Diabetic Foot Infection Presenting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome: A Unique Disorder of Systemic Reaction from Infection of the Most Distal Body

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a major complication of diabetic foot that lead to nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation (LEA). Such distal infection of the body having systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is rarely reported. Consecutive patients treated for limb-threatening DFI in a major diabetic foot center in Taiwan were analyzed between the years 2014 to 2017. Clinical factors, laboratory data, perfusion, extent, depth, infection and sensation (PEDIS) wound score in 519 subjects with grade 3 DFI and 203 presenting SIRS (28.1%) were compared. Major LEA and in-hospital mortality were defined as poor prognosis. Patients presenting SIRS had poor prognosis compared with those with grade 3 DFI (14.3% versus 6.6% for major LEA and 6.4% versus 3.5% for in-hospital mortality). Age, wound size, and HbA1c were independent risk factors favoring SIRS presentation. Perfusion grade 3 (odds ratio 3.37, p = 0.044) and history of major adverse cardiac events (OR 2.41, p = 0.036) were the independent factors for poor prognosis in treating patients with DFI presenting SIRS. SIRS when presented in patients with DFI is not only limb- but life-threatening as well. Clinicians should be aware of the clinical factors that are prone to develop and those affecting the prognosis in treating patients with limb-threatening foot infections.

Monitoring of glycation, oxidative stress and inflammation in relation to the occurrence of vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The study aimed to evaluate if the monitoring of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), lipoperoxides (LPO) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in plasma could help to predict development of diabetic complications (DC). Clinical and biochemical parameters including AGEs, AOPP, LPO and IL-6 were investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) with (+DC) and without (-DC) complications. AGEs were significantly higher in both diabetic groups compared to controls. AGEs were also significantly higher in group +DC compared to -DC. AGEs significantly correlated with HbA1c. We observed significantly higher AOPP in both diabetic groups in comparison with controls, but the difference between -DC and +DC was not significant. LPO significantly correlated with BMI. IL-6 were significantly increased in both diabetic groups compared to controls, but the difference between -DC and +DC was not significant. There was no significant correlation between IL-6 and clinical and biochemical parameters. These results do not exclude the association between IL-6 and onset of DC. We suggest that the measurement of not only HbA1c, but also AGEs may be useful to predict the risk of DC development in clinical practice. Furthermore, the measurement of IL-6 should be studied as adjunct to HbA1c monitoring.