A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine.

METHODS

We performed a randomized double-blind comparison of remimazolam to placebo for outpatient colonoscopy. This study design was a requirement of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. An additional group was randomized to open-label midazolam administered according to its package insert instructions (the randomization ratio for remimazolam:placebo:midazolam was 30:6:10). Study medications were administered under the supervision of the endoscopist, without any involvement of an anesthesia specialist. Patients were given 50 to 75 μg of fentanyl before receiving study medications. Patients who failed to achieve adequate sedation in any arm were rescued with midazolam dosed at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint was a composite that required 3 criteria be met: completion of the colonoscopy, no need for rescue medication, and ≤5 doses of remimazolam or placebo in any 15-minute interval (≤3 doses of midazolam in any 12-minute interval in the open-label midazolam arm).

RESULTS

There were 461 randomized patients in 12 U.S. sites. The primary endpoint was met for remimazolam, placebo, and midazolam in 91.3%, 1.7%, and 25.2% of patients, respectively (P < .0001 for remimazolam vs placebo). Patients administered remimazolam received less fentanyl, had faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function, were ready for discharge earlier, and felt back to normal sooner than patients with both placebo and midazolam. Hypotension was less frequent with remimazolam, and hypoxia occurred in 1% of patients with remimazolam or midazolam. There were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam can be administered safely under the supervision of endoscopists for outpatient colonoscopy, and it allows faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function compared with placebo (midazolam rescue) and midazolam. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02290873.).

AVX-470, an Orally Delivered Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Antibody for Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a First-in-Human Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

AVX-470 is an oral, polyclonal bovine-derived anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antibody in development for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AVX-470 neutralizes TNF locally in the gastrointestinal tract, minimizing systemic exposure. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human trial designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of 4 weeks of AVX-470 in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with active UC were randomized and 36 received AVX-470 (0.2, 1.6 or 3.5g/day) or placebo over 4 weeks. Endoscopic activity was assessed by colonoscopy pre- and post-treatment. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. Clinical and endoscopic response and remission were assessed as exploratory endpoints.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (92%) patients completed treatment and follow-up. The incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups and no allergic reactions or opportunistic infections were reported. AVX-470 therapy did not induce human anti-bovine antibodies (HABA). Bovine immunoglobulin (Ig) with TNF binding capacity was detected in stool, while bovine Ig levels in serum were low. Across all AVX-470 doses, 25.9% of patients achieved clinical response compared with 11.1% on placebo, with greatest improvements in the 3.5g/day group associated with proximal colon endoscopic improvement and reductions in serum CRP and IL-6.

CONCLUSIONS

AVX-470 was safe and well tolerated in this first-in-human trial in UC, with efficacy trends for clinical, endoscopic and biomarker endpoints in the highest dose group (3.5g/day). Results suggest benefit of an orally delivered locally active agent in moderate to severe UC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov as study NCT01759056 and with EudraCT as study 2012-004859-27.

Once-daily mesalamine granules for maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis: pooled analysis of efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVES

A capsule formulation of mesalamine granules (MG) was developed for once-daily dosing and better compliance. The study aim was to evaluate MG efficacy and tolerability in maintaining ulcerative colitis (UC) remission.

METHODS

Pooled analysis of 2 identical phase 3, randomized, double-blind trials of once-daily MG 1.5 g or placebo for up to 6 months. The primary endpoint was percentage of patients remaining relapse-free at month 6 versus placebo. Relapse was defined as revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding score ≥1 and mucosal appearance score ≥2, UC flare, or UC-related adverse event (AE).

RESULTS

Data were pooled for patients receiving MG (n = 373) and placebo (n = 189). Significantly more patients were relapse-free at 6 months with MG (79.4%) than placebo (62.4%; P < 0.001) and across subgroups based on select demographic and baseline characteristics (P < 0.05). Secondary outcome measures including rectal bleeding, physician rating of disease activity, stool frequency, total SDAI score, and relapse-free duration favored MG (P < 0.01). Common AEs with MG and placebo, respectively, were headache (10.9% and 7.6%), diarrhea (7.9% and 7.0%), and abdominal pain (6.3% and 6.5%).

CONCLUSION

Once-daily MG was more efficacious than and as well tolerated as placebo in maintaining UC remission. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00744016 and NCT00767728.

Daclatasvir plus simeprevir with or without ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We evaluated the combination of daclatasvir (pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor) and simeprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor), with or without ribavirin, in hepatitis C virus genotype 1-infected patients.

METHODS

This phase II, open-label study enrolled treatment-naive patients or prior null responders with genotype 1b (n=147) or 1a (n=21) infection. Genotype 1b-infected patients were randomized 1:1 to receive daclatasvir 30mg plus simeprevir 150mg once daily with or without ribavirin; those who completed the initial 12-week treatment were re-randomized 1:1 to stop treatment or continue treatment through to week 24. Genotype 1a-infected patients received daclatasvir plus simeprevir with ribavirin for 24weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12).

RESULTS

For genotype 1b, 84.9% (45/53) and 74.5% (38/51) of treatment-naive patients and 69.6% (16/23) and 95.0% (19/20) of prior null responders to peginterferon and ribavirin achieved SVR12 with daclatasvir plus simeprevir alone and with ribavirin, respectively. Treatment duration did not have a well-defined impact on response. For genotype 1a, daclatasvir plus simeprevir with ribavirin provided a 66.7% (8/12) response rate in treatment-naive patients and was not effective in prior null responders. Data suggest that baseline resistance polymorphisms influenced SVR12 rates. Daclatasvir plus simeprevir was well tolerated with or without ribavirin with low incidences of serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Daclatasvir plus simeprevir, with or without ribavirin, was effective with a 12- or 24-week duration in genotype 1b-infected patients and was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01628692.

Mesalazine granules 1.5 g once-daily maintain remission in patients with ulcerative colitis who switch from other 5-ASA formulations: a pooled analysis from two randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine (mesalamine) granules (MG) were shown to be effective for the maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis (UC) in two double-blind placebo-controlled trials.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of once-daily MG for maintenance of remission in patients with UC who switched from other 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) formulations.

METHODS

Data from two independent multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month trials evaluating patients with UC in remission were combined for analysis of a subpopulation of patients who switched from other 5-ASA formulations to MG 1.5 g or placebo upon randomisation. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who remained relapse-free at Month 6 or end of treatment. Relapse was defined as a Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding score ≥1 and mucosal appearance score ≥2, a UC flare or medication used to treat a UC flare.

RESULTS

Of the 487 patients who received 5-ASA maintenance therapy at enrolment, 322 were in the MG group and 165 were in the placebo group. The percentage of patients who remained relapse-free (based on Sutherland Disease Activity Index scores) after 6 months was significantly higher with MG than placebo (78.3% vs. 58.8%, P < 0.001). Rectal bleeding, stool frequency and the physician's rating of disease activity remained unchanged after 6 months in a higher percentage of patients using MG compared with those on placebo (P < 0.004 for each endpoint).

CONCLUSION

Mesalazine granules 1.5 g once-daily is effective for maintenance of remission in UC patients who switch from other 5-ASA formulations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00744016, NCT00767728.

Clinical trial: once-daily mesalamine granules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis - a 6-month placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing and remitting idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorder.

AIM

To evaluate once-daily mesalamine (mesalazine) granules (MG) for maintenance of remission of UC.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients (n=209 MG, n=96 placebo) with UC in remission [revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding=0, mucosal appearance <2] who took MG 1.5 g or placebo once-daily for up to 6 months. Primary efficacy endpoint: the percentage of patients who remained relapse-free at month 6/end of treatment. Relapse was defined as SDAI rectal bleeding score ≥1 and a mucosal appearance score ≥2, a UC flare, or initiation of medication to treat a UC flare.

RESULTS

The percentage of relapse-free patients at month 6/end of treatment was higher with MG than placebo (78.9% vs. 58.3%, P < 0.001) in the intent-to-treat analysis. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.025) favouring MG were observed for most secondary endpoints including improvement in rectal bleeding, physician's disease activity rating, stool frequency, the SDAI at month 6/end of treatment, patients classified as a treatment success and relapse-free duration. The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily mesalamine (mesalazine) was effective in maintaining remission of UC for 6 months.

Safety and efficacy of a new 3.3 g b.i.d. tablet formulation in patients with mild-to-moderately-active ulcerative colitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new twice-daily balsalazide disodium 1.1 g tablet dosing regimen (6.6 g/day, three tablets twice daily) for the treatment of mild-to-moderately-active ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

In a double-blind, multicenter study patients with symptoms of acute UC and a baseline Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) score between 6 and 10, inclusive, with a subscale rating of > or =2 for both rectal bleeding and mucosal appearance were randomized to receive 3.3 g of balsalazide or placebo tablets twice daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving clinical improvement (> or =3 point improvement in MMDAI) and improvement in rectal bleeding (> or =1 point improvement) at 8 weeks. Safety assessments were conducted from baseline through 2-weeks post-treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients (166 balsalazide, 83 placebo) received at least 1 dose of study medication. The mean MMDAI score at baseline was 7.9; 62% of patients had a score > or =8.0 (moderate disease). A significantly larger proportion of patients achieved clinical improvement and improvement in rectal bleeding in the balsalazide group vs. the placebo group (55 vs. 40%, P=0.02). The most common adverse events reported were worsening of UC and headache; both were reported more often in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Balsalazide disodium 1.1 g tablets administered as 3.3 g twice daily are effective, well tolerated and significantly better than placebo for improving signs and symptoms of mild-to-moderately-active UC. This new formulation with a reduced pill and dosing burden offers the potential to improve convenience and compliance in patients with active UC.

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized, sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in comparison with a sham procedure.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic GERD requiring maintenance proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy were entered into a randomized, single-blind, prospective, multicenter trial. Seventy-eight patients were randomly assigned to undergo endoscopic full-thickness restructuring of the gastric cardia with transmural suture. Eighty-one patients underwent a sham procedure. Group assignments were revealed following the 3-month evaluation. The primary end point was > or =50% improvement in GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) score. Secondary end points included medication use and esophageal acid exposure.

RESULTS

By intention-to-treat analysis, at 3 months, the proportion of patients achieving > or =50% improvement in GERD-HRQL score was significantly greater in the active group (56%) compared with the sham group (18.5%; P < .001). Complete cessation of PPI therapy was higher among patients in the active group than in the sham group by intention-to-treat analysis (50% vs 24%; P = .002). The percent reduction in median percent time pH < 4 was significantly improved within the active group versus baseline (7 vs 10, 18%, P < .001) but not in the sham group (10 vs 9, -3%, P = .686). Between-group analysis revealed the active therapy to be superior to the sham in improving median percent time pH < 4 (P = .010). There were no perforations or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic full-thickness plication more effectively reduces GERD symptoms, PPI use, and esophageal acid exposure than a sham procedure.

A phase 1/2A trial of STA 5326, an oral interleukin-12/23 inhibitor, in patients with active moderate to severe Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Intestinal inflammation associated with Crohn's disease is characterized by a type 1 helper T cell response and elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-12. We report our clinical experience with a novel oral IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor (STA 5326) for the treatment of active Crohn's disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an open-label, dose-escalating trial of the orally delivered small molecule immunomodulator STA 5326 in 73 patients with active Crohn's disease (Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] 220-450, inclusive). Five cohorts of patients were treated for up to 4 weeks with 14 mg twice a day (bid), 35 mg daily (qd), 28 mg bid, 35 mg bid, or 70 mg qd. The endpoints of the study included safety and improvement in clinical activity measured by the CDAI and the Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity.

RESULTS

STA 5326 was well tolerated. Reported adverse events were similar across dose cohorts. The most common (>15%) drug-related adverse events observed were dizziness, nausea, headache, and fatigue. Clinical activity at day 28/29 was observed at qd doses of 28 mg and above for the clinical endpoints of response and remission: 70 points or greater decrease in CDAI (range 42%-82% of patients); 100 points or greater decrease in CDAI (range 38%-64% of patients), and CDAI <150 (range 15%-36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral qd dosing of STA 5326 for 4 weeks was well tolerated in doses up to 70 mg qd in patients with active moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Clinical activity was observed at qd doses of 28 mg and above.

Open-label, dose-ranging pilot study of 4 weeks of low-dose therapy with sodium phosphate tablets in chronically constipated adults

BACKGROUND

The tablet formulation of sodium phosphate (NaP) is a prescription osmotic purgative that has been marketed since 2001. The use of NaP tablets in patients with constipation has not been studied previously.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the tolerability and efficacy of 28 days of therapy with NaP tablets (1.5 g NaP/tablet) in patients with chronic constipation.

METHODS

Adults with functional constipation or constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and Z-3 spontaneous bowel movements (BMs) during the 7-day screening/baseline period were eligible for this open-label, dose-ranging study. Patients were randomized to receive starting doses of 4 NaP tablets (group A) or 8 NaP tablets (group B) each morning for 28 days. After a minimum of 48 hours, the NaP dose could be titrated upward (in the case of no BM or no relief of symptoms) or downward (in the case of a predefined excess laxative response) by 2 tablets/d to a minimum of 2 tablets/d or a maximum of 12 tablets/d. Patients kept a diary of their BMs and gastrointestinal symptoms. A serum chemistry panel was obtained weekly. The primary end points were the constipation response (based on the change from baseline in weekly number of BMs) and the global sense response (based on daily scores for the patient's overall sense of change in their bowel problems).

RESULTS

At randomization, there were 18 patients in group A and 25 in group B. Of these, 40 patients (16 group A, 24 group B) had > or 7 days of diary information while taking study treatment and were evaluable for efficacy. The constipation response rate was 100% in group A and 95.8% in group B, and the respective global sense response rates were 68.8% and 79.2%. Four patients in group B withdrew due to adverse events, none of which were serious. Five patients had occasional hypokalemia that required no treatment. Changes from baseline in serum concentrations of calcium, inorganic phosphorus, and potassium were not clinically significant and did not require treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study, NaP tablets taken daily were generally well tolerated (particularly in the low-dose group) and produced prompt relief of constipation--generally within the first week of treatment--that was sustained over the 28-day treatment period. A reasonable starting dose appears to be 2 to 4 tablets (3-6 g NaP) daily.

Balsalazide is superior to mesalamine in the time to improvement of signs and symptoms of acute mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

Balsalazide is a novel azo-bonded 5-aminosalicylic acid treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. The study objective was to compare symptomatic remission rates with balsalazide and mesalamine while controlling for extent of disease and time since diagnosis in patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A total of 173 patients with sigmoidoscopically verified ulcerative colitis were randomized to 8 wk of double-blind treatment with balsalazide 6.75 g/day or mesalamine 2.4 g/day. Both treatments provided 2.4 g/day of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid. Patients maintained symptom diaries throughout the treatment period.

RESULTS

Overall, 46% of balsalazide- and 44% of mesalamine-treated patients achieved symptomatic remission. Higher response rates were noted in newly diagnosed patients with < or = 40 cm of disease (68% vs 61%) than in recently relapsed patients with >40 cm of disease (36% vs 25%). The median time to symptomatic remission was 12 days shorter with balsalazide (25 days) than with mesalamine (37 days). Significantly more balsalazide patients showed sigmoidoscopic (p = 0.002), stool frequency (p = 0.006), rectal bleeding (p = 0.006), and physician's global assessment score (p = 0.013) improvement by 14 days than did mesalamine patients. Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (54% vs 64%), which were most commonly related to the gastrointestinal and central and peripheral nervous systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Balsalazide is an effective and safe treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Improvement of symptoms occurs considerably earlier with balsalazide than with mesalamine.

A randomized, double blind, dose-response comparison of balsalazide (6.75 g), balsalazide (2.25 g), and mesalamine (2.4 g) in the treatment of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

Balsalazide is a new innovative, mesalamine-containing prodrug that is activated by bacteria in the colon. Balsalazide has been shown previously to be well tolerated and effective in the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to determine the dose-response of balsalazide for efficacy and safety in active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis and to compare this profile with that of mesalamine, pH-dependent, delayed-release tablets.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, active control, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-response, parallel-group study was performed comparing balsalazide (6.75 g daily), balsalazide (2.25 g daily), and mesalamine (2.4 g daily), administered for 8 wk to 154 patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis as verified by sigmoidoscopy.

RESULTS

Eight weeks of treatment with 6.75 g of balsalazide daily provided significantly greater improvement than did balsalazide (2.25 g daily) in rectal bleeding (64.7% [6.75-g balsalazide] vs 32.4% [2.25-g balsalazide], p < 0.006), stool frequency (58.8% vs 29.4%, p < 0.006), sigmoidoscopic score (78.9% vs 52.5%, p < 0.015), and Physician's Global Assessment (73.7% vs 51.3%, p < 0.03). The efficacy of balsalazide showed a significantly more rapid onset of action than that of mesalamine (2.4 g daily) (2-wk sigmoidocopic score improvement, 54.7% [6.75-g balsalazide] vs 29.4% [2.4-g mesalamine], p = 0.006) with numerically greater improvement at 8 wk in five of seven measured signs and symptoms. Balsalazide (6.75 g daily) was well tolerated, and the safety profile did not differ significantly from that of balsalazide (2.25 g daily) or mesalamine.

CONCLUSIONS

Eight weeks of treatment with balsalazide (6.75 g daily) is significantly more effective than balsalazide (2.25 g daily) and more rapid in onset than mesalamine (2.4 g daily) in improving signs and symptoms of acute ulcerative colitis. Balsalazide (6.75 g daily) is well tolerated, and the safety profile does not differ from that of balsalazide (2.25 g daily) and mesalamine (2.4 g daily).

Budesonide enema for the treatment of active, distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis: a dose-ranging study. U.S. Budesonide enema study group

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Budesonide is a highly potent topical glucocorticosteroid that is characterized by low systemic availability as a result of high first-pass hepatic metabolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three doses of an enema preparation of budesonide in patients with active distal ulcerative colitis/proctitis.

METHODS

In a double-blind multicenter trial, 233 patients were randomized to receive either a placebo enema or budesonide enema at a dose of 0.5 mg/100 mL, 2.0 mg/100 mL, or 8.0 mg/100 mL. The primary efficacy variables were an improvement of sigmoidoscopic inflammation grade, total histopathology score, and remission rates. Effects on cortisol concentrations were also assessed.

RESULTS

After 6 weeks of treatment, there was significant improvement in sigmoidoscopy and histopathology scores in the budesonide 2.0-mg and 8.0-mg dose groups compared with placebo. Remission was achieved in 19% of patients in the 2.0-mg budesonide group (P </= 0.050) and 27% of patients in the 8.0-mg budesonide group (P </= 0.001) compared with 4% in the placebo group. More than 90% of all budesonide patients had a normal adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-stimulated cortisol response at the last visit. The budesonide enemas were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide enema is both effective and safe for the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis/proctitis. A dose of 2. 0 mg/100 mL budesonide is the lowest effective dose.

Nonperinatal nosocomial transmission of Candida albicans in a neonatal intensive care unit: prospective study

Nosocomial Candida albicans infections have become a major cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). To determine the possible modes of acquisition of C. albicans in hospitalized neonates, we conducted a prospective study at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Ga. Clinical samples for fungal surveillance cultures were obtained at birth from infants (mouth, umbilicus, and groin) and their mothers (mouth and vagina) and were obtained from infants weekly until they were discharged. All infants were culture negative for C. albicans at birth. Six infants acquired C. albicans during their NICU stay. Thirty-four (53%) of 64 mothers were C. albicans positive (positive at the mouth, n = 26; positive at the vagina, n = 18; positive at both sites, n = 10) at the time of the infant's delivery. A total of 49 C. albicans isolates were analyzed by restriction endonuclease analysis and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis by using genomic blots hybridized with the CARE-2 probe. Of the mothers positive for C. albicans, 3 of 10 were colonized with identical strains at two different body sites, whereas 7 of 10 harbored nonidentical strains at the two different body sites. Four of six infants who acquired C. albicans colonization in the NICU had C. albicans-positive mothers; specimens from all mother-infant pairs had different restriction endonuclease and CARE-2 hybridization profiles. One C. albicans-colonized infant developed candidemia; the colonizing and infecting strains had identical banding patterns. Our study indicates that nonperinatal nosocomial transmission of C. albicans is the predominant mode of acquisition by neonates in NICUs at this hospital; mothers may be colonized with multiple strains of C. albicans simultaneously; colonizing C. albicans strains can cause invasive disease in neonates; and molecular biology-based techniques are necessary to determine the epidemiologic relatedness of maternal and infant C. albicans isolates and to facilitate determination of the mode of transmission.

Animal exposure risks. Implications for occupational health nurses

1. Diseases transmitted from animals to humans, referred to as zoonoses, pose risks for persons occupationally exposed to animals. 2. Occupational health nurses should be proactive in identifying potential occupational health risks and educating employees to protect themselves from animal exposure risks. 3. Exposure history should include exposure to birds and animals during occupational and recreational activities. 4. Primary prevention is critical, as immunizations and treatments are limited and include many associated risks.

Canadian consensus recommendations for the measurement and reporting of diastolic dysfunction by echocardiography: from the Investigators of Consensus on Diastolic Dysfunction by Echocardiography

Abnormalities of diastolic filling are increasingly recognized as a cause of symptoms and predictors of outcome in patients with most forms of heart disease. Noninvasive assessment of diastolic filling is possible in almost all patients, but accurate evaluation must relate echocardiographic Doppler measurements to the complex physiologic and hemodynamic factors responsible for normal and abnormal filling. This evaluation has been facilitated by recent correlation of Doppler measurement of mitral and pulmonary venous inflow with hemodynamic studies. These studies have confirmed that when a careful, integrated approach is taken, Doppler flow patterns can document a progressive pattern of abnormality in many conditions. Impaired left ventricular (LV) relaxation is seen early and is recognized by a decrease in early transmitral LV filling and an increased proportion of filling during atrial contraction. As abnormalities progress, increasing LV chamber stiffness and elevated left atrial pressure lead to a "pseudonormal" filling pattern that previously has caused considerable confusion. This can be unmasked by careful evaluation of pulmonary venous inflow and the use of the Valsalva maneuver. When marked diastolic abnormalities are present, LV filling has restrictive features characterized by rapid early filling, a very stiff left ventricle with high filling pressures, and a poor prognosis. Routine measurement of indexes of diastolic filling have been hampered by uncertainty as to what should be measured, what techniques should be used, definition of normal values, and a clear method of reporting findings. This report represents the efforts of a Canadian consensus group to define a national standard for the performance and reporting of echocardiographic Doppler studies of diastolic filling.

Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy and choledocholithiasis

The management of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy (LLC) is uncertain. Open common bile duct exploration is the least desirable option since it defeats the purpose of LLC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with papillotomy has become the procedure of choice since it has a high rate of success and results in minimal morbidity. Intraoperative techniques using balloon catheters and the flexible choledochoscope via the cystic duct may obviate the need for ERCP in selected cases.