265 A PHYSIOTHERAPY-LED TRANSITION TO HOME INTERVENTION FOR OLDER ADULTS FOLLOWING EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT DISCHARGE: A PILOT FEASIBILITY RANDOMISED-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background

Older adults frequently attend the Emergency Department (ED) and experience high rates of adverse outcomes following ED presentation including functional decline, ED re-presentation and unplanned hospital admission. The development of effective interventions to prevent such outcomes is a key priority for research and service provision. A presentation to an ED can be viewed as an opportunity to assess those at risk of adverse outcomes and initiate a care plan in those deemed as ‘high risk'. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a physiotherapy led integrated care intervention for older adults discharged from the ED (ED-PLUS).

Methods

Older adults presenting to the ED with undifferentiated medical complaints and discharged within 72 hours were computer randomised in a ratio of 1:1:1 to deliver usual care, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in the ED, or ED-PLUS (Trial registration: NCT04983602). ED-PLUS is an evidence-based and stakeholder-informed intervention to bridge the care transition between the ED and community by initiating a CGA in the ED and implementing a six-week, multi-component, self-management programme in the patient’s own home. Feasibility (recruitment and retention rates) and acceptability of the programme were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. Functional decline was examined post-intervention using the Barthel Index. All outcomes were assessed by a research nurse blinded to group allocation.

Results

29 participants were recruited, indicating 97% of our recruitment target. 90% of participants completed the ED-PLUS intervention. All participants expressed positive feedback about the intervention. The incidence of functional decline at 6 weeks was 10% in the ED-PLUS group versus 70-89% in the usual care and CGA-only groups.

Conclusion

High adherence and retention rates were observed among participants and preliminary findings indicate a lower incidence of functional decline in the ED-PLUS group. Recruitment challenges existed in the context of COVID-19. Data collection is ongoing for six-month outcomes.

941 EFFECTIVENESS OF ACUTE GERIATRIC UNIT CARE AMONG HOSPITALISED OLDER ADULTS WITH ACUTE MEDICAL COMPLAINTS: A META-ANALYSIS

Introduction

Older adults are clinically heterogeneous and are at increased risk of adverse outcomes during hospitalisation due to the presence of multiple comorbid and complex conditions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to update and synthesise the totality of research evidence on the effectiveness of acute geriatric unit (AGU) care for older adults admitted to hospital with acute medical complaints.

Method

MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Embase databases were systematically searched from 2008 to February 2021. Screening, data extraction, and quality grading were undertaken by two reviewers. Only trials with a randomised design comparing AGU care and conventional care units were included. Meta-analyses were performed in Review Manager 5.4 and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence for outcomes reported. The primary outcome measure was incidence of functional decline between baseline two-week prehospital admission status and discharge and at follow-up.

Results

11 trials recruiting 7,496 participants across three countries were included. AGU care was associated with a 23% reduction in functional decline at six-month follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–0.92; moderate certainty evidence), and significant cost savings (mean difference (MD) -538.01USD, 95% CI -571.05USD—-504.96USD; low certainty evidence). No differences were found in functional decline at hospital discharge or at three-month follow-up, length of hospital stay, the likelihood of living at home, mortality, hospital readmission, cognitive function, or patient satisfaction with the index admission.

Conclusion

AGU care improves clinical and process outcomes for older adults admitted to hospital with acute medical complaints. Future research should focus on greater inclusion of clinical and patient reported outcome measures including quality of life. Use of such measures may lead to a greater focus on patient-centered care and service provision priorities.

142 FRAILTY IDENTIFICATION AND INTERDISCIPLINARY ASSESSMENT OF OLDER PEOPLE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Background

Older People are attending Emergency Departments (EDs) in increasing numbers but the optimal assessment measures to use have yet to be established. This study examined the clinical utility of different assessments of strength, functional mobility, sarcopenia, cognition and frailty used by the physiotherapist in an interdisciplinary team (IDT) in the ED and determined any associations with clinical outcomes.

Methods

This observational cross-sectional study recruited adults ≥70 years who were assessed by an IDT on weekdays during working hours. Demographic variables such as age, gender, social situation, baseline mobility, falls and clinical measures such as Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), 4AT, hand-held dynamometry, calf circumference and functional mobility in ED were recorded. Clinical outcomes were admission to hospital, discharge from ED with onward referral (ambulatory care or community) and discharge from ED with no referral. Ethical approval was obtained and SPSS was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Two hundred and fifty four participants were recruited, 58.3% female, mean age 80.23 (SD 6.56). Median CFS was 4 (IRQ 2.0), range 1–7 with 32.7% (n = 83) considered frail. Sarcopenia prevalence was 89.3% using grip strength and 7.1% using calf circumference. Grip strength predicted frailty even after adjusting for age (p < 0.0001), gender (p < 0.0001) and falls (p = 0.043). Admission to hospital was predicted by major diagnostic category (p = 0.016) and inability to sit to stand independently in ED (p < 0.0001). Seventy percent (n = 179) of participants were discharged from ED, with 27.6% referred to ambulatory care or community services. Onward referral was predicted by frailty (p = 0.016) and falls in the last six months (p = 0.028).

Conclusion

Grip strength in addition to a validated tool such as CFS may assist an experienced IDT in identifying frailty, which can in turn inform decision-making regarding ED disposition and pathways of care for older people. Functional assessment in the ED is also important to determine the need for hospital admission.

178 A RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PROCESS OUTCOMES OF OLDER ADULTS REFERRED TO A COMMUNITY RE-ENABLEMENT TEAM FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Background

Emergency Departments (ED) are complex and challenging environments to provide care to older adults. There is currently a paucity of high quality methodological research investigating the effectiveness of interventions focused on transitions of care from the ED to primary care services (Hughes et al, 2019). This study aims to evaluate the impact of a collaborative model of care between primary and secondary care services for older adults discharged home following ED index visit.

Methods

This was an observational retrospective study. Participants aged ≥65 years discharged home from the ED of a University Teaching Hospital and referred to a Multidisciplinary Community Intervention Team (MDCIT) were included. Referral pathways were via the OPTIMEND team (Cassarino et al, 2021) and MDCIT, which is a rapid access re-enablement team based in the community and compromises nursing staff, an occupational therapist, physiotherapist, therapy and healthcare assistants. Descriptive statistics were used to profile the baseline characteristics of study participants and to summarise data related to process outcomes. Ethical approval was granted for this study (020/2021).

Results

In the study period, January—December 2020, 54 patients were referred to the MDCIT. The mean age of participants was 80.1 years (SD 8.2), 57% were female, and the most common Manchester Triage System presenting complaint was ‘limb problems’. The median Patient Experience Time within the ED was 7.4 hours (IQR 13.1); 55% of participants were seen in their home within 24 hours of discharge. A mean of 10 interventions were delivered by the MDCIT. A 9.1% incidence rate of 30 day unscheduled hospital readmission was recorded.

Conclusion

Integrated care programmes have been advocated to improve the continuum of care from the ED into the community. This evaluation has demonstrated the feasibility of implementing such a model of care. However, further methodologically robust research is required to advance the evidence base and should also focus on patient outcomes.