Traumatic brain injury in the elderly with high Glasgow coma scale and low injury severity scores: Factors influencing outcomes

BACKGROUND

Current trauma activation guidelines do not clearly address age as a risk factor when leveling trauma patients. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and mode of injury play a major role in leveling trauma patients. We studied the above relationship in our elderly patients presenting with traumatic head injury.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of patients who presented to the emergency department with traumatic brain injuries. We classified the 270 patients into two groups. Group A was 64 years and younger, and group B was 65 years and older. Their GCS, ISS, age, sex, comorbidities, and anticoagulant use were abstracted. The primary outcome was mortality and length of stay. The groups were compared using an independent student's t-test and Chi-square analysis. The Cox regression analysis was used to analyze differences in the outcome while adjusting for the above factors.

RESULTS

There were 140 patients in group A, and 130 patients in group B who presented to the ED with a GCS of 14-15 and an ISS of below 15. The mean ISS significantly differed between group A (6.2 ± 6.8) vs (7.9 ± 3.2) in group B (p < 0.0001). The most common diagnosis in group A was concussion (57.3%), while in group B was subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage (55%). In group B, 13.8% presented as a level one or level two trauma activation. The mean hospital and intensive care stay for group A was 2.1 (±1.9) days and 0.9 (±1.32) days, respectively, versus 4.2 (±3.04) days and 2.4 (±2.02 days) for the elderly group B. Mortality in group A was zero and in group B was 3.8%. Cox regression analysis showed age as an independent predictor of death as well as length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Elderly traumatic brain injury patients presenting to the ED with minor trauma and high GCS should be triaged at a higher level in most cases.

Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Thoracic trauma accounts for 10%-15% of all trauma admissions. Rib fractures are the most common injury following blunt thoracic trauma. Epidural analgesia improves patient outcomes but is not without problems. The use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade (CINB) may offer superior pain control with fewer side effects. This study's objective was to compare the rate of pulmonary complications when traumatic rib fractures were treated with CINB vs epidurals.

METHODS

A hospital trauma registry provided retrospective data from 2008 to 2013 for patients with 2 or more traumatic rib fractures. All subjects were admitted and were treated with either an epidural or a subcutaneously placed catheter for continuous intercostal nerve blockade. Our primary outcome was a composite of either pneumonia or respiratory failure. Secondary outcomes included total hospital days, total ICU days, and days on the ventilator.

RESULTS

12.5% (N=8) of the CINB group developed pneumonia or had respiratory failure compared to 16.3% (N=7) in the epidural group. No statistical difference (P=0.58) in the incidence of pneumonia or vent dependent respiratory failure was observed. There was a significant reduction (P=0.05) in hospital days from 9.72 (SD 9.98) in the epidural compared to 6.98 (SD 4.67) in the CINB group. The rest of our secondary outcomes showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

This study did not show a difference in the rate of pneumonia or ventilator-dependent respiratory failure in the CINB vs epidural groups. It was not sufficiently powered. Our data supports a reduction in hospital days when CINB is used vs epidural. CINB may have advantages over epidurals such as fewer complications, fewer contraindications, and a shorter time to placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these statements.