[Modeling T2 high severe asthma using human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC)]

Severe asthma patients with persistent airflow obstruction are characterized by functional obstruction due to mucus plugs containing mucins, fibrin, and eosinophil derived Charcot- Leyden crystals. The molecular mechanisms underlying this endotype are not clearly understood. Developing new models is crucial to respiratory research insofar as critical differences exist between human and rodent airway epithelium. We (and other teams) have shown that it is possible to reconstitute in vitro a complex and functional airway epithelium displaying all the features described in vivo from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC). Our aim is to establish a human in vitro model of severe asthma that will recapitulate airway epithelium remodeling and mucus plugs.

Change in cardiorespiratory parameters following surgical correction of pectus excavatum: protocol for the historical-prospective HeartSoar cohort

INTRODUCTION

How cardiorespiratory function changes following the surgical correction of pectus excavatum (PE) often gives mixed results, with meta-analyses demonstrating no benefit in terms of pulmonary function but improvement in cardiac function. Functional responses may depend on type of surgery, follow-up time and/or the patient's presurgical functional status, and debate persists on the purely aesthetic nature of such surgery. The aim of this protocol is to analyse data describing lung function and incremental exercise testing before vs after the surgical correction of PE.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A historical-prospective before-after surgical correction of PE cohort will be constituted. Historical inclusions are recruited during follow-up visits at approximately 12, 24, 36 or 48 months following a prior surgery (with presurgical data mined from patient records). Prospective inclusions are recruited during presurgical work-ups and followed for 1 year following surgery. The data collected include spirometry, incremental exercise testing, body mass index, body composition, questionnaires targeting general health status, self-esteem and body image. Any complications due to surgery are also described.The primary outcome is oxygen pulse during incremental exercise testing, and 44 data points are required to demonstrate a moderate postsurgical change (ie, a Cohen's effect of d=0.5). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests or t-tests for paired data will be used for before-after comparisons (with false discovery rate corrections for secondary analyses).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and was approved by a randomly assigned, independent, ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Méditerranée II, reference number: 218 B21) as per French law on 6 July 2018. Informed, written consent for study participation is required of all study candidates prior to enrolment. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03770390; Clinicaltrials.gov.

[Production of innervated bronchial epithelium from a blood sample]

Asthma is a frequent respiratory disease, with severe asthma occurring in 3 to 5% of cases. Chronic inflammation of the bronchial epithelium is essential to its pathophysiology. When activated by the bronchial environment, the peripheral sensory nervous system contributes to inflammation of the airways. However, due to a lack of reliable models, the mechanisms of action remain largely unknown. Using induced pluripotent stem cells reprogrammed from blood cells, we have set up a model of bronchial epithelium innervated by sensory neurons. This model will ensure better understanding of the mechanisms of action underlying neurogenic inflammation.

Feasibility of a nasal breathing training during pulmonary rehabilitation. A pilot randomized controlled study

Hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) is a common source of dyspnea and disability. While pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) including breathing exercises is indicated, randomized controlled trial are warranted to recommend one type of breathing exercise than another. We aimed to compare during PR, the effect of 5 sessions of nasal ventilation exercise (NV+PR) versus voluntary hypoventilation (vHV+PR) on exercise dyspnea (primary outcome) and capacity and health-related quality of life in patients. In this open label randomized controlled trial, 19 HVS patients (age=48.3 ± 15.2 y.o, female/male=18/1, Nijmegen score=33 ± 7.7) were randomized in a NV+PR (n = 9) or vHV+PR (n = 10) group. Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) with nasal/oral ventilation were assessed before and after 3 months of PR, and questionnaires (Nijmegen, VQ-11). There was a significant effect of PR of but no significant difference between groups in the improvements of dyspnea@max exercise (time effect (T): p < 0.01; group (G): p = 0.63; group*time interaction (G*T): p = 0.49), mMRC dyspnea (T: p < 0.01; G: p = 0.45; G*T: p = 0.62), 6MWD (T: p < 0.05; G: p = 0.36; G*T: p = 0.31), VQ-11 (T: p < 0.001; G: p = 0.16; G*T: p = 0.09) and plasma HCO₃^- (T: p < 0.05; G: p = 0.93; G*T; p = 0.36), Yet, Nijmegen score (T: p < 0.01; G: p = 0.32; G*T: p < 0.05) improvement was larger in NV+PR group. The exercise oronasal breathing shift during the 6MWT was significantly delayed in all patients (T: p < 0.05; G: p = 0.30; G*T: p = 0.32) and positively correlated with plasma HCO₃^-(r = 0.42; p < 0.05). Nasal exercise was not superior versus voluntary hypoventilation during PR in HVS patients. Yet, nasal exercise appeared feasible, leading to acquisition of a nasal breathing pattern during walking, improvement of PR outcomes and ventilatory alkalosis. The link between nasal breathing and hyperventilation is discussed in the light of the nasal ventilation rhythm in the limbic system and its role on the limbic emotional and ventilatory functions.

Hedgehog pathway and its inhibitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

COPD affects millions of people and is now ranked as the third leading cause of death worldwide. This largely untreatable chronic airway disease results in irreversible destruction of lung architecture. The small lung hypothesis is now supported by epidemiological, physiological and clinical studies. Accordingly, the early and severe COPD phenotype carries the most dreadful prognosis and finds its roots during lung growth. Pathophysiological mechanisms remain poorly understood and implicate individual susceptibility (genetics), a large part of environmental factors (viral infections, tobacco consumption, air pollution) and the combined effects of those triggers on gene expression. Genetic susceptibility is most likely involved as the disease is severe and starts early in life. The latter observation led to the identification of Mendelian inheritance via disease-causing variants of SERPINA1 - known as the basis for alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency, and TERT. In the last two decades multiple genome wide association studies (GWAS) identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with COPD. High significance SNPs are located in 4q31 near HHIP which encodes an evolutionarily highly conserved physiological inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway (HH). HHIP is critical to several in utero developmental lung processes. It is also implicated in homeostasis, injury response, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor resistance to apoptosis. A few studies have reported decreased HHIP RNA and protein levels in human adult COPD lungs. HHIP^+/- murine models led to emphysema. HH pathway inhibitors, such as vismodegib and sonidegib, are already validated in oncology, whereas other drugs have evidenced in vitro effects. Targeting the Hedgehog pathway could lead to a new therapeutic avenue in COPD. In this review, we focused on the early and severe COPD phenotype and the small lung hypothesis by exploring genetic susceptibility traits that are potentially treatable, thus summarizing promising therapeutics for the future.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

POS0385 “EFFECTIVE LUNG AGE” IN SUBJECTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS-ASSOCIATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (SSc-ILD) IN THE SENSCIS TRIAL

Background

FVC declines gradually with aging. The loss of lung function in patients with progressive SSc-ILD mimics an accelerated ageing process.

Objectives

Using reference equations, we estimated the “effective lung age” of subjects in the SENSCIS trial (i.e. the age of healthy individuals with the same FVC) and compared these estimates to their real age.

Methods

The SENSCIS trial enrolled subjects with SSc-ILD with first non-Raynaud symptom within the prior ≤7 years, extent of fibrotic ILD on HRCT ≥10%, FVC ≥40% predicted, DLco 30–89% predicted. Evidence of recent decline in FVC was not an inclusion criterion. Subjects were randomised to receive nintedanib or placebo. Using reference equations published by the European Respiratory Society Global Lung Function Initiative, based on FVC data from over 70,000 healthy individuals aged 3–95 years from 26 countries, [Quanjer et al. Eur Respir J 2012;40:1324–1343], we estimated the effective lung age of subjects at baseline and at week 52 based on their FVC, sex, ethnicity and height, and compared these effective lung ages with the subjects’ real ages. Three subjects aged <25 years were excluded. The upper limit of effective lung age was considered to be 95 years.

Results

Mean time since onset of first non-Raynaud symptom was 3.5 years in both the nintedanib and placebo groups. At baseline, mean (SD) effective lung age was 83.1 (14.4) years in the nintedanib group (n=287) and 82.9 (14.8) years in the placebo group (n=286). In these groups, respectively, the mean (SD) difference between effective lung age and real age was 28.4 (17.7) and 29.3 (18.5) years and the difference was >20 years in 71.4% and 72.4% of subjects. In the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, median (Q1, Q3) effective lung age was 88.4 (74.6, 95.0) and 88.5 (74.7, 95.0) years at baseline and 91.0 (75.2, 95.0) and 95.0 (75.9, 95.0) years at week 52.

Conclusion

At entry into the SENSCIS trial, subjects with SSc-ILD had an effective lung age that was much higher than their real age. Over 52 weeks, the increase in effective lung age was numerically lower in subjects treated with nintedanib than placebo. These data show that marked loss of lung function that can occur in the few years following onset of SSc-ILD and support a benefit of nintedanib in slowing the progression of SSc-ILD.

Acknowledgements

The SENSCIS trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim. Toby M Maher and Oliver Distler were members of the SENSCIS trial Steering Committee.

Disclosure of Interests

Toby Maher Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Genentech, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Galecto, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, IQVIA, Pliant, Respivant, Roche, Theravance and Veracyte, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Arnaud Bourdin Speakers bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Paid instructor for: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Consultant of: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, Elizabeth Volkmann Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Forbius, Horizon, Kadmon, Serena Vettori Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Jörg H.W. Distler Shareholder of: 4D Science, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Inventiva, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Active Biotech, Anamar, ARXX, AstraZeneca, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Inventiva, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Anamar, ARXX, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cantargia, Celgene, CSL Behring, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Inventiva, Kiniksa, Sanofi-Aventis, RedX, UCB, Margarida Alves Employee of: Margarida Alves is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Christian Stock Employee of: Christian Stock is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: OD has/had relationships with the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three calendar years:

Speaker fee: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Medscape

, Consultant of: OD has/had relationships with the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three calendar years:

Consultancy fee: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, 4P Science, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur

OD has/had relationships with the following companies in the area of potential treatments for arthritides in the last three calendar years:

Consultancy fee: Abbvie

, Grant/research support from: OD has/had relationships with the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three calendar years:

Research Grants: Boehringer Ingelheim, Kymera, Mitsubishi Tanabe

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, short version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

POS0835 DECLINE IN FORCED VITAL CAPACITY (FVC) IN SUBJECTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS-ASSOCIATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (SSC-ILD) IN THE SENSCIS TRIAL VERSUS HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCE SUBJECTS WITHOUT LUNG DISEASE

Background:

In the randomized SENSCIS trial in subjects with SSc-ILD, nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks (mL/year) by 44% compared to placebo. Healthy individuals have varied FVC depending on age, sex, ethnicity and height; expected values can be determined using internationally recognised reference equations.

Objectives:

To provide further context to the FVC declines observed in the SENSCIS trial, we compared the decline in FVC observed in subjects with SSc-ILD in the SENSCIS trial with the decline in FVC that would be expected in hypothetical subjects without ILD matched for age, sex, ethnicity and height.

Methods:

The SENSCIS trial enrolled subjects with SSc-ILD aged ≥18 years with first non-Raynaud symptom ≤7 years before screening, extent of fibrotic ILD ≥10% on HRCT, FVC ≥40% predicted and DLco 30–89% predicted. Baseline FVC (mL) and changes in FVC (mL) at week 52 were assessed in the nintedanib and placebo groups, with missing values at week 52 imputed using predictions from the primary analysis model (random slope and intercept model). Changes in FVC in the SENSCIS trial were compared to values in hypothetical healthy reference subjects matched to the SENSCIS subjects for age, sex, ethnicity and height. FVC values in these healthy reference subjects were derived from the equations published by the European Respiratory Society Global Lung Function Initiative in 2012, which were derived from data from over 70,000 subjects.1

Results:

In the nintedanib and placebo groups of the SENSCIS trial, respectively, mean (SD) time since onset of first non-Raynaud symptom was 3.5 (1.6) and 3.5 (1.8) years. In the nintedanib group, mean (SD) FVC at baseline was 2460 (737) mL, compared with 3403 (787) mL in the healthy reference subjects. In the placebo group, mean (SD) FVC at baseline was 2544 (817) mL compared with 3516 (887) mL in the healthy reference subjects. The difference in the change from baseline in FVC at week 52 between the nintedanib-treated subjects in the SENSCIS trial (n=287) and the healthy reference subjects was 26.6 mL ([95% CI: 1.2, 52.0]; p=0.04). The difference in the change from baseline in FVC at week 52 between the placebo-treated subjects in the SENSCIS trial (n=286) and the reference subjects was 77.5 mL ([95% CI: 51.4, 103.7]; p<0.001) (Figure 1).

Conclusion:

Subjects with SSc-ILD who participated in the SENSCIS trial had marked lung function impairment at baseline compared with healthy matched reference subjects, despite a mean duration of SSc of 3.5 years. Over 52 weeks, the decline in FVC in subjects with SSc-ILD who received placebo was 4-fold greater than in healthy reference subjects. Subjects with SSc-ILD who were treated with nintedanib had a decline in FVC that was only slightly greater than the decline observed in the matched healthy subjects. These data support the clinical relevance of the reduction in the rate of FVC decline provided by nintedanib in patients with SSc-ILD.

References:

[1]Quanjer et al. Eur Respir J 2012;40:1324−43.

Acknowledgements:

The SENSCIS trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim. Medical writing support was provided by FleishmanHillard Fishburn, London, UK. The authors meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

Disclosure of Interests:

Toby Maher Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Genentech, Consultant of: Acelleron Pharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline and Roche/Genentech, Arnaud Bourdin Speakers bureau: Actelion/Janssen (personal fees and other), AstraZeneca (personal fees and other), Boeringher Ingelheim (personal fees and other), Chiesi (personal fees and other), GlaxoSmithKline (personal fees and other), Novartis (personal fees and other), Pulsar Therapeutics (other), Roche (personal fees and other), Sanofi Regeneron (personal fees and other), Teva (other) and United Therapeutics (other), Consultant of: Actelion/Janssen (personal fees and other), AstraZeneca (personal fees and other), Boeringher Ingelheim (personal fees and other), Chiesi (personal fees and other), GlaxoSmithKline (personal fees and other), Novartis (personal fees and other), Pulsar Therapeutics (other), Roche (personal fees and other), Sanofi Regeneron (personal fees and other), Teva (other) and United Therapeutics (other), Grant/research support from: Actelion/Janssen (grants and other), AstraZeneca (grants and other), Boeringher Ingelheim (grants and other), Chiesi (other), GlaxoSmithKline (grants and other), Novartis (other), Pulsar Therapeutics (other), Roche (other), Sanofi Regeneron (other), Teva (other) and United Therapeutics (other), Elizabeth Volkmann Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Corbus and Forbius, Serena Vettori Paid instructor for: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Jörg H.W. Distler Speakers bureau: Actelion, Active Biotech, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos NV, GlaxoSmithKline, Inventiva, JB Therapeutics, Medac, Pfizer, RuiYi and UCB, Consultant of: AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos NV, Inventiva, JB Therapeutics and UCB, Grant/research support from: Active Biotech, AnaMar, Array BioPharma, Arxx Therapeutics, aTyr, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galapagos NV, GlaxoSmithKline, Inventiva, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Redx and UCB, Margarida Alves Employee of: Currently an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Christian Stock Employee of: Currently an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Oliver Distler Consultant of: AbbVie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Bayer, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, IQVIA, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Target Bioscience, Topadur Pharma and UCB, Grant/research support from: Kymera Therapeutics and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma

Apnoea-hypopnoea indices determined via continuous positive airway pressure (AHI-CPAPflow) versus those determined by polysomnography (AHI-PSGgold): a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To date, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains the cornerstone of obstructive sleep apnoea treatment. CPAP data describing residual sleep-disordered breathing events (ie, the CPAP-measured apnoea-hypopnoea indices (AHI-CPAP_flow)) is difficult to interpret because it is an entirely different metric than the polysomnography (PSG) measured AHI gold standard (AHI-PSG_gold). Moreover, manufacturer definitions for apnoea and hypopnoea are not only different from those recommended for PSG scoring, but also different between manufacturers. In the context of CPAP initiation and widespread telemedicine at home to facilitate sleep apnoea care, there is a need for concrete evidence that AHI-CPAP_flow can be used as a surrogate for AHI-PSG_gold.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

No published systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) has compared the accuracy of AHI-CPAP_flow against AHI-PSG_gold and the primary objective of this study is therefore to do so using published data. The secondary objectives are to similarly evaluate other sleep disordered breathing indices and to perform subgroup analyses focusing on the inclusion/exclusion of central apnoea patients, body mass index levels, CPAP device brands, pressure titration modes, use of a predetermined and fixed pressure level or not, and the impact of a 4% PSG desaturation criteria versus 3% PSG on accuracy. The Preferred Reporting Items for SRMA protocols statement guided study design. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies of adult patients (≥18 years old) treated by a CPAP device will be included. The CPAP intervention and PSG comparator must be performed synchronously. PSGs must be scored manually and follow the American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines (2007 AASM criteria or more recent). To assess the risk of bias in each study, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool will be used.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol received ethics committee approval on 16 July 2020 (IRB_MTP_2020_07_2020000404) and results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications.

PROSPERO/TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

CRD42020159914/NCT04526366; Pre-results.

Expectations about treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Comparative survey of patients, carers and physicians (the RESPIR French survey)

CONTEXT

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a severe chronic disease during which anxiety and depression are frequent comorbidities. Better knowledge of patients' expectations is needed to inform an action plan to improve medical care.

AIM

To describe feelings and expectations of patients suffering from IPF and of their carers about antifibrotic therapy and compare them to what is perceived by their pulmonologist.

METHODS

National prospective study on practices and perceptions. Specific questionnaires were e-mailed to all 3276 pulmonologists in France who, in turn, invited patients and carers to participate in a survey.

RESULTS

147 pulmonologists, 161 patients and 144 carers participated in the survey. The role of the carer was evaluated as "important" or "very important" by more than 90% of participants, i.e. pulmonologists, patients or carers. Inconsistencies between how patients felt and how pulmonologists perceived them were identified: 88% of patients responded that they understood quite well what IPF is (vs. 75% of patients according to pulmonologists); 85.5% of patients said they were determined to fight the disease (vs. 68.0%); 61.7% of patients wanted to be kept informed of potential complications before they occurred (vs. 69.6%) and 81.2% wanted to be involved in therapeutic decisions (vs. 43.1%). Globally, patients had a more positive view of antifibrotic therapies than expected by pulmonologists: 41.5% evaluated their advantages superior to what they had expected (vs. 29.1% of patients according to pulmonologists) and 76.5% had a positive image of the benefits/disadvantages ratio (vs. 62.4%). Although pulmonologists had the impression that they were keeping their patients well-informed about exacerbations, hospital stays and the possible negative evolution of the disease despite antifibrotic therapies, 34.0%, 42.0% and 22.0% of patients respectively declared not being aware of these aspects.

CONCLUSION

The feelings of patients suffering from IPF regarding their disease and treatment globally proved more positive compared with how pulmonologists perceived them. Taking into account the expectations and needs of patients may allow healthcare professionals to better address their needs and priorities.

Prioritising outcomes for evaluating eosinophil-guided corticosteroid therapy among patients with acute COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalisation: a Delphi consensus study

OBJECTIVES

Presently, those outcomes that should be prioritised for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation studies remain unclear. In order to coordinate multicentre studies on eosinophilia-driven corticosteroid therapy for patients hospitalised for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), we aimed to find consensus among experts in the domain regarding the prioritisation of outcomes.

DESIGN

A modified Delphi study was proposed to recognised COPD experts. Two brainstorming questionnaires were used to collect potential outcomes. Four subsequent rounds of questionnaires were used to rank items according to a six-point Likert scale for their importance in the protocol, as well as for being the primary outcome. Priority outcome criteria were predefined as those for which ≥70% of experts indicated that the outcome was essential for interpreting study results.

SETTING

COPD exacerbation management in France.

PARTICIPANTS

34 experts recommended by the French Language Pulmonology Society were invited to participate. Of the latter, 21 experts participated in brainstorming, and 19 participated in all four ranking rounds.

RESULTS

105 outcomes were ranked. Two achieved consensus as candidate primary outcomes: (1) treatment failure defined as death from any cause or the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation, readmission because of COPD or intensification of pharmacologic therapy, and (2) the time required to meet predefined discharge criteria. The 10 secondary priority outcomes included survival, time with no sign of improvement, episodes of hospitalisation, exacerbation, pneumonia, mechanical or non-invasive ventilation and oxygen use, as well as comorbidities during the initial hospitalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi consensus project generated and prioritised a great many outcomes, documenting current expert views concerning a diversity of COPD endpoints. Among the latter, 12 reached consensus as priority outcomes for evaluating the efficacy of eosinophil-driven corticosteroid therapy in AECOPD inpatients.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The eo-Delphi project/protocol was registered on 23 January 2018 at https://osf.io/4ahqw/.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using commercial assays and seroconversion patterns in hospitalized patients

Objectives

SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays are needed for serological surveys and as a complement to molecular tests to confirm COVID-19. However, the kinetics of the humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 remains poorly described and relies on the performance of the different serological tests.

Methods

In this study, we evaluated the performance of six CE-marked point-of-care tests (POC) and three ELISA assays for the diagnosis of COVID-19 by exploring seroconversions in hospitalized patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

Results

Both the ELISA and POC tests were able to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in at least half of the samples collected seven days or more after the onset of symptoms. After 15 days, the rate of detection rose to over 80% but without reaching 100%, irrespective of the test used. More than 90% of the samples collected after 15 days tested positive using the iSIA and Accu-Tell® POC tests and the ID.Vet IgG ELISA assay. Seroconversion was observed 5 to 12 days after the onset of symptoms. Three assays suffer from a specificity below 90% (EUROIMMUN IgG and IgA, UNscience, Zhuhai Livzon).

Conclusions

The second week of COVID-19 seems to be the best period for assessing the sensitivity of commercial serological assays. To achieve an early diagnosis of COVID-19 based on antibody detection, a dual challenge must be met: the immunodiagnostic window period must be shortened and an optimal specificity must be conserved.

Comparison of anti-interleukin-5 therapies in patients with severe asthma: global and indirect meta-analyses of randomized placebo-controlled trials

Inconsistent results have been reported regarding IL-5 blockade treatment in asthma. There were no direct between-treatment comparisons. Only differences between each drug and placebo were studied. We identified all RCTs with anti-IL5 treatments for patients with asthma over the 1990-September 2015 period. RCTs were searched on Medline, Cochrane and Embase. At least 50 patients were enrolled in each study. Outcomes considered were exacerbation rate reduction, FEV₁ changes, ACQ-5 improvement, adverse events and serious adverse events. A global meta-analysis was first conducted followed by an indirect comparison of each IL-5-targeting drug: benralizumab, reslizumab and mepolizumab. Further eosinophilic subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were also conducted in case of heterogeneity. Ten trials involving 3421 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. IL-5 blockade significantly reduced annual exacerbation rates vs. placebo by 40% [29-50] (P < 0.01, I² = 0.61). ACQ-5 was significantly improved vs. placebo but below the recognized MCID level (-0.31 [-0.41, -0.21], P < 0.01, I² = 0.11). FEV₁ changes from baseline were improved vs. placebo by 0.09 L [0.05-0.12] (P < 0.01, I² = 0.28). The subgroup analysis identified a slight additional improvement in mean treatment effects in eosinophilic (> 300 mm³ /L) patients with severe asthma. Similar patterns and rates of adverse events and severe adverse events were reported with the three drugs. The data interpretations were not affected by the sensitivity analysis. IL-5 blockade appears to be a relevant treatment strategy to improve severe asthma management, particularly for eosinophilic patients. No clear superiority appeared between the drugs when appropriate doses were compared.

Treatment response with mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma patients with previous omalizumab treatment

Background

We performed post hoc analyses to evaluate the effect of humanized monoclonal antibody mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma previously treated with omalizumab.

Methods

Data were collected from two randomized double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies: MENSA (NCT01691521: 32‐week treatment phase) and SIRIUS (NCT01691508: 24‐week treatment phase). Active treatment was 75 mg intravenous mepolizumab (MENSA) or 100 mg subcutaneous mepolizumab (MENSA, SIRIUS). Patients had evidence of eosinophilic inflammation ≥150 cells/μl (at screening) or ≥300 cells/μl (during the previous year). Primary outcomes were the rate of exacerbations (MENSA) and the percentage reduction in oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose (SIRIUS). Other outcomes included lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and morning peak expiratory flow), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ‐5), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, and safety.

Results

Overall, 576 patients were included from MENSA and 135 from SIRIUS, with 13% and 33% previously receiving omalizumab, respectively. In MENSA, mepolizumab reduced the rate of exacerbations by 57% (prior omalizumab) and 47% (no prior omalizumab) vs placebo. In SIRIUS, reductions in OCS use were comparable regardless of prior omalizumab use. Despite reducing chronic OCS use, mepolizumab also resulted in similar reductions in exacerbation rate relative to placebo in both subgroups. Asthma control and quality of life improved with mepolizumab vs placebo in both studies independent of prior omalizumab use, as shown by ACQ‐5 and SGRQ scores. Adverse events were also comparable irrespective of prior omalizumab use.

Conclusions

These post hoc analyses indicate that patients with severe eosinophilic asthma respond positively to mepolizumab regardless of prior use of omalizumab.

[Home care for acute pulmonary embolism: Feasibility and general practitioner acceptability]

BACKGROUND

In France, initial management of pulmonary embolism (PE) is performed in the hospital setting. The latest international guidelines suggest that PE at low risk of mortality can be treated in the ambulatory care setting. This means that ambulatory care pathways and general practitioner (GP) opinions concerning such a change in practice need to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To determine: (1) rate of patients eligible for an ambulatory management of their PE and reasons for hospitalization of PE at low risk of mortality; (2) acceptability for GPs of PE home care and patient's desired care pathway.

METHODS

Two-part prospective observational study conducted in Montpellier University Hospital from May 2012 to August 2013: (1) in-hospital study including all consecutive patients with non-hospital acquired PE; (2) telephonic survey on PE patient's ambulatory care pathway conducted among GPs.

RESULTS

In-hospital study: 99.1% (n=211) of included patients were hospitalized and only 14.1% (n=30) had all criteria for home care. Patient's pathway survey: 68.3% (n=112) of GPs, particularly those aged 40-54 years and those who had already managed patients alone after hospital discharge, were in favour of home care for PE. One hundred and thirty-nine (84.8%) GPs wanted a collaborative management with an expert thrombosis physician and an outpatient follow-up visit at one week.

CONCLUSION

Few patients managed at Montpellier University Hospital are eligible for ambulatory management of their PE. GPs have a favorable opinion of home care for PE if it is conducted in collaboration with an expert thrombosis physician.

[Subcutaneous immunoglobulin and support program: what level of interest of patients?]

Two different routes of administration exist for the immunoglobulin therapy: intravenous (Ig IV - monthly administration in medical setting) and subcutaneous (Ig SC - weekly self-administration at home). According to the literature, efficacy and safety are similar,. but Ig SC could improve quality of life and treatment satisfaction. The Policlinique Médicale Universitaire of Lausanne has developed an interdisciplinary program for the long-term support of Ig SC patients. Moreover, it conducted an exploratory survey interviewing Ig IV patients about their interest for Ig SC: patients interested judged less favourably efficacy and/or tolerance of Ig IV and considered that Ig SC would improve their motivation for treatment and its impact on their private and professional life.