Neoadjuvant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a solution for extrahepatic abdominal operation in cirrhotic patients with severe portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Major abdominal surgery, although technically feasible per se, can be contraindicated in some cirrhotic patients because of severe portal hypertension. The present study reports our experience of seven such patients who were prepared for major abdominal surgery by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

STUDY DESIGN

There were seven cirrhotic patients (six men and one woman aged 47 to 69 years) with portal hypertension. Portal hypertension was considered severe because of the presence of at least one of the following: history of variceal bleeding (five of seven patients), varices at risk of bleeding (red signs or cardial location of varices; four of seven patients), or intractable ascites (three of seven patients). The planned operations included colon, gastroesophageal, kidney, and aortic procedures in three, two, one, and one patient, respectively. Because portal hypertension was the leading cause of surgical contraindication, the following "two-step strategy" was applied to the seven patients: first, TIPS to control portal hypertension, followed, after a delay of at least 1 month, by abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

The TIPS procedure was successfully performed in all patients without complications. The hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased from 18+/-5 to 9+/-5 mm Hg (p<0.01). All patients were operated on with a delay ranging from 1 month to 5 months after TIPS (2.9+/-1.3 months; median 3 months). The planned operation was performed in six of the seven patients. One patient with cancer of the cardia did not have resection because of extensive abdominal spreading of the tumor. Intraoperative transfusion was necessary in only two patients. Operative mortality occurred in one patient, 36 days after resection of a left colon cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimally invasive nature of TIPS allows us to propose the following two-step management of cirrhotic patients with severe portal hypertension needing abdominal surgery: decompression of the portal system by TIPS followed by elective surgery.

Split-liver transplantation for two adult recipients: feasibility and long-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To identify the outcomes and risks of split-liver transplantation (SLT) for two adult recipients to determine the feasibility of more widespread use of this procedure to increase the graft pool for adults.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The shortage of cadaver liver grafts for adults is increasing. Using livers from donors defined as optimal, the authors have been developing techniques for SLT for two adult recipients at their center.

METHODS

From July 1993 to December 1999, 34 adults have undergone SLT with grafts from optimal donors prepared by ex situ split (n = 30) or in situ split (n = 4), and 88 adults received optimal whole-liver grafts that were not split. Four split-grafts were transplanted at other centers. The outcomes of transplantation with right and left split-liver grafts were compared with those of whole-liver transplants. The main end points were patient and graft survival at 1 and 2 years and the incidence and types of complications.

RESULTS

For whole-liver, right and left split-liver grafts, respectively, patient survival rates were 88%, 74%, and 88% at 1 year and 85%, 74%, and 64% at 2 years. Graft survival rates were 88%, 74%, and 75% at 1 year and 85%, 74%, and 43% at 2 years. Patient survival was adversely affected by graft steatosis and recipients inpatient status before transplantation. Graft survival was adversely affected by steatosis and a graft-to-recipient body weight ratio of less than 1%. Primary nonfunction occurred in three left split-liver grafts. The rates of arterial (6%) and biliary (22%) complications were similar to published data from conventional transplantation for an adult and a child. SLT for two adults increased the number of recipients by 62% compared with whole-liver transplantation and was logistically possible in 16 of the 104 (15%) optimal cadaver donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Split-liver transplantation for two adults is technically feasible. Outcomes and complication rates can be improved by rigid selection criteria for donors and recipients, particularly for the smaller left graft, and possibly also by in situ splitting in cadaver donors. Wider use will require changes in the procedures for graft allocation and coordination between centers experienced in the techniques.