Lung cancer: New biological insights and recent therapeutic advances

Approximately 1.6 million new cases of lung cancer are diagnosed each year throughout the world. In many countries, the mortality related to lung cancer continues to rise. The outcomes for patients with all stages of lung cancer have improved in recent years. The use of systemic therapy in conjunction with local therapy has led to improved cure rates in both resectable and unresectable patient groups. For patients with advanced stage disease, modest but real improvements in overall survival and quality of life have been achieved with systemic chemotherapy. A major focus of research has been the development of molecularly targeted agents and the identification of biomarkers for patient selection. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer with mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase domain achieve response rates of greater than 70% and superior progression-free survival when treated with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor compared with standard chemotherapy. This has now emerged as the preferred therapeutic approach for the subset of patients with a mutation in exons 19 or 21 of the EGFR. Another promising targeted approach involves the use of an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor in patients with a translocation involving the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) and -ALK genes. Finally, a paradigm shift in favor of maintenance therapy for patients with advanced stage disease has gained strength from recent data. All of these advances have been made possible by developing a greater understanding of the biology, the discovery of novel anticancer agents, and improved supportive care measures. This article reviews the major strides made in the treatment of lung cancer in the recent past.

The evolving role of histology in the management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Until recently, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was treated as a single disease despite recognition of its histologic and molecular heterogeneity. Recent clinical trials, however, demonstrate that histology is an important factor for individualizing treatment, based on either safety or efficacy outcomes. For example, the labeling of the licensed agents bevacizumab and pemetrexed is restricted to patients with nonsquamous cell NSCLC. For bevacizumab, this restriction is due to an apparent association between squamous cell histology and severe pulmonary hemorrhage, whereas for pemetrexed, superior treatment effects have been observed in patients with nonsquamous cell histology. Given fewer agents are both active and tolerable in patients with squamous cell carcinoma compared with adenocarcinoma, and the nature of this particular phenotype of NSCLC, new drugs are needed for this histology. In this new histology-based treatment era, questions persist. Can pathology accurately distinguish the histologic subtypes of NSCLC? Can we use cytologic diagnosis? In the future, will molecular profiling of tumors trump histologic analysis? Herein we describe how therapy for NSCLC is evolving on the basis of a better understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying NSCLC histologic heterogeneity and tumorigenesis.

Thymidylate Synthase But Not Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 Tumor Expression Predicts Outcome in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Treated With Pemetrexed-Based Chemotherapy

Purpose

The relationship between thymidylate synthase (TS) expression and outcome in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treated with pemetrexed (P) was retrospectively evaluated.

Patients and Methods

Sixty histologically confirmed patients with MPM previously treated with P and platinum (45 of 60) or as single agent (15 of 60) were retrospectively considered. Eighty-one control patients with MPM not P-treated were also evaluated. TS and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) gene expression levels were evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction and by immunohistochemistry using the H-score.

Results

Median TS H-score value was 90 (range, 5 to 240). A significant correlation between low TS protein expression and longer time to progression (TTP; 17.9 v 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 2.05, 95% CI, 1.19 to 3.77; P = .02) or overall survival (OS; 30 v 16.7 months; HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 4.91; P = .019) was found when patients were divided according to median H-score. Conversely, TS mRNA levels were not significantly correlated with outcome. In platinum-treated patients (n = 45), no correlation was found with survival according to ERCC1 median H-score, but patients in the lower tertile had a significantly shorter survival (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.08 to 8.69; P = .035). In control MPMs, TS had no prognostic role. At multivariate analysis, TS protein levels were the only independent prognostic factor for both TTP (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.13 to 6.49; P = .02) and OS (HR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.90 to 25.07; P = .003).

Conclusion

In patients with MPM treated with P-based chemotherapy, low TS protein levels are predictive of improved TTP and OS. The role of TS assessment is worth of prospective validation in future studies on MPM.