Routine immunization experience and practices during the COVID-19 pandemic of caregivers attending a tertiary hospital in Cape Town

Introduction

Immunizations are successful, cost-effective interventions for the control of infectious diseases and preventing mortality. Lockdown restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic had adverse effects on child-health including access to immunizations. Our study aimed to document immunization status, describe caregiver experiences around accessing immunizations during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify any significant factors associated with immunization status.

Methods

Caregivers, with children between the ages of 10 to 33 months, attending Tygerberg Hospital Paediatric Department were invited to complete an anonymous survey from 15th September-15th December 2022. Data was captured using a REDCap questionnaire and analysed using Stata Version 17.

Results

171 caregivers completed the survey. Immunizations were up to date in 81%. Most (155, 88%) agreed it was important to immunize their child. A third of caregivers (55) felt it was unsafe to attend the clinic and 37% (62) agreed it was difficult to attend. Caregivers receiving a social grant (p = 0.023) or who felt safe attending clinic (p = 0.053) were more likely to be up to date with immunizations. Three-quarters (128, 78%) were aware of recommendations to continue immunization. These caregivers were more likely to think it was important to immunize on time (p = 0.003) and to receive family encouragement (p = 0.001). Caregivers were more likely to attend clinic if they felt it was important to vaccinate on time (p < 0.001) or felt safe attending clinic (p = 0.036).

Conclusion

Immunization rates were higher than expected but below global targets. Although caregivers feel immunizations are important, unknowns still instilled fear of attending clinics. Social factors such as family support and social grants improve vaccine seeking behaviour.

Paediatric antimicrobial use at a South African hospital

BACKGROUND

Data on antimicrobial use among hospitalized children in Africa are very limited due to the absence of electronic prescription tracking.

METHODS

This study evaluated antimicrobial consumption rates, the antimicrobial spectrum used, and the indications for therapy on a paediatric ward and in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Antimicrobial prescription and patient demographic data were collected prospectively from May 10, 2015 to November 11, 2015. For the same period, data on antimicrobials dispensed and costs were extracted from the pharmacy electronic medicine management system. The volume of antimicrobials dispensed (dispensing data) was compared with observed antimicrobial use (prescription data).

RESULTS

Of the 703 patients admitted, 415/451 (92%) paediatric ward admissions and 233/252 (92%) PICU admissions received ≥1 antimicrobials. On the ward, 89% of prescriptions were for community-acquired infections; 29% of PICU antimicrobials were prescribed for healthcare-associated infections. Ampicillin and third-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed agents. Antimicrobial costs were 67541 South African Rand (ZAR) (5680 United States Dollars (USD)) on the ward and 210484 ZAR (17702 USD) in the PICU. Ertapenem and meropenem were the single largest contributors to antimicrobial costs on the ward (43%) and PICU (30%), respectively. The volume of antimicrobials dispensed by the pharmacy (dispensing data) differed considerably from observed antimicrobial use (prescription data).

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of antimicrobial consumption were documented. Community-acquired infections were the main indication for prescription. Although pharmacy dispensing data did not closely approximate observed use, this represents a promising method for antimicrobial usage tracking in the future.

Static standing, dynamic standing and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-over efficacy study design.

OBJECTIVE

To determine spasticity differences between static and dynamic standing training in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Vancouver, Canada.

METHODS

Ten individuals with SCI who could stand with or without bracing or supports participated in both dynamic and static standing training (one session each, 2 days apart) using a Segway. The primary outcome was spasticity as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and electromyography (EMG) of the quadriceps, hamstrings, adductors and gastrocnemius.

RESULTS

There was no statistically detectable difference in spasticity between dynamic and static standing training in individuals with SCI as measured by VAS, MAS or EMG, although there was a trend towards decreased spasticity after the dynamic training.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in spasticity outcomes between static and dynamic standing training on a Segway for individuals with SCI.

SPONSORSHIP

This research was funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries.

The preparticipation evaluation for athletes with disability

BACKGROUND

Athletes are routinely assessed medically prior to competition. Although standardized preparticipation examinations (PPEs) are available for able-bodied athletes, the literature lacks any validated equivalent for the athlete with disability (AWD). Since participation and level of competition is increasing in this population, evidence-based tools such as a standardized PPE form should be available for health professionals to assess AWD health and safety.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To develop an AWD-targeted standardized preparticipation history evaluation (PPE history) using consensus-based expert recommendations.

METHODS

Researchers developed a PPE history for critical evaluation of its content validity. Structured Delphi method for collecting and interpreting contributions from an expert panel using a series of questionnaires with controlled feedback was performed. Opinions based on the experience of related experts - physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians and physiatrists - were studied during each of the three survey rounds. The process was terminated once adequate consensus relating to the proposed PPE history document was reached.

RESULTS

Majority consensus was reached for forty-nine of fifty-four items to create a refined ten section AWD-specific document to supplement the current standardized PPE. Modifications were made by researchers to accommodate the five items that did not reach statistical consensus.

CONCLUSION

Consensus was reached on a variety of AWD-specific PPE items, including the disability-related history and functional review. Equipment issues represent a complex area of evaluation, worthy of future research and discussion. The current proposed PPE history tool is considered comprehensive and ready for application in a clinical setting as an adjunct to existing PPE tools. Injury research in the AWD population will provide guidance for refinement and further validation of this PPE history document.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.