Molecular and Functional Heterogeneity of Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Metastases

INTRODUCTION

Treatment response to the standard therapy is low for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) mainly due to the tumor heterogeneity. We investigated the heterogeneity between primary PanNETs and metastases to improve the precise treatment.

METHODS

The genomic and transcriptomic data of PanNETs were retrieved from the Genomics, Evidence, Neoplasia, Information, Exchange (GENIE), and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, respectively. Potential prognostic effects of gene mutations enriched in metastases were investigated. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed to investigate the functional difference. Oncology Knowledge Base was interrogated for identifying the targetable gene alterations.

RESULTS

Twenty-one genes had significantly higher mutation rates in metastases which included TP53 (10.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.035) and KRAS (3.7% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.016). Signaling pathways related to cell proliferation and metabolism were enriched in metastases, whereas epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and TGF-β signaling were enriched in primaries. Gene mutations were highly enriched in metastases that had significant unfavorable prognostic effects included mutation of TP53 (p < 0.001), KRAS (p = 0.001), ATM (p = 0.032), KMT2D (p = 0.001), RB1 (p < 0.001), and FAT1 (p < 0.001). Targetable alterations enriched in metastases included mutation of TSC2 (15.5%), ARID1A (9.7%), KRAS (9.1%), PTEN (8.7%), ATM (6.4%), amplification of EGFR (6.0%), MET (5.5%), CDK4 (5.5%), MDM2 (5.0%), and deletion of SMARCB1 (5.0%).

CONCLUSION

Metastases exhibited a certain extent of genomic and transcriptomic diversity from primary PanNETs. TP53 and KRAS mutation in primary samples might associate with metastasis and contribute to a poorer prognosis. A high fraction of novel targetable alterations enriched in metastases deserves to be validated in advanced PanNETs.

Successful Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Case Report

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may potentially aid downstaging, increase the possibility of radical surgery. We herein report a case of a 63-year-old man who had been diagnosed with locally advanced small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas according to the diagnostic biopsy. The patient received 6 courses of etoposide and cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in an attempt to stop tumor progression, which promoted obvious tumor shrinkage without adverse effects and allowed subsequent Appleby procedure, the distal pancreatectomy with celiac artery resection. The patient showed no recurrence in the follow-up of a contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scan, which is 8 months after surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is a rare case to report etoposide and cisplatin administration before surgery for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma promoted a pathological partial response and finally achieved a radical surgery, providing a novel therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Multifocality is not associated with worse survival in sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in patients with hereditary cancer syndromes are typically multifocal. In contrast, sporadic pNETs are usually unifocal and the incidence of multifocal sporadic pNETs is unknown. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of multifocality in sporadic pNETs and any associated effect on recurrence risk and survival.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of pNETs at Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2019 were identified and clinical data were obtained from medical records. Syndromic disease was defined as pNETs arising in the setting of a hereditary cancer syndrome. Statistical comparisons were made using χ² , Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests and survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Six hundred and sixty-one patients with sporadic pNETs and fifty-nine with syndromic pNETs were identified. Multifocal disease was present in 4.8% of sporadic patients and 84.7% of syndromic patients (p < .001). Within patients with sporadic pNETs, clinicopathologic features and recurrence-free and overall survival were similar between patients with unifocal and multifocal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Multifocal sporadic pNETs are rare and multifocality is not associated with worse survival or increased recurrence risk. Patients with multifocal sporadic pNETs can likely be safely managed with a combination of resection and observation as indicated for each tumor.

Characteristics, Treatment, Outcomes, and Survival in Neuroendocrine G1 and G2 Pancreatic Tumors: Experiences From a Single Tertiary Referral Center

Purpose

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas (Pan-NETs) are usually hormonally inactive with a capacity to metastasize. Since Pan-NETs are rare, more knowledge is needed.

Methods

We reviewed all patients' medical files with Pan-NET treated at a tertiary center (2006-2019). Grade 1 (G1) and grade 2 (G2) tumors were compared. The latter group was subdivided arbitrarily based on proliferation index into G2a (3-9.9%) and G2b (10-19.9%).

Results

We found 137 patients (76 females, 61 males; G1 n=66, G2 n=42), the median age at diagnosis 61 years (interquartile range (IQR) 50-71), and tumor size 2 cm (1.3-5 cm). The initial surgery was performed in 101 patients. The remaining (n=36) were followed conservatively. Metastatic disease was evident in 22 patients (16%) at diagnosis while new lesions developed in 13 out of 22 patients (59%). In patients without previous metastatic disease, progressive disease was discovered in 29% of G1 vs. 55% of G2 patients (P=0.009), 47% of G2a vs. 75% of G2b patients (NS). Survival was poorer in patients with metastasis at diagnosis vs. those with local disease (P<0.001). During follow-up of 74 months, Pan-NET related death was found in 10 patients. Survival was not different between G1 vs. G2 or G2a vs. G2b, or if tumors were functional. Size ≤2 cm was associated with a better outcome (P=0.004). During the follow-up of small tumors (≤2 cm, n=36) two were resected.

Conclusion

In small non-functional Pan-NETs, active surveillance is reasonable. Progressive disease was more common in G2, but survival was similar in G1, G2 and between G2 subgroups. Survival was poorer in patients with metastasis at diagnosis.