Performance measures for the SACRED team-centered approach to advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology have defined performance measures for upper and lower gastrointestinal, pancreaticobiliary, and small-bowel endoscopy. Quality indicators to guide endoscopists in the growing field of advanced endoscopy are also underway. We propose that equal attention is given to developing the entire advanced endoscopy team and not the individual endoscopist alone.We suggest that the practice of teams intending to deliver high quality advanced endoscopy is underpinned by six crucial principles concerning: selection, acceptance, complications, reconnaissance, envelopment, and documentation (SACRED).

Prophylactic antibiotic use in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic antibiotics are used in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions. However, there are no universally accepted guidelines regarding the best regimen. This retrospective, multicentre study was designed to compare the different prophylactic antibiotic regimens in these patients in three hospitals across two NHS trusts over a five-year period.

METHODS

Case notes and electronic records were reviewed for all patients undergoing acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions between January 2010 and December 2014. Prophylactic antibiotic regimens, duration of use, wound infection, implant loss, seroma and therapeutic antibiotic use was recorded. Patients were divided into groups based on prophylactic antibiotic regimen and actual duration of use. Intergroup analysis was performed using Stata 13.0. Implant loss due to infection was the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients had 122 breast reconstructions performed over the study period. Four prophylactic antibiotic regimens were identified: single dose (n = 20), three doses (n = 17), antibiotics for five-seven days (n = 51) and antibiotics until drains removed (n = 32). There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between the various regimens in implant loss, wound infection, therapeutic antibiotic prescription or seroma rates. Based on the actual duration of prophylactic antibiotics usage, three groups were identified: prophylactic antibiotics given for one day (n = 26), antibiotics for up to one week (n = 76) and for more than one week (n = 13). Again, no statistically significant difference was observed in the groups for any outcome measure.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated no difference in outcomes between different prophylactic antibiotic regimens in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions.

Thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer

Patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma of the breast are thought to be at lower risk of developing thromboembolic complications than those with abdominal malignancies and the role of the thromboprophylaxis is unproven. To determine current thromboprophylaxis practice a questionnaire was sent to 184 consultant surgeons thought to be involved in breast cancer surgery, of whom 137 responded (74%). Eleven surgeons no longer dealt with breast cancer patients. Of the remaining 126, thromboprophylaxis was given routinely by 88 (69.8%), with the commonest regimens being subcutaneous heparin only (n=43) and heparin combined with compression stockings (n=20). Patients with breast cancer were regarded as being at high risk of thromboembolic complications by 65 clinicians in this group (73.7%). Thirty-eight consultants did not use thromboprophylaxis routinely, the most commonly stated reasons were low/no risk of DVT (n=24), because of early postoperative mobilization (n=20) and increased risk of bleeding complications (n=15). Twenty clinicians reported a total of 22 deep venous thromboses and two pulmonary emboli affecting patients under their care who had surgery for breast cancer during the preceding year. Almost 70% of surgeons routinely employ thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery but practice varies widely.