Trocar site closure with a novel anchor-based (neoClose®) system versus standard suture closure: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Objective

Patients with obesity have a higher risk of trocar site hernia. The objective of the present study was to compare a standard suture passer versus the neoClose® device for port site fascial closure in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Methods

This is a randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms. Thirty five patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 and undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were randomized to each group. Port site fascial closure for trocars ≥ 10 mm was performed with the neoClose® device in the study group and the standard suture passer in the control group. Primary outcomes were time required to complete closure and intensity of postoperative pain at the fascial closure sites. Secondary outcomes were intraabdominal needle depth and incidence of trocar site hernia.

Results

The use of the neoClose® device resulted in shorter closure times (20.2 vs 30.0 s, p = 0.0002), less pain (0.3 vs 0.9, p = 0.002) at port closure sites, and decreased needle depth (3.3 cm vs 5.2 cm, p < 0.0001) compared to the standard suture passer. There was no trocar site hernia at the one-year follow-up in either group.

Conclusion

Use of the neoClose® device resulted in faster fascial closure times, decreased intraoperative needle depth, and decreased postoperative abdominal pain at 1 week as compared to the standard suture passer. These data need to be confirmed on larger cohorts of patients with longer follow-up, especially in terms of long-term hernia recurrence rates.

Randomized trial of yoga in women with breast cancer undergoing radiation treatment

8505

Background: Yoga, an ancient Indian science, incorporates stress-reduction techniques that include regulated breathing, visual imagery, and meditation, as well as various postures that may be useful for cancer patients. Methods: A yoga program was developed that including loosening and breathing exercises, postures, alternate nostril breathing, a deep relaxation technique, and meditation for patients with breast cancer who were undergoing radiotherapy. Women participated in bi-weekly classes during their 6 weeks of radiation treatment. Sixty-one women with breast cancer were randomly assigned to either the yoga program or to a waitlist control group. Patients completed measures of intrusive thoughts and avoidance behaviors (Impact of Events Scale: IES), depressive symptoms (CES-D), sleep disturbances (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), fatigue (BFI), and quality of life (SF-36) at baseline, 1 week, and 1 and 3 months after the last radiation therapy. We report on the outcomes 1 week after the end of radiotherapy. Results: The average age of the women was 52, 3% stage 0, 28% stage I, 43% stage II, and 26% stage III, 48% had undergone breast-conserving surgery, and 75% had received chemotherapy prior to starting radiotherapy. Analysis of covariance, controlling for baseline, revealed that the yoga group had significantly better SF-36 physical function scores (adjusted means: yoga 81.8 vs. control 68.6, P < 0.01), significantly higher SF-36 general health scores (adjusted means: yoga 78.3 vs. control 67.9, P < 0.03), marginally better SF-36 social functioning scores (adjusted means: yoga 85.3 vs. control 76.0, P > 0.1), significantly lower levels of sleep-related daytime dysfunction (adjusted means: yoga 0.5 vs. control 1.2, P < 0.04), and marginally lower levels of fatigue (adjusted means: yoga 1.9 vs. control 3.1, P < 0.06) than the control group. There were no other group differences on the SF-36 subscales or for the CES-D or IES scores. Conclusions: The results indicated that the yoga program was associated with statistically and clinical significant improvements in aspects of quality of life.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.