Comparison of Volumetric Quantitative PET Parameters Before and After a CT-Based Elastic Deformation on Dual-Time 18FDG-PET/CT Images: A Feasibility Study in a Perspective of Radiotherapy Planning in Head and Neck Cancer

Background

The use of 18FDG-PET/CT for delineating a gross tumor volume (GTV, also called MTV metabolic tumor volume) in radiotherapy (RT) planning of head neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) is not included in current recommendations, although its interest for the radiotherapist is of evidence. Because pre-RT PET scans are rarely done simultaneously with dosimetry CT, the validation of a robust image registration tool and of a reproducible MTV delineation method is still required.

Objective

Our objective was to study a CT-based elastic registration method on dual-time pre-RT 18FDG-PET/CT images to assess the feasibility of PET-based RT planning in patients with HNSCC.

Methods

Dual-time 18FDG-PET/CT [whole-body examination (wbPET) + 1 dedicated step (headPET)] were selected to simulate a 2-times scenario of pre-RT PET images deformation on dosimetry CT. ER-headPET and RR-headPET images were, respectively, reconstructed after CT-to-CT rigid (RR) and elastic (ER) registrations of the headPET on the wbPET. The MTVs delineation was performed using two methods (40%SUVmax, PET-Edge). The percentage variations of several PET parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV, TLG) were calculated between wbPET, ER-headPET, and RR-headPET. Correlation between MTV values was calculated (Deming linear regression). MTVs intersections were assessed by two indices (OF, DICE) and compared together (Wilcoxon test). Additional per-volume analysis was evaluated (Mann-Whitney test). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibilities were evaluated (ICC = intra-class coefficient).

Results

36 patients (30M/6F; median age = 65 y) were retrospectively included. The changes in SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVpeak values between ER-headPET and RR-headPET images were <5%. The variations in MTV values between ER-headPET and wbPET images were −6 and −3% with 40%SUVmax and PET Edge, respectively. Their correlations were excellent whatever the delineation method (R² > 0.99). The ER-headPET MTVs had significant higher mean OF and DICE with the wbPET MTVs, for both delineation methods (p ≤ 0.002); and also when lesions had a volume > 5cc (excellent OF = 0.80 with 40%SUVmax). The inter- and intra-observer reproducibilities for MTV delineation were excellent (ICC ≥ 0.8, close to 1 with PET-Edge).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated no significant changes in MTV after an elastic deformation of pre-RT 18FDG-PET/CT images acquired in dual-time mode. This opens possibilities for HNSCC radiotherapy planning improvement by transferring GTV-PET on dosimetry CT.

Clinical Assessment of 177Lu-DOTATATE Quantification by Comparison of SUV-Based Parameters Measured on Both Post-PRRT SPECT/CT and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Feasibility Study

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with WD-GEP-NET who benefited from a pretherapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and a 177Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT after the cycle 1 of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy were prospectively included. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed on a system calibrated with a conversion factor of 9.48 counts/MBq per second and were reconstructed with an iterative algorithm allowing quantification using the SPECTRA Quant software (MIM Software, Cleveland, OH). For each patient, different SUV parameters were recorded on both PET/CT (Ga parameters) and SPECT/CT (Lu parameters) for comparison: physiological uptakes (liver/spleen), tumor uptake (1-10/patient; SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV), tumor-to-liver and tumor-to-spleen ratios according to liver/spleen SUVmax and SUVmean (TLRmax, TLRmean, TSRmax, and TSRmean, respectively).

RESULTS

Ten patients (8 female; 2 male) aged from 50 to 83 years presenting with a metastatic progressive WD-GEP-NET (7 small intestine, 2 pancreas, 1 rectum) were included. Median values of lesional Lu-SUV were significantly lower than the corresponding Ga-SUV (P < 0.001), whereas median values of lesional Lu-MTV, Lu-TLR, and Lu-TSR were significantly higher than the corresponding Ga-MTV, Ga-TLR, and Ga-TSR (P < 0.02). Pearson correlation coefficients were strong for both SUV and MTV parameters (0.779-0.845), weak for TLR parameters (0.365-0.394), and moderate-to-strong for TSR parameters (0.676-0.750).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the feasibility of 177Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT quantification in clinical practice and show a strong correlation of several SUV-based parameters with the corresponding in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.