1
|
Day case versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Shoulder Elbow 2021; 13:471-481. [PMID: 34659480 PMCID: PMC8512977 DOI: 10.1177/1758573220944411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of papers have been published comparing the safety and efficacy of day case and inpatient anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, no systematic review of the literature has been published to date. The aim of this review was to determine if day case total shoulder arthroplasty (length of stay <24 h) leads to similar outcomes as standard-stay inpatients (length of stay ≥24 h). METHODS The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewers were queried for publications utilizing keywords that were pertinent to total shoulder arthroplasty, day case, outpatient and inpatient, clinical or functional outcomes, and complications. In order to determine the quantitative impact of day case total shoulder arthroplasty on readmission and revision rate, a meta-analysis was performed on articles that observed 30- or 90-day readmission or revision. RESULTS Eight articles were found to be suitable for inclusion in the present study which included 6103 day case total shoulder arthroplasty and 147,463 inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. Following meta-analysis, there was no significant difference among patients who underwent day case total shoulder arthroplasty compared to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty regarding revision rates (OR: 1.001; 95% CI: 0.721-1.389; p = 0.995) and 30-day readmission rates (OR: 0.940; 95% CI: 0.723-1.223; p = 0.646). In contrast, patients who underwent day case total shoulder arthroplasty were less likely to have a readmission within 90 days compared to their inpatient counterparts (OR: 0.839; 95% CI: 0.704-0.999; p = 0.049). Two out of eight studies reported comparable baseline clinical characteristics among groups, while five studies reported significant differences and one study did not provide information regarding clinical characteristics, such as medical comorbidities or American Society of Anaesthesiologists'(ASA) score. No significant difference among groups was found in all or almost all studies regarding mortality rates, and rates of cardiac complications, cerebrovascular events, thromboembolic events, pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, and nerve complications. Finally, results were rather conflicting regarding the correlation of day case total shoulder arthroplasty to the rate of surgical site infections. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that day case total shoulder arthroplasty might lead to similar rates of mortality, complications, revisions, and readmissions compared to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty when used in a selected population of younger, healthier, and more male patients. In contrast, there was no consensus regarding the impact of day case total shoulder arthroplasty on the rate of surgical site infections. Finally, further research of higher quality is required to establish patient demographic criteria, ASA score, or comorbidity index cut off that might be used to define day case-treated patients who seem to have equivalent outcomes compared to inpatient-treated patients.Level of evidence: Systematic review of level III studies (lowest level included).
Collapse
|
2
|
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with a partially cemented all-polyethylene pegged bone-ingrowth glenoid component: a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2021; 13:627-641. [PMID: 34804212 PMCID: PMC8600676 DOI: 10.1177/1758573220944168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several articles have been published reporting on the clinical performance of a novel pegged, all-polyethylene glenoid component design which features a central peg, circumferentially fluted, interference-fit peg for tissue integration and three small peripheral pegs for cementing. However, no systematic review exists to this date. METHODS The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications up to May 2020. RESULTS Overall, 13 articles were included for analysis (560 operated shoulders, range of mean follow-up: 2-6 years). The survival rate was 98.2% (550 out of 560 cases), while the rate of aseptic loosening was 0.2% (1 out of 560 cases). There were 139 cases (out of 399 reported; 34.1%) with peri-glenoid radiolucency, and 35 cases (out of 223 reported; 15.7%) of asymptomatic central peg osteolysis, with 1 of them undergoing revision. CONCLUSIONS There was fair quality of evidence to show that partially cemented all-polyethylene pegged bone-ingrowth glenoid components produce promising results, with a low revision rate in the short- to medium-term follow-up. Nevertheless, this analysis showed high rates of both radiolucency of the glenoid component and osteolysis around the central peg which raise concern for potential failure of this glenoid component in the long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic review, IV.
Collapse
|
3
|
Functional Outcomes of Bilateral Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. JOINTS 2021; 7:188-198. [PMID: 34235384 PMCID: PMC8253605 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
To answer the question whether bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a safe and effective treatment which results in satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes with low complications rates. A second question to be answered was: what is the quality of the evidence of the already published studies which investigate the use of bilateral RTSA?
Methods
Two reviewers independently conducted a systematic search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms “reverse” AND “total” AND “shoulder” AND “arthroplasty” AND “clinical.” Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.
Results
From the 394 initial studies we finally selected and assessed 6 clinical studies which were eligible to our inclusion–exclusion criteria. The aforementioned studies included in total 203 patients (69% females; mean age range: 67.1–75 years; mean follow-up range: 12–61 months). From those, 168 patients underwent staged bilateral RTSA (mean duration between first and second operation range: 8–21.6 months) and the rest of them a unilateral RTSA as controlled treatment. Almost all mean clinical and functional scores, which were used to assess the therapeutic value of bilateral RTSA, depicted significant postoperative improvement in comparison with the mean preoperative values. The modified Coleman methodology score, which was used to assess the quality of the studies, ranged from a minimum of 36/100 to a maximum of 55/100.
Conclusion
Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, staged bilateral RTSA seems to be a safe and effective procedure for patients with cuff tear arthropathy, which results in significantly improved clinical and functional outcomes and low reoperations' rates.
Level of Evidence
Systematic review of level III-IV therapeutic studies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Non-rigid fixation of the glenoid bone block for patients with recurrent anterior instability and major glenoid bone loss: A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2021; 13:168-180. [PMID: 33897848 PMCID: PMC8039760 DOI: 10.1177/1758573219872512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New types of glenoid bone block fixation, involving suture buttons, suture anchors or even implant-free impaction of the graft, have been recently introduced. In contrast to screws which allow for a rigid fixation of the bone block, these alternative procedures provide a non-rigid type of fixation. METHODS Two reviewers independently conducted the search in a systematic way (according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms "Latarjet" OR "Eden-Hybbinette" OR "bone block" AND "anterior" AND "shoulder" AND "instability." RESULTS Eight out of the 325 initial studies were finally chosen according to our inclusion-exclusion criteria. In total, 750 patients were included in this review. The overall anterior instability recurrence rate for patients treated with non-rigid fixation was 2.6%, while the overall rate of non-union or graft osteolysis was 5.4%. CONCLUSIONS Regardless of the graft type, bone block non-rigid fixation showed satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with substantial glenoid bone deficiency. Furthermore, non-rigid fixation resulted in adequate bone graft healing and osseous incorporation. Lastly, given the relative lack of data, further prospective controlled studies are required to assess bone block non-rigid fixation procedures in comparison with the traditional rigid (with screws) fixation techniques. LEVEL Systematic review, IV.
Collapse
|
5
|
Comparison between all-suture and biocomposite anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A retrospective cohort study. J Orthop 2021; 24:264-270. [PMID: 33867751 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Suture anchors have revolutionized arthroscopic surgery, enabling direct soft tissue-to-bone repair. There are many types of anchors still used in arthroscopic shoulder operations. We sought to compare the clinical outcome of all-suture and biocomposite anchors when used in arthroscopic Bankart repair for patients suffering from anterior shoulder instability. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study of 30 patients (mean age: 26.6 years, SD: 8.8 years, male/female ratio: 5/1, mean follow up: 28 months, SD: 23.8, range: 12-92) with anterior shoulder instability was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups based upon the type of suture anchors used for the Bankart repair: group A (14 patients) used only all-suture anchors and group B (16 patients) used only biocomposite anchors. Outcomes reported were postoperative dislocations, positive shoulder apprehension test, self-reported sense of shoulder instability, return to activities of daily living, return to sports, patient satisfaction and complications. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used were the Rowe Score for Instability, Constant Shoulder Score, Walch Duplay Score, The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score and external rotation at 90° of arm abduction, external rotation at 0° of arm abduction, forward flexion, abduction, adduction and internal rotation. Results Rates of postoperative shoulder dislocation demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 groups (p > .05). Four postoperative dislocations happened, two in each group (14.3% and 12.5% for all suture only and biocomposite only groups, respectively), with three of them being traumatic. In addition, no significant differences were observed amongst groups regarding shoulder apprehension test (group A: 85.7% vs. group B: 93.8%), sense of shoulder instability (7.1% vs. 6.3%), return to activities of daily living (group A: 85.7% vs. group B: 93.8%), return to sports (group A: 85.7% vs. group B: 87.5%), patient satisfaction (moderate level: group A 21.4% vs. group B 12.5%), and PROMs. Conclusion The short-term failure rate and clinical/functional outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair using all-suture anchors is similar to the use of biocompatible anchors. Level of evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
|
6
|
Excellent Clinical and Radiological Midterm Outcomes for the Management of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability by All-Arthroscopic Modified Eden-Hybinette Procedure Using Iliac Crest Autograft and Double-Pair Button Fixation System: 3-Year Clinical Case Series With No Loss to Follow-Up. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:795-803. [PMID: 33127552 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological midterm outcomes of the all-arthroscopic modified Eden-Hybinette procedure in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. METHODS A retrospective, single-center case series with prospectively collected data was conducted. The inclusion criterion was traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss; patients with atraumatic or multidirectional instability were excluded. An all-arthroscopic modified Eden-Hybinette procedure using iliac crest autograft and double-pair button fixation was carried out. All patients were postoperatively assessed for recurrence and apprehension. Shoulder range of motion values and functional scores, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, Oxford instability, Rowe instability, and Walch-Dupplay, were recorded. Graft positions, healing, and absorption were evaluated with computed tomography. Comparisons of values were performed with paired t tests for normally distributed differences and with nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed rank test otherwise. RESULTS The final study cohort included 28 patients, mean age 36 ± 10 years, and mean follow-up period 43 ± 6 months (range 36 to 53). Median glenoid bone loss was 12.4% (range 8% to 33%). No recurrence occurred, no subjective shoulder instability was reported, and no major complications were documented through the last follow-up. Postoperative shoulder range of motion had no significant differences compared with the healthy side. All final postoperative functional scores significantly increased to show excellent results compared with preoperative values. All grafts were positioned and healed optimally, and none was completely reabsorbed. CONCLUSIONS The all-arthroscopic modified Eden-Hybinette procedure is safe, leading to excellent clinical and radiological midterm outcomes in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. This technique restores glenoid bone defects and preserves the normal shoulder anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, therapeutic, retrospective case series.
Collapse
|
7
|
Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2021; 13:29-37. [PMID: 33717216 PMCID: PMC7905522 DOI: 10.1177/1758573220914277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of papers have been published reporting on the clinical performance of modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. However, no systematic review of the literature has been published to date. METHODS The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and EMBASE were queried for publications from January 1980 to October 2019 utilizing keywords pertinent to total shoulder arthroplasty, trabecular metal, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Overall, seven articles were included for analysis (322 operated shoulders, mean follow-up range: 2-4 years). The survival rate of modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components was 96% (309 out of 322 cases) at 43 months mean follow-up, while the rate of aseptic loosening was 0.3% (1 out of 322 cases). There were 35 cases (10.9%) with glenoid component radiolucency (one of them required revision), and 37 cases (11.5%) of metal debris formation, with four of them undergoing revision. CONCLUSIONS There was low quality evidence to show that the use of modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty may be safe and effective at short-term follow-up. However, this analysis showed alarmingly high rates of both radiolucency of the glenoid component and metal debris formation which raise concern for potential failure of this glenoid component in the long term. Therefore, we feel that modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components should be still used with caution as part of a structured surveillance or research program until we know if there is a detriment to the prosthesis in the medium to long term.Level: Systematic review, IV.
Collapse
|
8
|
Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study. Musculoskelet Surg 2020; 104:187-193. [PMID: 31147965 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. METHODS A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12-80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. RESULTS No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. CONCLUSIONS Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair.
Collapse
|
9
|
Total shoulder arthroplasty with hybrid fixation of glenoid components consisting of cementless porous metal pegs or cage along with cemented backside polyethylene surface: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 2020; 104:229-236. [PMID: 32529404 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-020-00670-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Recently, hybrid glenoid components have been developed, consisting of cementless highly porous metal central peg, monoblock keel or cage along with cemented backside polyethylene surface. The aims of this study were twofold: (1) to determine the revision and complication rates of hybrid glenoid components, consisting of porous metal pegs or coatings attached to the polyethylene, for aseptic loosening in TSA and (2) to evaluate the rate of radiolucent lines in patients who underwent TSA with hybrid glenoid components consisting of porous metal pegs or coatings attached to the polyethylene. The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications utilizing the following keywords: "hybrid" OR "bone-ingrowth" OR "bone ingrowth" AND "TSA" OR "total" AND "shoulder" AND "arthroplasty" OR "replacement". Five articles were included for analysis (470 operated shoulders, mean follow-up: 47.5 months). The overall weighted mean modified methodology Coleman score was 51.2/100, indicating a moderate level of overall methodological quality. The survival rate of hybrid glenoid components was 97.4% (458 out of 470 cases), while the rate of glenoid-related complications was 2.8% (13 cases). Finally, there were 54 cases (out of 313 reported; 17.3%) with glenoid radiolucency (none of them required revision). TSA with hybrid fixation glenoid components was associated with high survivorship and low rate of glenoid component-related complications at 4 years mean follow-up. In addition, there was limited evidence to show that the short- to mid-term outcome of TSA using hybrid glenoid components is not inferior to the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components.
Collapse
|
10
|
Arthroscopic anatomic complete versus non-anatomic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of comparative trials. Musculoskelet Surg 2020; 104:145-154. [PMID: 32358709 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-020-00648-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Several clinical studies have compared the clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic anatomic complete repair and arthroscopic partial repair for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs). To our knowledge, no systematic review of these comparative trials has been published yet. A systematic analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Six studies were eligible for analysis, and they were level III case-control studies. There were 223 cases of complete repair and 208 cases of partial repair (mean age range 59-67 years, mean follow-up range 24-45 months). All studies reported significant postoperative improvement in the reported subjective scores and range of motion in both groups. Complete repair was associated with at least equal or better functional outcomes compared to the partial repair. The rate of complications requiring reoperation in the complete and partial repair cohorts was 1.3% and 3.4%, respectively. Although the overall rate of radiographic integrity of the complete and partial repair cohorts was 61.1% and 26.7%, respectively, we found no clinical relevance in this finding. There is moderate-to-good quality evidence to support that both arthroscopic complete and partial repairs of MRCTs are associated with satisfactory functional outcomes and low rate of complications requiring reoperation. Complete repair is associated with at least equal or better functional outcomes compared to the partial repair and, therefore, it should remain the first line of treatment.
Collapse
|
11
|
Arthroscopic partial repair with versus without biodegradable subacromial spacer for patients with massive rotator cuff tears: a case-control study. Musculoskelet Surg 2020; 105:247-255. [PMID: 32124328 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-020-00649-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate whether arthroscopic partial repair with the additional use of a biodegradable subacromial spacer would be proven better treatment for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) compared to single arthroscopic partial repair. METHODS A matched-pairs case-control study of 32 patients suffering from irreparable MRCT who underwent an arthroscopic partial repair with (Group B: 16 patients) or without (Group A: 16 patients) InSpace Balloon (ISB®; Orthospace, Caesarea, Israel) implantation was conducted. For the clinical and functional assessment of the patients, the visual analog scale, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Range of Motion (RoM), and patients' satisfaction were obtained. RESULTS The two groups were matched in all baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (n.s.). All mean final quantitative postoperative clinical and functional scores of group A (partial repair and ISB) and group B (single partial repair), as well as active RoM, were significantly improved (t test) in comparison with the mean preoperative values (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in relation to the two success rate criteria (ASES minimal clinically important difference or MCID > 17, Constant score MCID > 10.4), as well as pain relief and RoM 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSION Arthroscopic partial repair, either with or without ISB implantation, resulted in significantly improved clinical and functional short-term outcomes for the treatment of MRCT. Patients who were treated with combined partial repair and ISB implantation had a potential propensity toward better functional outcomes and higher patient satisfaction compared to the single-partial-repair-treated group. However, given that these differences were not significant, we feel that further studies are required to clarify the potential therapeutic value of ISB implantation in the treatment of irreparable MRCT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III. CLINICAL TRIALS' REGISTRY German Clinical Trials Register (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). ID number: DRKS00014725. Date of registration: 07/05/2018.
Collapse
|
12
|
The clinical outcome of the ‘Surgilig’ technique for the reconstruction of acromioclavicular dislocations: A systematic review. J Orthop 2020; 18:126-131. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 07/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
13
|
Iliac Crest Bone Grafting for the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients with Glenoid Bone Loss: a Systematic Review of Contemporary Literature. SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN 2020; 6:12. [PMID: 32048101 PMCID: PMC7013021 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-020-0240-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of clinical trials have been published assessing the role of iliac crest bone grafting for the management of recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone loss in contemporary practice. We therefore performed a systematic review of contemporary literature to examine the effect of iliac crest bone grafting on postoperative outcomes of these patients. Our hypothesis is that contemporary iliac crest bone block techniques are associated with low reoperation and complication rates combined with satisfactory functional results. METHODS The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE were searched between January 2008 and December 2019 for relevant publications. RESULTS Following the application of the inclusion-exclusion criteria, nine articles were found eligible for our analysis. In total, 261 patients (mean age range, 25.5-37.5 years; mean follow-up range, 20.6-42 months) were included in the studies of the current review. The mean modified Coleman score was 48.6 (range 37-65), indicating an overall low-to-moderate methodological quality. In the short term, the overall all-cause reoperation rate was 6.1%, while the rate of recurrent instability was 4.8%. The graft non-union rate was 2.2%, while the rate of osteolysis, graft fracture, and infection was 0.4%, 0.9%, and 1.7%, respectively. Finally, hardware-related complications, such as screw breakage or symptomatic mechanical irritation around the screw insertion, occurred in 3.9% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Iliac crest bone block techniques in contemporary practice are safe and effective in the short-term (< 4 years) follow-up for the management of anterior shoulder instability with substantial glenoid bone deficiency. However, further studies of higher quality and longer follow-up are required to establish the therapeutic value of these techniques as well as to clarify whether there are differences in the outcomes of arthroscopic and open iliac crest bone block procedures.
Collapse
|
14
|
All-Arthroscopic McLaughlin's Procedure in Patients with Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion Caused by Locked Posterior Shoulder Dislocation. JOINTS 2019; 7:71-77. [PMID: 34195533 PMCID: PMC8236323 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to investigate the clinical and functional outcomes of the all-arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure in a clinical series of patients suffering by neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation. Methods A retrospective clinical study based on prospectively collected data was conducted in a single center regarding 10 patients with neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation and concomitant reverse Hill-Sachs lesion, who were treated with the all-arthroscopic Mclaughlin procedure. The average humeral bone defect was 39 ± 7% according to the preoperative computed tomography evaluation. The mean time of follow-up was 77 ± 16 months (range, 63-104 months). Results No patient had suffered a new dislocation, whereas all of them were satisfied with the surgical outcome and returned to their previous activities of daily living. External rotation was restored to every patient studied from 0 degrees at the baseline. At the last follow-up, the median external rotation beside the body was 90 degrees (range, 50-90 degrees; p < 0.01) and the respective measurement at 90 degrees of abduction was 90 degrees (range, 80-90 degrees; p < 0.01). The active forward flexion was increased ( p < 0.01), from 60 degrees (range, 30-180 degrees) at the baseline to 180 degrees (range, 160-180 degrees) at the last follow-up and the internal rotation was gained ( p < 0.01) from the level of buttock (range, lateral thigh-T12) at the baseline to the T11 level (range, T7-L3) at the last follow-up. The median UCLA score was increased from 8 (range, 4-22) to 35 (range, 33-35; p < 0.01) and the Oxford instability score from 5 (range, 3-16) to 46 (range, 43-48; p < 0.01), respectively. Conclusion The arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure in substantial reverse Hills-Sachs lesion caused by locked posterior dislocation leads to excellent clinical and functional results in the long-term follow-up. Level of Evidence This is a therapeutic study, case series with no comparison group, Level IV.
Collapse
|
15
|
Satisfactory mid-term outcome of subacromial balloon spacer for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:3890-3896. [PMID: 30888449 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05485-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To answer the question whether arthroscopic subacromial balloon spacer (InSpace Balloon-ISB) implantation results in improved outcomes in patients suffering by irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT). Secondarily, we aimed to compare the outcomes of a combined ISB and arthroscopic partial repair procedure with those of a single ISB implantation without any repair. METHODS A retrospective single-centre case series, based on prospectively collected data of patients who were suffering by irreparable MRCT, was conducted. An ISB implantation along with an arthroscopic non-anatomic repair or debridement was carried out in all patients included in this study. Patients were functionally evaluated with the use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score and the Constant score. Individual's pain was pre- and postoperatively measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (0-100/100). Patients' satisfaction and postoperative complications were also documented. As for the active range of motion (RoM), shoulder's forward flexion, external rotation at 0° and of 90° of abduction, and internal rotation were also pre- and postoperatively assessed. RESULTS Thirty-one patients [mean age: 65.2 years, standard deviation (SD): 8.5, and range: 50-80 years] with a mean follow-up of 22.1 months (SD: 9.8; range: 6-31 months) were reviewed. All final postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in comparison with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). The vast majority of the patients declared fully or almost fully satisfied with their treatment (80.6%), while most patients were free of pain at their last follow-up (83.9%). We identified 18 patients (group A), who were treated with a combined ISB implantation and arthroscopic non-anatomic repair and 13 patients (group B) who received an ISB implant without any repair. The long head of biceps, where existed, was tenotomized in both groups. No significant difference was found between the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups. As for the mean final postoperative scores and RoM, the differences between the two groups were insignificant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The use of ISB implantation for patients suffering by MRCT leads to significantly improved mid-term outcomes and high patents' satisfaction. The additional use of arthroscopic partial repair with ISB was not proven superior to the single ISB implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV; therapeutic case series.
Collapse
|
16
|
Is subscapularis repair associated with better outcome compared to non-repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review of comparative trials. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2019; 11:7948. [PMID: 31616550 PMCID: PMC6784593 DOI: 10.4081/or.2019.7948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to investigate whether combined reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and subscapularis repair leads to improved clinical and functional outcome in comparison with RTSA alone. Two reviewers independently conducted a systematic search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms "reverse" AND "shoulder" AND "arthroplasty" AND "with" AND "subscapularis" AND "repair". From the 72 initial studies, we finally chose five studies which were eligible to our inclusion-exclusion criteria. The total mean modified Coleman methodology test was 55/100 (range: 47/100 to 60/100). The eligible studies included 1087 patients, in total. Regarding the subjective functional scores as well as range of motion (ROM), the differences amongst groups were insignificant in almost all studies. The mean complications' rate of the repair group was 10.4%, whereas the respective rate of the nonrepair group was 10.2%. All studies concluded that the repair of subscapularis did not affect the complications' rate of patients who were treated with RTSA. The mean dislocations' rates of the repair and the nonrepair group were 1.5% and 2.3%, respectively. Although subscapularis repair was proven safe and effective for the augmentation of RTSA, it did not offer any additional clinical or functional benefit in the outcome of patients treated with lateralized RTSA. Therefore, it is not supported its routine use for patients who have a preoperatively sufficient subscapularis tendon.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
We describe an arthroscopic technique for the management of glenoid rim fractures. It is performed with the patient placed in lateral decubitus position. The fracture is assessed through the anterosuperior portal, and the fragment is mobilized. A special glenoid guide is used from the posterior portal to reduce the fragment and to create 2 tunnels through the glenoid and through the glenoid rim fragment. Two pairs of round buttons are connected with high-strength sutures and are tightened posteriorly. This allows strong fixation of the fractured fragment and avoids all the anterior structures since all the instruments are inserted posteriorly.
Collapse
|
18
|
Arthroscopic partial repair for massive rotator cuff tears: does it work? A systematic review. SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN 2019; 5:13. [PMID: 30976931 PMCID: PMC6459454 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-019-0186-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While arthroscopic complete repair of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) back to their anatomic footprint is preferential, there are cases where this type of repair is not applicable due to the contraction of the torn tendons. In such cases, a non-anatomic incomplete or partial repair can be performed. A number of clinical studies have investigated the clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair for irreparable MRCT. To our knowledge, no systematic review has been published yet to synthetically evaluate these results. METHODS Two reviewers independently conducted the search in a PRISMA-compliant systematic way using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms "arthroscopy"[MeSH Terms] OR arthroscopic surgical procedure [Text Word (tw)] AND massive rotator cuff tears [tw] AND arthroscopic partial repair [tw]. RESULTS From the 55 initial studies, we finally chose 11 clinical studies which were eligible to our inclusion-exclusion criteria. The mean modified methodology Coleman score was 58/100, whereas it ranged from 41/100 to 78/100. In total, 643 patients were included in this review. All postoperative mean clinical and functional subjective scores, as well as muscle strength of patients treated with arthroscopic partial repair, were found significantly improved, when compared with the respective mean preoperative values. The rate of structural failure of the partial repair, as it was estimated by postoperative imaging modalities, was 48.9%. The overall reoperations' rate was 2.9% regarding the patients who were treated with partial repair. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic partial repair might be a safe and effective alternative treatment for irreparable contracted MRCT, where a complete repair cannot be performed. The methodological quality of the relevant, available literature is low to moderate; therefore, further studies of higher quality are required to confirm these results.
Collapse
|
19
|
Arthroscopic versus open Latarjet: a step-by-step comprehensive and systematic review. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2019; 29:957-966. [PMID: 30847680 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02398-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether arthroscopic Latarjet procedure significantly differs from the open procedure as for the clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes. METHODS Two reviewers independently conducted a systematic search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms "shoulder" AND "anterior" AND "instability" AND "Latarjet". RESULTS From the 259 initial papers, we finally assessed five clinical studies which were eligible to our inclusion-exclusion criteria. The mean modified Coleman score for methodological deficiencies of the studies was 65.4/100, whereas it ranged from 53/100 to 77/100. The arthroscopic technique illustrated comparable results to the open technique regarding the postoperative recurrence rate. No significant difference was found amongst groups in relation to the postoperative osteoarthritis, infection rates, soft tissue healing, postoperative mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, mean Walch-Duplay score, fatty infiltration of the subscapularis muscle and posterior protrusion of the screw. The arthroscopic technique yielded significantly superior results as for the non-union rate of the graft, the total graft osteolysis and graft resorption, the mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score and the early postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS Both the open and the arthroscopic Latarjet procedures led to satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes for the treatment of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and significant glenoid bone loss. However, the overall quality of the studies ranged from low to moderate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Comprehensive and systematic review of level II-III therapeutic studies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Background: The surgical treatment of a Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior (SLAP) lesion becomes more and more frequent as the surgical techniques, the implants and the postoperative rehabilitation of the patient are improved and provide in most cases an excellent outcome. Objective: However, a standard therapy of SLAP lesions in the shoulder surgery has not been established yet. An algorithm on how to treat SLAP lesions according to their type and data on the factors that influence the surgical outcome is essential for the everyday clinical practice. Method: In this article, a retrospective evaluation of patients with SLAP lesion, treated surgically in our orthopaedic clinic was conducted. Results: According to the clinical outcome and our experience with the surgical therapy of SLAP lesions we demonstrate an algorithm on the proper therapeutic approach. Conclusion: SLAP I lesions are treated with debridement. Most controversies concern patients with SLAP II lesions, whose therapy is either fixation of the superior labrum or tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. For patients with SLAP III or IV lesions the most commonly accepted approach is tenotomy or tenodesis of the long head of biceps tendon.
Collapse
|
21
|
The effect of quadriceps contraction during weight-bearing on four patellar height indices. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 90:870-3. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.90b7.20111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The effect of weight-bearing on the height of the patellar using four radiological indices was studied in 25 healthy men using lateral radiographs of the knee in 30° of flexion non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing. The position of the patella was quantified using the Insall-Salvati, the modified Insall-Salvati, the Blackburne-Peel and the Caton indices. The contraction of the quadriceps on weight-bearing resulted in statistically significant proximal displacement of the patella with all four indices studied. The mean Insall-Salvati index was 0.919 (sd 0.063) before and 1.109 (sd 0.042) after weight-bearing (p = 0.001), while the mean modified Insall-Salvati index was 0.734 (sd 0.039) before and 0.896 (sd 0.029) after weight-bearing (p = 0.041). Similarly, the Blackburne-Peel index was 0.691 (sd 0.09) before and 0.807 (sd 0.137) after weight-bearing (p = 0.012). The mean Caton index was 0.861 (sd 0.09) before and 0.976 (sd 0.144) after weight-bearing (p = 0.023). The effect of quadriceps contraction should be considered in clinical studies where the patellar position indices are reported.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lack of association between vitamin D and calcitonin receptor gene polymorphisms and forearm bone values of young Greek males. JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL & NEURONAL INTERACTIONS 2008; 8:196-203. [PMID: 18622089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED INTRODUCTION--HYPOTHESIS: Since the genetic bases of bone mass regulation in males are still poorly understood and the role of calciotropic hormones on bone mineral metabolism is absolute, our hypothesis is based on the certainty that specific genetic polymorphism will contribute, at least, on bone mass values. Our objective was to examine the relative contribution of genetic variables to the regulation of bone values in a population of young healthy men, focusing on the BsmI polymorphism of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene and the AluI polymorphism of calcitonin receptor (CTR) gene. METHODS Areal bone mineral density (aBMD), bone mineral content (BMC) and geometrical areas at specific skeletal sites of the forearm, of 301 healthy Caucasian young men, aged 18-25, were assessed by single X-ray absorptiometry (Osteometer DTX-100). VDR and CTR alleles were determined by BsmI and AluI endonuclease restriction fragment analyses. Analysis of covariance was used as a statistical model. RESULTS No significant differences in the forearm aBMD, BMC or in area values were observed between the VDR and CTR genotypes. Findings did not change after adjusting for demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS The BsmI and AluI polymorphisms are not related to the forearm bone values either reflecting mass or geometrical variables in this male population.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dietary factors (calcium, proteins, alcohol, coffee and tea intake), exercise, sunlight exposure and immobilization on bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in young men. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS We examined a group of 300 healthy men, aged 18-30. Mean weight was 80-81 kg (53-125 kg range) and height 179 cm (160-195 cm range). Distal BMC (dBMC), distal BMD (dBMD) and ultradistal BMD (udBMD) at the radius were measured by single X-ray absorptiometry (Osteometer DTX). The data concerning lifestyle factors were obtained through a questionnaire. The 300 men were divided in four groups according to calcium intake, four groups taking into account protein and three groups alcohol intake. There also were five groups of exercise level, six groups of sun exposure and two groups of duration of immobilization. RESULTS In the group with the lowest levels of calcium intake (< 400 mg/day), dBMD and udBMD were lower than in the other groups of calcium intake (P = 0.002). dBMC and udBMD were lower (P = 0.043 and 0.015, respectively) in subjects with low physical activity (< 2 h/week), whereas dBMC and udBMD were higher (P < 0.0005) in subjects with frequent sun exposure (group labelled 'very often'). Multiple regression analysis on bone mineral density of the forearm showed that, calcium intake, exercise and sunlight were also independent predictors of bone mass. No significant correlation between the other examined factors and BMD or BMC was detected. CONCLUSIONS Calcium intake, exercise level and sun exposure showed a statistically significant correlation with distal BMD and BMC in young adult men.
Collapse
|