Patient-reported outcome results from the open-label phase III AURELIA trial evaluating bevacizumab-containing therapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the effects of bevacizumab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs; secondary end point) in the AURELIA trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to chemotherapy alone (CT) or with bevacizumab (BEV-CT). PROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer Module 28 (EORTC QLQ-OV28) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Cancer symptom index (FOSI) at baseline and every two or three cycles (8/9 weeks) until disease progression. The primary PRO hypothesis was that more patients receiving BEV-CT than CT would achieve at least a 15% (≥ 15-point) absolute improvement on the QLQ-OV28 abdominal/GI symptom subscale (items 31-36) at week 8/9. Patients with missing week 8/9 questionnaires were included as unimproved. Questionnaires from all assessments until disease progression were analyzed using mixed-model repeated-measures (MMRM) analysis. Sensitivity analyses were used to determine the effects of differing assumptions and methods for missing data.

RESULTS

Baseline questionnaires were available from 89% of 361 randomly assigned patients. More BEV-CT than CT patients achieved a ≥ 15% improvement in abdominal/GI symptoms at week 8/9 (primary PRO end point, 21.9% v 9.3%; difference, 12.7%; 95% CI, 4.4 to 20.9; P = .002). MMRM analysis covering all time points also favored BEV-CT (difference, 6.4 points; 95% CI, 1.3 to 11.6; P = .015). More BEV-CT than CT patients achieved ≥ 15% improvement in FOSI at week 8/9 (12.2% v 3.1%; difference, 9.0%; 95% CI, 2.9% to 15.2%; P = .003). Sensitivity analyses gave similar results and conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab increased the proportion of patients achieving a 15% improvement in patient-reported abdominal/GI symptoms during chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results from the AURELIA trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy (CT) for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (OC)

5542

Background: Adding BEV to CT significantly improved PFS in platinum-resistant OC in the open-label phase III AURELIA trial. As symptom improvement is a major goal of treatment, determining effects on HRQoL was a key secondary aim of AURELIA. Methods: After investigator selection of single-agent CT (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, or weekly paclitaxel), patients (pts) with measurable/assessable platinum-resistant OC were randomized to CT ± BEV. HRQoL and symptoms were assessed at baseline and every 2 or 3 cycles (8/9 wks) until PD using the EORTC OC Module (OV28) and FOSI. The primary HRQoL endpoint was an absolute improvement of ≥15% (≥15 points) on the 100-point OV28 subscale for abdominal (abdo)/GI symptoms (items 1–6) at wk 8/9. Pts with missing questionnaires (Qs) were included and considered not to have improved. A sensitivity analysis excluded pts with Qs missing for reasons other than PD/death or switch from CT to BEV. Subgroup analyses of symptomatic pts included only those with a baseline score ≥15 (sufficient to show ≥15-point improvement). Mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was used to compare Qs from all time points until PD/death, not just wk 8/9. The FOSI was analyzed similarly. Results: Baseline Qs were available from 89% of 361 randomized pts. At wk 8/9, 81% of BEV–CT vs 68% of CT pts who were alive and PD-free returned OV28 Qs. For the primary HRQoL endpoint, more BEV–CT than CT pts had a ≥15% improvement in the OV28 abdo/GI symptom subscale at wk 8/9 (21.9% vs 9.3%, 12.7% difference [95% CI 4.4–20.9]; p = 0.002). The sensitivity analysis described above showed a 13.3% difference [95% CI 4.5–22.1]. In the subgroup of 233 pts with a baseline score ≥15, there was a 16.9% difference (95% CI 6.1–27.6) favoring BEV–CT (29.6% vs 12.7%). MMRM analysis of OV28 abdo/GI symptom subscale scores also favored BEV–CT (6.4-point difference [95% CI 1.28–11.6]). More BEV–CT than CT pts had a ≥15% improvement in FOSI score at wk 8/9 (12.2% vs 3.1%, 9.0% difference [95% CI 2.9–15.2]). Conclusions: Adding BEV to CT resulted in more frequent ≥15% improvements in patient-reported abdo/GI symptoms in platinum-resistant OC. Clinical trial information: NCT00976911.

Prediction of progression-free survival rates after bevacizumab plus interferon versus interferon alone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: comparison of a nomogram to the Motzer criteria

BACKGROUND

The combination of bevacizumab plus interferon (BEV+IFN) for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) in a phase 3 study.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a novel model for prediction of individual PFS using data from the randomized, controlled phase 3 trial of BEV + IFN or interferon alone. The ability of the Motzer criteria for prediction of PFS was also assessed.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Pretreatment parameters of 628 patients were included in the Cox regression model predicting PFS at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo. BEV+IFN was administered to 337 patients; 291 patients received interferon alone. The developed model and the Motzer criteria were internally validated using Harrell's concordance index and calibrated.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median PFS was 10.2 versus 4.6 mo (p < 0.001) for patients receiving BEV + IFN or interferon alone, respectively. The novel model relying on age, Karnofsky performance status, baseline albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and time from primary diagnosis to treatment resulted in the highest discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]: 72.8, 75.0, 72.8, and 70.8% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo). The AUC of the Motzer criteria risk groups was 63.7, 61.8, 58.6, and 51.8% for the same time points. Comparison of discriminatory ability between the developed model and the Motzer criteria showed statistically significant differences (all p ≤ 0.02). An external validation of the new model is warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed model identified prognostic factors of PFS in mRCC patients treated with BEV+IFN or interferon alone and quantified individual risk of PFS. Relative to the Motzer criteria, the novel model demonstrated better discriminatory properties. The model may serve clinicians in identifying patients who can benefit the most from BEV+IFN versus interferon alone.

Overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma initially treated with bevacizumab plus interferon-α2a and subsequent therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a retrospective analysis of the phase III AVOREN trial

OBJECTIVE

• To retrospectively evaluate the effect of subsequent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after first-line bevacizumab + interferon-α2a (IFN) or IFN + placebo in the phase III AVOREN (Avastin and Roferon in Renal Cell Carcinoma) trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• A total of 649 patients with untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were randomized to receive IFN (9 MIU three times a week for up to 1 year) in combination with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or placebo until disease progression. • The protocol allowed the use of any post-protocol anti-cancer therapy for patients with progressive disease or those in whom the trial therapy was discontinued. Data regarding the timing and type of subsequent therapy were recorded and overall survival (OS) analysed.

RESULTS

• Patients were randomized to bevacizumab + IFN (n= 327) or IFN + placebo (n= 322); 180 (55%) patients in the bevacizumab + IFN, and 202 (63%) in the IFN + placebo arm, received post-protocol anti-cancer therapy. • TKIs were the most common post-protocol therapy, received by 113 (35%) and 120 (37%) patients in the bevacizumab + IFN and IFN + placebo arms, respectively. • The median OS in patients who received any subsequent TKI was 38.6 months in the bevacizumab + IFN arm and 33.6 months in IFN + placebo arm [hazard ratio (HR), 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-1.13; P= 0.203]. In an additional retrospective analysis that censored patients who received subsequent TKIs, median OS was 25.0 and 20.7 months, respectively, in the bevacizumab + IFN and IFN + placebo arms (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67-1.05; P= 0.123).

CONCLUSIONS

• These retrospective exploratory data of sequential bevacizumab + IFN followed by TKIs in patients able to receive multiple lines of therapy suggest that sequential therapy could be a promising approach to improve patient outcomes in mRCC.

Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (AVOREN): final analysis of overall survival

PURPOSE

A phase III trial of bevacizumab combined with interferon alfa-2a (IFN) showed significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Here, we report overall survival (OS) data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six hundred forty-nine patients with previously untreated mRCC were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus IFN (9 MIU subcutaneously three times a week; n = 327) or IFN plus placebo (n = 322) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. The primary end point was OS. Final analysis of the secondary end point (PFS) was reported earlier.

RESULTS

Median OS was 23.3 months with bevacizumab plus IFN and 21.3 months with IFN plus placebo (unstratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.10; P = .3360; stratified HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.04; P = .1291). Patients (> 55%) in both arms received at least one postprotocol antineoplastic therapy, possibly confounding the OS analysis. Patients receiving postprotocol therapy including a tyrosine kinase inhibitor had longer median OS (bevacizumab plus IFN arm: 38.6 months; IFN plus placebo arm: 33.6 months; HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.13). Tolerability was similar to that reported previously.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab plus IFN is active as first-line treatment in patients with mRCC. Most patients with mRCC receive multiple lines of therapy, so considering the overall sequence of therapy when selecting first-line therapy may optimize patient benefit.

Phase II trial of mapatumumab, a fully human agonistic monoclonal antibody that targets and activates the tumour necrosis factor apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor-1 (TRAIL-R1), in patients with refractory colorectal cancer

Background:

Recombinant tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces tumour-selective apoptosis in various pre-clinical models by binding its specific receptors expressed on cancer cells. Mapatumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that is agonistic to the TRAIL Receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1).

Methods:

This phase II multicentre study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who had failed to respond to, were intolerant to, or not candidates for fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan-based regimens. All patients received two loading doses of mapatumumab (20 mg kg⁻¹ every 14 days), followed by maintenance therapy with 10 mg kg⁻¹ infused every 14 days.

Results:

A total of 38 patients, who had progressive disease after a median of three earlier chemotherapy lines, were enrolled. No response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was observed. A total of 12 patients (32%) achieved stable disease for a median of 2.6 months. The median progression-free survival was 1.2 months. The most common adverse events reported, regardless of relationship, were fatigue, nausea, anorexia, and abdominal pain. Plasma mapatumumab concentrations were within the range of exposures predicted by the results of phase I studies of mapatumumab.

Conclusion:

No clinical activity of single-agent mapatumumab was observed in patients with advanced refractory CRC. However, on the basis of its favourable safety profile and pre-clinical evidence of potential synergy in combination with agents commonly used in the treatment of colorectal cancer, further evaluation of mapatumumab in combination with chemotherapy is warranted.