1
|
Khoury EG, Lynch-Kelly K, Fulton-Ward T, Heritage S, Devasar A, Jones CM. Online Oncology Careers Events to Attract the Future Oncology Medical Workforce: An Exemplar Event and Review of the Literature. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:e51-e60. [PMID: 37932187 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.10.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
AIMS There are too few oncologists to meet the increasing burden imposed by the rising incidence of cancer. This results from issues with the retention of established oncologists and longstanding challenges to the recruitment of adequate numbers of trainees. To counter this, the British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies (BONUS) devised an online oncology careers event for medical students and junior doctors who are yet to select a specialty. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online careers event was devised with a focus on oncology practice and related subspecialties, as well as research. Event attendees were asked to respond to piloted pre- and post-event surveys. Knowledge and attitudes towards a career in oncology were evaluated using Likert scale and multiple-choice questions. A systematic literature search was carried out to contextualise these data. RESULTS Of the 73 attendees, 44 (60%) participants completed both the pre- and post-event surveys; 79.5% of attendees believed that information on a career in oncology is lacking in medical training. This viewpoint was supported by the systematic review, which highlighted a need for relevant focussed interventions targeted at medical students and fledgling doctors. The education event led to an increase in the median reported understanding of the oncology career pathway from 6.0 to 8.0 (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001), as well as the likelihood of pursuing a career in oncology (8.0-9.0; P < 0.05). It was also associated with a proportional increase in medical and surgical oncology interest, albeit with a fall in interest in clinical and interventional oncology as well as academia. CONCLUSION A targeted online careers event increases knowledge of and interest in a career in oncology, albeit predominantly for medical and surgical subspecialties. Broader initiatives based on our model should be developed and careers in academia as well as clinical and interventional oncology emphasised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E G Khoury
- Cancer Academic Sciences Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - T Fulton-Ward
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Heritage
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Devasar
- Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - C M Jones
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heritage SR, Lynch-Kelly K, Kalvala J, Tulloch R, Devasar A, Harewood J, Khoury E, Abdelwahed A, Fung A, Bigogno CM, Gray R, Keshwara S, Joseph PJS, Selby P, Tharmalingam H. Medical Student Perspectives on Undergraduate Oncology Education in the UK. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e355-e364. [PMID: 35595594 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies (BONUS) surveyed students who attended an oncology revision day to determine their views on the current quantity, quality and type of curriculum-based oncology teaching they have experienced. MATERIALS AND METHODS Students attending two BONUS revision days received a questionnaire assessing their experience of oncology teaching within the medical curriculum and interest in pursuing a future career in oncology using a 10-point Likert scale. Data were collected with informed consent to be anonymised and used for research. Student demographics and qualitative and quantitative data about experiences of oncology education were analysed. RESULTS In total, 451 students registered to attend the revision days. After removal of duplicates, non-responders and non-UK participants, responses from 153 students studying across years 1-6 at 22 UK medical schools were analysed. The mean quantity of oncology lectures students reported receiving was 8.9 hours and the mean quantity of clinic/ward-based oncology teaching was 7.5 hours. Ninety (62.1%) of the 145 students who responded to the relevant question reported that they had received dedicated teaching in oncology. Students who had received dedicated oncology teaching reported a statistically significantly higher mean quality 6.1 (95% confidence interval 5.6-6.5) versus 5.0 (95% confidence interval 4.3-5.5; P = 0.003) and quantity 5.2 (95% confidence interval 4.7-5.6) versus 4.3 (95% confidence interval 3.7-4.9; P = 0.03) of oncology teaching compared with those who had not received this. CONCLUSION Appropriate oncology education is essential for all medical students due to the high prevalence of cancer. All future doctors need the appropriate knowledge and communication skills to care for cancer patients. Our analysis provides quantitative evidence to support the value of specialist oncology teaching within the medical school curriculum in improving student-reported experience. National student-led revision days and events may widen interest in a future career in oncology and aid collaboration between oncology societies. It is important for the general undergraduate medical curriculum to integrate specialty content. An integrated curriculum should facilitate a holistic approach that spans prevention, screening, treatment and palliation rather than being split by subspeciality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Heritage
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - K Lynch-Kelly
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Kalvala
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - R Tulloch
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Devasar
- Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J Harewood
- School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - E Khoury
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Abdelwahed
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Fung
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - C M Bigogno
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - R Gray
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - S Keshwara
- Whiston Hospital, St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, UK
| | - P J S Joseph
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - P Selby
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|