POS0885 HYPOCHROMIC ERYTHROCYTES AS PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR OF SURVIVAL AMONG PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS SCREENED FOR PULMONARY HYPERTENSION

Background

Iron deficiency is frequent among patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), particularly among those with pulmonary hypertension (PH). First data indicate prognostic importance of hypochromic erythrocytes (HRC) >2% among patients with PH1. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of HRC in SSc patients screened for PH.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of HRC in SSc patients screened for PH.

Methods

In this retrospective, single-center cohort study SSc patients screened for PH were included. Clinical characteristics, laboratory and pulmonary functional parameters associated with the prognosis of SSc were analysed using uni- and multivariable analysis.

Results

A total of 280 SSc patients were screened, 171 were included in the analysis having complete data of iron metabolism (79% female, 61.0±12.9 years of age, 73.2% limited cutaneous SSc, 56 manifest PH and 112 pulmonary fibrosis). The patients were followed for 2.4±1.8 (median 2.4) years. HRC >2% at baseline was significantly associated with worse survival in the uni- (p=0.018) and multivariable analysis (p<0.0001). Overall 34.5% of the patients suffered from iron deficiency and 22% received iron substitution during follow-up. HRC >2% was identified as independent predictor of mortality, for patients with and without pulmonary manifestations of SSc.

Conclusion

This study detected for the first time that HRC >2% is an independent prognostic predictor and can possibly be used as a biomarker among SSc-patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

References

[1]Xanthouli P, Theobald V, Benjamin N, Marra AM, D’Agostino A, Egenlauf B, Shaukat M, Ding C, Cittadini A, Bossone E, Kögler M, Grünig E, Muckenthaler MU, Eichstaedt CA. Prognostic impact of hypochromic erythrocytes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Respir Res. 2021 Nov 9;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01884-9.

Disclosure of Interests

Panagiota Xanthouli Speakers bureau: MSD and OMT, outside the submitted work, Ojan Gordjani: None declared, Christina Eichstaedt: None declared, Nicola Benjamin Speakers bureau: Actelion pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare and MSD., Benjamin Egenlauf Speakers bureau: Actelion, MSD, Bayer and OMT outside the submitted work, Satenik Harutyunova Speakers bureau: Bayer, MSD, Actelion and GSK, outside the submitted work., Alberto Marra Speakers bureau: Bayer/MSD outside the submitted work, Vivienne Theobald: None declared, Nicklas Milde: None declared, Christian Nagel Speakers bureau: Actelion, MSD, Boehringer, Novartis, Bayer, and AstraZeneca, Norbert Blank Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Actelion and Bayer Vital., Consultant of: MSD, GSK, Actelion and Bayer Vital., Hanns-Martin Lorenz Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Cellgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, and Lilly (less than $10,000 each) and research support from AbbVie, MSD, BMS, Cellgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Baxter, SOBI, Biogen, Actelion, Bayer Vital, Shire, Octapharm, Sanofi, Hexal, Mundipharm, and Thermo Fisher, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Cellgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, and Lilly (less than $10,000 each) and research support from AbbVie, MSD, BMS, Cellgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Baxter, SOBI, Biogen, Actelion, Bayer Vital, Shire, Octapharm, Sanofi, Hexal, Mundipharm, and Thermo Fisher, Ekkehard Grünig Speakers bureau: Actelion, Bayer AG, and MSD; grants from GSK, Novartis, and United Therapeutics; and personal fees from SCOPE, OrPha Swiss GmbH, and Zurich Heart House, Consultant of: Actelion, Bayer AG, and MSD; grants from GSK, Novartis, and United Therapeutics; and personal fees from SCOPE, OrPha Swiss GmbH, and Zurich Heart House

P3676Hemodynamic phenotypes in systemic sclerosis patients screened for pulmonary hypertension (PH): impact of the new definition of PH

Background

Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are at high risk of developing concomitant pulmonary hypertension (PH) which has a crucial impact on the patients' symptoms, quality of life and prognosis.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of the new hemodynamic definition of precapillary PH as proposed at the 2018 World Symposium on PH in Nice in patients with SSc. Although recent data suggest that PVR >2 WU could be considered as abnormal in the new definition a conservative cut-off value of PVR ≥3 WU has been used.

Methods

SSc-patients were screened for PH using clinical assessments as WHO-functional class, 6 minute walking distance and right heart catheterisation. Patients were divided into hemodynamic subgroups according to their mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) values with mPAP ≤20 mmHg, 21–24 mmHg and ≥25 mmHg. These subgroups were further divided according to their pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with PVR <3 WU or ≥3 WU.

Results

One-hundred-twenty-two patients (79% female, age 57.6±12.7 years, 6MWD 439.5±98.1 meters, 70% diffuse cutaneous SSc, 30% limited cutaneous SSc, 53% WHO-FC II, 25% WHO-FC III) who were prospectively screened for PH were included in the analysis (Figure 1). Among them 26 had a symptomatic manifest PH using the cut-off value of mPAP ≥25 mmHg. Only half of this group presented with PVR ≥3 WU, the others had PVR <3 WU. Eight of these 26 PH-patients presented with PH due to left heart disease. Out of 21 patients with mildly elevated mPAP 21–24 mmHg, two (10%) met the new definition criteria of PH (pulmonary arterial wedge pressure <15 mmHg, mPAP 23 and 24 mmHg, PVR 3.0 and 3.2 WU, CI 2.2 L/min/m2 both, WHO-FC II both, respectively). Out of 75 patients with mPAP <21 mmHg, three presented with PVR ≥3 WU.

Overview of systemic sclerosis patients

Conclusions

The new definition of precapillary pulmonary hypertension may on the one hand allow detecting an additional 10% of PH patients with mild elevated mPAP. On the other hand, eight of 13 patients (62%), who met the former definition of pulmonary arterial hypertension, would be classified as “normal” due to a lack of increase in PVR according to the new definition. The data of this study suggest that for SSc-patients the cut-off value of mPAP >20 mmHg is useful, but the criteria of PVR ≥3 WU may be too strict.

Further studies with larger sample sizes will be needed to better characterise these hemodynamic subgroups and to define the extent of pulmonary vascular disease and treatability.