Prevalence of modifiable risk factors and related poor cardiovascular outcomes following atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has become a global epidemic. Early catheter ablation and therapies modifying risk factors (RF) have been shown to improve outcomes of AF ablation. However, the time invested in pursuing risk factor modification may delay ablation, which could negate the procedural benefit.

Purpose

This study sought to investigate the prevalence and impact of potentially modifiable RF among AF patients undergoing catheter ablation in clinical practice.

Methods

This retrospective study included 724 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation at a tertiary care center from 2012–2019. Pre-specified modifiable risks were examined, including the time from AF diagnosis to ablation, fluctuation/increase in BMI >5% prior to ablation, mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure >125/80 mmHg, obstructive sleep apnea with CPAP noncompliance, hyperlipidemia without statin therapy, tobacco use, excessive alcohol use, and diabetes mellitus with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >6.5%. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations and mortality following AF ablation. A multivariate analysis was performed.

Results

The mean age was 61±10 years old, 32.5% were female and 72.2% had persistent AF. Many study patients had modifiable RF, ranging from 4.7% with excessive alcohol use to 64.0% experiencing delayed AF ablation. The mean time from AF diagnosis to ablation was 4.7 years. During a mean follow-up of 1.6 years after ablation, 467 (64.5%) patients met the primary outcome. Independent RF for the primary outcome were an increase/fluctuation in BMI >5% (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–1.60; P=0.008), diabetes with HbA1c >6.5% (AHR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09–2.03; P=0.014) and hyperlipidemia without statin therapy (AHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08–1.57; P=0.005). Delayed AF ablation over 1.5 years did not alter the outcome, Figure 1.

Conclusion

Substantial portions of patients undergoing AF ablation have potentially modifiable RF. Increased or fluctuating BMI, diabetes with HbA1c >6.5%, and hyperlipidemia not treated with statin therapy portend an increased risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmia, CV hospitalizations and mortality. These findings underscore an importance pursuing RF management in patients with AF to reduce adverse outcomes after ablation.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The Jensen Family Research Sponsorship at the University of Nebraska Medical Center

Poor glycemic control in diabetic patients increases the risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmia and cardiovascular hospitalizations among morbidly obese patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

Background/Introduction

Obesity and atrial fibrillation (AF) coexist and share multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Lifestyle modifications can reduce AF burden in obese patients. However, the time invested in pursing lifestyle changes may delay AF ablation, which could negate the procedural benefit.

Purpose

To examine the effects of lifestyle modifications and the timing of catheter ablation on morbidly obese patients with AF.

Methods

This retrospective study included 217 consecutive AF patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 undergoing AF ablation at a tertiary care center from 2012 to 2019. Modifiable risks were examined, including the time from AF diagnosis to ablation, fluctuation of BMI >5% or an increase in BMI >3% prior to ablation, mean systolic blood pressure >130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >80 mmHg, obstructive sleep apnea with CPAP noncompliance, hyperlipidemia without statin therapy, tobacco use, excessive alcohol use, and diabetes mellitus with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5%. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent atrial arrhythmias and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations following AF ablation. A multivariate analysis adjusting for age, gender and modifiable risks was performed.

Results

The mean age was 61±9 years old, 58% were female and 45% had persistent AF. A substantial portion of the study patients had modifiable risk factors, ranging from 2.7% with excessive alcohol use to 67.3% experiencing delayed AF ablation, Figure 1. The median time from diagnosed AF to ablation was 1.3 years. During a mean follow-up of 2.9 years after AF ablation, 136 (62.7%) patients met the primary outcome. Only HbA1c ≥6.5% was an independent risk factor with adjusted hazard ratio of 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.02–2.36, P=0.0412, Figure 2A. Delayed AF ablation did not alter the outcome, Figure 2B. There was no interaction between time of ablation and HbA1c ≥6.5% (P=0.67).

Conclusion

Substantial portions of morbidly obese patients undergoing AF ablation have potentially modifiable risk factors. Poor glycemic control with HbA1c ≥6.5% predicts an increased risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias and CV hospitalizations, while delayed AF ablation does not. This finding underscores an importance of optimizing HbA1c in morbidly obese patients with AF to reduce adverse outcomes after ablation.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The fingerprint of a flow: wrinkle patterns in nonuniform coatings on pre-stretched soft foundations

We study the wrinkle patterns obtained when applying a thin polymeric film on a uniaxially prestretched soft foundation. The film is coated onto a substrate where it drains under the action of gravity, thereby introducing a continuous variation in its thickness. We first study the fluid mechanics component of the problem and derive the coating profile as a function of the curing properties of the polymeric solution. Upon polymerization, the prestretch is released and yields the formation of wrinkles, which are arranged in organized patterns, including fractals. We study a variety of scenarios depending on the relative orientation of the gradient of film thickness and the stretching direction. In particular, we characterize and rationalize the distribution of singular events in our problem where wrinkles merge to allow a variation of the average value of the wrinkle wavelength across the sample.

Vertex epidural hematoma with communicating bifrontal subgaleal hematomas treated by percutaneous needle aspiration

The case of an 11-year-old boy is presented who suffered a bicycle accident with a parasagittal skull fracture, a small vertex epidural hematoma, frontal contusions and a frontal subgaleal hematoma. Enlargement of the vertex epidural hematoma was diagnosed after development of a slight paraparesis on day 11 with the aid of MRI. Three percutaneous needle aspirations of the subgaleal hematoma with a total of 59 ml being evacuated led to quick recovery and disappearance of the subgaleal as well as the vertex epidural hematoma. It is speculated that both hematomas communicated via the skull fracture thus making the evacuation of the epidural hematoma by subgaleal punctures possible.

[Lumbar facet syndrome. Recommendation for staging before and after intra-articular injection treatment]

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar facet joint syndrome is normally based on spondylarthrosis. One of the most common methods of treating it is intra-articular injection of local anaesthetics and cortisone. In this prospective study our goal was to have an objective grading scale to assess the severity of lumbar facet syndrome before and after injection.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients were treated by CT-guided intra-articular injections of 0.3 ml bupivacaine and 0.8 ml methylprednisolone. Five different parameters were scored in each patient: (1) finger-ground distance; (2) Schober index (10 cm distance along lumbar spine, difference in cm after flexion of lumbar spine); (3) rotation of lumbar spine; (4) lumbago; (5) pseudoradicular pain. The last two parameters were evaluated by a visual analog score (VAS) with zero for no pain and 10 for worst possible pain. Each parameter was evaluated with one, two or three points. After adding the points, we graded the severity of lumbar facet joint syndrome.

RESULTS

Finger-ground distances improved statistically (P<0.05). Schober index and rotation of lumbar spine were not significant. VAS concerning lumbago and pseudoraducular pain were also statistically significant (P<0.001). Thirteen patients remained in the same grade, 18 patients improved by one grade and 1 patient by two grades.

DISCUSSION

The grading system presented for assessing lumbar facet joint syndrome is a good parameter to evaluate the severity of the disease and follow-up after injection of local anaesthetics and cortisone. Although they showed no statistical significance, Schober index and rotation of lumbar spine are necessary to evaluate facet syndrome.

[Treatment of lumbar facet joint syndrome by CT-guided infiltration of the intervertebral joints]

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar facet joint syndrome is a common condition, involving about 79% of patients suffering from low back pain. Denervation by scalpel or electrofrequency is a well-known method of treating it. An alternative method for longer lasting pain relief is CT-guided intraarticular infiltration of facet joints with local anaesthetics and cortisone.

METHODS

In 62 patients with facet syndrome a total of 205 joints were infiltrated, CT monitoring being used in all cases. Each facet joint was infiltrated with 0.3 ml bupivacaine and 0.8 ml methylprednisolone. The patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 consisted of 24 persons who had undergone lumbar disc surgery, group 2 of 23 patients with spondylarthrosis of the facet joints, and group 3 of 15 patients who had undergone lumbar disc surgery but had additional spondylarthrosis. Very good results were defined as pain relief for longer than 4 weeks, good results as pain relief for up to 4 weeks and poor results as brief pain relief or none at all. In 27 patients facet infiltration was performed for the purpose of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Results were significantly in group 2 than in group 1 (Fisher's exact test P < 0.012). In group 3 results were better than in group 1, but worse than in group 2. These differences were not statistical by significant (Table 3). Seven patients in the diagnostic group had no pain relief, and facet syndrome was excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided facet joint infiltration is a good method for treatment and diagnosis of lumbar facet joint syndrome. It can be repeated and has no severe side effects. The best results were seen in patients with spondylarthrosis of the facet joints. After lumbar disc surgery the pain relief was shorter, though it also yielded good results. For patients with unspecific low back pain, facet joint injections are a very good diagnostic method, allowing definite exclusion of lumbar facet syndrome.