored, the latter including issues related to study design, disease site and disease setting.

Promising novel therapies for the treatment of endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the novel agents which are being developed for the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma and to review other molecular targets that may be interesting in the treatment of this disease. While the majority of women with endometrial cancer enjoy a relatively good prognosis, the options for those women who suffer from a disease recurrence are limited and there is a need to identify novel agents.

METHODS

A review of clinical trials of novel therapeutic agents and their molecular targets is provided. In addition, a review of the current literature on other potential molecular targets for endometrial cancer was performed.

RESULTS

Several phase II trials of novel agents, both alone and in combination with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, have been completed or are nearing completion. It appears that the targeted agents may have the most efficacy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy or in a multi-targeted agent approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy offers the opportunity for a meaningful response rate in women with endometrial cancer, but the responses are often short lived and cure is uncommon in the setting of recurrent disease. The recent increase in molecular targets has led to the availability of many novel therapies. Determining how these agents are to be used, alone or in combination with "standard" therapies, needs to be defined and translational studies are needed to develop rational combinations of these novel agents before we can move into clinical trials.